This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Volume, patterns, and types of sedentary behavior and cardio-metabolic health in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study
© Carson and Janssen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 15 October 2010
Accepted: 4 May 2011
Published: 4 May 2011
Cardio-metabolic risk factors are becoming more prevalent in children and adolescents. A lack of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) is an established determinant of cardio-metabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. Less is known about the relationship between sedentary behavior and cardio-metabolic health. Therefore, the objective was to examine the independent associations between volume, patterns, and types of sedentary behavior with cardio-metabolic risk factors among children and adolescents.
The results are based on 2527 children and adolescents (6-19 years old) from the 2003/04 and 2005/06 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). A cardio-metabolic risk score (CRS) was calculated based on age- and sex-adjusted waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and C-reactive protein values. Volume and patterns of sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were measured objectively using accelerometers. Types of sedentary behavior were measured by questionnaire. A series of logistic regression models were used to examine associations.
Volume and patterns of sedentary behavior were not predictors of high CRS after adjusting for MVPA and other confounders (P > 0.1). For types of sedentary behavior, high TV use, but not high computer use, was a predictor of high CRS after adjustment for MVPA and other confounders. Children and adolescents who watched ≥4 hours per day of TV were 2.53 (95% confidence interval: 1.45-4.42) times more likely to have high CRS than those who watched <1 hour per day. MVPA predicted high CRS after adjusting for all sedentary behavior measures and other confounders. After adjustment for waist circumference, MVPA also predicted high non-obesity CRS; however, the same relationship was not seen with TV use.
No association was observed between overall volume and patterns of sedentary behavior with cardio-metabolic risk factors in this large sample of children and adolescents. Conversely, high TV use and low MVPA were independently associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors. However, the association between high TV use and clustered cardio-metabolic risk factors appears to be mediated or confounded by obesity. Thus, TV and MVPA appear to be two separate behaviors that need to be targeted with different interventions and policies.
Cardio-metabolic risk factors, such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and glucose intolerance, are known predictors of coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes among adults . These risk factors are becoming more prevalent in children and adolescents, and approximately 50% of American youth have at least one cardio-metabolic risk factor . This is concerning as cardio-metabolic risk factors track from childhood to adulthood . In addition, cardio-metabolic risk factors during adolescence predict the development of sub-clinical cardiovascular disease , coronary heart disease , and mortality in adulthood . Therefore, improving the cardio-metabolic risk factor profile of young people has long-term implications on population health.
Physical inactivity is an established determinant of cardio-metabolic risk factors in children and adolescents . The majority of physical inactivity research has focused on how inadequate moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) influences health . However, even within highly active persons, MVPA accounts for only a fraction of total energy expenditure . An emerging area of study is the relation between sedentary behavior and health . Sedentary behavior refers to activities that involve minimal body movement and low energy expenditure . To date, two studies have examined the relationship between the overall volume of sedentary behavior with a summary cardio-metabolic risk score among children and adolescents [10, 11]. Although both studies found significant associations, the results need to be interpreted with caution. Specifically, neither study adjusted for MVPA even though MVPA is an independent predictor of cardio-metabolic risk factors .
In addition to the overall volume, the type of sedentary behavior appears to impact cardio-metabolic health. For example, a recent review reported that TV use is more strongly related to obesity than video game and computer use in young people . A limitation of the existing screen time (i.e., TV, computer, video game) literature is that only one study has considered the impact of the overall volume of sedentary behavior on the observed relationships .
Along with volume and types of sedentary behavior, consideration should be given to the patterns in which sedentary behavior is accumulated. Prolonged bouts of sedentary behavior are associated with cardio-metabolic health in adults [15, 16]. One study among adults reported that an increased number of breaks in sedentary behavior are associated with an improved cardio-metabolic risk factor profile, independent of total sedentary behavior time and MVPA . No study has examined the relationship between patterns of sedentary behavior and cardio-metabolic risk factors in the pediatric population. Children and adolescents spend extended periods of time being sedentary in and outside of school [9, 18, 19] and have sporadic MVPA patterns . It is unknown whether patterns of sedentary behavior independently impact cardio-metabolic risk factors in young people.
