- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Forty years of increasing suicide mortality in Poland: Undercounting amidst a hanging epidemic?
© Höfer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 16 March 2012
- Accepted: 1 August 2012
- Published: 11 August 2012
Suicide rate trends for Poland, one of the most populous countries in Europe, are not well documented. Moreover, the quality of the official Polish suicide statistics is unknown and requires in-depth investigation.
Population and mortality data disaggregated by sex, age, manner, and cause were obtained from the Polish Central Statistics Office for the period 1970-2009. Suicides and deaths categorized as ‘undetermined injury intent,’ ‘unknown causes,’ and ‘unintentional poisonings’ were analyzed to estimate the reliability and sensitivity of suicide certification in Poland over three periods covered by ICD-8, ICD-9 and ICD-10, respectively. Time trends were assessed by the Spearman test for trend.
The official suicide rate increased by 51.3% in Poland between 1970 and 2009. There was an increasing excess suicide rate for males, culminating in a male-to-female ratio of 7:1. The dominant method, hanging, comprised 90% of all suicides by 2009. Factoring in deaths of undetermined intent only, estimated sensitivity of suicide certification was 77% overall, but lower for females than males. Not increasing linearly with age, the suicide rate peaked at ages 40-54 years.
The suicide rate is increasing in Poland, which calls for a national prevention initiative. Hangings are the predominant suicide method based on official registration. However, suicide among females appears grossly underestimated given their lower estimated sensitivity of suicide certification, greater use of “soft” suicide methods, and the very high 7:1 male-to-female rate ratio. Changes in the ICD classification system resulted in a temporary suicide data blackout in 1980-1982, and significant modifications of the death categories of senility and unknown causes, after 1997, suggest the need for data quality surveillance.
- Undetermined Intent
In many countries of the European Union, suicide mortality exceeds that due to traffic accidents . Suicides result from a complex interplay between mental health conditions, such as affective or substance abuse disorders, and socioeconomic factors [2, 3]. Additionally, changes in political regimes, especially in former communist Eastern Europe, appear to have influenced the course of suicide rates [4, 5]. Suicide and some other health-related statistics were kept secret in communist countries until 1988. However, despite publication, their validity remains questionable. While studies affirmed the reliability of suicide statistics in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Baltic and other countries [6, 7], neither the reliability nor the validity of Polish data has been examined.
The validity of suicide certification covers two elements, specificity and sensitivity. Specificity measures false-negativity and sensitivity true positivity. Sensitivity seems the much more problematic of the two in democratic countries at least . Alternatively stated, suicide undercounting is typically a much greater cause for scientific and public health concern than overcounting. Suicides are known to be hidden in other cause-of-death categories, predominantly ‘undetermined injury intent’ and ‘symptoms, signs, ill-defined conditions and unknown causes.’ Poisoning suicides, for example, seem highly prone to misclassification in other cause-of-death categories [9–11], especially ‘unintentional poisoning’ . In general, death ascertainment procedures, such as performance of clinical and forensic autopsies, plausibly influence the sensitivity of suicide certification . Thus, assessing the sensitivity as well as reliability of this certification is essential for comprehending the temporal course of suicide rates. Indeed, any evaluations of the impact of social, political, and economic change or interventions on suicide rates remain of unknown value in the absence of evidence on data quality.
No detailed analyses of Polish suicide statistics by method of suicide have previously been published. In addressing a research gap, we first documented the trend in Polish suicide rates from 1970 to 2009 by sex and method. We then estimated the reliability and sensitivity of the Polish suicide data to determine whether we could affirm their soundness . Assessing data reliability was an imperative, since cause-of-death coding during our observation period involved three revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-8, -9 and -10), which might have impacted the reliability of the official suicide statistics.
Population and mortality data, disaggregated by sex, age, manner, and cause, were obtained from the Polish Central Statistics Office for the period 1970-2009. Suicides in Poland were coded under ICD-8 and ICD-9 codes (E950-E959) for the periods 1970-1979 and 1980-1997, respectively, and under ICD-10 (X60-X84) for the period 1998-2009. Recorded on a death certificate, cause of death has to be determined by an authorized physician following an external body examination. While an autopsy can be requested by the physician prior to completion of a final death certificate in equivocal cases in Poland , the prevalence of autopsies is unknown .
