Case-based reported mortality associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection in the Netherlands: the 2009-2010 pandemic season versus the 2010-2011 influenza season
In contrast to seasonal influenza epidemics, where the majority of deaths occur amongst elderly, a considerable part of the 2009 pandemic influenza related deaths concerned relatively young people. In the Netherlands, all deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection had to be notified, both during the 2009-2010 pandemic season and the 2010-2011 influenza season. To assess whether and to what extent pandemic mortality patterns were reverting back to seasonal patterns, a retrospective analyses of all notified fatal cases associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection was performed.
Methods
The notification database, including detailed information about the clinical characteristics of all notified deaths, was used to perform a comprehensive analysis of all deceased patients with a laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection. Characteristics of the fatalities with respect to age and underlying medical conditions were analysed, comparing the 2009-2010 pandemic and the 2010-2011 influenza season.
Results
A total of 65 fatalities with a laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection were notified in 2009-2010 and 38 in 2010-2011. During the pandemic season, the population mortality rates peaked in persons aged 0-15 and 55-64 years. In the 2010-2011 influenza season, peaks in mortality were seen in persons aged 0-15 and 75-84 years. During the 2010-2011 influenza season, the height of first peak was lower compared to that during the pandemic season. Underlying immunological disorders were more common in the pandemic season compared to the 2010-2011 season (p = 0.02), and cardiovascular disorders were more common in the 2010-2011 season (p = 0.005).
Conclusions
The mortality pattern in the 2010-2011 influenza season still resembled the 2009-2010 pandemic season with a peak in relatively young age groups, but concurrently a clear shift toward seasonal patterns was seen, with a peak in mortality in the elderly, i.e. ≥ 75 years of age.
Background
In 2009, the rapid spread of an emerging influenza virus, A(H1N1) of swine origin, resulted in the first pandemic of the 21st century [1]. This pandemic influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus has led to a limited outbreak in the Netherlands with, as in many other countries, generally mild illnesses in the majority of patients [2, 3]. The pandemic was considerably less lethal than was expected, with a low overall case fatality rate [4, 5]. Nevertheless, a considerable part of the pandemic influenza related deaths concerned relatively young persons (mainly young and middle aged adults) [3, 5–8]. This is contrary to seasonal influenza epidemics, where deaths occur mainly amongst elderly aged 65 years or older [9–11].
In the Netherlands, all deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection had to be notified since 30 April 2009. This mandatory notification remained in place during the influenza season 2010-2011, which in Europe has been characterized predominantly by the influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus, and to a lesser extent influenza virus type B [12, 13].
The national notification system provided detailed information of the clinical characteristics of all deaths associated with a laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection in the Netherlands. We performed a retrospective analysis of all fatalities, comparing the 2009-2010 pandemic season with the 2010-2011 influenza season, aiming to assess whether and to what extent pandemic mortality patterns concerning age distribution and underlying conditions were reverting to seasonal patterns.
Methods
Data collection
In the Netherlands, laboratory investigation was indicated for all hospitalised and/or deceased patients with suspected influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus during the 2009-2010 pandemic as well as the 2010-2011 influenza season. Following laboratory confirmation of influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection, name and clinical characteristics of hospitalised and deceased patients had to be reported to the municipal health service (MHS) by both the attending medical doctor and the head of the involved microbiology laboratory. The MHS entered the notifications into a national anonymous and password-protected web-based database, including structured questions about patient demographics and information on underlying medical conditions, treatments, clinical presentation, and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). In the pandemic season 2009-2010, additional information on underlying conditions for deceased patients was collected by the Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb) of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) in consultation with the MHS and subsequently added to the notification database.
Data analysis
The notification database was used to perform a comprehensive analysis of all deceased patients with a laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection. Ethical approval was not required for this study as only anonymous data were used, and no (medical) interventions were made on human subjects.
