Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Correspondence
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 3,
  • 2,
  • 4,
  • 3,
  • 5, 6,
  • 7 and
  • 7
BMC Public Health201111:450

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-450

©  Ludvigsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

  • Received: 2 September 2010
  • Accepted: 9 June 2011
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

The Swedish National Inpatient Register (IPR), also called the Hospital Discharge Register, is a principal source of data for numerous research projects. The IPR is part of the National Patient Register. The Swedish IPR was launched in 1964 (psychiatric diagnoses from 1973) but complete coverage did not begin until 1987. Currently, more than 99% of all somatic (including surgery) and psychiatric hospital discharges are registered in the IPR. A previous validation of the IPR by the National Board of Health and Welfare showed that 85-95% of all diagnoses in the IPR are valid. The current paper describes the history, structure, coverage and quality of the Swedish IPR.

Methods and results

In January 2010, we searched the medical databases, Medline and HighWire, using the search algorithm "validat* (inpatient or hospital discharge) Sweden". We also contacted 218 members of the Swedish Society of Epidemiology and an additional 201 medical researchers to identify papers that had validated the IPR. In total, 132 papers were reviewed. The positive predictive value (PPV) was found to differ between diagnoses in the IPR, but is generally 85-95%.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the validity of the Swedish IPR is high for many but not all diagnoses. The long follow-up makes the register particularly suitable for large-scale population-based research, but for certain research areas the use of other health registers, such as the Swedish Cancer Register, may be more suitable.

Keywords

  • Classification of diseases
  • disease
  • epidemiology
  • morbidity
  • register

Background

The Swedish National Inpatient Register (IPR; Swedish: slutenvårdsregistret), also called the Hospital Discharge Register, was established in 1964 (Figure 1). The IPR has complete national coverage since 1987. The IPR is part of the National Patient Register (Swedish: patientregistret). Currently, more than 99% of all somatic and psychiatric hospital discharges are registered in the IPR. Diagnoses in the IPR are coded according to the Swedish international classification of disease (ICD) system, first introduced in 1964 (adapted from the WHO ICD classification system) (Figure 1). A history of the Swedish and Nordic ICD system has been published elsewhere [1]. It is mandatory for all physicians, private and publicly funded, to deliver data to the IPR (except for visits in primary care). A detailed description of the regulations relevant to the IPR has been given in the Appendix (Additional file 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Timeline of the Swedish Inpatient Register. Years inside the arrow indicate the first year when an ICD classification was in use. ICD-10 was introduced in 1997, with the exception of the county of Skåne where ICD-9 was still in use throughout 1997. The one-year delay in introducing ICD-10 in Skåne has some implications when identifying patients with a certain disease/disorder in this county because about 8-9% of the Swedish population live in Skåne.

History and coverage of the IPR

The IPR was founded in 1964 when the NBHW (National Board of Health and Welfare; Swedish: Socialstyrelsen) began collecting data on somatic inpatient care in six Swedish counties (roughly the Uppsala region)(Figure 2, red line)[2] (for the population statistics underlying Figures 2 and 3, please see Additional file 2). In fact, the NBHW started to collect data on psychiatric care in 1962 but when the IPR was reconstructed in the 1990s, all psychiatric data originating before 1973 were removed (Figure 3). Beginning in about 1970, data collection for the IPR went from a pilot project to an all-inclusive effort to cover the entire country. In 1983, approximately 85% of all somatic care and almost all psychiatric care were reported to the NBHW [2]. In 1984, the NBHW asked permission from the National Data Inspection Board to link individual data to the personal identity number (PIN) (Swedish: personnummer) [3] of each individual. Although granted permission, the NBHW postponed the introduction of a PIN-based register because the Swedish attorney general objected to the use of the PIN in the IPR. Only in 1993 did the Swedish government declare that the IPR should use the PIN as the unique identifier in all hospital discharges. After 1993, all counties have collaborated on reconstructing earlier hospital discharges linked to the PIN for the years 1984-91. This linkage was possible for all but three counties: two counties were unable to reconstruct data for the year 1985 while the third did not enter the IPR until 1987.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Somatic care: coverage of the Swedish population. Red = Proportion of the Swedish population living in counties that had started to report somatic hospital discharges to the Swedish Inpatient Register. Blue = Proportion of the Swedish population living in counties where all somatic hospital discharges were reported to the Swedish Inpatient Register (1964: 6%; 1972: 36%; 1982: 71%; 1984: 86%). In 1976, for the first time more than 50% of the Swedish population were covered. Complete coverage (100%) was attained in 1987. County population data obtained from the government agency Statistics Sweden (Appendix).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Psychiatric care: coverage of the Swedish population. Blue = Proportion of the Swedish population living in counties where all psychiatric hospital discharges were reported to the Swedish Inpatient Register (1973: 86%; 1985: 94%; 1986: 98%). All counties in Sweden started to record psychiatric care in 1973. (Actually, psychiatric diagnoses were recorded before 1973 but then removed until 1973 - see text). County population data obtained from the government agency Statistics Sweden (Appendix).

Each year, there are about 1.5 million hospital discharges in the IPR (Figure 4), with the majority of these taking place in somatic care. From 1997 and onwards, surgical day care procedures are reported to the NBHW, and since 2001, counties are obliged to report hospital-based outpatient physician visits. However, primary health care data are still not reported on a national level to the NBHW. Whereas coverage of the IPR is currently almost 100%; coverage of hospital-based outpatient care is considerably lower (about 80%)[2]. In the outpatient register, data from private caregivers are missing (coverage of data from public caregivers in outpatient care is almost 100%). The number of hospitals reporting to the IPR increased rapidly in the 1970s. In the 1960s, 20 hospitals and roughly 80 nursing homes reported to the IPR [2]. In the 1980s, the number of units reporting to the IPR had increased to 580. Because of organizational changes, the number of reporting units has since declined.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Number of hospital discharges from 1964-2007[2]. Surgery = General surgery.

IPR variables

IPR variables can be divided into four categories: patient-related data, data about the caregiver, administrative data and medical data (Table 1). Figure 5 displays a typical dataset from the IPR as delivered to researchers.
Table 1

Variables in the Swedish IPR

Variable

Description

Patient-related data

Personal Identity Number (PIN)

Combination of date of birth, three-digit birth number and a check digit [3]. Personal identity number shall be reported for all admissions/discharges, except for induced abortions where it is not registered for legal reasons

Sex

1 = male; 2 = female

Age

Age in years at discharge. In individuals with missing birth dates, the difference between year of discharge and birth year is used to calculate age.

County

The county where the patient has his/her permanent residence (this is not necessarily the county where the patient is admitted).

Municipality and parish

Usually consists of six digits, where positions 1-2 indicate county, 3-4 municipality and 5-6 parish. Individuals living outside Sweden are assigned the value "99". Missing data have been replaced by data from Statistics Sweden.

Data about caregiver (hospital/department)

Hospital

Each hospital in Sweden has a unique 5-digit code assigned by the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW)(e.g., Lund University Hospital has code 41001).

Type of department

Each type of department or health centre has a unique code assigned by the NBHW (e.g. ophthalmology departments have code 511)

Administrative data

Admission date

Year-month-day

Discharge date

Year-month-day

Duration of admission

Number of days at hospital. Patients discharged on the day of admission are assigned the value "1".

