Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Racial and geographic variation in coronary heart disease mortality trends

BMC Public Health201212:410

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-410

Received: 13 January 2012

Accepted: 27 April 2012

Published: 6 June 2012

Abstract

Background

Magnitudes, geographic and racial variation in trends in coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality within the US require updating for health services and health disparities research. Therefore the aim of this study is to present data on these trends through 2007.

Methods

Data for CHD were analyzed using the US mortality files for 1999–2007 obtained from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Age-adjusted annual death rates were computed for non-Hispanic African Americans (AA) and European Americans (EA) aged 35–84 years. The direct method was used to standardize rates by age, using the 2000 US standard population. Joinpoint regression models were used to evaluate trends, expressed as annual percent change (APC).

Results

For both AA men and women the magnitude in CHD mortality is higher compared to EA men and women, respectively. Between 1999 and 2007 the rate declined both in AA and in EA of both sexes in every geographic division; however, relative declines varied. For example, among men, relative average annual declines ranged from 3.2% to 4.7% in AA and from 4.4% to 5.5% in EA among geographic divisions. In women, rates declined more in later years of the decade and in women over 54 years. In 2007, age-adjusted death rate per 100,000 for CHD ranged from 93 in EA women in New England to 345 in AA men in the East North Central division. In EA, areas near the Ohio and lower Mississippi Rivers had above average rates. Disparities in trends by urbanization level were also found. For AA in the East North Central division, the APC was similar in large central metro (−4.2), large fringe metro (−4.3), medium metro urbanization strata (−4.4), and small metro (−3.9). APC was somewhat higher in the micropolitan/non-metro (−5.3), and especially the non-core/non-metro (−6.5). For EA in the East South Central division, the APC was higher in large central metro (−5.3), large fringe metro (−4.3) and medium metro urbanization strata (−5.1) than in small metro (−3.8), micropolitan/non-metro (−4.0), and non-core/non-metro (−3.3) urbanization strata.

Conclusions

Between 1999 and 2007, the level and rate of decline in CHD mortality displayed persistent disparities. Declines were greater in EA than AA racial groups. Rates were greater in the Ohio and Mississippi River than other geographic regions.

Keywords

Coronary heart disease African Americans Mortality

Background

In 2009, despite a long-term decline in death rates, coronary heart disease (CHD) was the leading cause of death in the US [14]. Although reductions in gender disparities in CHD mortality have been noted [5], disparities in CHD mortality based on race/ethnicity have remained largely unchanged [6], and disparities in the morbidity of CHD appear to be increasing [7]. Many publications have examined the decline in CHD mortality in the US prior to 2000, but relatively few have detailed both racial and geographic variation [1, 820]. The Healthy People 2010 Initiative set the goals of reducing the CHD mortality rate by 20 percent between 2000 and 2010 and reducing disparities in CHD mortality. The Healthy People 2010 objectives of reducing death rates to 162 deaths per 100,000 populations for CHD were met in 2004. However, despite the overall decrease in CHD death rates, the target death rates were not met for two subpopulations: blacks and men [3]. Two out of the four overarching goals of Healthy People 2020 are: 1) achieve health equity, eliminate disparities, and improve the health of all groups; and; 2) Examining and monitoring the distribution of death rates provides the requisite information for focusing on the groups most in need of early intervention to eliminate preventable disease, disability, and premature death and to improve the health of all groups [4]. Magnitudes, geographic and racial variation in trends in CHD mortality within the US require frequent updating for health services and health disparities research.

Accordingly, this report presents CHD mortality trends between 1999–2007 among non-Hispanic blacks and whites aged 35–84 years and geographic and racial variation in CHD mortality trends.

