Skip to main content

Sugar sweetened beverage consumption by Australian children: Implications for public health strategy



High consumption of sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) has been linked to unhealthy weight gain and nutrition related chronic disease. Intake of SSB among children remains high in spite of public health efforts to reduce consumption, including restrictions on marketing to children and limitations on the sale of these products in many schools. Much extant literature on Australian SSB consumption is out-dated and lacks information on several key issues. We sought to address this using a contemporary Australian dataset to examine purchase source, consumption pattern, dietary factors, and demographic profile of SSB consumption in children.


Data were from the 2007 Australian National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey, a representative random sample of 4,834 Australian children aged 2-16 years. Mean SSB intake by type, location and source was calculated and logistic regression models were fitted to determine factors associated with different levels of consumption.


SSB consumption was high and age-associated differences in patterns of consumption were evident. Over 77% of SSB consumed was purchased via supermarkets and 60% of all SSB was consumed in the home environment. Less than 17% of SSB was sourced from school canteens and fast food establishments. Children whose parents had lower levels of education consumed more SSB on average, while children whose parents had higher education levels were more likely to favour sweetened juices and flavoured milks.


SSB intake by Australian children remains high and warrants continued public health attention. Evidence based and age-targeted interventions, which also recognise supermarkets as the primary source of SSB, are recommended to reduce SSB consumption among children. Additionally, education of parents and children regarding the health consequences of high consumption of both carbonated and non-carbonated SSBs is required.

Peer Review reports


There has been a well-documented rise in the prevalence of overweight, obesity and lifestyle related diseases in the Australian population over recent decades [1]. Although recent evidence suggests that the prevalence of overweight and obesity in Australian children has plateaued [2], within the global context the current levels remain disturbingly high. Additionally, the significant associated costs to both the individual and community warrant continued public health focus and development of effective interventions.

Despite much research, and significant public health and media attention, prevention and effective long term treatment of excess weight gain and lifestyle related conditions remains elusive. Although it is likely that these conditions are due to a combination of factors, the rapid increase in their prevalence suggests changing environmental factors may play a significant role. One potential factor, which is temporally associated with the rise in overweight and obesity, is an increased consumption of refined carbohydrate [3].

Sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a significant source of refined carbohydrate in the diet of developed nations such as the United States and Australia [47]. Current research has attempted to examine the contribution of SSB consumption towards excess weight gain and disease. Notwithstanding differences in methodology, participants, definitions of SSBs and funding sources [8], well-designed longitudinal and prospective studies typically report positive associations between higher and more regular SSB consumption and detrimental health outcomes [9]. While the exact biological mechanisms which link SSB consumption and weight gain remain unknown, a number of plausible hypotheses have been proposed which explain how energy from SSB may bypass the homeostatic regulatory systems that control appetite and energy intake resulting in increased hunger, reduced satiety and excessive energy consumption. For example, incomplete compensation for calories consumed as liquids, in comparison to isocaloric solids, may contribute to excess energy intake and increased risk of weight gain and the high glycemic load typical of SSBs may reduce satiety and increase risk of disease. Additionally, the unique metabolic pathway of fructose may increase the risk of a number of short and long term negative health outcomes, and some evidence suggests high SSB consumption is linked with other poor dietary patterns which may further increase the risk of weight gain and disease [1012].

In recognition of the link between SSB and excess weight gain, the Australian Dietary Guidelines [13] recommend limiting the consumption of soft drink and cordial. Health advocacy groups, such as the Australian Medical Association [14] and Public Health Association of Australia [15] have called for a number of additional interventions to reduce SSB intake. Proposed measures include the taxation of nutritionally poor products such as soft drinks with generated revenue to be channelled into preventive programs and healthcare, restriction of the sale of soft drinks in schools, and limitations on the promotion and advertising of these products to children. These strategies mirror international efforts to reduce SSB consumption by children.

Despite the increased public health attention, additional restrictions on marketing, and limitations on the sale of these products in many schools, intake of SSBs by children remains high. Moreover, the extant literature lacks comprehensive descriptions of the nature of SSB consumption in Australia with respect to the source, pattern, demographic and other dietary factors associated with intake. We aim to address this by describing the major sources of SSB, the patterns of consumption, and demographic and dietary factors associated with high and regular consumption in a representative random sample of Australian children. Additionally, we sought to identify potential target areas for future public health intervention.