Elective health care

1 = Yes, 2 = No

Mode of admission

1 = from other hospital/department, 2 = from special living (e.g., home for disabled people, or geriatric care), 3 = other (i.e. from home)

Mode of discharge

1 = to other hospital/department, 2 = to special living (e.g., home for disabled people or geriatric care), 3 = other (i.e. discharged to home), 4 = deceased.

Medical data

Diagnoses

In 1964-1996, the IPR permitted up to 6 diagnoses per discharge. Between 1997-2009 8 diagnoses could be recorded (one of them being the primary diagnosis).

Primary and

additional diagnoses

The primary diagnosis or "main condition" should be the condition diagnosed at the end of the episode of health care responsible for the patient's need for treatment or investigation.

The additional (secondary or contributory diagnoses/conditions) may or may not contribute to the primary diagnosis. They may be co-morbidities and/or complications. Since 2010 the number of possible additional diagnoses per case is unlimited (however, the NBHW will generally only deliver the first 7 additional diagnoses to researchers who request data from the IPR).

External cause of injury or poisoning (E-code) - or "Chapter XX codes".

Until 1997, only one E-code could be recorded per discharge; from 1998, numerous "E-codes" may be recorded. With the introduction of ICD-10 in 1997, E-codes should be referred to as "Chapter XX-codes". (In ICD-10, E00-E99 codes represent metabolic conditions).

Procedures

In 1964 the Swedish NBHW introduced a national classification of procedures based on an American classification of surgical procedures. It had four digit-codes (e.g. appendectomy 4510). Since 1997, a Swedish version of the NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures is in use. This classification is based on five-character alpha-numeric codes (e.g. JEA01 for appendectomy). Current procedures are listed in the Swedish Classification of surgical and medical procedures (Swedish: "KVÅ" - klassifikation av vårdåtgärder)(issued by the NBHW).

Between 1964 and 1996, up to 6 operations/surgical procedures could be listed per discharge. From 1997, up to 12 operations/surgical procedures could be listed per discharge. In the future it will be possible to record more than 12 diagnoses per discharge. Since 2007, all performed procedures are mandatory to record, including medical procedures. The surgeon may also (voluntarily) report date of operation and type of anaesthesia and drugs used according to the ATC list.

Psychiatric care

0 = voluntary care, 1-4: compulsory psychiatric inpatient care (under different conditions or according to certain laws). If a patient has been treated according to categories 1, 2, 3 or 4, the condition prevailing most of the time shall be reported. Compulsory care can be further divided into "forensic" and "civil", depending on the reasons for compulsory care.

IPR = Inpatient Register. NBHW = National Board of Health and Welfare.

Since January 2009, the NBHW collects additional data on compulsory psychiatric care (psychiatric care under certain laws) in addition to the IPR. The data are collected three times per year.

In older versions of the IPR, the variable "Billing forms (between counties)" was also included.

Figure 5
Figure 5

A sample of variables from the Swedish Inpatient Register (as seen with the statistics programme SPSS). Each hospital discharge is listed on a row. This means that an individual may occupy several rows in the IPR (first, second, third hospital discharge, etc.). The variable lpnr (or lopnr) is constructed when the dataset is delivered to the researcher, and serves as unique serial number. In the original IPR dataset, each discharge is linked to a unique Personal Identity Number (PIN)[3]. Please note that the order of the variables above may differ from that in the original IPR dataset.

The basic unit of the IPR is not the patient but the admission/discharge. Individual patients can be identified by their unique PIN.

Personal identity number (PIN)

Each hospital discharge is keyed to an individual's PIN [3] (Table 1). Overall (1964-2008), the PIN is found missing in 2.9% of all hospital discharges.

Primary diagnosis

Overall, a primary diagnosis is listed in 99% of all hospital discharges. The highest rate of missing data occurred in 1968 (4.6%), which may be due to the change from ICD-7 to ICD-8 that occurred in that year. After 2000, missing primary diagnoses have been consistently more common in psychiatric care than in somatic care (5.7-9.4% in psychiatric care vs. 0.5-0.9% in somatic care). Since the start of the IPR, primary diagnoses are missing in 0.8% of somatic care, 2.4% of geriatric care, 3.1% of psychiatric care and 0.5% of general surgery.

The proportion of patients without a primary diagnosis does not differ by hospital type (university hospitals 1.4%, county hospitals 0.7%, small local hospitals 0.8%) but is slightly higher in nursing homes (3.1%).

Injuries and poisoning: external cause

All hospital admissions for injury or poisoning must be coded by an E code indicating the cause of the injury/poisoning (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Figure 6

Percentage of hospital discharges for injury and poisoning with reported external cause[2].

Mode of admission and discharge

The variables "mode of admission" and "mode of discharge" describe where the patient stays before and after admission, respectively (Table 1). These variables have generally been recorded in more than 95% of all hospital admissions (with the exception of the year 1979 and in single counties in 1997-2000).

Alternative registers

Even though the IPR contains important information on a wide spectrum of diagnoses, it is sometimes preferable to use other Swedish health registers, such as the Swedish Cancer Register)[4], the Cause of Death Register[5] and the Swedish Medical Birth Register[6]. There are also a large number of Swedish National Quality Registers (n = 89 in 2011)(http://www.kvalitetsregister.se, accessed April 19, 2011).

Earlier assessment of the IPR

The NBHW has previously examined the quality of the IPR on three separate occasions (one published study with data collection in 1986 (899 patients, patient chart validation)[7], one unpublished study with data collection in 1990 (n = 875, patient chart validation)[2, 8] and one comparison between the IPR and the National Quality Registers in 2009. The two patient chart studies focused on three types of diagnostic coding error detected in medical records.

1. Diagnostic errors, i.e. the patient received an incorrect diagnosis (the patient receives an ICD code that is not related to his or her actual main complaint). Diagnostic errors were more common in internal medicine records (especially in the 1986 study [7]) than in records from gynaecology departments, and slightly more common in older than in younger patients [2].

2. Translation errors, i.e. the ICD code in the IPR is different from the code actually listed in the patient chart. This type of error was detected in less than 1% of all medical records.

3. Coding errors, i.e. the faulty ICD code accompanies an otherwise correct diagnosis. Such coding errors occurred in 5.9% of hospital discharges in 1986 and in 8.3% in 1990.

In the 1990 validation, the risk of an incorrect primary diagnosis correlated with the number of secondary diagnoses [8]. The overall proportion of incorrect diagnoses at the ICD code 3-digit/character level (e.g., ICD-9: 571 "chronic liver disease and liver cirrhosis") was 13% in 1986 and 12% in 1990; at the four-digit level (e.g., ICD-9: 571E "chronic hepatitis"), it was 15% in 1986 and 14% in 1990 (B. Smedby, personal communication, Jan 30, 2010).

