- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of the compliance with the physical activity guidelines in children and adolescents in Germany
- Darko Jekauc1Email author,
- Anne K Reimers1,
- Matthias O Wagner1 and
- Alexander Woll1
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-714
© Jekauc et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 13 March 2012
- Accepted: 20 August 2012
- Published: 30 August 2012
Abstract
Background
Regular physical activity (PA) is a prerequisite for normal growth and maturation, health, and fitness of children and adolescents. Because of the growing evidence of the health benefits of regular PA, several national and international public health organisations have established PA guidelines. The purpose of this study was to assess the percentage of children and adolescents in Germany who meet the PA guideline of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA each day and to evaluate socio-demographic correlates of compliance with the PA guideline.
Methods
The sample consists of 4,529 children and adolescents aged between 4 and 17 years who lived and were registered in the Federal Republic of Germany between 2003 and 2006. The compliance with the PA guideline was assessed using a widely accepted screening measure. Socioeconomic status, immigration background and residential area were assessed using a parent questionnaire.
Results
Overall, 13.1% of girls and 17.4% of boys complied with the national guideline of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA daily. While compliance was significantly lower in older participants of both gender groups, the steepest decrease in compliance was observed for age groups around the transition time from primary to secondary school. Logistic regression revealed that socioeconomic status and a migration background were significant predictors for compliance in girls and residential area for compliance in boys.
Conclusions
Programs and policy action addressing the problem of decreasing compliance with PA guideline with increasing age are warranted. The transition from primary school to secondary school seems to be a critical stage in life with respect to PA behaviour. Therefore, specific interventions should aim at restructuring and reorganising their daily and physical activities during this transition.
Keywords
- Physical activity guideline
- Socio-demographic
- Children
- Adolescents
- Compliance
Background
The increase in prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents is a major public health concern in industrialised countries [1] and physical activity (PA) is inversely related to being overweight and obesity [2]. Especially for children and adolescents, regular PA is a prerequisite for normal growth and maturation, health, and fitness. Compared to inactive young people, physically active children and adolescents have higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular endurance and muscular strength, more favourable cardiovascular and metabolic disease risk profiles, enhanced bone health, and reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression [3]. In addition, limited PA during childhood and adolescence may predispose development of a sedentary life style in adulthood [4, 5].
Because of the growing evidence of the health benefits of regular PA, several public health organisations have established PA guidelines [6–11]. These organisations claim that children and adolescents aged between 5 and 17 years should perform at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous PA (of 5 to 8 metabolic equivalent of task) each day. Data from the HBSC-Study (Health Behaviour in School-aged Children) showed that in most European countries most adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 years do not engage in moderate-to-vigorous PA every day [12], and similar results were reported for the United States [13], Australia [14] and Brazil [15].
Three comprehensive reviews concluded that socio-demographic variables are consistently correlated with PA in children and adolescents and that boys are more active than girls [16–18]. However, data on age-related levels of PA are inconclusive. For instance, while Sallis et al. [16] reported that younger children were more active than older children, the results by Uijtdewillingen et al. [17] were opposite. In addition, van der Horst et al. [18] did not find enough evidence that would suggest that age is a determinant of PA. Further, being of African-American descent has been associated with lower PA levels [17] and adolescents of Euro-American race are more physically active [16] suggesting that ethnicity influences PA level. Finally, while the review of Sallis et al. [16] concluded that socioeconomic status is not related to PA, Stalsberg and Pedersen [19] reported that 58% of the reviewed articles found that adolescents from families with higher socioeconomic status tend to be more physically active than those from families with lower socioeconomic status.
To date, representative data on comparative prevalence rates and potential predictors for compliance with the PA guideline in German children and adolescents are lacking. Previous studies had several limitations including (i) lack of a representative nationwide study sample, (ii) prevalence estimates only provided for specific and narrow age groups and (iii) use of non-validated measures to estimate compliance with the PA guideline. Hence, statements on compliance with the PA guideline and potential predictors of children and adolescents in Germany can not be generalised, and are incomplete and unreliable.