Materials and methods

Deaths in 1999–2007 with coronary heart disease (International Classification of Disease 10th revision [ICD-10] codes I20-I25 (1999–2007) as underlying cause were enumerated [20]. Data available for public use from National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), files provided the underlying cause of death and demographic data on decedents [20]. The underlying cause of death is the disease (or injury) that initiated the sequence of events leading directly to death. For non-Hispanic African Americans (AA) and European Americans (EA), age-adjusted death rates per 100,000 using the 2000 US standard population with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed for persons aged 35–84 years using standard methods [20]. Following policy of the NVSS, years and areas were combined to avoid producing death rates considered unreliable, i.e. when the death count is less than 20. Variation by sex and race in annual percentage change (APC) between 1999 and 2007 were assessed using JoinPoint software [21]. Joinpoint is statistical software for the analysis of trends using joinpoint models, that is, models where several different lines are connected together at the "joinpoints". This enables the user to test that an apparent change in trend is statistically significant. The tests of significance use a Monte Carlo Permutation method. Numbers of U.S. residents for the period 1999–2007 were obtained from the U.S. Bureau of the Census and used to calculate death rates per 100,000 populations. Bridged-race Census estimates were used as denominators for groups defined by race and Hispanic origin. Urbanization levels and Census divisions are defined in Additional file 1: Table S1[22].

Results

In 2007 at ages 35–84, US age-adjusted CHD death rates per 100,000 (95% CI) were as follows: women EA 111 (110–112), AA 171 (168–174); men EA 238 (237–239), AA 312 (307–316). Examination of annual percent change (APC) and US age-adjusted CHD death rates between 1999 and 2007 for women and men at ages 35–84 yrs revealed that rates declined for AA and EA men at ages 35–84, and in each age subgroup (Table 1). In both EA and AA women, the rates declined more rapidly in later years compared to the earlier years of the decade. In women, APC was greater above age 54 than at 35–54 years, which the APC for EA women barely different from 0 (Table 1).
Table 1

Annual percent change age-adjusted rates of mortality from coronary heart disease per 100,000 by race in non-Hispanic women and men aged 35-84+ years: United States, 1999-2007

Characterstic

Year

AA women

EA women

AA men

EA men

APC(CI)35-84Y

1999-2007

-

-

−4.0 (−4.6,-3.4)

−4.8 (−5.1,-4.5)

Rate

1999

-

-

329

346

Rate

2007

-

-

246

240

APC(CI)35-84Y

2003-2007

-

−6.2 (−7.2, -5.1)

-

-

Rate

2003

-

143

-

-

Rate

2007

-

111

-

-

APC(CI)35-84Y

1999-2003

-

−4.5 (−5.5,-3.5)

-

-

Rate

1999

-

172

-

-

Rate

2003

-

143

-

-

APC(CI)35-84Y

2002-2007

−6.3 (−7.0,-5.6)

-

-

-

Rate

2002

237

-

-

-

Rate

2007

171

-

-

-

APC(CI)35-84Y

1999-2002

−3.7 (−5.2, -2.1)

-

-

-

Rate

1999

265

-

-

-

Rate

2002

237

-

-

-

APC(CI) 35-54Y

1999-2007

−3.2 (−3.9,-2.6)

−0.8 (−1.4, -0.1)

−2.6 (−3.2.-2.0)

−2.1 (−2.4,-1.7)

APC(CI) 55-84Y

1999-2007

−5.7 (−6.3,-5.1)

−5.7 (−6.2, -5.2)

−4.3 (−4.9,-3.6)

−5.2 (−5.5,-4.9)

APC(CI) >84Y

1999-2007

−5.2 (−6.2,-4.2)

−5.9 (−6.5,-5.2)

−6.1 (−6.8,-5.5)

−5.2 (−5.7,-4.8)

AA, African American; EA, European American; APC, annual percent change; CI, 95% confidence interval; Y = ages in years.

Table 2 shows states with in order of decreasing age adjusted CHD mortality rates for AA in 2005–2007, while Additional file 2: Tables S2 and Additional file 3: Table S3 show state rankings for EA. Relative variation was greatest in AA men and least in AA women. For the entire period 1999–2007, Figures 1 and 2 show that high death rates for EA men and women tended to cluster around the Ohio and lower Mississippi Rivers and low rates in Rocky Mountains ( Additional file 2: Tables S2 and Additional file 3: Table S3). Clustering of high rates for both AA men and women was seen in the East North Central, West South Central states, Middle Atlantic States and California and low rates in South Atlantic and East South Central states (see Additional file 4: Figures S1 and Additional file 5: Figure S2. The ratio of the 90th to the 10th percentile of rates in states for EA and AA combined was 1.67 in 1999 and 1.76 in 2007 (1.61 and 1.67 resp. in EA only).
Table 2