The comparison between the IPR and the National Quality Registers found that the IPR has high sensitivity for most surgical procedures (Table 2)[9], whereas sensitivity varied between 76.4% and 96.0% for three diseases not requiring surgery (multiple sclerosis, incident stroke and prostate cancer)(Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison between Swedish Quality Registers and the National Patient Register [9]

Disease/

Procedure

Quality Register

Total number of cases

Matching between the Quality Register and the Patient Register (%)

Proportion of all cases identified through the Patient Register (%)

Hernia surgery*

Swedish Hernia Register

17,707

69.9

92.5

Cholecystectomy*

Swedish Register of Gallstone Surgery and ERCP

12,472

79.9

96.4

ERCP*

 

7,458

54.5

71.2

Multiple Sclerosis*

Swedish Multiple Sclerosis Register

13,503

52.9

76.4

Knee arthroplasty

The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register

11,122

90.1

93.6

Hip arthroplasty

The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

14,757

91.0

93.4

Hip fracture

The Swedish Hip Fracture Register

15,920

64.0

95.3

Surgery on the abdominal aorta*

Swedvasc

1,784

77.4

90.6

Infrainguinal bypass surgery

 

979

72.4

81.9

Carotid artery surgery

 

1,584

81.6

95.2

First stroke

Swedish Stroke Register

22,202

79.4

96.0

Heart surgery

Swedish Heart Surgery Register#

13,440

95.1

97.6

Cataract surgery*

National Cataract Register

75,050

75.2

78.6

Prostate cancer*

National Prostate Cancer Register

3,985

62.0

82.8

ERCP = endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

* Quality register compared with the Patient Register (IPR and hospital-based outpatient data). In the other comparisons the Quality Register was compared only with the IPR.

# Currently part of the Register Swedeheart.

Use of the IPR

Systematic collection of medical data is essential for modern health care because such data are used to plan, evaluate and fund health care. Through the IPR, administrators, health care personnel and researchers are able to (a) evaluate the incidence and prevalence of diseases [10], (b) examine the effects and consequences of interventions (e.g., surgery [11]), including quality of care and (c) establish cohorts of patients with a certain disease [12] or condition.

The primary purpose of this paper was to review and validate the IPR. A second objective was to describe its potential use in population-based epidemiological research.

Methods

Sorensen et al suggest that administrative databases could be evaluated in three ways [13]:
  1. (a)

    Through comparison with other independent reference sources

     
  2. (b)

    Through patient chart reviews (medical records)

     
  3. (c)

    By comparing the total number of cases in different databases

     

The majority of the evaluations in this paper were based on (b), i.e. patient chart reviews.

Assessment by the current study

In January 2010, we began identifying papers that might concern the validity of the IPR (Figure 7) using database searches in PubMed and HighWire. We used the following search algorithm: "validat* (inpatient or hospital discharge) Sweden". We also contacted 218 members of the Swedish Society of Epidemiology and another 201 researchers with experience in register-based research. Altogether, we identified 132 papers, all of which were subsequently examined in detail. Tables 3 and 4 list papers that validated the IPR.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Collection of validation studies. In both the PubMed and HighWire Press search, we used the following search algorithm to identify relevant papers: validat* (inpatient or hospital discharge) Sweden. Databases were searched from the start of the databases until January 2010. *In the HighWire Press literature search, JFL manually screened all titles, authors, keywords and, when available, abstracts for the 840 hits. If a validation of the inpatient register could not be ruled out, the corresponding author was contacted. A number of publications could then be excluded; 14 "new papers" remained that had not previously been identified.

Table 3

Validation of diagnoses in the Swedish Inpatient Register by Positive Predictive Values (PPVs)

Diagnosis

Correct diagnosis in the IPR (%) = positive predictive value (PPV)

Comment

Main Author

PubMed ID

Year

Gold Standard (reference)

Cardiovascular disease

Myocardial infarction

36/36 (100)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 861/864 (99.7)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Myocardial infarction

2053/2101 (98)

Patients aged 45 - 70 years in 1992 - 1994.

Linnersjö[34]

11121592

2000

MR

Angina Pectoris

18/19 (95)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 879/881 (99.8)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Heart failure (HF)

259/317 (81.7)

Definition of HF proposed by the European Society of Cardiology [35].

Restricting the diagnosis HF to the primary diagnosis, then 133/140 (95.0%) were correct.

Ingelsson [36]

15916919

2005

ULSAM

Heart failure

15/17 (88)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 876/883 (99.2)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Atrial fibrillation (using ICD-codes for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter)

97/100 (97)

95 individuals had ECGs consistent with atrial fibrillation. Two patients had no ECGs available but were regarded as having atrial fibrillation on the basis of medical records.

Smith [37]

19936945

2009

MR + Electrocardiograms (ECG)

Non-fatal strokes

3492/5101 (68.5)

Patients aged 25-74 years in 1985-89. Criteria for acute stroke in this study were based on WHO criteria.

Stegmayr [38]

1291884

1992

MONICA-population based stroke register

Stroke/Transient ischemic Attack

207/210 (98.6)

ULSAM

Wiberg

 

(PC, Feb 12)

ULSAM

Gestational hypertension

108/111 (97.3)

 

Zetterström

 

(PC, March 3)

MR

Gestational hypertension

97/115 (84.3)

 

Ros [39]

9620050

1998

MR

Vascular interventions (for lower limb ischemia)

545/546 (99.8)

 

Hultgren [40]

11170873

2001

MR

Autoimmune/immune-mediated diseases

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

489/510 (95.9)

Malmö, Sweden, 1990-1994. According to the RA criteria of the American College of Rheumatology [41].

Turesson [42]

10461483

1999

MR

Rheumatoid arthritis

Without lymphoma: 440/505 (87.1)

With lymphoma: 386/413 (93.5)

In 40 of the 386 cases with lymphoma, medical records did not include enough information to evaluate whether the RA criteria of the American College of Rheumatology were fulfilled but all available information supported the diagnosis of RA

Baecklund [22]

16508929

2006

MR

Wegener's granulomatosis

68/78 (87)

American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria [43]

Knight [12]

12115591

2002

MR

Celiac disease

66/77 (86) of patients with later lymphoma

Only in 8 patients could celiac disease be ruled out. In 3 patients, the chart reviews were consistent with possible celiac disease.

Ekström-Smedby [44]

15591504

2005

MR

Primary adrenocortical insufficiency

105/133 (78.9)

 

Bensing [45]

18727712

2008

Patients tested positive for 21-OH autoantibodies

Diabetes mellitus (type 1 and 2)*

22/28 (79)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 872/872 (100)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Both diabetes (type 1 or 2) and foot ulcer*

235/236 (99.6) admissions were correct with regards to ICD-coding

117 patients with deep foot infections and type 1 or 2 diabetes, who had been referred to a multidisciplinary foot-care team at Lund University Hospital.

Ragnarson-Tennvall [46]

11123504

2000

MR

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

4778/6440 (74)

1965-1983.

Due to the ICD-classification used at this time, ulcerative colitis could not be distinguished from Crohn's disease, and therefore "overall IBD" was evaluated

Ekbom [47]

1985033

1991

MR + histopathological reviews

Psychiatric disease and neurology

Schizophrenia

94/100 (94.9)

Review of medical records with structured diagnostic interviews

Ekholm [48]

16316898

2005

MR

Schizophrenia

78/91 (85.7)

Individuals born 1973-77.

DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia syndrome

Dalman [49]

12395142

2002

MR

Schizophrenia

106/111 (95.5)

Review of 121 consecutive cases in one city using a structured DSM-IV checklist, 111 records obtained

Hultman [50]

16863597

2006

MR

Schizophrenia,

schizophreniform disorder or schizoaffective disorder

94/168 (56)

Primary diagnoses that fulfilled DSM-IV criteria (OPCRIT algorithm)

Reutfors [51]

-

2009

MR

Schizophrenia †

78/104 (75.0)

to

85/104 (81.7)

104 patients discharged in 1971 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. DSMIII-criteria were used for this validation. From Stockholm County IPR. A strict review found a PPV of 75%. This figure increased to 85% when some lack of information was accepted (less strict criteria).