The purpose of this study was to assess the percentage of children and adolescents in Germany who meet the PA guideline of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA each day and to evaluate the socio-demographic correlates of guideline compliance using nationwide representative data, a broad age range and reliable and validated measurement instruments.
Methods
Sampling and participants
Data were obtained from the Motorik Modul (MoMo-Study), a study which aims to estimate prevalence rates in PA and level of motor abilities in children and adolescents in Germany [20]. The sample of the MoMo-Study is a representative sub-sample of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) [21]. To ensure the representativeness of the study results, deviations of the sample from the population structure regarding age, gender, region and country of citizenship oversampling procedures were used. Participants were recruited using a three step process. First, a systematic sample of 167 primary sampling units was selected from an inventory of German communities stratified according to the BIK classification system [21] that measures the level of urbanization and the geographic distribution. The probability of any community being picked was proportional to the number of inhabitants younger than 18 years. For communities with less than 350 inhabitants under 18 years, the adjacent community was added to the sample. Second, an age stratified sample of randomly selected children and adolescents was drawn from the official registers of local residents for the KiGGS with a total of 28,400 participants aged between 0 und 17 years [22]. Out of these 28,400 selected participants, 17,641 children and adolescents aged between 0 and 17 years took part in the KiGGS for a response rate of 62.1%. Third, 7,866 participants aged between 4 and 17 years in the KiGGS-sample were randomly assigned to the sample of the MoMo-Study. Of these 7,866 participants 4,529 children and adolescents took part in the MoMo-Study (response rate = 57.6%). In accordance with this three step recruitment process, weighting procedures were used to ensure the representativity of the results. In the first step, design weights were calculated which are the products of the inverse selection probabilities of each community and each participant within the community according to age and gender. In the second step, adjustment weighting was conducted to adjust the deviations of the design weighted net sample of the KiGGS from the population structure (31.12.2004) considering age, gender, region (East vs. West Germany) and nationality (German vs. not German) [22]. In a third step, inverse selection probabilities were calculated to rule out deviations of the net sample of the MoMo-Study from the KiGGS net sample. A set of variables as age, gender, social status, migration background, residential area, physical activity, motor abilities, subjective and objective measures of health status were used to assess the deviations between the MoMo-Study and the KiGGS and to calculate the selection probabilities [23]. The results of these analyses showed that age, socioeconomic status, migration background and subjective health had a significant effect on participation rates [23]. The final weight was a product of these three steps weightings which was normed to the sample size of the MoMo-Study.
Informed written consent was obtained from the participants and their parents or guardians before the subjects entered into the study according to Helsinki Declaration. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité of the Humboldt University of Berlin in March 2003.
Data collection
Data were collected at central locations at the 167 sample points rented for the KiGGS and MoMo studies. The MoMo-Study was conducted approximately two weeks after the examination of the KiGGS-Study at the same location. All potential participants of the MoMo-Study were asked by the personnel of the examiner team of the KiGGS for permission to be contacted by the team of the MoMo-Study. In the cases where permission was granted, the potential participants were firstly contacted by letter containing a pamphlet to provide basic information on the MoMo-Study and secondly by telephone to arrange an appointment at the examination location. In order to improve participation rate participants aged 10 years or younger received a small present (e. g. cuddly toy) and participants aged 11 years or older received an incentive of 10 Euro. Data were collected between May 2003 and May 2006 [20]. Participants of the MoMo-Study aged younger than 11 years were interviewed in the presence of their parents by qualified interviewers. Participants aged 11 years or older completed the PA questionnaire independently.
Measures
Physical activity
Compliance with the PA guideline was assessed by two items asking about the engagement in bouts of moderate-to-vigorous PA for at least 60 minutes during the past 7 days and during a typical week [24]. Moderate-to-vigorous PA was defined in the questionnaire as "any activity that increases your heart rate and makes you get out of breath some of the time". The participants were asked to sum the duration of all times spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA for each day across all activities.