To assess the temporal reliability and sensitivity of official Polish suicide statistics, we incorporated two causes of death that have been traditionally viewed in the literature as highly susceptible to hiding suicides, namely ‘undetermined injury intent’ (referred to as ‘undetermined intent’) and ‘ill-defined conditions and unknown causes’ (subsequently referred to as ‘unknown causes’) . ‘Undetermined intent’ deaths were coded within E980-E989 under ICD-8 and ICD-9, and Y10-Y34 under ICD-10. Deaths from ‘unknown causes’ were coded under ICD-8 and ICD-9 as ‘E799 - Other ill-defined and unknown causes of morbidity and mortality,’ and under ICD-10 as ‘R99 – Other ill-defined and unknown causes of mortality’. ‘E797 - Senility without mention of psychosis’ (ICD-9 and ICD-10), and ‘R54 – Senility’ (ICD-10) were categorized under ‘unknown causes.’ In our reliability and sensitivity estimates, we also incorporated ‘unintentional poisoning’ deaths. These deaths were coded as E850-E869 (ICD-8 and ICD-9) or X40-49 (ICD-10).
To quantify the temporal reliability of Polish suicide data, we used the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient to calculate the association between suicide rates and potential suicide reservoirs over time. A positive and high correlation indicated high data reliability. We estimated the sensitivity of Polish suicide certification, using a previously suggested procedure, which involved calculation of both upper and lower limits under alternative assumptions that deaths categorized as undetermined intent, unknown causes and/or unintentional poisonings, variously contained misclassified suicides . Upper limits were calculated as the ratio of the suicide rate to the combined mortality rates for suicide and undetermined intent. The denominator in the lower limit estimates also incorporated respective mortality rates for unknown causes and unintentional poisonings.
Crude mortality rates were calculated as the annual number of deaths per 100,000 inhabitants, based on the corresponding average annual population. Time trends were estimated by the Spearman test for trend using the IBM SPSS Statistic 19.0 software package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois), and p-values were considered significant at the 0.05 level.
Suicide rate changes, 1970-2009
Age-specific suicide rates changed over the observation period. Rates for males aged 0-9 years (r = -0.65, p < 0.05) and 10-14 years (r = -0.55, p < 0.05) declined significantly. All other age groups showed significant increasing time trends (r = 0.38 to 0.81 at p < 0.05), except ages 15-19, which showed no change. Among females, suicide rates at ages 10-14 increased significantly (r = 0.38, p = 0.02), with declines observed at ages 15-19 (r = -0.52, p < 0.01) and 20-34 (r = -0.80, p < 0.01). No significant time trends manifested for remaining age groups.
The suicide rate for hanging, the most common suicide method regardless of sex, increased over the observation period from 8.8 to 15.2 per 100,000 (r = 0.92, p < 0.01). This corresponded to an increase in the prevalence of hangings among all suicides from 78.4% to 89.9%. Increase was observable for females (r = 0.80, p < 0.01) and males (r = 0.92, p < 0.01). The prevalence of suicide by poisoning, the second most common method for both sexes, declined from 10.6% in 1970 to 4.8% in 2009 (r = -0.87, p < 0.01). Decline was stronger among females (21.9 to 8.4%; r = -0.91, p < 0.01) than males (7.6 and 4.1%; r = -0.81, p < 0.01). Between 1970 and 2009, shooting suicide rates decreased for both females (r = -0.41, p < 0.01) and males (r = -0.50, p < 0.01), as did the respective drowning suicide rates (r = -0.74, p < 0.01) (r = 0.91, p < 0.01). On the other hand, the rate of suicide by jumping from a height increased for females (r = 0.46, p < 0.01) and males (r = 0.54, p < 0.01).