Kristjansson [52]

-

1987

MR

Schizophrenia

(Kappa = 0.37 correlating to an agreement rate of 68%)

All individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in the IPR and who had an inpatient forensic psychiatric assessment using a national register of all such evaluations from 1988-2000 (n = 1638).

Fazel [25]

19454640

2009

Forensic psychiatric assessment

Schizophrenia

34/44 (77%)

 

Bergman [53]

-

1999

Four-week- inpatient assessment in forensic psychiatry department

Alzheimer

54/75 (72)

 

Jin [54]

15326258

2004

Clinical work-up following phone interview

Personality disorders

37/40 (92)

Random sample of 40 individuals out of 401 violent offenders with personality disorders from a longitudinal study

Grann [55]

-

1998

MR

Personality disorders

30/55 (55%)

 

Bergman [53]

-

1999

Four-week- inpatient assessment in forensic psychiatry department

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)

69/83 (83)

83% of patients fulfilled the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke criteria for GBS [56]. PPV of first primary diagnosis with GBS was 84%; and for secondary diagnosis 75%.

Jiang [57]

7785420

1995

MR

Herpes simplex encephalit

223/638 (35.0)

1990-2001

Hjalmarsson [58]

17806053

2007

Laboratory data (positive finding of HSV-1)

Trauma and fractures

Brain concussion

18/18 (100)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 880/882 (99.8)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Hip fracture

21/22 (95)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 877/878 (99.9)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Hip fracture

2556/2597 (98.4)

Cases derived both from IPR and operation registers.

Michaelsson [59]

9632404

1998

MR

Injuries

1299/1370 (94.8)

Injury code was correct at 3-digit-level.

Gedeborg

-

(PC, Feb 3)

MR

Surgical procedures (and related medical conditions)

Major amputations (leg and arm)

610/624 (97.8)

Unique number of amputations was 610 in 624 patients.

Malmstedt

 

(PC, Feb 24)

MR

Appendicitis†

1661/1840 (90.3)

Performed in the Jönköping county. Incidental appendectomies were excluded. The IPR overestimated the prevalence of appendicitis with 6%. The negative predictive value of appendicitis was 94.0% and the accuracy 91.3%†

Andersson [60]

8298378

1994

Histological examination of excised tissue (in patients undergoing appendectomy)

Inguinal hernia

17/18 (94)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 882/882 (100)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Other disorders

Achalasia

67/83 (81)

 

Zendehdel [61]

17488250

2007

MR

Prostate hyperplasia

14/14 (100)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 882/886 (99.5)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Asthma

14/15 (93)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 885/885 (100)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Abdominal pain (observation for abdominal pain)

33/37 (89)

Only primary diagnoses were evaluated.

NPV = 860/863 (99.7)

Nilsson [7]

8114596

1994

MR

Preeclampsia

137/148 (92.6)

 

Ros [39]

9620050

1998

MR

Endometriosis

Without ovarial cancer: 615/628 (97.9% correct).

With ovarial cancer: 220/225 (97.8% correct)

 

Melin

-

(PC, Feb 3)

MR

Foot ulcer (only)

249/250 (99.6) admissions to hospital were correct with regards to ICD-coding

Based on 117 patients with deep foot infections and type 1 or 2 diabetes, referred to multidisciplinary foot-care team. Specificity for foot ulcers and concomitant diabetes was 98%.

Ragnarson-Tennvall [46]

11123504

2000

MR

Connective tissue disease (CTD)

71/91 (78%)

In this study CTD included rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythemathosus, sclerodermia, Sjögren's syndrome, dermatomyositis, polymyositis etc.

Nyren [62]

9492663

 

MR

Acute pancreatitis

695/602 (98.8)

Among 602 patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in the IPR. 84.0% had a definitive acute pancreatitis and another 14.8% a probable acute pancreatitis.

Lindblad

 

(PC, Feb 6)

MR + laboratory tests and radiological imaging

PC, Personal communication: All personal communications took place in 2010 (exact date is listed in the table).

CDT, Connective tissue disease. GBS, Guillain-Barré Syndrome; HF, Heart Failure, IBD, Inflammatory bowel disease. IPR, Inpatient Register.

MR, compared with Medical Records (patient charts).

PPV, Positive Predictive Value.

NPV, Negative Predictive Value.

ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men) cohort.

*From ICD-7 through ICD-9, no distinction was made between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. For practical reasons "diabetes" has been listed as an autoimmune disorder.

† These studies took place when the county in question did not yet report inpatient data to the IPR, but results are deemed valid for the IPR.

Table 4

Validation of diagnoses in the Swedish Inpatient Register by sensitivity

Diagnosis

Proportion identified through the IPR (%) (sensitivity)

Comment

Main Author

PubMed ID

Year

Gold Standard (Reference)

Cardiovascular disease

Myocardial Infarction (MI)

54/59 (91.5)

Cross-sectional, 1-year retrospective study. ≥20 year-olds from Degerfors area.

Elo [14]

19084244

2009

Data were obtained from IPR, hospital-based outpatient care and primary health care

Myocardial infarction

99/128 (77)

 

Merlo [63]

10870938

2000

Men born 1914

Myocardial infarction

113/144 (79)

 

Merlo [63]

10870938

2000

The Skaraborg Hypertension Study

Myocardial Infarction

3201/4148 (77.2)

The researchers identified all MIs in Stockholm county in 1973 through the local IPR and the national Cause of Death Register (restricted to individuals living in Stockholm).

Ahlbom [64]

721364

1978

Swedish Cause of Death Register

Myocardial infarction

4746/5832 (81.4) of MI cases in community registers were found in IPR or the Cause of Death Register.

IPR and Cause of Death Register data from 1972-1981 for regions with IPR registers at the time. 81% of cases in community registers were found in IPR or Cause of Death Register. Meanwhile 85% of cases in IPR and the Cause of Death Register were found in Community registers (disregarding non-matching fatal cases).

Hammar [65]

2066207

1991

Community registers with myocardial infarctions

Angina Pectoris

86/196 (43.9)

Cross-sectional, 1-year retrospective study. ≥20 year-olds from Degerfors area.

Elo [14]

19084244

2009

Data were obtained from IPR, hospital-based outpatient care and primary health care

Acute coronary syndrome (MI or unstable angina pectoris)

IPR from emergency department missed 2% of 218 patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Discharge diagnoses from emergency department, Lund University Hospital.

Forberg [66]

18804783

2009

MR. The study evaluates different methods to identify acute coronary syndrome in patients, using information not available in the IPR (e.g. ECG measurements).

Non-specified ischemic heart disease

44/206 (21.4)

Cross-sectional, 1-year retrospective study. ≥20 year-olds from Degerfors area.

Elo [14]

19084244

2009

Data were obtained from IPR, hospital-based outpatient care and primary health care

Stroke (non-subarachnoidal hemorrhage)

318/377 (84.4)

Data from a local stroke incidence study at the Örebro University Hospital.

Appelros

-

(PC, Feb 22)

Local stroke incidence study

Non-fatal strokes

3492/3732 (93.6) of all cases

3492/3562 (98.0) of estimated hospital cases

Patients aged 25-74 years in 1985-89. Criteria for acute stroke from MONICA study were comparable to WHO criteria.