For this study, a qualified staff member (native speaker) translated the PA screening measure developed by Prochaska et al. [24] from English to German. Another staff member translated the questionnaire from German back into English without reference to the original instrument. The comparison of the re-translated version with the original version revealed one wording difference that was subsequently resolved by the translators. Finally, the German version of the PA screening measure was completed by five seventh-grade students to test the comprehensibility of the translated measure. These five students did not participate in the main study. The German and English version of the PA screening measure contain the same item and scale formatting.
A separate study was conducted with 196 participants aged between 9 and 17 years to assess reliability and validity of this PA screening measure [25]. The test-retest reliability was sufficient: the composite measure showed a significant intraclass correlation of 0.74 for a one-week test-retest interval. In addition, the PA index significantly correlated with accelerometer measured (moderate-to-vigorous) PA (Actigraph GT1M) (r = 0.24) and with (moderate-to-vigorous) PA measured using the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall (PDPAR) (r = 0.43). These results are comparable with the reliability and validity estimates of the English version of the PA screening measure [24].
Socio-demographic characteristics
Socio-demographic characteristics were assessed using a parent questionnaire conducted in the KiGGS [21]. The questionnaire included items on both parents' educational and professional status as well as total income available to the family household [26]. The categorisation of the socioeconomic status was conducted according to Winkler and Stolzenberg [26]. The migration background variable was constructed based on information on nationality, country of birth, year of immigration of both parents as well as historical criteria (e.g. labour migrants, asylum seekers), languages spoken at home and the proficiency of German language of both the children and parents [21]. The residential area variable reflected the level of urbanisation. Towns or settlements with less than 5,000 residents were classified as rural area, towns with 5,000–19,999 residents as small town, towns with 20,000–99,999 residents as medium-sized town and cities with 100,000 or more residents as city.
Data analysis
Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 19 (IBM, New York, USA). Frequency distributions were calculated for all predictors and for the outcome variable (compliance with the PA guideline). To calculate the PA compliance index, the mean of both PA items was computed. A new dichotomous variable was created differentiating between compliers and non-compliers with the PA guideline. If the participant received a score of seven days with moderate-to-vigorous PA for at least 60 minutes, the participant was assigned to the group of compliers; otherwise the participant was assigned to the group of non-compliers.
Participant’s age, migration background, socioeconomic status and residential area were considered as potential predictors for compliance with the PA guideline. Because of the well-documented differences between boys and girls [16–18], all analyses were calculated separately for both gender groups. All analyses were performed separately for children (4 to 10 years) and adolescents (11 to 17 years) because we expected that the mechanisms of action of the predictors differ between children and adolescents [16]. Bivariate and multivariate analysis strategies were used to rule out confounding effects. Chi-square goodness of fit tests were performed to evaluate bivariate associations between the predictors and the outcome variable. Four multiple logistic regressions were calculated to assess the incremental power of prediction of each predictor among children and adolescents and within each gender group, respectively. Weighting procedures were employed to enhance the representativeness of estimates [22]. To adjust p-values and confidence intervals for clustering effects within the primary sampling units, the SPSS-Module "Complex Samples" was used.
