Skip to main content

“Health divide” between indigenous and non-indigenous populations in Kerala, India: Population based study



The objective of this study is to investigate the magnitude and nature of health inequalities between indigenous (Scheduled Tribes) and non-indigenous populations, as well as between different indigenous groups, in a rural district of Kerala State, India.


A health survey was carried out in a rural community (N = 1660 men and women, 18–96 years). Age- and sex-standardised prevalence of underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), anaemia, goitre, suspected tuberculosis and hypertension was compared across forward castes, other backward classes and tribal populations. Multi-level weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate the predicted prevalence of morbidity for each age and social group. A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition was used to further explore the health gap between tribes and non-tribes, and between subgroups of tribes.


Social stratification remains a strong determinant of health in the progressive social policy environment of Kerala. The tribal groups are bearing a higher burden of underweight (46.1 vs. 24.3%), anaemia (9.9 vs. 3.5%) and goitre (8.5 vs. 3.6%) compared to non-tribes, but have similar levels of tuberculosis (21.4 vs. 20.4%) and hypertension (23.5 vs. 20.1%). Significant health inequalities also exist within tribal populations; the Paniya have higher levels of underweight (54.8 vs. 40.7%) and anaemia (17.2 vs. 5.7%) than other Scheduled Tribes. The social gradient in health is evident in each age group, with the exception of hypertension. The predicted prevalence of underweight is 31 and 13 percentage points higher for Paniya and other Scheduled Tribe members, respectively, compared to Forward Caste members 18–30 y (27.1%). Higher hypertension is only evident among Paniya adults 18–30 y (10 percentage points higher than Forward Caste adults of the same age group (5.4%)). The decomposition analysis shows that poverty and other determinants of health only explain 51% and 42% of the health gap between tribes and non-tribes for underweight and goitre, respectively.


Policies and programmes designed to benefit the Scheduled Tribes need to promote their well-being in general but also target the specific needs of the most vulnerable indigenous groups. There is a need to enhance the capacity of the disadvantaged to equally take advantage of health opportunities.

Peer Review reports


Large inequalities in health exist between indigenous and non-indigenous populations worldwide [1]. This “health divide” has also been demonstrated in India [2], where indigenous groups are officially classified as Scheduled Tribes. Compared to national averages, Scheduled Tribes have higher mortality rates [3] and experience a greater prevalence of tuberculosis [4] and undernutrition [5], including high anaemia levels [6, 7]. These groups are also exposed to higher risks of inadequate food intake [8], poor hygiene [9], and tobacco and alcohol consumption [10], as well as lower access to health care [1113].

Increasing social inequalities, the development of the private health sector, barriers to access to care among the poor [14, 15] and the deterioration in the quality of the public health sector are all factors that may increase the differential vulnerability of tribal populations. However, Scheduled Tribes in India are demographically, culturally and economically heterogeneous, varying widely in terms of their population size, language, and the nature of their interactions with the rest of society [16, 17]. Given that exclusion from social and economic opportunities varies in nature and magnitude [18, 19], inequalities in health outcomes between tribal groups are likely. Yet most of the evidence on the health of Scheduled Tribes is available either at the aggregated level, failing to account for the diversity among Scheduled Tribe groups, or focuses on the health of a specific Scheduled Tribe, making it difficult to analyse inter-tribal inequalities in health.

Broad social and economic changes have taken place in India in the past 20 years, particularly with respect to affirmative action policies intended to benefit Scheduled Tribe members [20]. Land tenancy reforms initially showed impressive effects in the 1970s and 1980s in states such as Kerala, although progress has slowed in recent years [21]. Recent evidence suggests that Scheduled Tribes continue to be highly marginalised, remaining virtually landless, perceived as outsiders, not performing as well in school (higher dropout rate) and unable to take advantage of affirmative action policies [16]. Therefore, it is unclear whether health inequalities have decreased in recent years. A shift in the disease burden in India is also evident [22], underscoring the need for new evidence on the health divide using clinical measures of morbidity.

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the magnitude of the health divide, as measured by morbidity rates, between tribe and non-tribe populations, as well as between different tribal groups in a rural community in the southern state of Kerala. We also examine the extent to which health inequalities are explained by material deprivation.