The purpose of this study was to comprehensively examine the relationships between the volume, patterns, and types of sedentary behavior with cardio-metabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. The specific objectives were to: (1) determine whether the volume of sedentary behavior predicts cardio-metabolic risk factors independent of MVPA; (2) determine whether patterns (bouts and breaks in bouts) of sedentary behavior predict cardio-metabolic risk factors independent of MVPA and the volume of sedentary behavior; and (3) determine whether different types of sedentary behavior are related to cardio-metabolic risk factors in a similar manner.
The study is based on the 2003-2004 and 2005-2006 cycles of the Nutrition Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of the US. NHANES consisted of a home interview and a physical exam conducted in a mobile examination center. Consent was obtained from all participants and their parents/guardians if <18 years old. NHANES was approved by the National Center for Health Statistics. The analyses presented here were approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at Queen's University.
A total of 6553 NHANES participants aged 6-19 attended the mobile examination center. We excluded 3208 participants with incomplete accelerometer information (as explained below) and an additional 918 participants with incomplete information on the cardio-metabolic outcome and covariate measures, leaving a final sample of 2527. There were no significant differences in age or gender (P > 0.05) between the participants that were included or excluded from the final sample. However, slightly more Hispanic (5.4%) and slightly less non-Hispanic white (3.2%) and non-Hispanic black (2.4%) participants were included in the final sample (P < 0.01).
Measurement of Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity
Volume of sedentary behavior, patterns of sedentary behavior (bouts and breaks in bouts), and physical activity variables were created by the authors based on the raw accelerometry data provided in the NHANES dataset. The Actigraph AM-7124 accelerometer (Actigraph, Ft. Walton Beach, FL) was the device used in the NHANES study. These are uniaxial accelerometers that record average intensities in one minute intervals or epochs. Participants were asked to wear the accelerometer on their right hip for 7 consecutive days except when sleeping or when the accelerometer could get wet.
Data from the accelerometers was downloaded by NHANES survey collaborators and checked for outliers and unreasonable or biologically implausible values, which were removed. Reasonable ranges of values were determined by criteria published in the literature and expert judgment . Further data reduction was completed by the authors. Initially, we removed days with incomplete information. A day was considered complete if it contained ≥10 hours of wear time , non-wear time was defined as a period of >20 minutes of zero counts . The second data reduction step involved removing participants with an insufficient number of days with complete data. Only participants with ≥4 complete days, including one weekend day, were included. The inclusion of a weekend day is important as there are significant weekday and weekend differences in MVPA and sedentary behavior [23, 24]. A 4-5 day accelerometer monitoring period has a test-retest reliability of 0.8 among children in grades 1-6 and 0.7 among adolescent in grades 7-12 .
Before we derived the sedentary behavior and physical activity variables from the raw accelerometry data, epoch cut-points were selected. There is currently substantial variation on the cut-points used to define sedentary behavior and different intensities of physical activity . We selected a cut-point of <100 counts per minute to define sedentary behavior . For MVPA, a regression equation developed by Freedson and colleagues, for 6-18 year olds, was used to estimate metabolic equivalents (METs) for each epoch value, based on the participant's age and the epoch count . MVPA was defined as ≥4.0 METs, based on established precedence in the pediatric exercise literature [25, 27]. Low intensity physical activity was defined as epoch values between 100 counts and an equivalent of 4.0 METs.
Finally, the type of sedentary behavior (TV or computer) was obtained by questionnaire from the NHANES dataset. TV and computer were selected because they were available in the dataset and they make up a large proportion of sedentary behavior time. For example, American youth spent 6-8 hours/day sedentary  and 4.5 hours/day using a TV or computer . Proxy respondents answered the questions for participants aged 6-11 and participants aged 12-19 responded themselves. Two questions were asked, "Over the past 30 days, on average about how many hours per day did (you/your child) sit and watch TV or video?" and "Over the past 30 days, on average how many hours per day did (you/your child) use a computer or play computer games?" There were 7 response options ranging from "none" to "5 hours or more". We collapsed these response options into 4 groups (<1 hour, 1 hour, 2-3 hours, ≥ 4 hours) based on frequency distributions.
Cardio-Metabolic Risk Factors
Waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL cholesterol), and C-reactive protein were the cardio-metabolic risk factors studied. These risk factors were selected because they were available in the NHANES dataset and because they capture different aspects of cardio-metabolic risk. All measurements were taken by trained personnel at the mobile examination center visit. Triglycerides and fasting glucose were not examined as cardio-metabolic risk factors due to the unavailability of fasting values in participants under the age of 12 in the NHANES dataset.