Data were from the 2007 Australian National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (NCNPAS), funded jointly by the Australian Government Department of Health and Aging, Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and industry group the Australian Food and Grocery Council. The NCNPAS was designed to assess the nutrient intake and physical activity levels of a representative sample of Australian children. Demographic, dietary, physical activity and basic anthropometric data were collected from 4,487 children aged between 2 and 16 years. Interviews were conducted from February through August of 2007.

Food, beverage and supplement intake was collected from participants and caregivers, for children 8 years and younger who required assistance, in two standardised multiple-pass 24 hour recalls. Additional information regarding usual dietary habits, including self- or caregiver reported usual daily intake of fruit and vegetables (number of serves), type of milk consumed, whether salt was added to cooking or meals, and type of salt used (iodised or non-iodised) was collected. This dietary intake information, in addition to socio-demographic data, was collected during a computer assisted personal interview (CAPI) and a second, follow up computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) was completed within 7 to 21 days. Height, weight, and waist circumference data were collected using recognised protocols [16]. The final sample, who provided socio-demographic information and a minimum of one day of dietary recall data, was 4,834. This represented 40% of eligible households. As demographic information was collected at the time of the CAPI, for families who were initially recruited but did not complete the personal interview due to study quotas being filled (n = 1,450) or withdrew part way (n = 502), no demographic information was available. Additionally, as random digit dialling was used in recruitment, there is no information about the characteristics of non-respondents. Further information on study methodology can be found in the NCNPAS User Guide [17].

Data treatment

Beverage classification

For the purpose of this analysis, beverages were classified as follows: water, non-flavoured milk, sugar sweetened beverages (SSB), pure fruit juice (no added sugar), hot tea and coffee (regardless of added sugar), alcohol, artificially sweetened diet beverages, and other (e.g. alcohol and vegetable juice). SSBs were further categorised into carbonated products (including energy drinks), juices with added sugar, cordial (defined as flavoured drink concentrate), sports drinks, milkshakes/smoothies, and flavoured milk. Flavoured milks included both low- and high-fat products as both have substantial sugar content and sugar levels were generally comparable.


Location of beverage consumption was provided on the NCNPAS dataset as: home or any other residence, place of purchase, institution (including school and childcare), during transport, leisure activity and other.


The source of beverage referred to where the product was purchased and included the following categories: fast food outlets including school canteens, packaged beverages purchased from supermarkets, and fresh products such as homemade juices, milkshakes or smoothies. As the contribution from fresh products was small, for analytic purposes this category was combined with products from unknown sources.

Levels of consumption

Children were classified as high, low-moderate or non-consumer of SSB based on their level of intake of SSB during the study period. Children whose SSB intake contributed more than one third of their total daily intake of beverages by volume were classified as high consumers. As the average volume of beverage consumed by children was approximately 1.4 litres per day, this cut-point was equivalent to slightly less than two glasses of SSB and approximately 50 grams of sugar per day. Those who reported no SSB consumption during the study were labelled non-consumers, and the remaining children were considered low-moderate consumers. Additionally, high consumption of each subgroup of SSB was classified separately. Children whose consumption was in the 90th percentile or above for each of the three main categories, carbonated drinks, sweetened juice or flavoured milk, were considered high consumers.

In order to investigate factors associated with regular intake, consumption on both days of dietary data collection was used as a proxy measure of regular SSB consumption. This analysis only included children who provided 2 days of completed dietary recall data (n = 4,633, 95.8%). Children who reported consuming SSB on both recall days were classified as regular consumers (n = 2,331). This classification was used as an additional measure of intake and it was unrelated to overall level of consumption. The majority of regular consumers (74%) were not considered high SSB consumers.

Demographic variables

Household variables

Household variables included the total annual household income (before tax) at the time of the survey and number of children living in the household. Family type was derived and categorised into original family, step or blended family, one parent family, and other (e.g. multi-generational families). The highest level of education achieved by either parent or caregiver within the household was categorised into university degree, vocational education (TAFE certificate or diploma), year 11-12 schooling, and year 10 schooling or below.