States* with the highest and lowest age-adjusted coronary heart disease mortality rate per 100,000 by sex and race in non-Hispanic African Americans aged 35–84 years: United States, 2005-2007

 

Women

Men

 

Michigan

Michigan

 

New York

Oklahoma

 

Arkansas

Arkansas

 

Oklahoma

California

 

California

Tennessee

 

Tennessee

New York

 

Missouri

Missouri

 

Illinois

Pennsylvania

 

Ohio

Illinois

 

Texas

Mississippi

 

Maryland

Louisiana

 

Mississippi

Indiana

 

Louisiana

Texas

 

Kentucky

Ohio

 

Arizona

West Virginia

 

Pennsylvania

Kentucky

 

New Jersey

Maryland

 

Florida

North Carolina

 

Indiana

New Jersey

 

Delaware

South Carolina

 

North Carolina

Delaware

 

Kansas

Florida

 

South Carolina

Arizona

 

Virginia

Wisconsin

 

Nevada

Virginia

 

Alabama

Kansas

 

Washington

Washington

 

Georgia

Alabama

 

Connecticut

Connecticut

 

Colorado

Nevada

 

Massachusetts

Georgia

 

Connecticut

Massachusetts

  

Colorado

  

Minnesota

Ratio+

2.1

3.1

*Excludes states with 99 or fewer deaths in 2005–2007 for given group.

+Ratio of rate of state in first row to state in last row.

Figure 1

Age-adjusted rate per 100,000 resident population of death from coronary heart disease by county for European American women aged 35–84 years: United States, 1999–2007. Yellow, 34.7-114.5; light orange 114.6-142.0; dark orange 142.1-172.2; red 172.4-407.2; white vertical bars, suppressed due to small number of deaths; color diagonal bars, unreliable value.

Figure 2

Age-adjusted rate of death per 100,000 population from coronary heart disease by county for European American men aged 35–84 years: United States, 1999–2007. Yellow 56.8-252.0; light orange 252.1-300.4; dark orange 300.6-356.3; red 356.4-743.4; white vertical bars, suppressed due to small number of deaths; color diagonal bars, unreliable value.

In 1999–2007 rates declined in all the nine US Census divisions (Table 3). Relative declines tended to be greatest in the New England, Mountain and Pacific divisions. Variation in rate of decline was greater in AA than in EA. The greatest relative declines were in AA women in the East South Central and New England divisions and the smallest relative declines occurred in AA males in the Pacific, Mid-Atlantic and North Central divisions.
Table 3

Annual percent change and selected age-adjusted rates of mortality from coronary heart disease per 100,000 by Census division, sex and race in non-Hispanics aged 35–84 years: United States, 1999-2007

Division

 

AA Women

EA Women

AA Men

EA Men

New England

     

APC

1999-2007

−6.2

−5.9

−4.7

−5.5

Rate

1999

176

144

329

306

Rate

2007

111

93

230

202

Mid Atlantic

     

APC

1999-2007

−3.9

−5.4

−3.5

−4.9

Rate

1999

284

197

452

379

Rate

2007

203

124

345

259

E. N. Central

     

APC

1999-2007

−5.2

−5.6

−3.6

−5.0

Rate

1999

285

181

487

374

Rate

2007

187

113

352

248

W. N. Central

     

APC

1999-2007

−4.9

−5.3

−3.5

−4.8

Rate

1999

274

151

428

324

Rate

2007

175

95

319

217

S. Atlantic

AAPC

    

APC

1999-2007

−6.1

−5.8

−4.7

−5.1

Rate

1999

238

165

395

344

Rate

2007

148

102

273

227

E. S. Central

     

APC

1999-2007

−6.4

−4.5

−4.1

−4.4

Rate

1999

266

189

434

398

Rate

2007

162

132

309

276

W. S. Central

     

APC

1999-2007

−5.8

−4.6

−4.1

−4.5

Rate

1999

276

189

461

385

Rate

2007

172

130

332

267

Mountain

     

APC

1999-2007

−5.7

−4.8

−5.6

−4.6

Rate

1999

229

137

332

295

Rate

2007

140

89

193

196

Pacific

     

APC

1999-2007

−5.3

−5.5

−3.2

−4.8

Rate

1999

308

172

471

339

Rate

2007

195

107

346

224

AA, African American; EA, European American.