Waist circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm at the level of the iliac crest. Waist circumference is an effective measure of abdominal adiposity among children and adolescents  and is a better predictor of cardio-metabolic risk factors than the body mass index . Blood pressure was measured manually four consecutive times on the right arm while seated. We calculated the average blood pressures. We calculated non-HDL cholesterol by subtracting HDL cholesterol from total cholesterol . HDL cholesterol was measured using the direct HDL immunoassay method and total cholesterol was measured enzymatically in serum in a series of coupled reactions using cholesteryl ester hydrolase, cholesterol oxidase, and peroxidase. Non-HDL cholesterol was chosen as the lipid marker because it is an important indicator of cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk among children and adolescents that it is not reliant upon a fasting blood sample . C-reactive protein was measured by latex enhanced nephelometry. C-reactive protein was chosen as the inflammatory marker because of its availability in the dataset, known impact on cardiovascular disease, and because it is not reliant upon a fasting blood sample [33, 34].
Waist circumference and non-HDL cholesterol were not normally distributed so they were log transformed by the authors prior to analyses. Age-adjusted values were created by the authors for each of the cardio-metabolic risk factors because they change with normal growth and maturation . Using forward stepwise regression, each of the cardio-metabolic risk factors were regressed up to a full cubic polynomial in age (age, age2, age3) separately within males and females. Variables were allowed to enter or leave the model at P < 0.10. The standardized residuals were retained and used to represent the age-adjusted values. Participants were then ranked based on the residual for each risk factor. A mean of the ranks was used to represent a summary cardio-metabolic risk score (CRS). Blood pressure was not measured in children <8 years old, so the CRS for 6-7 year olds was limited to three risk factors. We categorized CRS into quartiles; the highest quartile denotes high CRS.
Age, gender, ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), socioeconomic status (SES), smoking status, and diet were considered as covariates. The poverty-to-income ratio, provided within the NHANES dataset, is a ratio between family income and poverty threshold and was used to measure SES . Smoking was assessed in NHANES by asking participants 12 and older, "Have you ever tried cigarette smoking, even 1 or 2 puffs?" We grouped participants into "yes" or "no" categories. Participants <12 years old were placed into the "no" category. Diet was assessed in NHANES via a 24 hour recall. We created four binary variables from the total nutrient values provided in the database: total fat (≤35% or >35% total calories), saturated fat (≤10% or >10% total calories), dietary cholesterol (≤300 or >300 mg/day), and sodium (≤2300 or >2300 mg/day) .
Analyses were completing using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and accounted for the complex design and sample weights of NHANES. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Relations between activity and sedentary behavior variables were determined using Pearson (continuous variables) and Spearman (categorical variables) correlations. Multiple logistic regression models were used to address the study objectives. All regression models predicted the highest CRS quartile and adjusted for various confounders including age, gender, ethnicity, SES, smoking, total fat, saturated fat, dietary cholesterol, sodium, and MVPA. To address objective 1 (volume of sedentary behavior), an initial regression model was run that included the sedentary behavior volume measure and all confounders except for MVPA. A second model was run that also adjusted for MVPA. To address objective 2 (patterns of sedentary behavior), initial regression models were run that included (a) the bouts of sedentary behavior measure and all confounders except MVPA, and (b) the breaks in bouts of sedentary behavior measure, volume of sedentary behavior, and all confounders except MVPA. Additional models were run that also adjusted for MVPA. To address objective 3 (types of sedentary behavior), initial regression models were run that included (a) TV use and all confounders except MVPA, and (b) computer use and all confounders except MVPA. Additional models were run that also adjusted for MVPA. Along with the analyses performed to address the main objectives, some supplemental analysis was conducted. First, age and gender interactions were explored in the primary analyses as well as sedentary behavior and MVPA interactions. Second, the relationship between MVPA and CRS was considered by running an initial logistic regression model that included the MVPA measure and all confounders. An additional model was run that also adjusted for overall volume of sedentary behavior. Third, the role of obesity as a mediator or confounder in the relationship between the sedentary behavior and MVPA variables with CRS was examined. Consistent with previous literature, a non-obesity CRS variable was created by removing waist circumference, and the above analyses were repeated predicting high non-obesity CRS, while further adjusting for waist circumference [10, 12, 38]. Finally, the relationship between the sedentary behavior and MVPA variables with individual CRS components was explored. All logistic regression models predicted the highest quartiles of the individual components. The same modeling strategies described above in this paragraph for the CRS outcome variable were used to explore these relationships.