This study is part of a collaborative research program on inequalities in health and health care by the Centre for Development Studies and the University of Montreal in a single Gram Panchayat (the lowest territorial administrative unit) located in the northern district of Wayanad in Kerala [23]. Although Scheduled Tribe members account for only 1% of the population in Kerala State, there are clusters of tribal groups in some areas. The Panchayat in this study has a population of 16,110 of whom 28% have Scheduled Tribe affiliations. Three out of five Scheduled Tribe members in the Panchayat are Paniyas, who make up one-fifth of Kerala’s Scheduled Tribe population [24]. Historically, Paniyas were bonded labourers. Today they are predominantly landless agricultural labourers who tend to migrate for employment opportunities. Paniyas also face social marginalisation, high levels of impoverishment, and poor access to health care [25]. Small numbers of other tribal groups who have living standards similar to the general population are also found in the Panchayat. The Kuruchian constitutes the large majority of “other Scheduled Tribes” in this area (94% of non-Paniyas).

We draw on data from a health survey approved by the ethics committee of University of Montreal. Households were selected from a sampling frame with the complete list of households in the Gram Panchayat, developed by conducting a census. The list was stratified by location in 10 Panchayat wards and 17 percent of households were selected in each ward. A total of 543 households were selected through a circular systematic random sampling process; house numbers were arranged in a circular manner and every sixth household was selected. Over-sampling of the tribal population (n = 226) was done by surveying all households in a tribal colony where one household had been randomly sampled. Each individual belonging to the household was interviewed, with the exception of minors (<18 y). Members were asked to respond to a standard questionnaire and underwent a physical examination by trained health personnel. Four health conditions common in populations prior to an epidemiologic transition (underweight, anaemia, goitre and tuberculosis) and one health condition common in the post-transition period (hypertension) were assessed. These measures enabled us to explore various patterns of morbidity associated with nutritional deficiencies as well as the epidemiologic transition.

Weight and height were measured using standard methods [26]; underweight was defined as body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2[27]. Pallor of the conjunctivae, tongue and nails was used to assess anaemia status [28]. Goitre was assessed by palpation of the thyroid gland [29]. Blood pressure was measured twice and the mean of the two readings was used for analyses. Hypertension was defined as the mean ≥140 and/or 90 mm Hg [30]. Suspected tuberculosis cases (cases eligible for sputum examination) were defined as either coughing for at least one week during the last four weeks and having had moderate fever at night in the last four weeks, or having had a positive tuberculosis test in the last 12 months [31].

To explore the health divide in adults, we compared individual age- and sex-standardised prevalence for morbidity measures. Standardised rates were computed using a direct method with the total study population as the standard population. Weights were assigned to generate representative estimates. Household caste or tribal affiliations were assigned to the three social groups conventionally used by the Government of India: Forward Castes (the most privileged), Other Backward Classes (a residual group of low castes), and the lowest ranked group, Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes. The lowest group was further disaggregated by contrasting Paniyas with other Scheduled Tribe populations. To assess trends across age groups, analysis was done using three groups (18–30 vs. 31–59 vs. 60–96 y). The socioeconomic status of households was defined in three ways. The local administration classifies households as above (APL) or below (BPL) the poverty line using a three-step approach: households with land or asset holdings and a certain minimum income are considered APL; the poorest (destitute households, Maha Dalits, single women, households with disabled persons as breadwinner, households headed by minors) are considered BPL; and the remaining households are ranked based on a quality of life score (based on 13 parameters such as type of house, availability of clothes, sanitation, literacy, means of livelihood and indebtedness). In addition, we used household landholdings of more than 50 cents of land (100 cents is equal to 1 acre) and crowding (ratio of individuals to rooms ≥3) as indicators of socioeconomic status [32].

Multi-level logistic regression models were used to estimate the predicted prevalence of morbidity for each age and social group, controlling for other covariates. Estimates were based on the current distribution of poverty and education across caste-age groups and the local population sex ratio. Random effect models were used to adjust for clustering at the household level and provide robust standard error estimates.