For AA within the Mid-Atlantic, East North Central and Pacific divisions where over 6 million AA aged 35–84 resided, age-adjusted rates for 1999–2007 combined were highest in large, central metropolitan (LCM) areas, e.g. Mid-Atlantic LCM 439 (95% CI 436–443) versus large fringe metro (LFM) 372 (366–379). In South Atlantic and East South Central divisions, rates showed a similar pattern but at somewhat lower levels e.g. South Atlantic LCM 369 (365–373) versus LFM 311 (307–315). In New England, West North Central and West South Central division’s rates were highest in the non-core (non-metropolitan) areas.

For EA within the New England, Mid-Atlantic, East North Central and Pacific divisions, age-adjusted rates for 1999–2007 combined were highest in LCM areas, e.g. Mid-Atlantic LCM 276 (95% CI 274–278) versus LFM 209 (208–210). In West North Central, South Atlantic, East South Central and West South Central divisions rates were highest in the non-core(non-metropolitan) divisions, e.g. East South Central non-core(non-metropolitan) division 281 (278–284) versus LCM 212 (209–215).

Trends were examined by urbanization level in the East North Central division for AA and the East South Central division for EA, i.e. the divisions with highest rates. For AA in the East North Central division, the APC was similar in large central metro (−4.2), large fringe metro (−4.3), medium metro urbanization strata (−4.4), and small metro (−3.9). The somewhat higher APC in the micropolitan/non-metro (−5.3), and especially the non-core/non-metro (−6.5) urbanization strata must be viewed with caution due to much smaller annual numbers of deaths.

For EA in the East South Central division, the APC was higher in large central metro (−5.3), large fringe metro (−4.3) and medium metro urbanization strata (−5.1) than in small metro (−3.8), micropolitan/non-metro (−4.0), and non-core/non-metro (−3.3) urbanization strata.

Discussion

The long-term decline in CHD mortality rates has continued during the first decade of the new century for major demographic subgroups. However, the historic racial disparities and substantial geographic disparities persist. Hence, the Healthy People 2010 goal of a 20% decline between 2000 and 2010 likely will be met or exceeded (2000–2007 all ages decline 33%), but little or no progress towards the goal of elimination of racial or geographic relative disparities during the decade is evident.

Many studies have documented the magnitude and the important contributions of both improvements in health care and improvements in population risk factor levels in reducing CHD incidence rates and reducing case fatality rates for acute myocardial infarction and long-term survival with CHD[1, 35, 8, 1318]. Combined US racial and geographic variation in levels and trends in CHD mortality or morbidity has been the subject of a smaller number of studies [1, 819]. The causes of the large racial and geographic variation in CHD mortality have yet to be fully identified [2330]. Disparities in access to and quality of therapeutic and preventive health care and socioeconomic and cultural variation in lifestyles and risk factor levels are thought to play important roles [29, 30]. For example, persistent racial disparities in utilization of revascularization produces have been well documented [31, 32].

Early investigators noted high stroke mortality rates among Americans in the southeastern coastal states. By late 1980s, this “stroke belt” had dissipated in the south eastern coastal areas and shifted to the Midwest regions of the Mississippi and Ohio River valleys [8]. CHD mortality has shown a similar westward shift to the so called coronary valley [9]. The increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among blacks has been mainly confined to the southern states (Mississippi River valley). Although changes in regional profile of risk factors, local environment, and migration pattern may have played a role, recent economic shifts in these areas may be the principal reason for changes in disease rates [8]. Whereas southeastern coastal areas have undergone considerable economic development, the more westward regions have not kept pace [8]. In Mississippi, one of the most economically and educationally disadvantaged US states, CVD mortality has risen among African Americans over the past two decades while among whites there has been a decline [10]. Similar patterns are also observed in the Northeast and the Midwest [11, 12].