Results
Sample characteristics
Frequency distributions for the predictors and the outcome variable
Variable | Total (N = 4529) | boys (n = 2285) | girls (n = 2244) |
|---|---|---|---|
Age group | |||
4-5 years | 989 (21.8%) | 484 (21.2%) | 505 (22.5%) |
6-10 years | 1712 (37.8%) | 863 (37.8%) | 849 (37.8%) |
11-13 years | 886 (19.6%) | 470 (20.6%) | 416 (18.5%) |
14-17 years | 942 (20.8%) | 468 (20.5%) | 474 (21.1%) |
Socioeconomic status | |||
low | 1157 (25.8%) | 578 (25.6%) | 479 (26.1%) |
medium | 2195 (49.0%) | 1113 (49.3%) | 1082 (48.7%) |
high | 1127 (25.2%) | 568 (25.1%) | 559 (25.2%) |
Migration background | |||
yes | 496 (11.0%) | 253 (11.1%) | 243 (10.9%) |
no | 4013 (89.0%) | 2025 (88.9%) | 1988 (89.1%) |
Residential area | |||
rural area | 1173 (25.9%) | 593 (26.0%) | 580 (25.8%) |
small town | 1334 (29.5%) | 691 (30.2%) | 643 (28.7%) |
medium-sized town | 1315 (29.0%) | 645 (28.2%) | 670 (29.9%) |
city | 707 (15.6%) | 356 (15.6%) | 351 (15.6%) |
Compliance with physical activity guideline | |||
compliers | 601 (15.3%) | 350 (17.4%) | 252 (13.1%) |
Bivariate analyses
Prevalence of the compliance with the physical activity guideline in children
boys | girls | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
compliance | χ 2 | df | p | compliance | χ 2 | df | p | |
Age group | 12.2 | 1 | .000 | 12.3 | 1 | .000 | ||
4-5 years | 35.4% | 28.4% | ||||||
6-10 years | 24.2% | 17.9% | ||||||
Socioeconomic status | 0.5 | 2 | .773 | 8.1 | 2 | .017 | ||
low | 25.8% | 27.5% | ||||||
medium | 27.4% | 20.0% | ||||||
high | 28.6% | 17.0% | ||||||
Migration background | 0.1 | 1 | .758 | 3.2 | 1 | .068 | ||
yes | 28.4% | 14.2% | ||||||
no | 27.1% | 21.4% | ||||||
Residential area | 7.5 | 3 | .058 | 2.1 | 3 | .549 | ||
rural area | 28.9% | 19.9% | ||||||
small town | 27.1% | 20.9% | ||||||
medium-sized town | 22.2% | 23.5% | ||||||
city | 33.0% | 18.3% | ||||||
Prevalence of the compliance with the physical activity guideline in adolescents
boys | girls | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
compliance | χ 2 | df | p | compliance | χ 2 | df | p | |
Age group | 0.5 | 1 | .464 | 4.8 | 1 | .029 | ||
11-13 years | 9.4% | 8.3% | ||||||
14-17 years | 8.1% | 5.0% | ||||||
Socioeconomic status | 7.1 | 2 | .029 | 9.1 | 2 | .011 | ||
low | 7.0% | 9.3% | ||||||
medium | 10.9% | 6.7% | ||||||
high | 5.8% | 2.8% | ||||||
Migration background | 1.9 | 1 | .168 | 6.7 | 1 | .010 | ||
yes | 5.4% | 10.8% | ||||||
no | 9.1% | 5.5% | ||||||
Residential area | 20.1 | 3 | .000 | 1.3 | 3 | .725 | ||
rural area | 16.5% | 7.1% | ||||||
small town | 7.9% | 7.2% | ||||||
medium-sized town | 6.0% | 6.0% | ||||||
city | 6.6% | 5.0% | ||||||
Logistic regression analyses
Logistic regression for predicting physical activity guideline compliance in girls aged 4 to 10 years
B-Weight | SE | χ 2 | df | p | adj OR | 95% CI for adj OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||||
Age (in years) | −0.19 | 0.04 | 18.5 | 1 | .000 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.90 |
Socioeconomic status | 13.3 | 2 | .001 | |||||
low | 0.82 | 0.24 | 11.3 | 1 | .001 | 2.28 | 1.41 | 3.68 |
medium | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.8 | 1 | .358 | 1.22 | 0.80 | 1.88 |
high (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Migration background | 5.5 | 1 | .020 | |||||
no | 0.70 | 0.30 | 5.5 | 1 | .020 | 2.01 | 1.12 | 3.60 |
yes (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Residential area | 1.1 | 3 | .768 | |||||
rural area | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.0 | 1 | .977 | 1.01 | 0.58 | 1.76 |
small town | 0.08 | 0.24 | 0.1 | 1 | .726 | 1.09 | 0.68 | 1.74 |
medium-sized town | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.9 | 1 | .347 | 1.24 | 0.79 | 1.96 |
city (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Intercept | −1.00 | 0.47 | 4.5 | 1 | .033 | 0.37 | ||
Logistic regression for predicting physical activity guideline compliance in boys aged 4 to 10 years
B-Weight | SE | χ 2 | df | p | adj OR | 95% CI for adj OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||||
Age (in years) | −0.17 | 004 | 18.6 | 1 | .000 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.91 |