Changing mortality categories implicating misclassification
Mortality rates for selected causes, and sensitivity estimates for suicide certification by type of classification, Poland, 1970-2009
Rate per 100,000
Upper limit 1
Lower limit 2
Cross-sectional analysis, 2000-2009
In the final decade under review, there were 58,810 registered suicides in Poland, a suicide rate of 15.4 per 100,000. Hanging was the most common suicide method. This was the means employed in 90% of all suicides, 92% of male suicides, and 79% of female suicides. Among males, the second most common method was poisoning (2.4%), which was followed by jumping (1.9%) and shooting (1.0%). Among females, poisoning ranked second (8.4%) and jumping third (6.2%). Drowning was more common among females (2.7%) than males (0.4%). Female shooting suicides were negligible (<0.1%), and remaining methods accounted for 2.6% of male suicides and 3.8% of female suicides.
Our study represents a comprehensive analysis of Polish suicide mortality statistics and their quality for the period 1970-2009. Besides the increasing suicide rate, a key finding was the high prevalence of hanging suicides and the relative peak in suicide rates in the age group of 40-54-year- olds. We also found that changes in the prevailing ICD classification system coincided with suicide mortality data deficits, an increase in the rate of deaths of undetermined intent, as well as major increases in the respective mortality rates for senility and unknown causes.
The suicide mortality rate in Poland is high according to global comparisons . Even in Czarist “European Russia,” the areas that are now Polish territory had a high rate . During our observation period, 1970-2009, the suicide rate in Poland rose substantially, a 51.3% increase. This large increase contrasted with the course of suicide rates in most other European countries . These countries mainly showed rate declines that dated from the mid-1980s or early 1990s. Exceptions were Spain and Ireland, which also exhibited rate increases .
While the male suicide rate in Poland increased, the female rate remained quite stable over the 40-year observation period. The net result was an increasing male-to-female suicide rate ratio, which by 2009 had ascended to 7:1. This ratio is the highest in Europe, and one of the highest recorded in the world . However, this magnitude may be artifactually high because of greater undercounting of female than male suicides. A competing explanation for the proportionally high male suicide rate could be reflected in the lower help-seeking behavior and consultation rates for males . On the other hand, the “male depressive syndrome,” which is characterized by low stress tolerance, low impulse control, and antisocial behavior, and is strongly linked to suicide , may be grossly under diagnosed in Poland. In addition, the rapid social change in post-communist countries has been postulated to increase male vulnerability towards psychiatric disorders .
Turning to methods, hanging featured in almost 90% of all Polish suicides by the end of the observation period. Although hanging is a common method of suicide in Europe, its prevalence in Poland is the highest among European countries. Estonia has a lower prevalence of hanging suicides than Poland, and is differential by sex, 79% for males and 71% for females . A lower prevalence with sex differentials were also reported for Germany (55.8% for males and 39.9% for females) , Austria (47.5% for males and 23.5% for females) , and Finland (37% for males and 26% for females) . Unknown is whether the exceedingly high prevalence of hanging suicides in Poland is a genuine pattern or at least, in part, an artifact of serious underestimation of “soft” suicide methods, such as poisoning and drowning. This would also explain the high male-to-female suicide rate ratio, under the assumption that females more often use a “soft” method, such as poisoning . On the other hand, an increasing prevalence of hanging suicides has also been reported for England over three decades , and in Australia and New Zealand, especially among young males [28, 29].
The second most common suicide method among both sexes is poisoning, which showed a strong decline among Polish females during the observation period. The total poisoning rate for Poland conforms to the European average . Relatively lower poisoning mortality rates were observed in Ireland and Estonia, which also have a high prevalence of hanging suicides. The rate of poisoning suicides also showed a considerable decline in Austria . Until the mid-1980s, a poisoning suicide rate decline in Poland could have been offset by an increase in the unintentional poisoning mortality rate. However, both rates subsequently declined, which suggested a general decrease in poisoning death registrations irrespective of decedent intent. Nevertheless, although estimates of Polish autopsy rates are unavailable, a likely decrease in both autopsies and toxicological analyses could have art factually contributed to the decrease in registrations .