Our understanding of the existence in race/ethnic variations in CHD disease burden comes from observed differences in their rates and risk factors between countries. For example, in the Seven Countries Study, [33], low CHD rates were observed in Japan and the Mediterranean countries, and high CHD rates in Finland and the US. These differences were in large part explained by differences in risk factors, but several factors may contribute to these observed differences, such as diverse demographic profiles, environmental factors, and genetic factors differences. These variations are perhaps best illustrated by the knowledge gained from studies in migrants. The Ni-Hon-San study of Japanese migrants revealed how blood cholesterol levels and CHD rates rose from relatively low levels among those in Japan, to intermediate levels in Honolulu, and to high levels in San Francisco [34].

Comparison of Afro-Caribbeans, South Asians, and Europeans in the UK indicate marked differences in central obesity, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia, and related dyslipidemia, despite similar blood pressure, body mass index, and total plasma cholesterol [35]. In Canada, there are marked differences between different ethnic groups in the prevalence and death rates from CHD, with the highest rates being among those of European and South Asian origin, but lowest among those of Chinese origin [36], suggesting that the propensity to CHD may vary in different ethnic groups.

Differences in the age-adjusted death rates vary widely between European populations. Data from the World Health Organization (WHO) indicate that the cardiovascular disease mortality rate is 6-fold higher among men and women in the Russian Federation compared with people in France [37]. In 1996, the age-standardized mortality rates for coronary heart disease (CHD) among males in the Russian Federation was 390/100 000 compared with 60/100 000 among males in France [37].

Although the CVD mortality rates are much lower among women compared with men, similar variations among women between countries also exist. Eastern European countries such as the Ukraine, the Russian Federation, Hungary, and the Czech Republic have among the highest and increasing CVD rates in the world, which is in marked contrast to most economically stable European countries where declines in CVD mortality rates have been experienced over the past 30 years [38]. CVD among European populations is mainly attributable to classical risk factors, namely diets high in saturated fats, elevated serum cholesterol and blood pressure (BP), diabetes, and smoking [39].

Strengths of this study include focus on the years 1999–2007 when only ICD-10 was in use, which precluded bias due to changes in ICD version [20]. Unlike some previous studies, analyses were restricted to non-Hispanics to avoid bias arising from misclassification of Hispanic ethnicity on death certificates. However, given the lack of information on racial and regional variation in validity of CHD diagnoses from death certificates, bias due to diagnostic misclassification cannot be excluded as a possible contributor to variation [40]. The validity of using age-adjusted rates for ages 65 yrs and over may be a problem as rates are driven by oldest age groups for CHD where diagnosis accuracy may be questionable. Results of trends in age-adjusted rates within three age bands were performed for this reason. Ecologic analyses of clinical information for cases or data on access to care or risk factor levels, socioeconomic and health service variables in different geographic areas could have confounded or mediated some of the results but analysis of those variables was beyond the scope of this study. More such efforts are needed to explain observed racial and geographic patterns. Continued monitoring of racial and geographic disparities will be of especial importance in an era of health care system changes.

Conclusions

Between 1999 and 2007, the level and rate of decline in CHD mortality displayed persistent disparities. Rates were greater in the Ohio and Mississippi River than other geographic regions. Declines were greater in EA than AA racial groups.

Funding

Dr. Obisesan was supported by career development award # AG00980, research award #RO1-AG031517 from the National Institute on Aging and research award #1UL1RR03197501 from the National Center for Research Resources.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine
(2)
Division of Geriatrics, Howard University Hospital