Stegmayr [38]

1291884

1992

MONICA-population based stroke register

Stroke

75/79 (95)

 

Merlo [63]

10870938

2000

The Skaraborg Hypertension Study

Stroke

76/81 (94)

 

Merlo [63]

10870938

2000

"Men born 1914"

Stroke

384/456 (84.2)

First-time stroke. Restricted to the Lund county.

Hallström [67]

17156265

2007

*

Stroke/Transient ischemic A.

217/232 (93.5)

ULSAM.

Wiberg

-

(PC, Feb 12)

ULSAM

Hypertension

5,886/42,796 (13.7)

IPR data from the county Östergötland.

Wiréhn [68]

17786807

2007

County registers of primary health care, outpatient hospital care and inpatient care

Hypertension

74/838 (8.8)

Cross-sectional, 1-year retrospective study. ≥20 year-olds from Degerfors area.

Elo [14]

19084244

2009

Data were obtained from IPR, hospital-based outpatient care and primary health care

Gestational

hypertension

108/166 (65.1)

 

Zetterström

-

(PC, March 3)

All pregnant women in Sweden have their blood pressure examined.

Lipid disorders

19/186 (10.2)

Cross-sectional, 1-year retrospective study. ≥20 year-olds from Degerfors area.

Elo [14]

19084244

2009

Data were obtained from IPR, hospital-based outpatient care and primary health care

Autoimmune/immune-mediated diseases

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

489/1150 (42.5)

Malmö, Sweden, 1990-1994. According to the RA criteria of the American College of Rheumatology [41].

Turesson [42]

10461483

1999

Data from all rheumatologists and general practictioners in Malmö city, 1997

Diabetes, type 1 and 2*

92/394 (23.3)

Cross-sectional, 1-year retrospective study. ≥20 year-olds from Degerfors area.

Elo [14]

19084244

2009

Data were obtained from IPR, hospital-based outpatient care and primary health care

Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus *

349/436 (80.0) patients with diabetes in "source 1" could be identified in the IPR

The researchers evaluated the presence of type 1 or type 2 diabetes among patients with atrial fibrillations at the Södersjukhuset Hospital. All but 8 patients in this validation had type 2 diabetes.

Friberg

-

(PC, Feb 8)

MR + biochemistry data + data on insulin or other medication against diabetes

Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus*

4,348/18,134 (24.0)

IPR data from the county Östergötland.

Wiréhn [68]

17786807

2007

County registers of primary health care, outpatient hospital care and inpatient care

Both type 1/2 diabetes and foot ulcer

235/280 (83.9) admissions could be identified through the IPR

Based on 117 patients with deep foot infections and type 1 or 2 diabetes, referred to multidisciplinary foot-care team. Specificity for foot ulcers and concomitant diabetes was 98%.

Ragnarson- Tennvall [46]

11123504

2000

MR

Infectious disease

CNS infection in intensive care

ICD-9: 21/22 (95.4)

ICD-10: 21/28 (75.0)

Specificity was 99.6% (ICD-9) and 99.7% (ICD-10). IPR data obtained through both primary and secondary diagnoses.

Gedeborg [69]

17208121

2007

ICU database diagnoses as reference

Pneumonia in intensive care

ICD-9: 89/185 (48.1)

ICD-10: 116/221 (52.5)

Specificity was 95.9% (ICD-9) and 95.8% (ICD-10). IPR data obtained through both main and secondary diagnoses.

Using only primary diagnoses for pneumonia the specificity increased slightly but the sensitivity decreased to 31.2% and 38.2% respectively.

Gedeborg [69]

17208121

2007

ICU database diagnoses as reference

Sepsis in intensive care

ICD-9: 85/186 (45.7)

ICD-10: 94/179 (52.5)

Specificity was 97.5% (ICD-9) and 92.6% (ICD-10). IPR data obtained through both main and secondary diagnoses.

Gedeborg [69]

17208121

2007

ICU database diagnoses as reference, with inclusion in sepsis trials (IST) as secondary reference

Tuberculosis

12/15 (80)

Evaluation in patients with concomitant rheumatoid arthritis

Askling [70]

15986370

2005

MR

Other disorders

Carotid, infrainguinal bypass and aortic aneurysm (AAA) procedures

10,861/11,638 (93.3) of patients identified through Swedvasc (Svenska kärlregistret) or the IPR could be identified in the IPR

(Swedvasc) started in 1987 and became nationwide 1994. In the paper by Troëng et al data on infraingunal and carotid bypass originated from 5 years (2000-2004), while data on aortic aneurysms originated from 1 year (2006). Divided the sensitivity figures were: Carotid 96.8%; Infrainguinal 92.3% and aortic aneurysm 88.9%.

Troëng [15]

And by

18851920

2008

The Swedish Vascular Register (Swedvasc)

Asthma

1,377/18,451 (7.5)

IPR data from the county Östergötland.

Wiréhn [68]

17786807

2007

County registers of primary health care, outpatient hospital care and inpatient care

Dementia

23/87 (26)

Participants originated from the study "Aging in women and men: a longitudinal study of gender differences in health behaviour and health among the elderly (as part of the Swedish Twin Register). The specificity for dementia was 97% (399/411)

Dahl [71]

18007116

 

MR + memory test scores etc.

Dementia

41.3% for prevalent cases and 42.3% for incident cases.

Participants originated from the study "Aging in women and men: a longitudinal study of gender differences in health behaviour and health among the elderly (as part of the Swedish Twin Register). The specificity for dementia was 97% (399/411)

Rizutto

 

(PC, May 14)

Comparison between cases detected in IPR with cases derived from the Kungsholmen (KP) and SNAC-K Projects [72]

Foot ulcer (only)

249/280 (88.9%) of admissions could be identified through the IPR

Based on 117 patients with deep foot infections and type 1 or 2 diabetes, referred to multidisciplinary foot-care team.

Ragnarson- Tennvall [46]

11123504

2000

MR

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

1,290/4,812 (26.8)

IPR data from the county Östergötland.

Wiréhn [68]

17786807

2007

County registers of primary health care, outpatient hospital care and inpatient care

PC, Personal communication: All personal communications took place in 2010 (exact date is listed in the table).

ICU, Intensive Care Unit. MI, Myocardial Infarction. MR, compared with Medical Records (patient charts). RA, Rheumatoid arthritis.

ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men) cohort.

*Data from all departments at the Lund Hospital including the emergency unit, general practitioners, community nurses, physicians at the Neurology department, autopsy registers, Forensic department, computerized searches of outpatient medical records

Results

With few exceptions, validation of ICD codes from the IPR was made by comparing registered diagnoses in the IPR with information in medical records (Tables 3 and 4). The positive predictive values (PPVs) of IPR diagnoses were 85-95% for most diagnoses (3-digit level, see Table 3). In a review of patients dying in hospital 90-98% of patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of malignancy had the same malignancy as the underlying cause of death [5]. In addition, 90.3% of those with a primary discharge diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) had MI as the underlying cause of death and with a similar proportion of those with other vascular diseases (89.0%). Agreement between discharge diagnosis and death certificate was slightly lower for traffic accidents (87.8%), meningitis (74.3%) and ulcer of the stomach or duodenum (69.9%) to name a few [5].

Sensitivity of the IPR was high (above 90%) for MI [14] as well as for surgery for carotid stenosis, surgery on the carotid arteries, or surgery on the arteries in the leg (infrainguinal) and aorta [15](Table 4) but low for lipid disorders and hypertension [14]. Few studies have examined to what extent an individual without a specific disease is assigned an ICD code for that disease.