To further explore the sources of the health gap between tribal and non-tribal groups, we used a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition [33, 34]. This technique enables us to quantify the part of the health gap due to group differences in the distribution of health determinants and the part due to differences in the effects of these determinants. The first component reflects differences in observable characteristics (endowments) between groups. The latter measures the part of the gap that remains unexplained after these characteristics are taken into account and is often seen as an indication of a discriminatory effect. In reality, the unexplained gap might reflect discrimination [35] or unequal treatment [36] of the groups, and also differences in omitted determinants of health [37]. The larger this remaining gap, the more likely discrimination and other unobservable factors play a role in explaining the health gap. We applied the method to decompose the gap in the prevalence of underweight, anaemia and goitre between tribal and non-tribal groups first, and then between Paniyas and Other Scheduled Tribes. Observable characteristics included in the models were: age, sex, education, poverty status, land ownership, occupation (wage labourer), housing condition (crowding) and access to safe drinking water. Estimates were obtained with statistical routines designed for non-linear outcomes (fairlie.ado and ndecompose.ado) [38]. We used Stata version 11 software for all analyses.


Health assessments were completed for a total of 1660 adults aged 18 years and above. Of the initial 543 households, 20 could not be located (3.7%), and 21 out of the 2418 individuals (0.9%) refused to participate. Characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1 by social group. Inequalities are evident between Scheduled Tribe and non-tribe members for indicators of education and socioeconomic status. Over one-third of tribe members have no formal education compared to less than 10% of non-tribe members. The proportion of tribe members living in BPL households is two times higher than for non-tribe members. Among those who are employed, 74.1% of tribal and 40.7% of non-tribal members reported working as wage labourers. Inequalities within the Scheduled Tribes group are also observed. Lack of education is much higher among the Paniya compared to the other Scheduled Tribes. On average, 63.9% of Scheduled Tribe households own <50 cents land, but this ranges from 89.3% of Paniya to 50.2% of other Scheduled Tribes. Crowding is markedly higher among Paniya households compared to all other groups.

Table 1 Characteristics of study sample by social groups

Comparison of the age and sex standardised prevalence of morbidity between tribal and non-tribal groups (Figure 1) reveals a higher prevalence of underweight, anaemia and goitre among tribal members. When morbidity prevalence is further disaggregated by tribal and caste groups (Figure 2), a strong gradient is observed between social groups for underweight, anaemia and goitre, with the Paniya group having the highest prevalence, followed by the other Scheduled Tribes, and the lowest prevalence among Other Backward Class and Forward Caste members. Prevalence of suspected tuberculosis and hypertension is similar across the groups. (See Additional file 1 for non-standardised prevalence).

Figure 1

Morbidity across tribal and non-tribal groups (standardized by age and sex; error bars 95% CI).

Figure 2

Morbidity across social groups (standardized by age and sex; error bars 95% CI).

To examine trends among adults of different ages, morbidity was compared across social and age groups (Figure 3; goitre and tuberculosis are not shown owing to space constraints). For underweight and anaemia, a comparable social gradient is evident for all age groups, with the highest prevalence among the Paniya in each age group. Hypertension prevalence is positively associated with age group, as expected, for all social groups and is largely similar between social groups within the 31–59 y and 60–96 y age groups. However, within the youngest age group (18–30 y), a unique pattern is observed whereby Paniya members have a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension compared to young adults from Other Backward Class or Forward Caste groups.

Figure 3

Morbidity prevalence by age and social group.

The magnitude of excess morbidity was estimated by age group for each social group, with Forward Caste as the reference group (Table 2), adjusted for the local distribution of poverty and education across caste-age groups and the population sex ratio. Compared to a predicted prevalence of underweight of 27.1% (95% CI 18.8, 35.5) among Forward Caste members 18–30 y, the prevalence is 31 and 13 percentage points higher for Paniya and other Scheduled Tribe members, respectively. A similar pattern is seen in the two older age groups. The Paniya also have a significantly higher predicted prevalence of anaemia, between 11 and 14 percentage points, across all age groups. For hypertension, excess morbidity is only evident among Paniya adults 18–30 y, whose prevalence is 10 percentage points higher than among Forward Caste adults of the same age group (5.4%; 95% CI 1.6, 9.2). Hypertension in the two older age groups is similar across social groups, with the possible exception of older Paniya adults where a protective effect is suggested.