References

  1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, Carnethon MR, Dai S, de Simone G, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Greenlund KJ, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Ho PM, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McDermott MM, Meigs JB, Moy CS, et al: Heart disease and stroke statistics-2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011, 123: e18-e209. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kochanek KD, Xu JQ, Murphy SL, Miniño AM, Kung HC: Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2009.National Vital Statistics Reports. 2011, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, vol 59 no 4Google Scholar
  3. Capewell S, Ford ES, Croft JB, Critchley JA, Greenlund KJ, Labarthe DR: Cardiovascular risk factor trends and potential for reducing coronary heart disease mortality in the United States of America. Bull World Health Organ. 2010, 88: 120-130. 10.2471/BLT.08.057885.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. US Department of Health and Human Services: Healthy People. 2020, Accessed at http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx on Mar 14, 2012 10:53:42 AM,Google Scholar
  5. Pearcy JN, Keppel KG: "A summary measure of health disparity.". Public Health Rep. 2002, 117 (3): 273-280. 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50161-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. O'Connell L, Brown SL: Do nonprofit HMOs eliminate racial disparities in cardiac care. J Health Care Finance. 2003, 30 (2): 84-94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis S, Liu Y, Gibbons G: Disparities in trends of hospitalization for potentially preventable chronic conditions among African Americans during the 1990s: implications and benchmarks. Am J Public Health. 2003, 93 (3): 447-455. 10.2105/AJPH.93.3.447.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Casper ML, Wing S, Knoless M, Pollard RA: The shifting stroke belt: changes in the geographic pattern of stroke mortality in the United States, 1962 to 1988. Stroke. 1995, 26 (5): 755-760. 10.1161/01.STR.26.5.755.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Casper M, Wing S, Strogatz D: Variation in the magnitude of black-white differences in stroke mortality by community occupational structure. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991, 45 (4): 302-306. 10.1136/jech.45.4.302.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones DW, Sempos CT, Thom TJ, Harrington AM, Taylor HA, Fletcher BW, Mehrotra BD, Wyatt SB, Davis CE: Rising levels of cardiovascular mortality in Mississippi, 1979–1995. Am J Med Sci. 2000, 319 (3): 131-137. 10.1097/00000441-200003000-00001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Geronimus AT, Bound J, Waidmann TA, Hillemeier MM, Burns PB: Excess mortality among blacks and whites in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1996, 335 (21): 1552-1558. 10.1056/NEJM199611213352102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang J, Madhavan S, Alderman MH: The association between birthplace and mortality from cardiovascular causes among black and white residents of New York City. N Engl J Med. 1996, 335 (21): 1545-1551. 10.1056/NEJM199611213352101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerber Y, Jacobsen SJ, Frye RL, Weston SA, Killian JM, Roger VL: Secular trends in deaths from cardiovascular diseases: a 25-year community study. Circulation. 2006, 113: 2285-2292. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.590463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford ES, Capewell S: Coronary heart disease mortality among young adults in the U.S. from 1980 through 2002: concealed leveling of mortality rates. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 50: 2128-2132. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.056.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pickle LW, Gillum RF: Geographic variation in cardiovascular disease mortality in US blacks and whites. J Natl Med Assoc. 1999, 91: 545-556.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillum RF, Mussolino ME, Madans JH: Coronary heart disease incidence and survival in African-American women and men. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Ann Intern Med. 1997, 127 (2): 111-118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Keenan NL, Shaw KM: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Coronary heart disease and stroke deaths - United States, 2006. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011, 14 (60): 62-66. 2011 JanGoogle Scholar
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Coronary heart disease mortality trends among whites and blacks-Appalachia and United States, 1980–1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998, 47: 1005-8. 1015Google Scholar
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): State-specific mortality from sudden cardiac death--United States, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002, 51 (6): 123-126.Google Scholar
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics: Multiple cause of death file. 2005, Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10.html on Nov 23, 2010 1:53:42 PM, –2006. CDC WONDER on-line database, compiled from multiple cause of death file 2005–2006 series 20 no. 2l, 2009,Google Scholar
  21. National Cancer Institute: JointPoint regression program. Accessed at (http://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/example.html) Nov 22, 2011, 9:22 AM,
  22. Ingram DD, Franco S: 2006 NCHS urban–rural classification scheme for counties. 2006, http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/CMF/Urbanization-Methodology.html (last accessed 12/20/2010)Google Scholar