Maternal variables

Maternal age at the birth of the study child and breast feeding duration, as recalled by the mother, were included in modelling.

Child variables

Study age groups were selected to align with the Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand age bands [18]. Birth weight in grams was categorised into low (≤ 2500 g), normal (male > 2500 g-4200 g, female > 2500 g-4000 g) and high (male > 4200 g, female > 4000 g), and current body mass index was derived and compared to age and sex relevant criteria which allowed classification of participants as underweight, normal weight, overweight or obese [19].

Dietary variables

Dietary variables were based on the 2-day dietary recall data. Added sugar intake, excluding sugars from beverages and fruit, and saturated fat consumption were calculated as a percentage of total daily energy intakes from dietary recall data.

Average calcium intake was calculated from dietary recall data and compared to age and sex based recommended dietary intakes references. Average daily caffeine intake was similarly calculated and compared to age relevant cut-offs. As no Australian recommendations exist for intake of caffeine by children, values were compared to age-based Canadian recommendations [20]. In addition, parent and child reported usual daily intake of fruit and vegetables, which were collected at the time of the CATI, were included.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using SAS Version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) taking into account population weights and the complex survey design. Population level average intake was calculated using survey weights and associated standard errors were calculated using expansion in Taylor series and the ultimate cluster variance estimate technique [21]. Mean intakes were calculated for beverage category, SSB type, SSB source and location of SSB consumption. T-tests were used to determine the significance of comparisons included in this report.

Six logistic regression models were fitted, adjusting for the complex sample design, to evaluate the associations between demographic and dietary factors and high, no and regular SSB consumption. Factors associated with high consumption of the most commonly consumed sub-groups of SSBs, carbonated beverages, sweetened juices and flavoured milk, were determined. Sports drinks, smoothies/milkshakes and cordials contributed little to overall consumption, and therefore these categories of SSB were not included in sub-group analyses. Variables were eliminated from the final models if statistically non-significant, as determined by Wald's test (alpha = 0.05), and the most parsimonious model reported.

Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to investigate the effect of altering the cut-point used to define high SSB consumption. Logistic regression models were run using alternative cut-points (40, 25 and 20 per cent of daily beverage intake) in order to assess the impact on the strength and direction of results. The average difference between the results of these models was less than 10 per cent, and the use of different cut-points did not change the direction of any results, not did it affect the interpretation of the final models.


With respect to the general characteristics of the sample, comparisons with the national census figures [22] revealed differences between the study participants and the general Australian population (Table 1). Households participating in the NCNPAS typically had higher levels of education and income.

Table 1 Participant Characteristics

Approximately 14% of participants were considered high SSB consumers, 66% were low-moderate consumers and approximately 20% reported no SSB consumption on either study day (Table 1).

The contribution of SSB to total daily energy intake is displayed in Table 2. The proportion of total energy intake from SSB for high consumers was double that of low-moderate consumers (high consumers 14.2%, 95% CI = 13.7-14.7, Low-moderate 6.0%, 95% CI = 5.8-6.2, p < 0.001). Age related differences in the average contribution of SSB to total energy intake were evident. Older children consumed a significantly greater proportion of energy from SSB than younger children (2-3 year olds 4.0%, 95% CI = 3.7-4.3, 14-16 year olds 7.5%, 95% CI = 7.0-7.9, p < 0.001).

Table 2 Contribution of SSB to Total Daily Energy Intake, by Level of Consumption, Age Group and Sex

Age-associated differences in the contribution of SSB sub-categories to total intake were evident (Table 3). The main source of SSB in the diet of younger children was sweetened juice (2-3 year olds 39.9%, 95% CI = 36.7-43.2). For each successive age group we observed a greater mean contribution from carbonated beverages and, in children over 9 years of age, carbonated drinks were the primary type of SSB consumed (14-16 year olds 41.7%, 95% CI = 38.6-44.8, p < 0.001). There was no reduction in the volume of non-carbonated SSBs consumed among the older age groups to compensate for the higher carbonated SSB consumption (Table 4).