Based on available clinical data, the underlying medical conditions were classified into nine groups: no underlying disorders, respiratory disorders, immunological disorders (including haematological malignancies), neurological disorders, intellectual disability (including Down syndrome), cardiovascular disorders, kidney and/or liver pathology, other non-specified malignancies and metabolic disorders. Distinction was made between patients with single and multiple underlying disorders. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all available clinical and epidemiological characteristics. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the 2009-2010 pandemic influenza season (week 30 2009 - week 39 2010) and the 2010-2011 influenza season (week 40 2010 - week 39 2011) with respect to binary variables, and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous variables. For both seasons, the pandemic influenza mortality rate per 100, 000 persons was calculated as the number of fatal pandemic influenza cases divided by the total Dutch population (determined on 1 January 2009 and 2010) * 100, 000. For this analysis, the patients were categorised in the following age groups:0-4, 5-14, 15-24, 25-34, ..., 75-84 and ≥ 85 years of age. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute).
Results
A total of 103 fatalities with a laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection were notified: 65 in the 2009-2010 pandemic season and 38 in 2010-2011 influenza season. No pregnancy-related pandemic influenza deaths were notified in either season. In 2009-2010, 61 of the 65 patients (94%) were admitted to hospital, 44 of them (68%) were admitted to the ICU, and 28 (43%) required mechanical ventilation because of respiratory insufficiency. In 2010/2011, 37 of the 38 fatalities (97%) were admitted to hospital, 27 of them (71%) to the ICU, and 23 (61%) required mechanical ventilation. No statistical significant differences between the two seasons were found for these variables.
Age distribution
The mean age of the deceased patients in 2009/2010 was lower compared to that in 2010/2011, respectively 41 and 53 years (p = 0.02). Figure 1 shows the mortality rate per age group based on the total Dutch population in 2009 and 2010. During the pandemic season, the population mortality rates peaked in children aged between 0 and 15 years of age and in persons aged between 55 and 64 years. In the 2010-2011 influenza season, the first peak was considerably lower, while the second peak shifted to persons aged between 75 and 84 years.
Figure 1
Population mortality rates for laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection per 100, 000 persons for the pandemic season 2009-2010 and the following season 2010-2011.
Clinical presentation
Data on clinical presentation was available for 42 of the 65 fatalities (65%) during the pandemic seasons and for 28 of the 38 (74%) during the 2010-2011 season (table 1). In both seasons, fatal cases presented mainly with respiratory symptoms (41%), including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), followed by systemic symptoms (17%).
Table 1
Clinical presentation reported for the deceased patients with a laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)2009 virus infection, the Netherlands 2009-2011 (n = 103)
Pandemic season
2009-2010
N = 65
Influenza season
2010-2011
N = 38
Clinical presentation
n
(%)
n
(%)
respiratory, including ARDS*
26
(40)
16
(42)
systemic
11
(17)
7
(18)
neurological
3
(5)
1
(3)
super infection
2
(3)
2
(5)
cardiovascular
-
2
(5)
unknown
23
(35)
10
(26)
* ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome
Immunological and respiratory disorders were the most commonly reported underlying medical conditions in the pandemic season, for respectively 23 (35%) and 22 (34%) of the 65 fatalities (table 2). In the 2010-2011 season, cardiovascular disorders and absence of medical underlying conditions were most common, respectively for 12 (32%) and 10 (26%) of the 38 deaths. Underlying immunological disorders were more common in the 2009-2010 compared to the 2010-2011 season (p = 0.02), while cardiovascular disorders were significantly more common in the 2010-2011 season (p = 0.005). Overall, multiple underlying conditions were reported for 27 of the 103 cases (26%). Particularly, intellectual disability (100%), cardiovascular (76%) and metabolic disorders (75%) were found in combination with other underlying conditions (data not shown).