Total (N = 2527)
Total wear time (minutes/day)
Sedentary behavior (% of total time)
Bouts of sedentary behavior (% of total time)
Breaks in bouts of sedentary behavior (% of bouts)
MVPA (% of total time)
Low intensity activity (% of total time)
Cardio-metabolic risk score components
Waist circumference (cm)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg, N = 2265)
C - reactive protein (mmol/l)
Correlations between sedentary behavior and physical activity variables.
Volume of SB
Bouts of SB
Breaks in Bouts of SB
Low Intensity PA
Volume of SB
Bouts of SB
Breaks in Bouts of SB
Low Intensity PA
Objective 1: Volume of Sedentary Behavior
High CRS according to volume, patterns, and types of sedentary behavior.
Total (N = 2527)
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)
Volume of sedentary behavior
P trend = 0.15
Ptrend = 0.20
Ptrend = 0.68
Bouts of sedentary behavior
Ptrend = 0.24
Ptrend = 0.27
Breaks in bouts of sedentary behavior
Ptrend = 0.66
Ptrend = 0.67
Ptrend = 0.83
Ptrend = 0.76
Ptrend = 0.75
Objective 2: Patterns of Sedentary Behavior
The prevalence of high CRS did not vary across quartiles of the bouts of sedentary behavior and the breaks in bouts of sedentary behavior measures (Table 3, Ptrend > 0.2). The two sedentary behavior pattern variables did not predict (Ptrend > 0.2) high CRS after adjusting for various confounders, the volume of sedentary behavior, (model 1) and MVPA (model 2).
Objective 3: Types of Sedentary Behavior
The prevalence of high CRS increased significantly with increasing hours of TV use (Table 3, Ptrend < 0.01). High TV use remained a significant predictor of high CRS after adjustment for various confounders (model 1) and MVPA (model 2). Participants who watched ≥4 hours/day of TV were 2.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45-4.42) times more likely to have high CRS than those who watched <1 hour/day. Computer use was not related to high CRS (Ptrend > 0.7).
There were no significant gender and age interactions in any of the models that examined the relationship between the volume, patterns, and types of sedentary behavior with high CRS. As well, there were no significant sedentary behavior and MVPA interactions.
After adjusting for confounders and the volume of sedentary behavior, participants in the second (odds ratio = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27-0.71), third (0.30, 0.16-0.55), and fourth (0.16, 0.06-0.40) MVPA quartiles were significantly less likely to have high CRS than participants in quartile one (Ptrend < 0.01). Similar associations were observed when predicting high non-obesity CRS after further adjusting for waist circumference. However, TV use was not associated with high non-obesity CRS. For example, participants who watch ≥4 hours/day of TV were not significantly (1.09, 0.63-1.86) more likely to have high non-obesity CRS than those who watched <1 hour/day after further adjusting for waist circumference.
High waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, non-HDL, and C-reactive protein according to volume, patterns, and types of sedentary behavior.
Systolic Blood Pressure
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)
OR (95% CI)
Volume of sedentary behavior
P trend = 0.66
Ptrend = 0.72
Ptrend = 0.16
Ptrend = 0.81
Bouts of sedentary behavior
Ptrend = 0.42
Ptrend = 0.62
Ptrend = 0.16
Ptrend = 0.69
Breaks in bouts of sedentary behavior
Ptrend = 0.77
Ptrend = 0.77
Ptrend = 0.69
Ptrend = 0.69
Ptrend = 0.41
Ptrend = 0.03
Ptrend = 0.05
Ptrend = 0.58
Ptrend = 0.94
Ptrend = 0.73
Ptrend = 0.62
Finally, the results of all of the aforementioned analyses were consistent when the analyses were repeated using linear regression with continuous CRS and continuous individual CRS component outcome variables.