Table 3 Mean Contribution of SSB Subcategories to Total SSB Intake, by Age Group
Table 4 Mean Volume (mls) of SSB Subcategories Consumed, by Age Group

The majority of SSB was consumed at home (2-3 year olds 81.1%, 95% CI = 78.8-83.5, 4-8 year olds 67.2%, 95% CI = 64.4-70.0, 9-13 year olds 66.1%, 95% CI = 63.3-68.8, 14-16 year olds 63.1%, 95% CI = 60.6-65.6). The proportion of SSB consumed at the place of purchase, in institutions and during leisure activities and transport was higher in older age groups. However, even amongst the oldest children who reported the greatest variation in the location of consumption, over 60 per cent of SSB was still consumed in the home (Table 5).

Table 5 Proportion of SSB Consumed at Home, Place of Purchase, Institution and Other Locations

Supermarket purchased products were the main source of SSB in all age groups (2-3 year olds 87.9%, 95% CI = 85.9-90.0, 4-8 year olds 77.2%, 95% CI = 74.9-79.5, 9-13 year olds 76.2%, 95% CI = 73.8-78.6, 14-16 year olds 74.38%, 95% CI = 72.0-76.8). Although the average contribution of SSB from fast food sources was higher in successive age groups, it remained relatively small (2-3 year olds 9.3%, 95% CI = 7.3-11.2, 14-16 year olds 21.1%, 95% CI = 18.7-23.4, p < 0.001) (Table 6). Of note, as a result of difficulty in determining whether beverages consumed in institutions were supermarket purchased and brought from home or purchased at the institution, many SSBs consumed in this location were coded as from an unknown source (52%).

Table 6 Proportion of SSB from Supermarket, Fast Food and Unknown Place of Purchase

High consumption of SSB, defined as consumption which was greater than a third of daily beverage intake, was associated with older age groups, male gender, lower levels of household education and a number of markers of poor dietary patterns including lower intake of fresh fruit and vegetables, and high caffeine consumption (Table 7). Conversely, no SSB consumption was associated with younger age groups, higher levels of household education and markers of healthy dietary patterns. Both high and non-consumers were more likely to be below the recommended dietary intake of calcium than low-moderate SSB consumers.

Table 7 Factors Associated with High, No and Regular SSB Consumption

Regular intake of SSB, defined by consumption of SSB on both study days, was associated with older age groups, male gender, lower levels of household education, and low daily intake of fruit (Table 7). There was no significant relationship between regular consumption and vegetable or caffeine intake. Additionally, regular SSB consumers were less likely to be below the recommended dietary intake for calcium than irregular consumers.

Factors associated with high consumption of the three main sub-groups of SSB differed (Table 8). Whilst high intake of carbonated SSB was significantly associated with lower levels of household education, intakes of sweetened juice and flavoured milk did not vary with levels of household education. Similarly suggestive of an association between parental education and dietary choices, we observed that high consumption of carbonated drinks was associated with lower intake of fruit, but high consumption of flavoured milk and sweetened juice were not.

Table 8 Factors Associated with High Consumption of Carbonated Drinks, Sugar Sweetened Juice and Flavoured Milk


SSBs contributed a substantial amount of energy to the diet of Australian children with mean intakes ranging from 4 per cent in children 2-3 years old to 7.5 per cent in 14 to 16 year olds. These values are lower than those reported for US children (2-18 years) whose SSB intake is approximately 10 per cent of their energy intake [23]. However, given the growing evidence which suggests biological mechanisms linking high and regular consumption of SSBs with negative short and long term health outcomes [8], effective public health intervention to reduce levels of intake by Australian children is recommended.

The majority of SSB in the diet of children in all age groups was sourced from supermarkets and consumed at home. Only a small percentage of SSBs were purchased from fast food sources. Even among the 14-16 year age group, who typically would have a higher level of independence from parents and some discretionary spending compared with younger children, around 75 per cent of their SSB intake was purchased from supermarkets. These findings are similar to those of Wang and colleagues who reported, in a study of US children, 55 to 70 per cent of the calories from SSBs were consumed in the home environment [24]. Although public health strategies and interventions have traditionally focused on fast food sources of SSBs the results of this study suggest that in order to significantly reduce levels of intake by children aged 2-16 years, future strategies should shift their focus to supermarket purchased SSBs and at home consumption.