Some hospital admissions are due to trauma and not disease. In 2008, Backe et al [16] used ambulance records as gold standard to examine the proportion of injuries and suffocations that were then recorded in the IPR. Agreement between the two data sources varied, with high agreement for "falls" (W00-W19; 93.9%) but lower for "road traffic accidents" (ICD-10: V01-V99) and "suffocation, drowning/near drowning, etc." (ICD-10: W64-85), where the IPR recorded less than 50% of all injuries noted in the ambulance reports.

Several studies have examined date of hospital admission. For instance, Nordgren found that for 62% (257/413) of spinal cord injuries, the hospital admission date agreed with the injury date (≤2 days within the injury date [17]).

Discussion

This review found a high PPV for the majority of evaluated diagnoses but a lower sensitivity. The PPVs reported in this review are similar to those in the Danish IPR (febrile seizures in children: 93%[18], MIs: 92-94%[19], venous thromboembolism: 75%[20]). Furthermore, US hospital data suggest a PPV of about 90% for some diagnoses (e.g., acromegaly: 76% of the patients had a definite diagnosis and 14% a probable diagnosis [21]).

The proportion of valid diagnoses in the IPR is probably higher in patients with severe as opposed to mild disease and higher among patients with causally related complications in contrast to those without complications. Baecklund et al reported that the IPR diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis was correct in 93.5% of individuals with later lymphoma but only in 87.1% in individuals who had not developed later lymphoma [22]. In this case the positive association between lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis leads to higher specificity for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with lymphoma.

There are several ways to increase the specificity and the PPV of a diagnosis in the IPR. In a paper on sepsis in celiac disease by Ludvigsson et al [23] sensitivity analyses were performed among patients with (1) sepsis diagnosed in a department of infectious diseases (i.e. in a department where sepsis is likely to be correctly diagnosed), (2) sepsis listed as the primary diagnosis and (3) the risk of having at least two hospital admissions with sepsis. All these measures could increase the specificity of a diagnosis. For instance, there is a risk that individuals discharged from a dermatology department with a diagnosis of MI (ICD-10: I20.9) actually had an incorrectly recorded eczema (ICD-10: L20.9). When Parikh et al examined parity and risk of later cardiovascular disease, they restricted their discharges to patients with a primary diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (or death from cardiovascular disease)[24]. In their recent paper on schizophrenia, substance abuse and violent crime Fazel et al resolved to study patients with at least two hospital admissions with schizophrenia [25].

The extent to which a condition has been reported and recorded in the IPR depends on several factors [26], including care-seeking behaviour of an individual, access to health care and the propensity of a physician to admit a patient. Hospital fees, however, are no major obstacle to inpatient care access in that the (public) health system in Sweden is almost free of charge.

Over time, an increasing number of patients are treated as outpatients [27], a trend largely driven by economic restraints but also by data indicating that the prognosis of some diseases (e.g., stroke) has an improved prognosis in ambulatory care [28]. The trend towards outpatient care suggests that the sensitivity of the IPR may have decreased in recent years for some diseases. In fact, our validation showed that the IPR has low sensitivity for hypertension and lipid disorders. The introduction of day care anaesthesia has resulted in that certain procedures, such as small-intestinal biopsy preceding a diagnosis of celiac disease [29], which previously required inpatient care, are nowadays often performed on an outpatient basis.

When Elmberg et al estimated mortality in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis (HH)[30], they found a relative risk of death of 2.15 among HH patients identified through the IPR, but only 1.09 in patients identified through regional clinic registers and 1.15 in those identified through outpatient data sources [30]. Some evidence suggests that patients with a certain disorder identified through the IPR may suffer from more intense disease than the average patient and be at higher risk of complications than patients identified outside the IPR (a phenomenon sometimes called Berkson's bias [31]).

Another issue that deserves attention is that the first recorded admission with a disorder is not always equal to the incident admission. According to patient chart reviews, 1 in 3 patients with a hospital admission for stroke had had an earlier stroke (L. Olai, personal communication, Feb 4, 2010). In an effort to separate incident admissions from readmissions some authors have suggested using prediction models combining information from current and previous records in the IPR [32]. It should be noted that the Swedish ICD system does contain a number of codes representing late effects of disease, such as ICD code I69 ("late effects of cerebrovascular disease").

A number of non-medical factors influence the coding of hospital discharges. Although originally used to collect data on health care use, today the IPR coding is also used as the basis for management and financing. Some hospitals have introduced compulsory use of certain secondary codes (when such codes apply) because these codes generate extra funding (e.g., a secondary code of diabetes mellitus is "valuable"). Further, international research suggests that the coding pattern may differ between hospitals and general practice [33]. Financial incitements have therefore led to a "diagnostic drift" in which more secondary diagnoses are listed [27] and where it is financially more rewarding to assign a patient a severe primary diagnosis than a severe secondary diagnosis (e.g., type 1 diabetes is more "valuable" as a primary diagnosis than as a secondary diagnosis). The effects of financial incitements on ICD coding have probably been underestimated and are likely to have changed the epidemiological pattern. A standardized behaviour of assigning ICD codes is therefore of importance for all stakeholders, including the Swedish state [27].

Despite the extensive scope of the IPR, there is still a need for additional variables (Additional file 3), including laterality, index admission, earlier comorbidity and risk factors (e.g., smoking).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Swedish IPR is a valuable resource for large-scale register-based research. A number of diagnoses have already been validated by the NBHW and by individual researchers. Current data suggest that the overall PPV of diagnoses in the register is about 85-95%.

List of abbreviations

IPR: 

Swedish Inpatient Register (Slutenvårdsregistret)

MI: 

Myocardial infarction

NBHW: 

National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen)

PIN: 

Personal Identity Number.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the researchers contributing to this paper. Special thanks go to Björn Smedby and Paul Blomqvist for their generous advice and to the University Library of the Karolinska Institutet for assistance.

The writing of this paper was made possible by a grant from the Swedish Society of Medicine, funding the salary of the main author, Jonas F Ludvigsson. The paper was written on behalf of SVEP - The Swedish Society of Epidemiology.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Paediatrics, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden
(2)
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
(3)
Section of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
(4)
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
(5)
Research Unit, Jämtland County, Sweden
(6)
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden
(7)
Department of Statistics and Analyses, National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden

References

  1. Smedby B, Schiøler G: Health Classifications in the Nordic Countries. Historic development in a national and international perspective 2006. Book Health Classifications in the Nordic Countries. Historic development in a national and international perspective 2006 (Editor ed.^eds.). 2006, City: Nordisk Medicinalstatistisk KomiteGoogle Scholar
  2. Forsberg L, Rydh H, Jacobsson A, Nyqvist K, Heurgren M: Kvalitet och innehåll i patientregistret. Utskrivningar från slutenvården 1964-2007 och besök i specialiserad öppenvård (exklusive primärvårdsbesök) 1997-2007. (Quality and content of the Patient Register)(2009-125-15). Book Kvalitet och innehåll i patientregistret. Utskrivningar från slutenvården 1964-2007 och besök i specialiserad öppenvård (exklusive primärvårdsbesök) 1997-2007. (Quality and content of the Patient Register)(2009-125-15). (Editor ed.^eds.). City. 2009Google Scholar
  3. Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, Ekbom A: The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009, 24: 659-667. 10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Mattsson B, Wallgren A: Completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register. Non-notified cancer cases recorded on death certificates in 1978. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1984, 23: 305-313. 10.3109/02841868409136026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Johansson LA, Westerling R: Comparing Swedish hospital discharge records with death certificates: implications for mortality statistics. Int J Epidemiol. 2000, 29: 495-502. 10.1093/ije/29.3.495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. SNBHW: The Swedish Medical Birth Register: a summary of content and quality. Book The Swedish Medical Birth Register: a summary of content and quality. (Editor ed.^eds.). 2003, City: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, [http://www.sos.se/fulltext/112/2003-112-3/2003-112-3.pdf]Google Scholar
  7. Nilsson AC, Spetz CL, Carsjo K, Nightingale R, Smedby B: Reliability of the hospital registry. The diagnostic data are better than their reputation. Lakartidningen. 1994, 91: 598-603-595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carjsö K, Smedby B, Spetz CL: Evaluation of the Data quality in the Swedish National Hospital Discharge Register. Book Evaluation of the Data quality in the Swedish National Hospital Discharge Register (Editor ed.^eds.). pp. 1-10. City: WHO/HST/ICD/C/98.34. 1998, 1-10.Google Scholar
  9. Kouchecki B, Köster M, Eckerström L, Wiberg-Hedman K: Bilaga 1-3 till Öppna jämförelser av hälso- och sjukvårdens kvalitet och effektivitet 2009. Book Bilaga 1-3 till Öppna jämförelser av hälso- och sjukvårdens kvalitet och effektivitet 2009. (Editor ed.^eds.). 2009, City: Socialstyrelsen (National Board of Health and Welfare)Google Scholar
  10. Fang F, Valdimarsdottir U, Bellocco R, Ronnevi LO, Sparen P, Fall K, Ye W: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Sweden, 1991-2005. Arch Neurol. 2009, 66: 515-519. 10.1001/archneurol.2009.13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jonas E, Marsk R, Rasmussen F, Freedman J: Incidence of postoperative gallstone disease after antiobesity surgery: population-based study from Sweden. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010, 6: 54-58. 10.1016/j.soard.2009.03.221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight A, Askling J, Ekbom A: Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of patients with Wegener's granulomatosis. Int J Cancer. 2002, 100: 82-85. 10.1002/ijc.10444.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sorensen HT, Sabroe S, Olsen J: A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research. Int J Epidemiol. 1996, 25: 435-442. 10.1093/ije/25.2.435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Elo SL, Karlberg IH: Validity and utilization of epidemiological data: a study of ischaemic heart disease and coronary risk factors in a local population. Public Health. 2009, 123: 52-57. 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.07.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Troeng T, Malmstedt J, Bjorck M: External validation of the Swedvasc registry: a first-time individual cross-matching with the unique personal identity number. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008, 36: 705-712. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.08.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Backe SN, Andersson R: Monitoring the "tip of the iceberg'': ambulance records as a source of injury surveillance. Scand J Public Health. 2008, 36: 250-257. 10.1177/1403494807086973.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nordgren C: On the need of validating inpatient registers. Spinal Cord. 2008, 46: 748-752. 10.1038/sc.2008.42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vestergaard M, Obel C, Henriksen TB, Christensen J, Madsen KM, Ostergaard JR, Olsen J: The Danish National Hospital Register is a valuable study base for epidemiologic research in febrile seizures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006, 59: 61-66. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.05.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Madsen M, Davidsen M, Rasmussen S, Abildstrom SZ, Osler M: The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003, 56: 124-130. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00591-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Severinsen MT, Kristensen SR, Overvad K, Dethlefsen C, Tjonneland A, Johnsen SP: Venous thromboembolism discharge diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry should be used with caution. J Clin Epidemiol. 63: 223-228.Google Scholar
  21. Ron E, Gridley G, Hrubec Z, Page W, Arora S, Fraumeni JF: Acromegaly and gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer. 1991, 68: 1673-1677. 10.1002/1097-0142(19911015)68:8<1673::AID-CNCR2820680802>3.0.CO;2-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Baecklund E, Iliadou A, Askling J, Ekbom A, Backlin C, Granath F, Catrina AI, Rosenquist R, Feltelius N, Sundstrom C, Klareskog L: Association of chronic inflammation, not its treatment, with increased lymphoma risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54: 692-701. 10.1002/art.21675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ludvigsson JF, Olen O, Bell M, Ekbom A, Montgomery SM: Coeliac disease and risk of sepsis. Gut. 2008, 57: 1074-1080. 10.1136/gut.2007.133868.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Parikh NI, Cnattingius S, Dickman PW, Mittleman MA, Ludvigsson JF, Ingelsson E: Parity and risk of later-life maternal cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 159: 215-221. e216Google Scholar
  25. Fazel S, Langstrom N, Hjern A, Grann M, Lichtenstein P: Schizophrenia, substance abuse, and violent crime. JAMA. 2009, 301: 2016-2023. 10.1001/jama.2009.675.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Blomqvist P: On the use of administrative databases in health care analyses (Dissertation). Karolinska Institutet. 1998Google Scholar
  27. Heurgren M, Serden L: Patientregistret för 2008 ur ett DRG-perspektiv. (The Patient Register from a DRG perspective)(2010-4-14). Book Patientregistret för 2008 ur ett DRG-perspektiv. (The Patient Register from a DRG perspective)(2010-4-14). (Editor ed.^eds.). City. 2009Google Scholar
  28. Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. BMJ. 1997, 314: 1151-1159.Google Scholar
  29. Ludvigsson JF, Montgomery SM, Ekbom A, Brandt L, Granath F: Small-intestinal histopathology and mortality risk in celiac disease. JAMA. 2009, 302: 1171-1178. 10.1001/jama.2009.1320.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Elmberg M, Hultcrantz R, Ebrahim F, Olsson S, Lindgren S, Loof L, Stal P, Wallerstedt S, Almer S, Sandberg-Gertzen H, et al: Increased mortality risk in patients with phenotypic hereditary hemochromatosis but not in their first-degree relatives. Gastroenterology. 2009, 137: 1301-1309. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Berkson J: Limitations of the application of fourfold tables to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin. 1946, 2: 47-53. 10.2307/3002000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gedeborg R, Engquist H, Berglund L, Michaelsson K: Identification of incident injuries in hospital discharge registers. Epidemiology. 2008, 19: 860-867. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318181319e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kljakovic M, Abernethy D, de Ruiter I: Quality of diagnostic coding and information flow from hospital to general practice. Inform Prim Care. 2004, 12: 227-234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Linnersjo A, Hammar N, Gustavsson A, Reuterwall C: Recent time trends in acute myocardial infarction in Stockholm, Sweden. Int J Cardiol. 2000, 76: 17-21. 10.1016/S0167-5273(00)00366-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Guidelines for the diagnosis of heart failure. The Task Force on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 1995, 16: 741-751.Google Scholar
