- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Public health campaigns and obesity - a critique
© Walls et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 26 July 2010
- Accepted: 27 February 2011
- Published: 27 February 2011
Controlling obesity has become one of the highest priorities for public health practitioners in developed countries. In the absence of safe, effective and widely accessible high-risk approaches (e.g. drugs and surgery) attention has focussed on community-based approaches and social marketing campaigns as the most appropriate form of intervention. However there is limited evidence in support of substantial effectiveness of such interventions.
To date there is little evidence that community-based interventions and social marketing campaigns specifically targeting obesity provide substantial or lasting benefit. Concerns have been raised about potential negative effects created by a focus of these interventions on body shape and size, and of the associated media targeting of obesity.
A more appropriate strategy would be to enact high-level policy and legislative changes to alter the obesogenic environments in which we live by providing incentives for healthy eating and increased levels of physical activity. Research is also needed to improve treatments available for individuals already obese.
- Physical Activity
- Healthy Eating
- Social Marketing
- Regulatory Reform
The increasing prevalence of obesity is now the target of public health effort in most developed countries . The cause of this increasing prevalence of obesity is attributed to societal changes leading to reduced physical activity and increased consumption of energy-dense foods [2, 3]. Obesity-reduction strategies in the form of community-based interventions and social marketing campaigns have been established often emphasising the desirability of an ideal body weight. The strategy for achieving this is by eating less, eating healthier foods, and exercising more [4–6] but the primary focus is the maintenance of healthy body weight and shape [7–12]. In general these interventions have had a whole-population focus [2, 12–14].
Community-based interventions and social marketing campaigns for obesity reduction
Community-based interventions are strategies that engage with whole 'communities', conceptualised along geographic boundaries (eg. villages and suburbs) or small social units (e.g. schools and workplaces) in order to address the factors that contribute to an outcome such as weight gain . Examples of such interventions include:
the building of sporting facilities and playgrounds, mapping out of walking itineraries, and the hiring of sports instructors;
changes to canteen menus, the introduction of fruit to canteen menus, reductions in television watching and increases in physical activity after school .
In this article we differentiate between these type of small- scale interventions and regulatory interventions that are enacted at governmental level and have wider reach and scope . However the distinction is not always so clear -community-based interventions can utilise policy change, at a local level, to address obesity. The Recommended Community Strategies and Measurements to Prevent Obesity in the United States: Implementation and Measurement Guide is an example of a guide for environmental and policy change strategies and measures for local governments and communities . Social marketing is the application of marketing to catalyse behavioural change in a targeted community or population .
Most community-based interventions and social marketing campaigns to address obesity have set out to address obesity across the entire community, rather than targeting an obese or overweight subset of the community or population [7, 12, 13, 22–25]. This is understandable, given that weight gain over recent decades has occurred across the range of body weight, not simply in the overweight or obese [26–28]. The focus of social marketing is inherently behaviour change in the individual . Community-based interventions vary in the emphasis placed on individual behavioural change and in their explicit focus on obesity and body image [2, 12, 22, 29, 30]. Most social marketing and community-based interventions have emphasised the importance of healthy eating and physical activity, and some have emphasised the desirability of achieving a healthy body weight [4–7, 12, 28]. Less commonly other factors likely to affect body weight, such as stress and lack of sleep [31–33], are also addressed.
There is sparse evidence that even the most well-designed of such interventions are effective at addressing obesity, either weight gain or maintenance, and virtually none that they are sustainable in the long term [13, 25, 34–37]. The results of several programmes have been published. The substantially beneficial ones have generally been in children [16, 17, 38–40], in whom behaviour can be more easily modified than in adults [2, 41–44]. Social marketing campaigns that have targeted weight loss explicitly have generally shown poor weight loss outcomes [13, 45].