Socioeconomic status | 0.5 | 2 | .772 | |||||
low | −0.15 | 0.22 | 0.5 | 1 | .486 | 0.86 | 0.56 | 1.31 |
medium | −0.04 | 0.18 | 0.1 | 1 | .815 | 0.96 | 0.67 | 1.37 |
high (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Migration background | ||||||||
no | −0.02 | 0.23 | 0.0 | 1 | .943 | 0.98 | 0.62 | 1.55 |
yes (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Residential area | 7.8 | 3 | .050 | |||||
rural area | −0.19 | 0.23 | 0.7 | 1 | .418 | 0.83 | 0.52 | 1.31 |
small town | −0.30 | 0.21 | 2.2 | 1 | .140 | 0.74 | 0.49 | 1.10 |
medium-sized town | −0.57 | 0.21 | 7.5 | 1 | .006 | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.85 |
city (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Intercept | 0.59 | 0.38 | 2.4 | 1 | .119 | 1.80 | ||
Logistic regression for predicting physical activity guideline compliance in girls aged 11 to 17 years
B-Weight | SE | χ 2 | df | p | adj OR | 95% CI for adj OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||||
Age (in years) | −0.21 | 0.07 | 9.7 | 1 | .002 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.92 |
Socioeconomic status | 6.5 | 2 | .040 | |||||
low | 1.16 | 0.46 | 6.4 | 1 | .011 | 3.18 | 1.30 | 7.75 |
medium | 0.86 | 0.44 | 3.8 | 1 | .050 | 2.36 | 1.00 | 5.58 |
high (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Migration background | 4.8 | 1 | .029 | |||||
no | −0.68 | 0.31 | 4.8 | 1 | .029 | 0.51 | 0.28 | 0.93 |
yes (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Residential area | 2.6 | 3 | .453 | |||||
rural area | 0.60 | 0.44 | 1.8 | 1 | .175 | 1.82 | 0.77 | 4.31 |
small town | 0.61 | 0.40 | 2.3 | 1 | .130 | 1.84 | 0.84 | 4.06 |
medium-sized town | 0.40 | 0.40 | 1.0 | 1 | .328 | 1.48 | 0.67 | 3.28 |
city (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Intercept | −0.36 | 1.08 | 0.1 | 1 | .741 | 0.70 | ||
Logistic regression for predicting physical activity guideline compliance in boys aged 11 to 17 years
B-Weight | SE | χ 2 | df | p | adj OR | 95% CI for adj OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||||||
Age (in years) | −0.04 | 0.06 | 0.4 | 1 | .502 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 1.07 |
Socioeconomic status | 5.7 | 2 | .057 | |||||
low | 0.15 | 0.37 | 0.2 | 1 | .673 | 1.17 | 0.57 | 2.40 |
medium | 0.61 | 0.29 | 4.4 | 1 | .036 | 1.85 | 1.04 | 3.28 |
high (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Migration background | 0.3 | 1 | .614 | |||||
no | 0.22 | 0.43 | 0.3 | 1 | .614 | 1.24 | 0.54 | 2.88 |
yes (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Residential area | 15.9 | 3 | .001 | |||||
rural area | 0.92 | 0.33 | 7.7 | 1 | .006 | 2.51 | 1.31 | 4.82 |
small town | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.1 | 1 | .791 | 1.09 | 0.56 | 2.12 |
medium-sized town | −0.17 | 0.35 | 0.2 | 1 | .631 | 0.84 | 0.42 | 1.69 |
city (ref.) | - | - | - | - | - | 1.00 | - | - |
Intercept | −2.59 | 0.96 | 7.3 | 1 | .007 | 0.07 | ||
Discussion
The purposes of this study were to show representative prevalence rates for complying with the PA guideline of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA every day in children and adolescents in Germany and to evaluate socio-demographic correlates of compliance with the PA guideline. The results of this study showed that only 15.3% of children and adolescents aged between 4 and 17 years meet the current PA guideline of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA every day. These estimates are comparable to results of the HBSC-Study for Germany [12]. The results of both studies emphasise the importance of interventions aimed at enhancing the level of PA in children and adolescents in Germany. The gender differences in compliance with PA guidelines in this study are in agreement with earlier reports for other countries including European countries [12] and the United States [13, 27, 28]. Both in children and adolescents, boys show higher compliance rate than girls. These differences are especially large in preschool children (4–5 years) where 35.4% of boys and 28.4% of girls meet the PA guideline. For schoolchildren and adolescents, the difference between both gender groups decreases.