Table 2
Underlying medical conditions of deceased patients with a laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)2009 virus infection, the Netherlands 2009-2011 (n = 103)
Pandemic season
2009-2010
N = 65
Influenza season
2010-2011
N = 38
Underlying medical condition*
n
(%)
n
(%)
p
None**
10
(15)
10
(26)
0.3
Respiratory disorder
22
(34)
7
(18)
0.1
Immunological disorder#
23
(35)
5
(13)
0.02
Neurological disorder
9
(14)
4
(10)
0.9
Intellectual disability##
8
(12)
2
(5)
0.4
Cardiovascular disorders
5
(8)
12
(32)
0.005
Kidney/liver disorders
4
(6)
3
(8)
0.9
Malignancies###
2
(3)
3
(8)
0.5
Metabolic disorders
1
(2)
3
(8)
0.3
Multiple underlying disorders
17
(26)
10
(26)
> 0.9
* Patients with multiple underlying disorders are counted for every underlying medical condition. For one patient underlying medical condition was unknown.
** In one patient a group A streptococcal infection was confirmed after autopsy.
# Including haematological malignancies.
## Including Down syndrome.
### Other non-specified malignancies.
Discussion
The peak in mortality rates in persons aged between 55 and 64 years observed during the 2009-2010 pandemic, shifted to older age groups in the 2010-2011 influenza season. Furthermore, the peak in mortality rates in children younger than 15 years of age decreased considerably.
The decline of the peak in children might partly be explained by immunity in the youngest age groups, possibly related to high attack rates of influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus in children during the pandemic season or to persisting vaccine-induced immunity [14–16]. Although the infection attacks rates during the pandemic season were very low in the older adults (≥ 40 years), the shift of the peak in mortality rates towards older age groups observed in our study might indicate increased circulation of the virus in the 2010-2011 influenza season in these age groups [14].
A shift of the age-specific mortality pattern similar to that observed in our study is also described for the post-pandemic seasons following the three pandemics in the 20th century. During each of these earlier pandemics, persons younger then 65 years of age initially accounted for a high proportion of influenza-related deaths, followed by a declining proportion of deaths in the post-pandemic seasons [17]. Simonsen et al. [17] hypothesised that younger persons may retain long-lasting immunity better than older persons after exposure to a new influenza virus subtype.
Recent studies on risk factors for influenza A(H1N1) 2009 deaths concluded that the majority of severe pandemic cases as well as fatalities had underlying medical conditions as previously also associated with severe seasonal influenza [4, 8, 18–22]. Our results are in line with previous studies in which respiratory disorders and immunosuppressive conditions were frequently reported as underlying diseases [4–6, 18, 21]. Furthermore, neurological disorders have been reported to be common underlying diseases in fatal pandemic influenza cases, especially in children and young adults [5, 19]. Patients with neurological and neuromuscular disease have also been recognized as high-risk group for severe disease from seasonal influenza [23].
Our study showed a noticeable number of deceased patients (10%) with intellectual disability. Pérez-Padilla et al. [24] recently showed that Down syndrome was associated with adverse outcomes in cases of influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) during the first months of the outbreak A(H1N1) 2009 influenza virus. All intellectual disabled patients in our study also had other chronic underlying conditions, making it impossible to assess the specific role of intellectual disability as a risk factor for fatal influenza.
Although it has been reported that the A(H1N1) 2009 influenza virus caused severe illness and death in pregnant and postpartum women [25–27], as observed for seasonal influenza, no pregnancy-related pandemic influenza deaths were notified in the Netherlands. As we noted for intellectual disorders, also for pregnancy fatalities it is important to verify whether other chronic underlying conditions are present.
The relatively high number of fatalities with underlying cardiovascular disorders in the 2010-2011 influenza season might be associated with the shift of the mortality rates to elderly persons, since cardiovascular disorders are generally more common in elderly persons. Because of the relatively small numbers of fatalities, it is not possible to compare the differences in underlying conditions between the two seasons adjusted by age.