This study examined associations between the volume, patterns, and types of sedentary behavior with cardio-metabolic risk factors in 6-19 year olds. Although this representative sample spent 50.8% of their waking hours in sedentary behavior, the volume of sedentary behavior was not an independent predictor of high-risk cardio-metabolic factor values. Similarly, patterns of sedentary behavior, such as the amount of time in bouts of sedentary behavior ≥30 minutes, was not related to cardio-metabolic risk factors. However, the type of sedentary behavior was important. More specifically, the amount of time spent watching TV was related to cardio-metabolic risk factors, while computer use was not.
Among adults, the volume of sedentary behavior, as measured objectively by accelerometers, is associated with a clustering of cardio-metabolic risk factors , waist circumference , and glucose intolerance  that are independent of MVPA and other confounders. The relationship between the volume of sedentary behavior and cardio-metabolic risk factors appears to be stronger and more consistent in adults than young people. In our study, the volume of objectively measured sedentary behavior was not associated with high CRS or its individual components. Two previous cross-sectional studies within children and/or adolescents have examined the association between the volume of sedentary behavior, measured by an accelerometer, with a summary cardio-metabolic risk score [10, 11]. Positive associations were observed in both studies. However, neither study examined whether these associations were independent of MVPA, which is an important limitation, given that MVPA is related to sedentary behavior (see Table 2). In addition, five previous studies within children and adolescents, all cross-sectional in design, have examined the association between the volume of sedentary behavior, measured by an accelerometer, with individual risk factors such as insulin resistance , blood pressure , and various measures of obesity [42–44]. One of these studies found moderate positive associations (r = 0.21) between the volume of sedentary behavior and insulin resistance among 9-10 year old children independent of obesity . Similarly, this study did not determine whether the associations were independent of MVPA. In the three studies that examined obesity measures, associations with volume of sedentary behavior did not exist or was severely attenuated after adjustment for MVPA [42–44].
Emerging evidence in adults suggests that patterns in which sedentary behavior is accumulated may independently impact cardio-metabolic risk. More specifically, a cross-sectional study of 168 Australian adults found that the frequency of breaks in sedentary behavior was negatively related to waist circumference, triglycerides, and glucose levels, independent of MVPA and the overall volume of sedentary behavior . We are unaware of previous studies that have examined these associations in children or adolescents. Thus, our observation that patterns of sedentary behavior, including sedentary behavior bouts and breaks in bouts of sedentary behavior, were not related to cardio-metabolic risk factors in 6-19 year olds makes a novel contribution to the literature. It is possible that the differences in results between the present study and the previously mentioned adult study  is explained by a physiological difference in the way sedentary behavior impacts health in adults and young people. It is also possible that the different results are due to differences in the way "breaks" were measured in the two studies. While the present study looked at the frequency of breaks within prolonged (≥30 minutes) bouts, the Australian study counted a break any time the participant moved from a sedentary minute to a minute above the 100 count per minute accelerometry threshold . Due to the dearth of information, more research is needed to better understand the relationship between patterns of sedentary behavior and cardio-metabolic health in all ages.
Our third objective was to determine if different types of sedentary behavior impact cardio-metabolic health in a similar manner. Several studies among young people have found associations between TV and total screen time with individual cardio-metabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome [12, 14, 45, 46]. To our knowledge only one of these studies reported on the impact of different screen time measures on cardio-metabolic risk factors other than obesity . This particular study found that blood pressure was associated with TV but not with computer use . Also, a recent literature review found that TV use is more strongly associated with obesity in children and adolescents than is computer use . Likewise, we found that the odds of a high CRS increased in a dose-response manner within increasing TV volume, independent of MVPA, but that computer use did not predict CRS. Similar associations were seen with the individual components of CRS. There are two possible explanations for these findings. First, amongst the sedentary behaviors, TV may be at the lowest end of the energy expenditure spectrum. In fact, one study reported that energy expenditure in children and adolescents was lower while watching TV then while sleeping . Second, TV encourages between meal snacking  and is associated with a greater exposure to junk food advertisements than other screen time measures . Even though various dietary measures (total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, and sodium) were adjusted for in this study, residual confounding may have been present. Future research needs to consider the impact of other types of sedentary behavior (reading, homework, etc.) on the health of young people.