  23. Peterson ED, Shah BR, Parsons L, Pollack CV, French WJ, Canto JG, Gibson CM, Rogers WJ: Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J. 2008, 156: 1045-1055. 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.07.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Setoguchi S, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Mittleman MA, Levin R, Winkelmayer WC: Improvements in long-term mortality after myocardial infarction and increased use of cardiovascular drugs after discharge: a 10-year trend analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008, 51: 1247-1254. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes JS, Kozak LJ, Owings MF: Use and in-hospital mortality associated with two cardiac procedures, by sex and age: national trends, 1990–2004. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007, 26: 169-177. 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Nemetz PN, Roger VL, Ransom JE, Bailey KR, Edwards WD, Leibson CL: Recent trends in the prevalence of coronary disease: a population-based autopsy study of nonnatural deaths. Arch Intern Med. 2008, 168: 264-270. 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang H, Steffen LM, Jacobs DR, Zhou X, Blackburn H, Berger AK, Filion KB, Luepker RV: Trends in cardiovascular risk factor levels in the Minnesota Heart Survey (1980–2002) as compared with the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1976–2002): A partial explanation for Minnesota's low cardiovascular disease mortality?. Am J Epidemiol. 2011, 173: 526-538. 10.1093/aje/kwq367.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, Critchley JA, Labarthe DR, Kottke TE, Giles WH, Capewell S: Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356 (23): 2388-2398. 10.1056/NEJMsa053935.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Glasser SP, Cushman M, Prineas R, Kleindorfer D, Prince V, You Z, et al: Does differential prophylactic aspirin use contribute to racial and geographic disparities in stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD)?. Prev Med. 2008, 47: 161-166. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Ezzati M, Oza S, Danaei G, Murray CJ: Trends and cardiovascular mortality effects of state-level blood pressure and uncontrolled hypertension in the United States. Circulation. 2008, 117 (7): 905-914. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.732131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Brown CP, Ross L, Lopez I, Thornton A, Kiros GE: Disparities in the receipt of cardiac revascularization procedures between blacks and whites: an analysis of secular trends. Ethn Dis. 2008, 18 (2 Suppl 2): S2-112-7. 17Google Scholar
  32. Gillum RF: Coronary revascularization in older women and men in the United States: trends in ethnic differences. Am Heart J. 2004, 147: 418-424. 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Menotti A, Keys A, Kromhout D, Blackburn H, Aravanis C, Bloemberg B, Buzina R, Dontas A, Fidanza F, Giampaoli S, Karvonen M, Lanti M, Mohacek I, Nedeljkovic S, Nissinen A, Pekkanen J, Punsar S, Seccareccia F, Toshima H: Inter-cohort differences in coronary heart disease mortality in the 25-year follow-up of the seven countries study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1993, 9 (5): 527-536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kagan A, Harris BR, Winkelstein W, Johnson KG, Kato H, Syme SL, Rhoads GG, Gay ML, Nichaman MZ, Hamilton HB, Tillotson J: Epidemiologic studies of coronary heart disease and stroke in Japanese men living in Japan, Hawaii and California: demographic, physical, dietary and biochemical characteristics. J Chronic Dis. 1974, 27 (7–8): 345-364.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. McKeigue PM, Shah B, Marmot MG: Relation of central obesity and insulin resistance with high diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in South Asians. Lancet. 1991, 337 (8738): 382-386. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91164-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Anand SS, Yusuf S, Vuksan V, Devanesen S, Teo KK, Montague PA, Kelemen L, Yi C, Lonn E, Gerstein H, Hegele RA, McQueen M: Differences in risk factors, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease between ethnic groups in Canada: the Study of Health Assessment and Risk in Ethnic groups (SHARE). Lancet. 2000, 356 (9226): 279-284. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02502-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 1997–1999 World Health Statistics Annual. 2000, World Health Organization, Geneva, Available at: http://www-nt.who.int/whosis/statistics/menu.cfm?path=statistics,whsa&language=english. Accessed March 9, 2012,
  38. Artaud-Wild SM, Connor SL, Sexton G, Connor WE: Differences in coronary mortality can be explained by differences in cholesterol and saturated fat intakes in 40 countries but not in France and Finland: a paradox. Circulation. 1993, 88: 2771-2779. 10.1161/01.CIR.88.6.2771.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ôunpuu S, Anand S: Global burden of cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2001, 104 (23): 2855-2864. 10.1161/hc4701.099488.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ives DG, Samuel P, Psaty BM, Kuller LH: Agreement between nosologist and cardiovascular health study review of deaths: implications of coding differences. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009, 57: 133-139. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02056.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/410/prepub

Copyright

© Gillum et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.