There remains a possibility that fatal case ascertainment is incomplete because of underreporting and -diagnosing. Especially in patients with severe underlying diseases and elderly, the generally non-specific symptoms may not have been recognized as being caused by influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection. This is reflected by the fact that pandemic influenza was reported as contributing cause of death in some patients instead of the main cause of death. Moreover, this might also partly explain the relatively high mortality in patients with underlying immunological disorders in the 2009-2010 pandemic season compared to the 2010-2011 influenza season. It is plausible that testing for influenza was more common during the pandemic season because of heightened attention, particularly in patients with severe underlying diseases like immunological disorders.
To improve completeness of reporting in the hectic pandemic season, additional information on underlying conditions was actively collected where not available, which might have caused some information bias. Another limitation of this study is the lack of reliable historical records on deaths related to laboratory-confirmed influenza. Although deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1) 2009 virus infection were notifiable during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 seasons, clinical influenza diagnoses are generally not laboratory-confirmed during seasonal influenza epidemics. Nevertheless, estimates of the burden of seasonal influenza show that about 90% of influenza-associated deaths occur in persons aged 65 years and older [9]. This is obviously different from the age specific mortality pattern seen during the 2009 and previous pandemics.
Conclusions
The maintenance of the mandatory notification of deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1) 2009 made it possible to compare the fatal cases during the 2009-2010 pandemic season with that during the 2010-2011 influenza season. The mortality pattern in the 2010-2011 season still resembles the pandemic season with a peak in relatively young age groups, but concurrently shows a clear shift towards the seasonal pattern, as also described for previous pandemics in the 20th century.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
We thank all the municipal health services, hospitals and laboratories for providing the data.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb)
Wielders CC, van Lier EA, van 't Klooster TM, van Gageldonk-Lafeber AB, van den Wijngaard CC, Haagsma JA, Donker GA, Meijer A, van der Hoek W, Lugner AK, et al: The burden of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) in the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health. 2010Google Scholar
van 't Klooster TM, Wielders CC, Donker T, Isken L, Meijer A, van den Wijngaard CC, van der Sande MA, van der Hoek W: Surveillance of hospitalisations for 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) in the Netherlands, 5 June - 31 December 2009. Euro Surveill. 2010, 15 (2): pii = 19461Google Scholar
Donaldson LJ, Rutter PD, Ellis BM, Greaves FE, Mytton OT, Pebody RG, Yardley IE: Mortality from pandemic A/H1N1 2009 influenza in England: public health surveillance study. BMJ. 2009, 339: b5213-10.1136/bmj.b5213.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Pebody RG, McLean E, Zhao H, Cleary P, Bracebridge S, Foster K, Charlett A, Hardelid P, Waight P, Ellis J, et al: Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) 2009 and mortality in the United Kingdom: risk factors for death, April 2009 to March 2010. Euro Surveill. 2010, 15 (20): pii = 19571Google Scholar
Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Openshaw PJ, Hashim A, Gadd EM, Lim WS, Semple MG, Read RC, Taylor BL, Brett SJ, McMenamin J, et al: Risk factors for hospitalisation and poor outcome with pandemic A/H1N1 influenza: United Kingdom first wave (May-September 2009). Thorax. 2010, 65 (7): 645-651. 10.1136/thx.2010.135210.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Kumar A, Zarychanski R, Pinto R, Cook DJ, Marshall J, Lacroix J, Stelfox T, Bagshaw S, Choong K, Lamontagne F, et al: Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada. JAMA. 2009, 302 (17): 1872-1879. 10.1001/jama.2009.1496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Louie JK, Jean C, Acosta M, Samuel MC, Matyas BT, Schechter R: A Review of Adult Mortality Due to 2009 Pandemic (H1N1) Influenza A in California. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (4): e18221-10.1371/journal.pone.0018221.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Thompson MG, Shay DK, Zhou H, Bridges C, Cheng PY, Burns E, Bresee JS, Cox NJ: Estimates of deaths associated with seasonal influenza --- United States, 1976-2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 59 (33): 1057-1062.Google Scholar
Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson LJ, Fukuda K: Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003, 289 (2): 179-186. 10.1001/jama.289.2.179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Puig-Barbera J: 2010-2011 influenza seasonal vaccine, preliminary mid-season effectiveness estimates: reason for concern, confounding or are we following the right track?. Euro Surveill. 2011, 16 (11): pii = 19821Google Scholar
Steens A, Waaijenborg SW, Wallinga J, Reimerink J, van der Lubben M, Friesema I, Westerhof A, Meijer A, Robert-Du Ry van Beest Holle M, van Beek J, et al: Estimates of the seroprevalence and attack rates of pandemic influenza in the Netherlands determined using a serosurvey on a random sample of the Dutch population. American Journal of Epidemiology.Google Scholar
Gageldonk-Lafeber Av, Hooiveld M, Meijer A, Donker G, Veldman-Ariesen M, Hoek Wvd, der SMv: The relative clinical impact of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) in the community compared to seasonal influenza in the Netherlands was most marked among 5-14 year olds. Influenza and other respiratory viruses. 2011Google Scholar
Steens A, Wijnans EG, Dieleman JP, Sturkenboom MC, van der Sande MAB, van der Hoek W: Effectiveness of a MF-59tm adjuvant pandemic influenza vaccine to prevent 2009 influenza A/H1N1 relatated hospitalisation; a matched case-control studie. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2011, 11: 196-10.1186/1471-2334-11-196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Simonsen L, Clarke MJ, Schonberger LB, Arden NH, Cox NJ, Fukuda K: Pandemic versus epidemic influenza mortality: a pattern of changing age distribution. J Infect Dis. 1998, 178 (1): 53-60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jain S, Kamimoto L, Bramley AM, Schmitz AM, Benoit SR, Louie J, Sugerman DE, Druckenmiller JK, Ritger KA, Chugh R, et al: Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States, April-June 2009. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361 (20): 1935-1944. 10.1056/NEJMoa0906695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Surveillance for pediatric deaths associated with 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus infection - United States, April-August 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009, 58 (34): 941-947.Google Scholar
Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S, Hernandez M, Quinones-Falconi F, Bautista E, Ramirez-Venegas A, Rojas-Serrano J, Ormsby CE, Corrales A, et al: Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361 (7): 680-689. 10.1056/NEJMoa0904252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Louie JK, Acosta M, Winter K, Jean C, Gavali S, Schechter R, Vugia D, Harriman K, Matyas B, Glaser CA, et al: Factors associated with death or hospitalization due to pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in California. JAMA. 2009, 302 (17): 1896-1902. 10.1001/jama.2009.1583.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Vaillant L, La Ruche G, Tarantola A, Barboza P: Epidemiology of fatal cases associated with pandemic H1N1 influenza 2009. Euro Surveill. 2009, 14 (33): pii = 19309Google Scholar
Keren R, Zaoutis TE, Bridges CB, Herrera G, Watson BM, Wheeler AB, Licht DJ, Luan XQ, Coffin SE: Neurological and neuromuscular disease as a risk factor for respiratory failure in children hospitalized with influenza infection. JAMA. 2005, 294 (17): 2188-2194. 10.1001/jama.294.17.2188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Louie JK, Acosta M, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA: Severe 2009 H1N1 influenza in pregnant and postpartum women in California. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362 (1): 27-35. 10.1056/NEJMoa0910444.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, Fry AM, Seib K, Callaghan WM, Louie J, Doyle TJ, Crockett M, Lynfield R, et al: Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA. 2010, 303 (15): 1517-1525. 10.1001/jama.2010.479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Rasmussen SA, Williams JL, Swerdlow DL, Biggerstaff MS, Lindstrom S, Louie JK, Christ CM, Bohm SR, et al: H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet. 2009, 374 (9688): 451-458. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61304-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