The variation in the pattern of SSB consumption by age is noteworthy. Of particular interest was the high consumption of sweetened juice by the 2-3 year old children. Similarly, Wang and colleagues reported, in US children, the main type of SSB consumed by children aged 2-5 years was sweetened fruit punch and fruit juice [24]. During a critical period of growth and development the high intake of sugary products is concerning. In addition to the early increased risk of weight gain and associated chronic disease, intake of SSBs at a young age has been linked to lower intake of milk and, as a result, lower intake of calcium, riboflavin, vitamin A and phosphorus [25]. Further, high intake of SSBs has been associated with dental caries [26], poor growth [27] and digestive issues in very young children [28]. In addition to the direct health consequences, there is some evidence to suggest that early food experiences influence later on-going food preferences and dietary patterns [29, 30]. At a young age when parents are likely to have almost complete control over a child's diet, replacing SSBs with unsweetened milk or water may be relatively easy. Further, the development of public health strategies to educate parents about the health implications of high consumption of sweetened fruit juice should be a priority. The differences in patterns of SSB consumption between age groups suggests that focused, age relevant interventions to target the main types, sources and locations of SSB intake is likely to improve the effectiveness of strategies.

The demographic and dietary factors associated with high consumption of carbonated SSBs and non-carbonated SSBs differed. While high consumption of carbonated drinks was related to a number of markers of unhealthy dietary patterns and lower levels of household education, non-carbonated SSBs were not. These findings are similar to those of Ranjit and colleagues who reported that high carbonated beverage consumption was associated with poor dietary and physical activity patterns in US children, while consumption of non-carbonated drinks was associated with positive health behaviours [31]. The variation in factors associated with carbonated and non-carbonated SSBs suggests differences in public perception. Non-carbonated SSBs are typically marketed based on health-related claims, or as functional beverages which contribute to a healthy balanced diet and active lifestyle. In contrast, carbonated SSBs have been heavily targeted by public health advocates. These easily identifiable products are well recognised as 'junk foods' with little nutritional value and consumption of these products is likely to be limited in health conscious families. Additionally, the Australian Dietary Recommendations [13] and Australian Guide to Healthy Eating [32], which mirror the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, suggest limiting intakes of soft drinks, cordials and/or sweetened drinks [13] but do not make explicit whether flavoured milks and sugar sweetened juices are included within this recommendation. Therefore a key step in reducing the intake of SSB appears to be education of the population regarding the health consequences of high and regular consumption of both carbonated SSBs and non-carbonated SSBs, and the role of these products in a healthy and balanced diet. Future public health guidelines should make explicit appropriate intakes and serving sizes for children and make clear recommendations for both carbonated and non-carbonated products.

Using the various definitions of high and regular intake we consistently found SSB intake to be associated with markers of poor dietary patterns. For example, high intake of caffeine, and lower intake of calcium, fruit and vegetables. This finding is supported by previous literature linking SSB consumption with unhealthy dietary habits [10]. However, in contrast with much of the previous literature [8, 9] there was no significant association between high or regular consumption of SSB and likelihood of being overweight or obese. This may be due to the cross-sectional study design. As reported dietary patterns are likely to be influenced by current weight status, drawing statistically valid and meaningful inferences from cross sectional data regarding the relationship between SSB consumption and risk of weight gain is impossible.

Growing evidence supports a mechanistic link between the high sugar, and specifically high fructose, content of SSBs and the risk of chronic disease and excess weight gain. The unique metabolic and hormonal effects of fructose are linked to a number of adverse short-term effects including enhanced de novo lipogenesis and triglyceride production resulting in dyslipidaemia, increased systolic blood pressure, reduced insulin and leptin sensitivity, impaired appetite control and visceral adiposity [3336]. These conditions may contribute to an increased risk of longer term chronic health conditions such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cardio-renal disease, and obesity [37, 38]. As common caloric sweeteners such as sucrose, high fructose corn syrup and fruit juice concentrate have relatively high concentrations of fructose they have similar metabolic effects [12]. Therefore, increasing public awareness of the dangers associated with high intake of caloric sweeteners in the diets of children should be of great concern to public health advocates.