Increased suicide rates were found among adolescent females under age 14 years, and in young males aged 20 years and older. Using an overlapping category, males aged 15-29 manifested increasing suicide rates in Poland, while showing rate declines in other EU countries . An upward trend in the suicide rate among children and young adolescents, up to age 14, has been observed in many countries, and in contrast to the Polish data, especially in the case of males . Nevertheless, large cross-national differences are apparent. For example, suicide rates are increasing among youth in the United States, stable in the United Kingdom, and decreasing in Austria [32–34] (McClure et al. 2001, CDC 2004, Dervic et al. 2006). Reasons for the increasing suicide rates among very young Polish females remain unknown, a research gap that argues for in-depth investigations.
Suicide rates in Poland do not increase with age like the “Hungarian” pattern reported for most European countries, as, for example, Hungary, Germany, and Austria [25, 35]. Polish suicide rates peak at ages 40-54, and then decrease across older age groups before rising again at ages 80 years and older. Typifying Eastern Europe, this pattern is pronounced in the former Soviet countries. The peak at middle age is paralleled in the United States in the case of female suicides . Although an empirical question, the overall "Camel" pattern, which we observed for age-specific suicide rates in Poland, likely variously implicates the combination of prevailing classification procedures and social, cultural, and economic conditions.
The prevalence of non-hanging suicides in Poland is very low. This finding alone suggests that poisonings and other “soft” suicide methods might be underrepresented in official Polish suicide statistics because of misclassification . However, the high mortality rates for undetermined intent and unknown causes, respectively, point to an even larger potential reservoir for misclassified suicides. Adopting a previously suggested method for quantifying sensitivity of suicide certification , we generated upper-level estimates (percent of true-positives) of 70-73%. When we factored into our sensitivity calculations unknown causes and unintentional poisonings, as mortality categories also prone to masking suicides, the ensuing lower-level estimates indicated that the Polish suicide data were extremely deficient. Our results also indicate that suicide misclassification is even more problematic for females than males. This inference is consistent with the excessively high male-to-female suicide rate ratio and the large sex differential in the prevalence of non-hanging suicides. In short, “softer” suicide methods and female suicides both appear highly prone to misclassification in Poland.
The blackout on Polish suicide data for the years 1980-1982, following the change from ICD-8 to ICD-9 coding, coincided with a sharp increase in the rate of undetermined intent deaths. This finding strongly suggests that undetermined deaths might indeed have been a reservoir for suicides during that interval. However, Polish suicide data otherwise appear temporally reliable. While suicide data deficits also occurred during these years in four countries neighboring Poland, namely, Belarus, Lithuania, Ukraine, and Russia , they were not investigated in detail. A recent study more generally showed that changing cause-of-death classification procedures may mean a redistribution of deaths across external cause categories .
According to the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP), six major approaches have been proposed for preventing suicide: treatment of mental disorders, firearm control, detoxification of domestic gas and car emissions, control of toxic substances, and restrained media reporting . Because of the excessively high hanging suicide rate in Poland, concerted efforts are needed for diagnosing and treating psychiatric disorders, including affective and alcohol or other substance abuse disorders. These efforts would necessarily be predicated on the assumption that careful assessment, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric conditions can reduce suicidal behavior.
The high rate of increase in the Polish suicide rate calls for a national prevention initiative. Contrary to the overall trend of suicide rate reduction in both Eastern and Western Europe, the Polish suicide rate trended strongly upwards between 1970 and 2009. Estimated sensitivity of Polish suicide certification is very low relative to that of some other countries, such as Hungary and Austria [17, 36, 38]. In light of the low sensitivity estimates, an exceptionally high male-to-female suicide rate ratio, and a questionably low prevalence of suicide by “soft” methods, it seems highly plausible that suicides rates in Poland appear gross underestimates despite the large secular increase.
Changes in the ICD classification system produced a temporary suicide data blackout (1980-1982). This observation, in concert with significant increases in respective mortality rates for senility and unknown causes, after 1997, collectively support our recommendations for routine monitoring of Polish suicide data quality and exercise of caution in comparing suicide rates in Poland with those of other nations. We do conclude that Polish suicide statistics seem highly reliable across time. We acknowledge that our study only provides an indirect assessment of Polish suicide data quality. Nonetheless, the results expose the importance of in-depth investigations, which include psychological autopsies, on deaths classified under undetermined intent and senility or other unknown causes. Such investigations must be integral to the comprehensive approach that is needed in Poland to optimize suicide data quality assurance and associated suicide risk-factor delineation, risk-group identification, intervention, and evaluation.