Table 2 Predicted excess morbidity (percentage points) by age and social group*

Figure 4 presents the predicted prevalence of morbidity for the poor (BPL) and non-poor (APL) within each social group, controlling for other covariates. These results highlight, again, the magnitude of the social gradient in health, but more importantly, they show that this social gradient holds for both the poor and the non-poor. There is no evidence in this context that poverty alone provides a satisfactory explanation for the existence of the health divide between tribes and non-tribes. This is further supported by the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition of the health gaps; Table 3 presents the overall results showing the proportion of the health gap explained by endowments (detailed results for the relative contribution of each of the covariates are presented in Additional file 2). Even after controlling for a large set of social determinants of health, an important health gap (difference in predicted prevalence) remains between tribes and non-tribes as well as between Paniyas and other Scheduled Tribes. For underweight and goitre, differences in endowments between tribes and non-tribes explain 54% and 42% of the health gap respectively; roughly half of the health gap remains unexplained. The results are similar for these two outcomes in the model comparing the Paniyas to other Scheduled Tribes. The situation is different for anaemia. The health divide between tribes and non-tribes for anaemia is largely explained by the inequality in the distribution of endowments between the two groups (86% of the health gap). But when contrasting the Paniyas with other tribal groups, the gap remains largely unexplained after taking into consideration the distribution of the socioeconomic factors. Sickle cell anaemia, a hereditary disease that is prevalent among the Paniya [39], may explain this difference in predicted prevalence of anaemia from the other tribes. Nonetheless, as expected, the analysis of the respective contributions of the major socioeconomic factors shows that the concentration of poverty and lack of education among the Scheduled Tribes contributes significantly to the excess morbidity observed in this group compared to the general population. The results are less clear for the health gap between Paniyas and other tribes.

Figure 4

Predicted prevalence of underweight, anaemia and hypertension by social group and poverty status (based on the distribution of education across caste-poverty groups and the local population sex ratio & age group).

Table 3 Decomposition of the health gap between (i) tribal and non tribal populations; and (ii) Paniya and Other Scheduled Tribe populations


Health inequalities are evident in a rural district of Kerala, with Scheduled Tribe members bearing a higher burden of morbidity compared to non-tribe groups. However, not all indigenous groups are equally disadvantaged. The largest tribal group, the Paniya, have higher unmet health needs compared to other Scheduled Tribes in this area, specifically with respect to underweight, anaemia and goitre. Comparison of morbidity across age groups reveals that this social gradient of inequality is apparent across generations. In contrast to levels observed in older adults, higher hypertension levels among young Paniya adults compared to their peers in other social groups point to a greater double burden of disease in this subgroup. Although tribal groups have higher levels of poverty, stratifying morbidity by household economic status does not change the gradient observed.

Strengths and limitations of study

This is the first study in Kerala, to our knowledge, to explore the extent of social inequalities in health between indigenous and non-indigenous people based on multiple clinical markers of morbidity. This allows us to quantify the vulnerability of indigenous groups across the spectrum of deteriorating health and disease, both in terms of morbidity resulting from the classical conditions of deprivation associated with poverty (anaemia, goitre, undernutrition and tuberculosis) and that associated with the epidemiologic transition (hypertension as a marker of cardiovascular risk). The limitations of our study lie first of all in the capacity to explore in greater depth how each disease process evolved. A more systematic study of each morbidity type would require biological and clinical investigations that go beyond the current population survey approach and objectives of the study. Secondly, none of the indicators assessed are able to reflect the situation unequivocally. Genetic differences between ethnic groups contribute to differences in attained adult height that may bias the validity of BMI <18.5 kg/m2 as a measure of underweight in this area; however, models including only adults with a height over 150 cm provided similar results. Anaemia was measured using clinical indicators associated with severe anaemia and may be more prevalent among the Paniya than other groups for genetic reasons, such as a higher prevalence of sickle cell disease [39, 40]. Nutritional deficiencies are not the only causative factor of goitre. Different survival rates across groups may have also moderated the gaps observed, given the lower life expectancy for the Paniyas and other Scheduled Tribes. Nonetheless the convergence of results and consistency of the patterns observed are reassuring and support the central hypothesis about the vulnerability of indigenous people, in particular the Paniyas.