Interestingly, in the present study the CRS variable was predicted by a self-report measure of TV use but not an objective measure of overall sedentary behavior volume or the overall volume of sedentary behavior accumulated in prolonged bouts. Also, TV use was poorly correlated (r ≤ 0.08) to these two objective measures. There are three possible explanations for these observations. First, the uniaxial accelerometer used in NHANES may not be sensitive enough to differentiate between sitting and standing like an inclinometer . Also, participants may have been more likely to keep their accelerometer on during their daily activities and MVPA, and take it off later in the evening while watching TV . Therefore, the objectively measured sedentary behavior may not have captured 100% of the sedentary behavior for some participants. Second, the specific sedentary behavior of TV may have a unique impact on cardio-metabolic risk factors due to its impact on energy expenditure and intake, as previously discussed. Third, the catchment period of sedentary behavior differed between the self- report measure (past 30 days) and the accelerometer measure (7 days). Perhaps, the longer catchment period better reflects typical behavior compared to the shorter period.
We also examined the association between objectively measured MVPA with CRS and non-obesity CRS. The finding that MVPA was strongly and independently associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors in a dose-response manner is consistent with previous literature . For example, a dose-response relationship between MVPA and cardio-metabolic risk factors was observed in approximately 2000 participants of the European Youth Heart Study . As with the present study, the associations between MVPA and clustered cardio-metabolic risk factors within children and adolescents have been reported to be independent of TV use and obesity . However, similar to the present study, the association between TV use and clustered cardio-metabolic risk factors do not appear to be independent of obesity . This suggests that obesity mediates or confounds the relationship between TV use and clustered cardio-metabolic risk factors .
Strengths of this study include the objective measures of MVPA and most of the sedentary behavior variables as well as our novel approach used to examine patterns of sedentary behavior. Limitations of the study include the cross-sectional design, which limits the ability to make causal inferences about the relationships. Also, our final sample was not representative of the population in terms of ethnicity. In addition, the accelerometers used may not be sensitive enough to differentiate between sitting and standing . Furthermore, we only considered two types of sedentary behavior, both of which were measured via self-report. The biases with these self-reported measures may have results in an underestimation of the strength of associations between the TV, computer, and CRS variables. Finally, although a variety of confounders were considered, we were not able adjust for pubertal development, a factor which influences physiological processes .
No association was observed between overall volume and patterns of sedentary behavior with cardio-metabolic risk factors in this large sample of children and adolescents. Conversely, TV use and low MVPA were both independently associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors. However, the association between high TV use and clustered cardio-metabolic risk factors appears to be mediated or confounded by obesity. In addition, the TV and MVPA variables were poorly correlated with one another. This suggests that these are two separate behaviors, and that different policy and intervention programs are needed to increase MVPA and decrease TV use in an effort to prevent and reduce cardio-metabolic risk factors.
This research was supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). VC was supported by a CIHR - Frederick Banting and Charles Best Doctoral Award. IJ was supported by a New Investigator Award from CIHR and an Early Researcher Award from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.
- Katzmarzyk PT, Perusse L, Malina RM, Bergeron J, Despres JP, Bouchard C: Stability of indicators of the metabolic syndrome from childhood and adolescence to young adulthood: the Quebec Family Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001, 54: 190-195. 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00315-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson WD, Kroon JJ, Greenway FL, Bouchard C, Ryan D, Katzmarzyk PT: Prevalence of risk factors for metabolic syndrome in adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2001-2006. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009, 163: 371-377. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Kahonen M, Taittonen L, Laitinen T, Maki-Torkko N, Jarvisalo MJ, Uhari M, Jokinen E, Ronnemaa T, Akerblom HK, Viikari JSA: Cardiovascular risk factors in childhood and carotid artery intima-media thickness in adulthood: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. JAMA. 2003, 290: 2277-2283. 10.1001/jama.290.17.2277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker JL, Olsen LW, Sorensen TI: Childhood body-mass index and the risk of coronary heart disease in adulthood. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 2329-2337. 10.1056/NEJMoa072515.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Franks PW, Hanson RL, Knowler WC, Sievers ML, Bennett PH, Looker HC: Childhood obesity, other cardiovascular risk factors, and premature death. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362: 485-493. 10.1056/NEJMoa0904130.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Andersen LB, Harro M, Sardinha LB, Froberg K, Ekelund U, Brage S, Anderssen SA: Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). Lancet. 2006, 368: 299-304. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69075-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spanier PA, Marshall SJ, Faulkner GE: Tackling the obesity pandemic: a call for sedentary behaviour research. Can J Public Health. 