- Eurostat: Causes of death in the EU. EUROSTAT: Statistics in focus— Population and social conditions. 2006, 1-11. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-NK-06-010/EN/KS-NK-06-010-EN.PDF]. Accessed January 12th, 2012, 10Google Scholar
- Hawton K, van Heeringen K: Suicide. Lancet. 2009, 373 (9672): 1372-1381. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60372-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayashi N, Igarashi M, Imai A, Osawa Y, Utsumi K, Ishikawa Y, Tokunaga T, Ishimoto K, Harima H, Tatebayashi Y, Kumagai N, Nozu M, Ishii H, Okazaki Y: Psychiatric disorders and clinical correlates of suicidal patients admitted to a psychiatric hospital in Tokyo. BMC Psychiatry. 2010, 10: 109-10.1186/1471-244X-10-109.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mäkinen IH: Suicide mortality of Eastern European regions before and after the Communist period. Soc Sci Med. 2006, 63 (2): 307-319. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Razvodovsky Y, Stickley A: Suicide in urban and rural regions of Belarus, 1990-2005. Public Health. 2009, 123 (1): 27-31. 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wasserman D, Värnik A: Reliability of statistics on violent death and suicide in the former USSR, 1970-1990. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1998, 394: 34-41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tollefsen IM, Hem E, Ekeberg O: The reliability of suicide statistics: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2012, 12 (1): 9-10.1186/1471-244X-12-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rockett IR, Kapusta ND, Bhandari R: Suicide misclassification in an international context: revisitation and update. Suicidology Online. 2011, 2: 48-61.Google Scholar
- Platt S, Backett S, Kreitman N: Social construction or causal ascription: distinguishing suicide from undetermined deaths. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1988, 23 (4): 217-221. 10.1007/BF01787820.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flanagan RJ, Rooney C: Recording acute poisoning deaths. Forensic Sci Int. 2002, 128 (1–2): 3-19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rockett IRH, Wang S, Stack S, De Leo D, Frost JL, Ducatman AM, Walker RL, Kapusta ND: Race/ethnicity and potential suicide misclassification: window on a minority suicide paradox?. BMC Psychiatry. 2010, 10: 35-10.1186/1471-244X-10-35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rockett IR, Hobbs G, De Leo D, Stack S, Frost JL, Ducatman AM, Kapusta ND, Walker RL: Suicide and unintentional poisoning mortality trends in the United States, 1987-2006: two unrelated phenomena?. BMC Publ Health. 2010, 10: 705-10.1186/1471-2458-10-705.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kapusta ND, Tran US, Rockett IR, De Leo D, Naylor CP, Niederkrotenthaler T, Voracek M, Etzersdorfer E, Sonneck G: Declining autopsy rates and suicide misclassification: a cross-national analysis of 35 countries. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011, 68 (10): 1050-1057. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dziennik Ustaw 2001: Rozporzadzenie minitra zdrowia dnia 7 grudnia 2001 r. w sprawie wzoru karty zgonu oraz sposobu jej wypelniania. 1782, Dziennik Ustaw 153 PozGoogle Scholar
- WHO: Reported information on mortality statistics WHO survey on mortality data. 2005, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/mort2005survey/en/index.html]. Accessed January 12thGoogle Scholar
- WHO: Suicide prevention and special programs. 2011, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/mort2005survey/en/index.html]. Accessed January 12th, 2012Google Scholar
- Värnik P, Sisask M, Värnik A, Laido Z, Meise U, et al: Suicide registration in eight European countries: a qualitative analysis of procedures and practices. Forensic Sci Int. 2010, 202 (1–3): 86-92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chishti P, Stone DH, Corcoran P, Williamson E, Petridou E: EUROSAVE Working Group: Suicide mortality in the European Union. Eur J Public Health. 2003, 13 (2): 108-114. 10.1093/eurpub/13.2.108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- IASP Executive Committee: I.A.S.P: Guidelines for Suicide Prevention. Crisis. 1999, 20 (4): 155-163.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Möller-Leimkühler AM: Barriers to help-seeking by men: a review of sociocultural and clinical literature with particular reference to depression. J Affect Disord. 2002, 71 (1–3): 1-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walinder J, Rutz W: Male depression and suicide. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001, 16 (Suppl 2): S21-S24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Möller-Leimkühler AM: The gender gap in suicide and premature death or: why are men so vulnerable?. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2003, 253 (1): 1-8. 10.1007/s00406-003-0397-6. ReviewView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Värnik A, Kõlves K, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Marusic A, Oskarsson H, Palmer A, Reisch T, Scheerder G, Arensman E, Aromaa E, Giupponi G, Gusmäo R, Maxwell M, Pull C, Szekely A, Sola VP, Hegerl U: Suicide methods in Europe: a gender-specific analysis of countries participating in the "European Alliance Against Depression". J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008, 62 (6): 545-551. 10.1136/jech.2007.065391.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Baumert J, Erazo N, Ruf E, Ladwig KH: Time trends in suicide mortality vary in choice of methods: an analysis of 145,865 fatal suicide cases in Germany 1991-2002. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008, 43 (11): 913-919. 10.1007/s00127-008-0380-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Etzersdorfer E, Voracek M, Kapusta N, Sonneck G: Epidemiology of suicide in Austria 1990-2000: general decrease, but increased suicide risk for old men. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005, 117 (1–2): 31-35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Räsänen P, Hakko H, Jokelainen J, Tiihonen J: Seasonal variation in specific methods of suicide: a national register study of 20,234 Finnish people. J Affect Disord. 2002, 71 (1–3): 51-59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gunnell D, Bennewith O, Hawton K, Simkin S, Kapur N: The epidemiology and prevention of suicide by hanging: a systematic review. Int J Epidemiol. 2005, 34 (2): 433-442. 10.1093/ije/dyh398.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beautrais AL: Methods of youth suicide in New Zealand: trends and implications for prevention. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2000, 34: 413-419. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2000.00690.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson D, Gunnell D: Comparison of trends in method-specific suicide rates in Australia and England & Wales 1968–97. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2000, 24: 153-157. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb00135.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mazur J: Suicide mortality in Poland as compared to EU countries–recent trends and demographic determinants. Przegl Epidemiol. 2007, 61 (4): 777-784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dervic K, Brent DA, Oquendo MA: Completed suicide in childhood. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008, 31 (2): 271-291. 10.1016/j.psc.2008.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McClure GM: Suicide in children and adolescents in England and Wales 1970–1998. Br J Psychiatry. 2001, 178: 469-474. 10.1192/bjp.178.5.469.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2004): http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_sy.html]. Accessed January 12th, 2012
- Dervic K, Friedrich E, Oquendo MA, Voracek M, Friedrich MH, Sonneck G: Suicide in Austrian children and young adolescents aged 14 and younger. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006, 15: 427-434. 10.1007/s00787-006-0551-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmidtke A, Sell R, Löhr C: Epidemiology of suicide in older persons. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2008, 41 (1): 3-13. 10.1007/s00391-008-0517-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Värnik P, Sisask M, Värnik A, Yur'yev A, Kõlves K, Leppik L, Nemtsov A, Wasserman D: Massive increase in injury deaths of undetermined intent in ex-USSR Baltic and Slavic countries: hidden suicides?. Scand J Public Health. 2010, 38 (4): 395-403. 10.1177/1403494809354360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gjertsen F, Bruzzone S, Vollrath ME, Pace M, Ekeberg O: Comparing ICD-9 and ICD-10: The impact on intentional and unintentional injury mortality statistics in Italy and Norway. Injury. 2012, Feb 16. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Rockett IR, Thomas BM: Reliability and sensitivity of suicide certification in higher-income countries. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1999, 29 (2): 141-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/644/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.