Comparison with other studies

Heightened vulnerability of Scheduled Tribes to underweight [41, 42] and anaemia [6] has been shown in other studies at a national level. While the risk of underweight was associated with lower socioeconomic status in those studies and ours, the odds of being underweight were still nearly twice as high for tribe compared to non-tribe members in our study, independent of their household poverty status. Furthermore, despite the widespread improvement in education and other social determinants of health and nutrition, there is no evidence in our sample of a reduction in underweight prevalence among younger adults from any social group. This is consistent with findings from a study comparing underweight in Indian adults between national surveys in 1998–99 and 2005–06 [41]. During this period of time, underweight prevalence in women decreased by only three percentage points and no age-related changes in underweight prevalence were observed.

Despite the epidemiological transition taking place in Kerala State [43, 44] and the potential for heightened sensitivity to lifestyle-related chronic disease risk factors as a result of childhood undernutrition [45, 46], no major shift in disease burden was observed in our sample. Hypertension prevalence estimates in rural areas of India ranged from 10% to 20% in earlier studies [47], similar to the levels found in this study, but have been as high as 42% in a more recent study in Kerala [43]. The higher hypertension levels observed among young Paniya adults suggests a higher level of vulnerability to post-transition diseases in these adults at the lower rung of society, although we did not assess in this study the potential contribution of genetic factors. Stress or psychosocial adversity in these individuals may contribute to this vulnerability, as younger Paniya members have not experienced improved life and work opportunities, despite benefiting from increased education opportunities [16]. Chronic stress associated with social position has biological effects that may contribute specifically to social gradients in risk of coronary disease and other morbidity [48]. Psychosocial factors also directly affect health related behaviours such as smoking, diet, alcohol consumption and physical activity, which also play an important role in blood pressure regulation [49]. Further research into the specific factors contributing to hypertension in this subgroup is needed.

Overall, the accumulation of health deficits in the Paniya group is indicative of their heightened vulnerability in terms of high exposure to health risks and barriers to accessing health care [50]. It is also consistent with the Paniyas’ own perceptions as voiced in focus group discussions, in which numerous vulnerability traps related to a range of risk factors were identified, including poor health, landlessness, poverty, exposure to harsh environmental conditions (e.g. floods), alcohol use, colony isolation, and education deficits [25, 51]. The consistency between our survey findings and the views of the Paniyas themselves increases our confidence in the robustness of the results.

Although caste-related differences in Kerala may be lower than in other parts of India, the results of our study suggest that this social determinant still underlies overall inequality [52]. By disaggregating the analyses by groups that mirror the social caste hierarchy, we observed a consistent health gradient across these groups. Individuals with Forward Caste affiliations are in better health compared to Other Backward Classes, who in turn are in better health than Scheduled Tribes, with Paniyas having the poorest health. A similar gradient in risk factors for ill health across the four groups was also observed (data not shown). An earlier study among women in this area also showed inequalities across caste groups in women’s perceived health, measured by self-reported health and limitations in daily activity [53].

Excluding the case of anaemia, roughly half of the health gap between tribes and non-tribes remains unexplained by differences in endowments. Our results correspond with those of Das [36] and Borooah [54] on the inequalities of poverty in India. In their respective studies, the authors found that the greater part of the difference in poverty rates between Scheduled Tribes and the general population was attributable to differences in coefficients rather than endowments; a result seen as “a likely indication of discrimination” [36]. In a recent study aimed at decomposing malnutrition inequalities in India, Van de Poel and Speybroeck [55] found that more than one-third of the malnutrition gap was attributable to differences in the effects of health determinants after controlling for a large set of explanatory variables.

Can the observed health gradient be explained solely by the concentration of poverty among tribal groups? Our results suggest not and are in contrast to others that suggest caste is diminishing in its importance in determining social status and associated health inequalities in India [56]. A recent study on mortality showed mixed results, with evidence for attenuation of caste differences when adjusted for living standards in the working age group (19–64 y) but a strong influence of caste in younger age groups, even after controlling for standard of living [3]. In our study of adults, the health gradient between social groups was still evident among those of similar economic status, indicating that health inequalities are rooted in social structures much deeper than material deprivation. The Blinder Oaxaca decomposition supports this position; differences in the effects of health determinants appear to play an important role. The unexplained part of the health gap reflects differences in the processes that generate health outcomes across social groups. It is likely that a significant part of this gap is driven by discriminatory practices and differential rates of returns on endowments for tribal and non tribal populations, especially since differences in endowments between indigenous and non-indigenous groups (poverty status, occupation, education, housing conditions, etc.) are themselves largely attributable to past exclusion and discrimination practices [36].