  36. Ingelsson E, Arnlov J, Sundstrom J, Lind L: The validity of a diagnosis of heart failure in a hospital discharge register. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005, 7: 787-791. 10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.12.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith JG, Platonov PG, Hedblad B, Engstrom G, Melander O: Atrial fibrillation in the Malmo diet and cancer study: a study of occurrence, risk factors and diagnostic validity. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009, 25: 95-102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Stegmayr B, Asplund K: Measuring stroke in the population: quality of routine statistics in comparison with a population-based stroke registry. Neuroepidemiology. 1992, 11: 204-213. 10.1159/000110933.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ros HS, Cnattingius S, Lipworth L: Comparison of risk factors for preeclampsia and gestational hypertension in a population-based cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 1998, 147: 1062-1070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hultgren R, Olofsson P, Wahlberg E: Gender differences in vascular interventions for lower limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001, 21: 22-27. 10.1053/ejvs.2000.1231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS, et al: The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988, 31: 315-324. 10.1002/art.1780310302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Turesson C, Jacobsson L, Bergstrom U: Extra-articular rheumatoid arthritis: prevalence and mortality. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999, 38: 668-674. 10.1093/rheumatology/38.7.668.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Leavitt RY, Fauci AS, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Hunder GG, Arend WP, Calabrese LH, Fries JF, Lie JT, Lightfoot RW, et al: The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Wegener's granulomatosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990, 33: 1101-1107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Smedby KE, Akerman M, Hildebrand H, Glimelius B, Ekbom A, Askling J: Malignant lymphomas in coeliac disease: evidence of increased risks for lymphoma types other than enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma. Gut. 2005, 54: 54-59. 10.1136/gut.2003.032094.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Bensing S, Brandt L, Tabaroj F, Sjoberg O, Nilsson B, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P, Kampe O: Increased death risk and altered cancer incidence pattern in patients with isolated or combined autoimmune primary adrenocortical insufficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008, 69: 697-704. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03340.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Ragnarson Tennvall G, Apelqvist J, Eneroth M: The inpatient care of patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers. A validation study of the correspondence between medical records and the Swedish Inpatient Registry with the consequences for cost estimations. J Intern Med. 2000, 248: 397-405. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00748.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ekbom A, Helmick C, Zack M, Adami HO: The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: a large, population-based study in Sweden. Gastroenterology. 1991, 100: 350-358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ekholm B, Ekholm A, Adolfsson R, Vares M, Osby U, Sedvall GC, Jonsson EG: Evaluation of diagnostic procedures in Swedish patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. Nord J Psychiatry. 2005, 59: 457-464. 10.1080/08039480500360906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Dalman C, Broms J, Cullberg J, Allebeck P: Young cases of schizophrenia identified in a national inpatient register--are the diagnoses valid?. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002, 37: 527-531. 10.1007/s00127-002-0582-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lichtenstein P, Bjork C, Hultman CM, Scolnick E, Sklar P, Sullivan PF: Recurrence risks for schizophrenia in a Swedish national cohort. Psychol Med. 2006, 36: 1417-1425. 10.1017/S0033291706008385.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Reutfors J: Life time OPCRIT generated DSM-IV diagnoses among patients with an initial clinical ICD schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis. 29th Nordic Congress of Psychiatr; Stockholm. 2009Google Scholar
  52. Kristjansson E, Allebeck P, Wistedt B: Validity of the diagnosis schizophrenia in a psychiatric inpatient register. 1987, 41: 229-234.Google Scholar
  53. Bergman B, Belfrage H, Grann M: Mentally disorderd offenders in Sweden: Forensic and general psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry. 1999, 20: 27-37.Google Scholar
  54. Jin YP, Gatz M, Johansson B, Pedersen NL: Sensitivity and specificity of dementia coding in two Swedish disease registries. Neurology. 2004, 63: 739-741.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Grann M, Haggård U, Tengström A, Woodhouse A, Långström N, Holmberg G, Kullgren G: Some experiences from registers of interest to forensic research in Sweden. Scand J Forensic Science. 1998, 78-80.Google Scholar
  56. Criteria for diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1978, 3: 565-566.Google Scholar
  57. Jiang GX, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Fredrikson S: Guillain-Barre syndrome in south-west Stockholm, 1973-1991, 1. Quality of registered hospital diagnoses and incidence. Acta Neurol Scand. 1995, 91: 109-117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hjalmarsson A, Blomqvist P, Skoldenberg B: Herpes simplex encephalitis in Sweden, 1990-2001: incidence, morbidity, and mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 45: 875-880. 10.1086/521262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Michaelsson K, Baron JA, Farahmand BY, Johnell O, Magnusson C, Persson PG, Persson I, Ljunghall S: Hormone replacement therapy and risk of hip fracture: population based case-control study. The Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group. Bmj. 1998, 316: 1858-1863.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A, Nystrom PO, Olaison G: Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. Bmj. 1994, 308: 107-110.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Zendehdel K, Nyren O, Edberg A, Ye W: Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Achalasia Patients, a Retrospective Cohort Study in Sweden. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007Google Scholar
  62. Nyren O, Yin L, Josefsson S, McLaughlin JK, Blot WJ, Engqvist M, Hakelius L, Boice JD, Adami HO: Risk of connective tissue disease and related disorders among women with breast implants: a nation-wide retrospective cohort study in Sweden. Bmj. 1998, 316: 417-422.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Merlo J, Lindblad U, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Hedblad B, Rastam J, Isacsson SO, Janzon L, Rastam L: Comparison of different procedures to identify probable cases of myocardial infarction and stroke in two Swedish prospective cohort studies using local and national routine registers. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000, 16: 235-243. 10.1023/A:1007634722658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ahlbom A: Acute myocardial infarction in Stockholm--a medical information system as an epidemiological tool. Int J Epidemiol. 1978, 7: 271-276. 10.1093/ije/7.3.271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Hammar N, Nerbrand C, Ahlmark G, Tibblin G, Tsipogianni A, Johansson S, Wilhelmsen L, Jacobsson S, Hansen O: Identification of cases of myocardial infarction: hospital discharge data and mortality data compared to myocardial infarction community registers. Int J Epidemiol. 1991, 20: 114-120. 10.1093/ije/20.1.114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Forberg JL, Green M, Bjork J, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L, Ohlin H, Ekelund U: In search of the best method to predict acute coronary syndrome using only the electrocardiogram from the emergency department. J Electrocardiol. 2009, 42: 58-63. 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.07.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Hallstrom B, Jonsson AC, Nerbrand C, Petersen B, Norrving B, Lindgren A: Lund Stroke Register: hospitalization pattern and yield of different screening methods for first-ever stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007, 115: 49-54. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00738.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wirehn AB, Karlsson HM, Carstensen JM: Estimating disease prevalence using a population-based administrative healthcare database. Scand J Public Health. 2007, 35: 424-431. 10.1080/14034940701195230.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Gedeborg R, Furebring M, Michaelsson K: Diagnosis-dependent misclassification of infections using administrative data variably affected incidence and mortality estimates in ICU patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60: 155-162.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Askling J, Fored CM, Brandt L, Baecklund E, Bertilsson L, Coster L, Geborek P, Jacobsson LT, Lindblad S, Lysholm J, et al: Risk and case characteristics of tuberculosis in rheumatoid arthritis associated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists in Sweden. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52: 1986-1992. 10.1002/art.21137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Dahl A, Berg S, Nilsson SE: Identification of dementia in epidemiological research: a study on the usefulness of various data sources. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007, 19: 381-389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, Backman L, Sandman PO, Winblad B: Occurrence of dementia in advanced age: the study design of the Kungsholmen Project. Neuroepidemiology. 1992, 11 (Suppl 1): 29-36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    73. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/450/prepub

Copyright

© Ludvigsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

Advertisement

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us