A progressive decrease in the prevalence of compliance with the PA guideline with age was observed. Similar age-related decreases have been reported in several international studies with subjective [12] and objective [29] measures of PA. For girls, there is a continuous decrease during childhood and adolescence. In childhood, the chance to meet the PA guideline decreased by 17% every year and during adolescence 19%. Therefore, PA interventions should be employed for girls of all ages. For boys, there was a significant decrease in the prevalence of meeting the PA guideline only during childhood but not during adolescence. Especially, strong decrease in the compliance rate was observed during the transition from childhood to adolescence and hence this stage of life seems to be a particularly critical period for the maintenance of PA levels [30]. In the German school system, most children change from primary school to secondary school around 10 years of age, requiring a reorganisation of everyday activities and friendships. Hence, PA programs need a special focus on this age period.
Interestingly, socioeconomic status influenced compliance with the PA guideline only in girls but not in boys. Contrary to our expectations, girls with low socioeconomic status were more likely to comply with the PA guideline than girls with high socioeconomic status. These differences intensify in adolescence. These results contradict the findings of a previous review [19] that in 58% of the reviewed studies children and adolescents from families with higher socioeconomic status tended to be more physically active than those from families with lower socioeconomic status. We speculate that this discrepancy in results between studies is related to the German school system in which adolescents with higher socioeconomic status more frequently attend a "Gymnasium" (an academic secondary school in the tripartite German secondary school system) and usually spend more time at school especially in the afternoons. Long schooldays, afternoon school and homework presumably pose an organisational challenge for meeting the PA guideline. However, it is unclear why this effect occurs only in girls but not in boys.
Migration background was a predictor of compliance with the PA guideline only for girls but not for boys. Interestingly, coming from a family with migration background had a negative effect on PA compliance in children but a positive effect on PA compliance in adolescents. For girls with migration background, the likelihood of meeting the PA guideline decreased slightly with increasing age. However, for girls without migration background, the compliance with the PA guideline decreased drastically around the transition from childhood to adolescence. Similarly to the socioeconomic effect, we speculate that the German school system may be responsible for these developments. Adolescents without migration background are more likely to attend the "Gymnasium" that is associated with more time spent at school and on homework. However, it remains unclear why the effect of migration background on PA compliance only affects girls but not boys. Further studies are needed to test this assumption and to better understand these gender specific differences.
In contrast to the effects of socioeconomic status and migration background, the effect of residential area significantly influenced compliance with the PA guideline only in boys. We hypothesize that boys who live in rural areas are more likely to use a bicycle and walk longer distances to get to school and to meet with friends. While in cites and medium-sized towns, the public transportation grid is well developed, rural areas suffer from a lack of public transportation. Hence, adolescent boys in rural areas may be forced to be physically active as a means of transportation. One strategy to bring the level of PA up to 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA per day could be to increase use of active transport by improving the infrastructure (e. g. building safe and convenient bicycle and walking paths) and promoting active transport in schools and communities. Two types of interventions were found to be effective in promoting PA: community-scale and street-scale urban design, as well as land use policies and practices [31]. Urban planners, policy makers and local communities should be involved in such interventions [32]. These endeavours should be implemented especially in such regions (e. g. rural areas) where active transport is safe for children and adolescents. Girls should be encouraged to use this kind of transportation in particular [33].