In this paper, we used clinical measures of morbidity, supporting other studies that found a social gradient in mortality and self perceived measures of health [3, 53]. Our findings highlight that this gradient is not solely explained by differences in material deprivation, suggesting that other factors, such as social exclusion and caste discrimination, are also important [57]. There is a need for future research to systematically test the role of discrimination in the health of Scheduled Tribes and other marginalised groups in India.

Even in the egalitarian state of Kerala, the health of Scheduled Tribes continues to lag behind other social groups. Moreover, significant health inequalities also exist within these tribal populations, with one tribe having very distinct needs compared to others in our study context. This necessitates moving beyond the standard approach of categorising all tribes as one equally disadvantaged group. Policies and programmes designed to benefit the Scheduled Tribes need to be tailored to not only promote the well-being of tribes in general but also to target the specific needs of each tribe, needs that differ both in nature and severity. Furthermore, these policies “cannot be limited to enhancing endowments” [36] but must also enhance the capacity of the disadvantaged to equally take advantage of these endowments. Improving the health of Scheduled Tribes will likely require multi-pronged efforts that try to address the very roots of inequality, discrimination and social injustice that constrains their opportunities to live healthy lives.


  1. 1.

    Cunningham C: Health of indigenous peoples. BMJ. 2010, 340: c1840-10.1136/bmj.c1840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Subramanian SV, Smith GD, Subramanyam M: Indigenous Health and Socioeconomic Status in India. PLoS Medicine. 2006, 3 (10): 1794-1804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Subramanian SV, Nandy S, Irving M, Gordon D, Lambert H, Davey Smith G: The mortality divide in India: the differential contributions of gender, caste, and standard of living across the life course. Am J Public Health. 2006, 96 (5): 818-825. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.060103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kaulagekar A, Radkar A: Social status makes a difference: tuberculosis scenario during National Family Health Survey-2. Indian journal of tuberculosis. 2007, 54 (1): 17-23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bawdekar M, Ladusingh L: Contextual correlates of child malnutrition in rural Maharashtra. J Biosoc Sci. 2008, 40 (5): 771-786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bharati P, Som S, Chakrabarty S, Bharati S, Pal M: Prevalence of anemia and its determinants among nonpregnant and pregnant women in India. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2008, 20 (4): 347-359. 10.1177/1010539508322762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nayar KR: Social exclusion, caste & health: a review based on the social determinants framework. Indian J Med Res. 2007, 126 (4): 355-363.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ghosh R, Bharati P: Women’s status and health of two ethnic groups inhabiting a periurban habitat of Kolkata City, India: a micro-level study. Health Care Women Int. 2005, 26 (3): 194-211. 10.1080/07399330590917753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Basu SK: A health profile of tribal India. Health for the millions. 1994, 2 (2): 12-14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Neufeld KJ, Peters DH, Rani M, Bonu S, Brooner RK: Regular use of alcohol and tobacco in India and its association with age, gender, and poverty. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005, 77 (3): 283-291. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.08.022.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nanda S, Tripathy M: Reproductive morbidity, treatment seeking behaviour and fertility: a study of scheduled caste and tribe women. J Hum Ecol. 2005, 18 (1): 77-83.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Meher R: Livelihood, poverty and morbidity: a study on health and socio-economic status of the tribal population in Orissa. Journal of Health Management. 2007, 9 (3): 343-367. 10.1177/097206340700900303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dolla CK, Meshram P, Verma A, Shrivastav P, Karforma C, Patel ML, Kousal LS: Health and morbidity profile of Bharias - a primitive tribe of Madhya Pradesh. J Hum Ecol. 2006, 19 (2): 139-141.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Levesque JF, Haddad S, Narayana D, Fournier P: Outpatient care utilization in urban Kerala, India. Health Policy Plan. 2006, 21 (4): 289-301. 10.1093/heapol/czl013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Levesque JF, Haddad S, Narayana D, Fournier P: Affording what’s free and paying for choice: comparing the cost of public and private hospitalizations in urban Kerala. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2007, 22 (2): 159-174. 10.1002/hpm.879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xaxa V: Protective discrimination: why scheduled tribes lag behind scheduled castes. Economic and Political Weekly. 2001, July 21: 2765-2772.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kakkoth S: The Primitive Tribal Groups of Kerala: A Situational Appraisal. Studies of Tribes and Tribals. 2005, 3 (1): 47-55.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mohanti BB: Land distribution among scheduled castes and tribes. Economic and Political Weekly. 2001, Oct 6: 3857-3868.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Deshpande A: Assets versus Autonomy? The Changing Face of the Gender-Caste Overlap in India. Feminist Economics. 2002, 8 (2): 19-35. 10.1080/13545700210160005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    India Ministry of Tribal Affairs: The National Tribal Policy: a Policy for the Scheduled Tribes of India. 2004, In. New Delhi: Ministry of Tribal Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Nair KN, Banerjee A: Structural changes in land distribution and its implications for improving access to land. Shaping India: Land, Population, Institutions and State in Historical Perspective. 2011, Population Institutions and State in Historical Perspective. Edited by Narayana D, Mahadevan R. New Delhi: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Basnyat B, Rajapaksa LC: Cardiovascular and infectious diseases in South Asia: the double whammy. BMJ. 2004, 328 (7443): 781-10.1136/bmj.328.7443.781.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Haddad S, Narayana D, Mohindra KS: Reducing inequalities in health and access to health care in a rural Indian community: an India-Canada collaborative action research project. BMC International Health and Human Rights, Under Review