2006, 97: 255-257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay MS, Esliger DW, Tremblay A, Colley R: Incidental movement, lifestyle-embedded activity and sleep: new frontiers in physical activity assessment. Can J Public Health. 2007, 98 (Suppl 2): S208-217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salmon J, Dunstan D, Owen N: Should we be concerned about children spending extended periods of time in sedentary pursuits even among the highly active?. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008, 3: 66-68. 10.1080/17477160802169672.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekelund U, Anderssen SA, Froberg K, Sardinha LB, Andersen LB, Brage S: Independent associations of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness with metabolic risk factors in children: the European youth heart study. Diabetologia. 2007, 50: 1832-1840. 10.1007/s00125-007-0762-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Gomez D, Eisenmann JC, Gomez-Martinez S, Veses A, Marcos A, Veiga OL: Sedentary behavior, adiposity, and cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents. The AFINOS Study. Rev Esp Cardio. 2010, 63: 277-285.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ekelund U, Brage S, Froberg K, Harro M, Anderssen SA, Sardinha LB, Riddoch C, Andersen LB: TV viewing and physical activity are independently associated with metabolic risk in children: the European Youth Heart Study. PLoS Med. 2006, 3: e488-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030488.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rey-Lopez JP, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Biosca M, Moreno LA: Sedentary behaviour and obesity development in children and adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008, 18: 242-251. 10.1016/j.numecd.2007.07.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Gomez D, Tucker J, Heelan KA, Welk GJ, Eisenmann JC: Associations between sedentary behavior and blood pressure in young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009, 163: 724-730. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jennings G, Nelson L, Nestel P, Esler M, Korner P, Burton D, Bazelmans J: The effects of changes in physical activity on major cardiovascular risk factors, hemodynamics, sympathetic function, and glucose utilization in man: a controlled study of four levels of activity. Circulation. 1986, 73: 30-40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lipman RL, Raskin P, Love T, Triebwasser J, Lecocq FR, Schnure JJ: Glucose intolerance during decreased physical activity in man. Diabetes. 1972, 21: 101-107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N: Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31: 661-666. 10.2337/dc07-2046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, Troiano RP: Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008, 167: 875-881. 10.1093/aje/kwm390.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Atkin AJ, Gorely T, Biddle SJ, Marshall SJ, Cameron N: Critical hours: physical activity and sedentary behavior of adolescents after school. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2008, 20: 446-456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adamo KB, Prince SA, Tricco AC, Connor-Gorber S, Tremblay M: A comparison of indirect versus direct measures for assessing physical activity in the pediatric population: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009, 4: 2-27. 10.1080/17477160802315010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Codebook for Data Production (2005-2006). Physical Activity Monitor - Raw Intensity Value Data (PAXRAW_D): Person Level Data. 2008Google Scholar
- Masse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, Matthews CE, Trost SG, Catellier DJ, Treuth M: Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005, 37: S544-554. 10.1249/01.mss.0000185674.09066.8a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC: Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed?. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32: 426-431. 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gorely T, Marshall SJ, Biddle SJ: Couch kids: correlates of television viewing among youth. Int J Behav Med. 2004, 11: 152-163. 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1103_4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reilly JJ, Penpraze V, Hislop J, Davies G, Grant S, Paton JY: Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data. Arch Dis Child. 2008, 93: 614-619. 10.1136/adc.2007.133272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freedson P, Pober D, Janz KF: Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005, 37: S523-530. 10.1249/01.mss.0000185658.28284.ba.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrell JS, McMurray RG, Baggett CD, Pennell ML, Pearce PF, Bangdiwala SI: Energy costs of physical activities in children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005, 37: 329-336. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000153115.33762.3F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iannotti RJ, Kogan MD, Janssen I, Boyce WF: Patterns of adolescent physical activity, screen-based media use, and positive and negative health indicators in the U.S. and Canada. J Adolesc Health. 2009, 44: 493-499. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.10.142.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Taylor RW, Jones IE, Williams SM, Goulding A: Evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and the conicity index as screening tools for high trunk fat mass, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in children aged 3-19 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000, 72: 490-495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Srinivasan SR, Chen W, Malina RM, Bouchard C, Berenson GS: Combined influence of body mass index and waist circumference on coronary artery disease risk factors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2005, 115: 1623-1630. 