The current analysis is limited by its reliance on 2-day dietary recall, a cross sectional study design and the potential for misclassification of beverage type or source. As individual consumption was based on 2 days of dietary recall it is possible that individual consumption on the survey days was not representative of their typical consumption patterns, in particular, for children who did not consume SSBs. However, as the survey days were randomly selected for each survey child, population estimates of average consumption of SSB should be unbiased. As data were self-reported, actual consumption may vary from recorded intakes. Further, the involvement of the parent or caregiver in dietary data collection in younger children (2-8 years) may have potentially influenced the accuracy of results. However, these biases are likely to underestimate the consumption of unhealthy foods such as SSBs and therefore reported intakes are likely to be biased towards the null, leading to an underestimation of the reported associations. The cross-sectional design means it is impossible to associate current consumption with the development of long term health outcomes such as obesity or chronic disease. Due to the use of random digit dealing for participant recruitment no demographic information was available for non-respondents. As a result, differences between study participants and non-respondents could not be determined and potential bias between these groups could not be assessed. However, households participating in NCNPAS typically had slightly higher levels of education and income in comparison to the general Australian population, and this could potentially bias results and limit the generalizability of the research.


These findings reveal opportunities to close possible gaps in public understanding of the role of both carbonated and non-carbonated SSBs in a healthy diet. Additionally, they highlight the need for evidence based, and age relevant public health interventions which target the primary sources and location of SSB consumption in order to effectively reduce levels of intake by Australian children. Finally, the importance of periodic monitoring of child health and nutrition status, to allow public health strategies to remain effective and relevant to the changing needs of the population, is clear.


  1. 1.

    Booth ML, Chey T, Wake M, Norton K, Hesketh K, Dollman J, Robertson I: Change in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among young Australians, 1969-1997. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 77 (1): 29-36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Olds TS, Tomkinson GR, Ferrar KE, Maher CA: Trends in the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity in Australia between 1985 and 2008. Int J Obes. 2010, 34 (1): 57-66. 10.1038/ijo.2009.211.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Slyper AH: The pediatric obesity epidemic: causes and controversies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89 (6): 2540-2547. 10.1210/jc.2003-031449.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Somerset SM: Refined sugar intake in Australian children. Publ Health Nutr. 2003, 6 (8): 809-813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bleich SN, Wang YC, Wang Y, Gortmaker SL: Increasing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among US adults: 1988-1994 to 1999-2004. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89 (1): 372-381.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM: Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010, 110 (10): 1477-1484. 10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Duffey KJ, Popkin BM: Shifts in patterns and consumption of beverages between 1965 and 2002. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15 (11): 2739-2747. 10.1038/oby.2007.326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD: Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2007, 97 (4): 667-675. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.083782.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB: Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84 (2): 274-288.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bes-Rastrollo M, Sanchez-Villegas A, Gomez-Gracia E, Martinez JA, Pajares RM, Martinez-Gonzalez MA: Predictors of weight gain in a Mediterranean cohort: the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Study 1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83 (2): 362-370. quiz 394-365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ambrosini GL, Oddy WH, Robinson M, O'Sullivan TA, Hands BP, de Klerk NH, Silburn SR, Zubrick SR, Kendall GE, Stanley FJ, et al: Adolescent dietary patterns are associated with lifestyle and family psycho-social factors. Publ Health Nutr. 2009, 12 (10): 1807-1815. 10.1017/S1368980008004618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres JP, Hu FB: Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010, 121 (11): 1356-1364. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    National Health and Medical Research Council: Dietary Guidelines for children and adolescents in Australia Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. 2003

  14. 14.

    AMA Position Statement on Obesity - 2009. []

  15. 15.

    2010 Federal Election Policy Priorities. []

  16. 16.

    Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart A, Carter L: International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. 2006, Potchefstroom, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Univeristy of South Australia, CSIRO, I-view: User Guide - 2007 National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. 2007

  18. 18.

    Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand. []

  19. 19.

    Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA: Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. Br Med J. 2007, 335 (7612): 194-10.1136/bmj.39238.399444.55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    It's Your Health - Caffeine. []

  21. 21.