A well recognised potential downside of the community-based programmes and social marketing campaigns targeting obesity is their promotion, exacerbated by the media, of the social desirability of thinness [46, 48–50]. The desirability of 'normal' body weight is emphasised to an extent that in some cases overstates the public health evidence for benefit; and ignores ethnic and age differences [51–53]. The reinforcement by such interventions of the already entrenched attitudes regarding the undesirability of being overweight may be harmful to some people [23, 34, 49, 53, 54]. The mistreatment of obese people has been well documented [46, 53, 55–57]. But there is little known about the psychological impact on people who are mild to moderately overweight, particularly in young women and female adolescents, who face the strongest social pressure to be thin [58, 59].
High-risk approaches to obesity reduction
Addressing lifestyle (diet and physical activity) is generally the first approach tried for assisting weight loss in the obese. But such change rarely achieves satisfactory results [34, 60, 61]. If success is not achieved following lifestyle change, the key methods for reducing weight in obese patients are drug treatment and, in the case of severely obese patients, surgery [60, 62, 63].
Anti-obesity or weight-loss drugs are those pharmaceutical agents designed to reduce or control weight by altering physiological processes . However the weight loss achievable from such interventions is fairly minimal - approximately 5% of body weight [65–67]. Furthermore, current drug treatments for obesity appear to have little long-term value and are associated with adverse effects [66, 68]. Two of the most widely used agents have recently been removed from market because of serious adverse effects .
The body responds to the reduced food consumption during weight loss via dieting or medication by implementing compensatory responses with the aim of achieving positive energy balance . Obesity surgery or bariatric surgery works by circumventing these compensatory responses, creating a feeling of satiety after a small intake of food , and resulting in the maintenance of a negative energy balance . In contrast to drug therapy, surgery has demonstrated significant efficacy [72–74]. Long-term studies have shown that surgery can result in reversal of type 2 diabetic states, improvement in cardiovascular risk factors, and a significant reduction in mortality [75–78]. But access to this intervention is always likely to be limited to the individuals at the very highest risk and those who can afford the procedure [79, 80]. Furthermore, serious adverse effects are experienced by some patients having undergone surgery [74, 81].
Given the uncertainty of the balance between 'benefit' and harm associated with community-based programmes and social marketing campaigns that specifically target the undesirability of obesity, the approach to controlling the increasing prevalence of this condition should shift towards dietary and physical activity interventions where there is a better established evidence base and a stronger prospect of benefit [2, 61, 82–88]. This could best be achieved by decreasing the focus on undesirable features of obesity and towards a focus on the public health benefits of healthy diets with a low content of processed, energy-dense foods and a high intake of fruit and vegetables, and physical activity. Such changes should focus on the benefits of a healthy diet and physical activity rather than on obesity per se. However promotion of a healthy diet and increased physical activity would be expected to lead to the achievement of weight control in current generations, and the prevention of weight gain in future generations.
Having said this, community-based interventions designed to improve dietary quality and physical activity levels have generally been unsuccessful whenever they are dependent on an individual acquiring the motivation to eat/act differently to the people in his/her social and peer groups or consume a diet markedly different to that readily available in the community [13, 54, 89, 90]. Strategies reliant on individual behaviour change are unlikely to achieve their goals [91, 92]. Success in encouraging consumers to make healthy dietary choices is likely to require society-wide changes that reduce the attractiveness and availability of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods [93, 94]. Healthy options need to be made more accessible, available and desirable than the unhealthy alternatives. It is unlikely that this will be achieved without legislative changes .
As a preventive measure, regulatory reform is one of society's most powerful mechanisms for change, with the potential to create significant shifts in culture, attitudes and behaviour. There is currently little evidence in support of a regulatory approach to addressing obesity [95–98]. However this lack of evidence is likely due to the early stage we are at in terms of addressing obesity. Regulation in many other areas of public health - seat belt use, vaccinations and occupational safety, for example - has resulted in important health benefits [95, 99, 100]. One of history's key regulatory reforms in public health, the 'sanitary reform' of 19th century Britain, has been voted by readers of the British Medical Journal as the most important medical milestone since 1840 . To use an example from tobacco control, the marked reductions in the prevalence of smoking observed in most developed countries over recent decades could not have been brought about without regulatory means .