10.1542/peds.2004-2588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gardner CD, Winkleby MA, Fortmann SP: Population frequency distribution of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES III], 1988-1994). Am J Cardiol. 2000, 86: 299-304. 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)00918-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Joshi D, Sempos CT: Non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular risk factors among adolescents with and without impaired fasting glucose. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009, 34: 136-142. 10.1139/H08-149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ridker PM: Cardiology Patient Page. C-reactive protein: a simple test to help predict risk of heart attack and stroke. Circulation. 2003, 108: e81-85. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000093381.57779.67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oliveira AC, Oliveira AM, Adan LF, Oliveira NF, Silva AM, Ladeia AM: C-reactive protein and metabolic syndrome in youth: a strong relationship?. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008, 16: 1094-1098. 10.1038/oby.2008.43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cook S, Auinger P, Huang TT: Growth curves for cardio-metabolic risk factors in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2009, 155 (S6): e15-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Fertility & Family Statistics Branch. Current Population Survey: Definitions and explanations. 2004Google Scholar
- US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 2005Google Scholar
- Rizzo NS, Ruiz JR, Hurtig-Wennlof A, Ortega FB, Sjostrom M: Relationship of physical activity, fitness, and fatness with clustered metabolic risk in children and adolescents: the European youth heart study. J Pediatr. 2007, 150: 388-394. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.12.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Healy GN, Wijndaele K, Dunstan DW, Shaw JE, Salmon J, Zimmet PZ, Owen N: Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Diabetes Care. 2008, 31: 369-371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N: Objectively measured light-intensity physical activity is independently associated with 2-h plasma glucose. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 1384-1389. 10.2337/dc07-0114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sardinha LB, Andersen LB, Anderssen SA, Quiterio AL, Ornelas R, Froberg K, Riddoch CJ, Ekelund U: Objectively measured time spent sedentary is associated with insulin resistance independent of overall and central body fat in 9- to 10-year-old Portuguese children. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31: 569-575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steele RM, van Sluijs EM, Cassidy A, Griffin SJ, Ekelund U: Targeting sedentary time or moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity: independent relations with adiposity in a population-based sample of 10-y-old British children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 90: 1185-1192. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekelund U, Sardinha LB, Anderssen SA, Harro M, Franks PW, Brage S, Cooper AR, Andersen LB, Riddoch C, Froberg K: Associations between objectively assessed physical activity and indicators of body fatness in 9- to 10-y-old European children: a population-based study from 4 distinct regions in Europe (the European Youth Heart Study). Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 80: 584-590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Purslow LR, Hill C, Saxton J, Corder K, Wardle J: Differences in physical activity and sedentary time in relation to weight in 8-9 year old children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008, 5: 67-10.1186/1479-5868-5-67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mark AE, Janssen I: Relationship between screen time and metabolic syndrome in adolescents. J Public Health (Oxf). 2008, 30: 153-160. 10.1093/pubmed/fdn022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Gomez D, Rey-Lopez JP, Chillon P, Gomez-Martinez S, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Martin-Matillas M, Garcia-Fuentes M, Delgado M, Moreno LA, Veiga OL, Eisenmann JC, Marcos A, Avena Study Group: Excessive TV viewing and cardiovascular disease risk factors in adolescents. The AVENA cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 274-10.1186/1471-2458-10-274.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Klesges RC, Shelton ML, Klesges LM: Effects of television on metabolic rate: potential implications for childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 1993, 91: 281-286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Francis LA, Lee Y, Birch LL: Parental weight status and girls' television viewing, snacking, and body mass indexes. Obes Res. 2003, 11: 143-151. 10.1038/oby.2003.23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Harrison K, Marske AL: Nutritional content of foods advertised during the television programs children watch most. Am J Public Health. 2005, 95: 1568-1574. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.048058.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chastin SF, Granat MH: Methods for objective measure, quantification and analysis of sedentary behaviour and inactivity. Gait Posture. 2009, 31: 82-86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT: U.S. population profile of time-stamped accelerometer outputs: Impact of wear time. J Phys Act Health. 2010,Google Scholar
- Ruiz JR, Ortega FB: Physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adolescents. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports. 2009, 3: 281-287. 10.1007/s12170-009-0043-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dorn LD: Measuring puberty. J Adolesc Health. 2006, 39: 625-626. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.05.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/274/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.