    Wolter K: Introduction to Variance Estimation. New York. 2006

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS): 2006 Census of Population and Housing Australia. Canberra. 2006

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM: Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001. Am J Preventitive Med. 2004, 27 (3): 205-210. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang YC, Bleich SN, Gortmaker SL: Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among US children and adolescents, 1988-2004. Pediatrics. 2008, 121 (6): e1604-1614. 10.1542/peds.2007-2834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Harnack L, Stang J, Story M: Soft drink consumption among US children and adolescents: nutritional consequences. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999, 99 (4): 436-441. 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00106-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Marshall TA, Levy SM, Broffitt B, Warren JJ, Eichenberger-Gilmore JM, Burns TL, Stumbo PJ: Dental caries and beverage consumption in young children. Pediatrics. 2003, 112 (3 Pt 1): e184-191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Smith MM, Lifshitz F: Excess fruit juice consumption as a contributing factor in nonorganic failure to thrive. Pediatrics. 1994, 93 (3): 438-443.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Committee on Nutrition: The Use and Misuse of Fruit Juice in Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2001, 107 (5): 1210-1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Skinner JD, Carruth BR, Wendy B, Ziegler PJ: Children's food preferences: a longitudinal analysis. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002, 102 (11): 1638-1647. 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90349-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fiorito LM, Marini M, Mitchell DC, Smiciklas-Wright H, Birch LL: Girls' early sweetened carbonated beverage intake predicts different patterns of beverage and nutrient intake across childhood and adolescence. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010, 110 (4): 543-550. 10.1016/j.jada.2009.12.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ranjit N, Evans MH, Byrd-Williams C, Evans AE, Hoelscher DM: Dietary and activity correlates of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among adolescents. Pediatrics. 2010, 126 (4): e754-761. 10.1542/peds.2010-1229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Department of Health and Family Services: The Australian guide to healthy eating. 1998, Canberra DHFS

  33. 33.

    Basciano H, Federico L, Adeli K: Fructose, insulin resistance, and metabolic dyslipidemia. Nutr Metab. 2005, 2 (1): 5-10.1186/1743-7075-2-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jalal DI, Smits G, Johnson RJ, Chonchol M: Increased fructose associates with elevated blood pressure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010, 21 (9): 1543-1549. 10.1681/ASN.2009111111.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, Griffen SC, Bremer AA, Graham JL, Hatcher B, Cox CL, Dyachenko A, Zhang W, et al: Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119 (5): 1322-1334. 10.1172/JCI37385.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Teff KL, Elliott SS, Tschop M, Kieffer TJ, Rader D, Heiman M, Townsend RR, Keim NL, D'Alessio D, Havel PJ: Dietary fructose reduces circulating insulin and leptin, attenuates postprandial suppression of ghrelin, and increases triglycerides in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89 (6): 2963-2972. 10.1210/jc.2003-031855.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, Kang DH, Gersch MS, Benner S, Sanchez-Lozada LG: Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86 (4): 899-906.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Miller A, Adeli K: Dietary fructose and the metabolic syndrome. Curr Opin Gastroenterology. 2008, 24 (2): 204-209. 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282f3f4c4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


This study was funded by a program grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (Grant Number 572742). The public use file from the National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey was provided by the Australian Social Science Data Archive on behalf of the Commonwealth Scientific Industrial and Research Organisation and the University of Adelaide, who conducted the survey. The survey was funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, and the Australian Food and Grocery Council. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors. The organisations that funded and conducted the survey are responsible for the initial data only, and are not responsible for the analyses, interpretations or conclusions reached by the authors.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Hafekost.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

KH, FM and DL conceived the original idea for the study. All authors contributed to the development of the study methodology. KH undertook the data analysis and wrote the first draft of manuscript. All authors contributed to writing the paper, and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hafekost, K., Mitrou, F., Lawrence, D. et al. Sugar sweetened beverage consumption by Australian children: Implications for public health strategy. BMC Public Health 11, 950 (2011).

Download citation


  • Sugar Sweetened Beverage
  • Excess Weight Gain
  • Australian Child
  • Computer Assisted Telephone Interview
  • Carbonate Drink