  24. 24.

    Registrar General I: Census of India 2001: Kerala data highlights, the scheduled tribes. 2001, Office of the Registrar General, India, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mohindra KS, Narayana D, Haddad S: “My story is like a goat tied to a hook.” Views from a marginalized tribal group in Kerala (India) on the consequences of falling ill: a participatory poverty and health assessment. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010, 64 (6): 488-494. 10.1136/jech.2008.086249.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cogill B: Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide. 2003, Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) Project, Academy for Educational Development (AED), Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004, 363 (9403): 157-163.

  28. 28.

    WHO/UNICEF/UNU: Iron deficiency anaemia assessment, prevention and control: a guide for programme managers. 2001, World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Janis C: Physical examination and health assessment. 2000, Philadelphia: Saunders, 3rd

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Whitworth JA: 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003, 21 (11): 1983-1992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    WHO: Tuberculosis prevalence surveys: a handbook. 2011, World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Narayana D, Haddad S, Mohindra KS, Feletto M, Aravind S: Poverty profile of Kottathara Panchayat. Profile no 2. Unpublished Report. 2005, Centre for Development Studies/Université de Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Blinder AS: Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural variables. Journal of Human Resources. 1973, 8: 436-455. 10.2307/144855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Oaxaca R: Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review. 1973, 14 (October): 693-709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jann B: The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. The Stata Journal. 2008, 8 (4): 453-479.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Das MB, Hall G, Kapoor S, Nikitin D: India: the scheduled tribes. Indigenous Peoples, Poverty and Development. Edited by: Hall GH, Patrinos HA. 2012, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jimenez-Rubio D, Hernandez-Quevedo C: Inequalities in the use of health services between immigrants and the native population in Spain: what is driving the differences?. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care. 2011, 12 (1): 17-28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fairlie RW: An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement. 2005, 30: 305-316.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Feroze M, Aravindan K: Sickle-cell disease among tribals of Attappady. 2004, Integrated Rural Technology Centre, Palakkad, India