This work examined the socio-demographic predictors of compliance with the PA guideline. However, one important issue is to question the appropriateness of the PA guidelines. PA guidelines were developed to quantify the amount of PA which is needed to support the normal growth and maturation, health, and fitness of children and adolescents. After reviewing 850 articles on the relationship between PA and health in children and adolescents, Strong et al. [3] conclude that “school-age youth should participate daily in 60 minutes or more of moderate to vigorous physical activity”. Several international [6–11] organisations have adopted this PA recommendation for children and adolescents. However, these strictly formulated PA recommendations raise the question whether the daily regularity of 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous PA is the most important aspect for health benefits or the accumulation of moderate to vigorous PA within one week. Convincing empirical evidence for the daily regularity of PA has not been yet shown. Because this issue has a serious impact on formulating future PA guidelines further research in this field is required. Especially, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the merit of PA recommendations.
The major strength of this study is that the subjective measure of compliance with the PA guideline used in this study is a well established instrument [16, 25]. In addition, this study reports national level representative data for children and adolescents in Germany for the full age spectrum between 4 and 17 years. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution because of some limitations. First, this study has a cross-sectional design, and hence the results of the study do not allow causal inferences of predictors. Second, the results were based on self-report data which has been shown to overestimate the prevalence rates of PA compliance compared to those assessed using objective measures [34]. In fact, compliance rates measured with objective measures may be even lower than those reported in this study. Third, this study did not provide information on the school obligations and transportation grid that would allow for a better understanding of the effects of socio-demographic variables.
Conclusions
The results of this study showed that a majority of children and adolescents in Germany do not meet the guideline of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA every day. Consequently, there is a need for program and policy action as early as possible at the family, community, school, health care, and governmental levels to tackle the problem of decreasing PA with increasing age. The transition from primary school to secondary school appears to be a critical stage of a children’s life with respect to their PA behaviour. Therefore, specific interventions are needed at this stage of life to help young people restructure their daily activities and reimplement PA into daily routines. Especially, boys living in medium seized towns and cities as well as girls with higher socioeconomic status and without migration background were the highest risk groups and need support to develop and maintain habits for daily PA.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by a project grant from the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) and by the German Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (Federal Ministry of Health). The second author thanks the Ministry of Science of the German State of Baden-Württemberg for supporting this project by a grant scholarship of the Brigitte Schlieben-Lange-Programm. We would like to thank all of the children and adolescents who participated in the study.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM: Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006, 295 (13): 1549-1555. 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, King MA, Pickett W: Overweight and obesity in Canadian adolescents and their associations with dietary habits and physical activity patterns. J Adolesc Health. 2004, 35 (5): 360-367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, Hergenroeder AC, Must A, Nixon PA, Pivarnik JM, Rowland T, Trost S, Trudeau FO: Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005, 146 (6): 732-737. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malina RM: Tracking of physical activity and physical fitness across the lifespan. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996, 67 (Suppl 3): S48-S57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Telama R, Yang X, Laakso L, Viikari J: Physical activity in childhood and adolescence as predictor of physical activity in young adulthood. Am J Prev Med. 1997, 13 (4): 317-323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Australian Government & Department of Health and Aging: An active way to better health. National physical activity guidelines for adults. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/BC3101B1FF200CA4CA256F9700154958/$File/adults_phys.pdf,
- European Commission: EU Physical Activity Guidelines. Recommended Policy Actions in Support of Health-Enhancing Physical Activity. http://ec.europa.eu/sport/documents/pa_guidelines_4th_consolidated_draft_en.pdf,
- British Heart Foundation: Couch Kids: the nation´s future. http://www.bhf.org.uk,
- Healthy People: A Systematic Approach to Health Improvement. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/#goals,
- Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. 2008, Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, www.health.gov/paguidelinesGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organisation, WHO: Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. 2010, Geneva: WHOGoogle Scholar
- WHO. World Health Organisation: Inequalities in young people's health: HBSC international report from the. 2005, http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/Life-stages/child-and-adolescent-health/publications2/2011/inequalities-in-young-peoples-health.-hbsc-international-report-from-the-20052006-survey, /2006 Survey,