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Feroze M, Aravindan KP: Sickle cell disease in Wayanad, Kerala: gene frequencies and disease characteristics. Natl Med J India. 2001, 14 (5): 267-270.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Subramanian SV, Perkins JM, Khan KT: Do burdens of underweight and overweight coexist among lower socioeconomic groups in India?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 90 (2): 369-376. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27487.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Subramanian SV, Smith GD: Patterns, distribution, and determinants of under- and overnutrition: a population-based study of women in India. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2006, 84 (3): 633-640.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Soman CR, Kutty VR, Safraj S, Vijayakumar K, Rajamohanan K, Ajayan K: All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality in Kerala State of India: Results From a 5-Year Follow-up of 161 942 Rural Community Dwelling Adults. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sathish T, Kannan S, Sarma PS, Razum O, Thankappan KR: Incidence of hypertension and its risk factors in rural Kerala, India: A community-based cohort study. Public health. 2012, 126 (1): 25-32. 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.11.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Miranda JJ, Kinra S, Casas JP, Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S: Non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: context, determinants and health policy. Trop Med Int Health. 2008, 13 (10): 1225-1234. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02116.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal PC, Martorell R, Richter L, Sachdev HS: Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet. 2008, 371 (9609): 340-357. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Gupta R: Trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. J Hum Hypertens. 2004, 18 (2): 73-78. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001633.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Brunner E: Stress and the biology of inequality. BMJ. 1997, 314 (7092): 1472-1476. 10.1136/bmj.314.7092.1472.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hemingway H, Marmot M: Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 1999, 318 (7196): 1460-1467. 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1460.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Mukherjee S, Haddad S, Narayana D: Social class related inequalities in household health expenditure and economic burden: evidence from Kerala, south India. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2011, 10 (1): 1-10.1186/1475-9276-10-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mohindra KS, Narayana D, Anushreedha SS, Haddad S: Alcohol use and its consequences in South India: Views from a marginalised tribal population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011, 117 (1): 70-73. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.12.021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Deshpande A: Does caste still define disparity? A look at inequality in Kerala, India. The American Economic Review. 2000, 90 (2): 322-325. 10.1257/aer.90.2.322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mohindra KS, Haddad S, Narayana D: Women’s health in a rural community in Kerala, India: do caste and socioeconomic position matter?. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006, 60 (12): 1020-1026. 10.1136/jech.2006.047647.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Borooah V: Caste, inequality, and poverty in India. Review of Development Economics. 2005, 9 (3): 399-414. 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2005.00284.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Van de Poel E, Speybroeck N: Decomposing malnutrition inequalities between Scheduled Castes and Tribes and the remaining Indian population. Ethnicity & Health. 2009, 14 (3): 271-287. 10.1080/13557850802609931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Subramanian SV, Ackerson LK, Subramanyam MA, Sivaramakrishnan K: Health inequalities in India: the axes of stratification. Brown Journal of World Affairs. 2008, XIV (2): 127-138.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Marmot M: Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9464): 1099-1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


We thank our partners and community members who supported the lengthy execution of this research. We are especially grateful to the Scheduled Tribe communities, community workers, Paniya representatives, and the families who were actively involved and ensured the success of this project. We also thank S. Aravind, M. Feletto, C.K. Harikrishnadas, S. Mukherjee, J.F. Lévesque, and T.R. Dilip for their involvement and important contributions to the health survey. We thank three anonymous reviewers, M.V. Zunzunegui, E. Freeman and P. Berti for their insightful comments on prior drafts of this manuscript.

This study was supported by the International Development Research Centre of Canada (grant number 101595-001). The funding source was not involved in any aspect of the study design, conduct, analysis, or interpretation.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slim Haddad.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors’ declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SH, KM and DN conceived the study. SH and KS wrote the first draft, and the paper was edited by all authors. SH, GM, and KS did the statistical analysis. All authors interpreted the data, critically revised the draft, and gave approval for the paper to be published. All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. SH is guarantor. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1 : Tables presenting non-standardized morbidity prevalence across groups. Table A: Morbidity across tribal and non-tribal groups (non-standardized). Table B: Morbidity across social groups (non-standardized). This additional file provides two supplementary tables presenting the non-standardized prevalence of morbidity for tribal and non-tribal groups (Table A) and for all social groups (Table B). (DOC 40 KB)


Additional file 2 : Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Detailed Regression Results. This additional file provides the detailed results for each Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition regression model, from which the results in Table 3 were summarized. (DOC 62 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haddad, S., Mohindra, K.S., Siekmans, K. et al. “Health divide” between indigenous and non-indigenous populations in Kerala, India: Population based study. BMC Public Health 12, 390 (2012).

Download citation


  • Health Inequality
  • Material Deprivation
  • Social Gradient
  • Suspected Tuberculosis
  • Tribal Population