- Butcher K, Sallis JF, Mayer JA, Woodruff S: Correlates of physical activity guideline compliance for adolescents in 100 US cities. J Adolesc Health. 2008, 42 (4): 360-368. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.025.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Spinks AB, Macpherson AK, Bain C, McClure RJ: Compliance with the Australian national physical activity guidelines for children: relationship to overweight status. J Sci Med Sport. 2007, 10 (3): 156-163. 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.06.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dumith SC, Domingues MR, Gigante DP, Hallal PC, Menezes AMB, Kohl HW: Prevalence and correlates of physical activity among adolescents from Southern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2010, 44 (3): 457-467. 10.1590/S0034-89102010000300009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC: A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32 (5): 963-975.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uijtdewilligen L, Nauta J, Singh AS, van Mechelen W, Twisk JW, van der Horst K, Chinapaw MJ: Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in young people: a review and quality synthesis of prospective studies. Br J Sports Med. 2011, 45 (11): 896-905. 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van der Horst K, Paw M, Twisk JWR, Van Mechelen W: A brief review on correlates of physical activity and sedentariness in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007, 39 (8): 1241-1250. 10.1249/mss.0b013e318059bf35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stalsberg R, Pedersen AV: Effects of socioeconomic status on the physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review of the evidence. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010, 20 (3): 368-383. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01047.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woll A, Kurth BM, Opper E, Worth A, Bos K: The 'Motorik-Modul' (MoMo): physical fitness and physical activity in German children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr. 2011, 170 (9): 1129-1142. 10.1007/s00431-010-1391-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurth BM, Kamtsiuris P, Holling H, Schlaud M, Dolle R, Ellert U, Kahl H, Knopf H, Lange M, Mensink GB, Neuhauser H, Schaffrath Rosario A, Scheidt-Nave C, Schenk L, Schlack R, Stolzenberg H, Thamm M, Thierfelder W, Wolf U: The challenge of comprehensively mapping children's health in a nation-wide health survey: design of the German KiGGS-Study. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 196-10.1186/1471-2458-8-196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kamtsiuris P, Lange M, Schaffrath Rosario A: [The german health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents (KiGGS): sample design, response and nonresponse analysis]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007, 50 (5–6): 547-556.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bös K: Motorik-Modul. A study of motor performance and physical activity in children and adolescents. Final report on the research project. 2009, Baden-Baden: NomosGoogle Scholar
- Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF, Long B: A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001, 155 (5): 554-559.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jekauc D, Wagner MO, Kahlert D, Woll A: Reliabilität und Validität des MoMo-Aktivitätsfragebogens für Jugendliche [Reliability and validity of MoMo-Physical-Activity-Questionnaire for adolescents (MoMo-AFB)]. Diagnostica. in pressGoogle Scholar
- Winkler J, Stolzenberg H: Der Sozialschichtindex im Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey [Social class index in the Federal Health Survey]. Gesundheitswesen. 1999, 61: S178-S183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC, Sirard J, Trost SG, Dowda M: Compliance with physical activity guidelines: Prevalence in a population of children and youth. Ann Epidemiol. 2002, 12 (5): 303-308. 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00263-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Ross J, Hawkins J, Harris WA, Lowry R, McManus T, Chyen D, Shanklin S, Lim C, Grunbaum JA, Wechsler H: Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States, 2005. J Sch Health. 2006, 76 (7): 353-372. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00127.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nader PR, Bradley RH, Houts RM, McRitchie SL, O'Brien M: Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from ages 9 to 15 years. JAMA. 2008, 300 (3): 295-305. 10.1001/jama.300.3.295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jago R, Page AS, Cooper AR: Friends and physical activity during the transition from primary to secondary school. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012, 44 (1): 111-117. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318229df6e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heath GW, Brownson RC, Kruger J, Miles R, Powell KE, Ramsey LT: The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2006, 3: 55-76.Google Scholar
- Harten N, Olds T: Patterns of active transport in 11–12 year old Australian children. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2004, 28: 167-172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duncan EK, Scott Duncan J, Schofield G: Pedometer-determined physical activity and active transport in girls. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008, 5: 2-10.1186/1479-5868-5-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sallis JF, Saelens BE: Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000, 71 (Suppl 2): S1-14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/714/prepub
Pre-publication history
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