Some of these targets for legislative change had advantages over obesity. However advocates of these other areas, advocates of tobacco control, for example, also faced considerable challenges . Given the history of regulatory reform in public health, it is likely that well-designed policy and legislative changes could also play an important role in obesity prevention.
food pricing adjustments such as subsidies on fruit and vegetables and taxation applied to energy-dense nutrient-poor food;
increasing exposure to healthy food (and decreasing exposure to unhealthy food) via zoning and restrictions on the display of foods in locations such as supermarkets, for example; and
improving the image of healthy food (and making unhealthy food less attractive) via restrictions on advertising and the presentation of caloric contents of restaurant meals, for example .
The enactment of such policies should be based on a broad, whole-systems approach to food policy and public health [13, 108, 109]. Such consideration would involve health professionals working with people from outside the health sector and being involved in policy development outside their usual areas of expertise. The specific options cannot generally be tested ahead of implementation; however they are practical, based on reasoned and reasonable assumptions , and would be enacted from a whole-systems paradigm. Without such a whole-systems approach to policy change, there is the potential for one policy to negate another's effectiveness [13, 28, 109]. For example, a system of subsidising fruit and vegetables and increasing taxation on 'unhealthy' foods could be undermined by the strong agricultural subsidies on the production of sugar, meat and dairy products, as reportedly occurs both in the US and EU currently [110, 111]. (Others have argued for a negligible effect of such interventions on consumer prices of food ).
A regulatory approach to addressing obesity also has an additional potential advantage over community-based and social marketing interventions - a greater potential for reducing inequalities in obesity. The messages espoused by community-based and social marketing interventions are more likely to be heeded by those with already high levels of education; people with lower educational attainment are much less likely to change their behaviour as a result of education efforts [113–117]. Community-based interventions and social marketing campaigns can focus specifically on areas (e.g. schools) with a high density of families of low socio-economic status and poor education [118, 119]. However legislative measures, and particularly those broader policies influencing income distribution, employment, housing and social services, are more likely to affect the whole population, regardless of educational attainment [93, 120]. Furthermore, Friel et al. (2007) and others have suggested that not just obesity itself, but also its unequal distribution across society, are driven by the same societal conditions [13, 97]. Thus regulatory reform addressing these same conditions could be considerably beneficial. Regulatory interventions also have the benefit of less potential to stigmatise obesity.
One of the main difficulties with enacting such policy and legislative change is the opposition from the food and beverage industry [2, 121–123]. The industry has strongly opposed legislative and regulatory approaches that encourage healthy eating when these may restrict its profitability [124–126]. It has placed considerable pressure on federal and state legislatures, at least in the United States, to enact statutes prohibiting lawsuits against food and beverage companies and restaurants for obesity-related claims [2, 125]. It has supported health promotion measures addressing obesity, but those measures with the likely outcome of increasing consumer confusion rather than promoting healthy eating . The food and beverage industry must be regulated in new ways if any change in the epidemiology of obesity is to be achieved [2, 126–128].
Furthermore, the political context in which regulatory change occurs must be better considered and integrated into the strategic planning of the implementation of any chosen framework of regulatory intervention. Analysis of the history of regulatory interventions in public health has revealed the public recognition of a 'crisis' situation as a key factor preceding regulatory intervention . Thus, more effectively structured communication of the evidence regarding the crisis reached in terms of obesity and the influence of the environment on individual attitudes and behaviours in regards to nutrition will be necessary for the generation of the requisite public support [98, 100, 103]. This information must be sensitively communicated and debated, however, so as to avoid further stigmatising individuals with obesity . The 'individual choice' paradigm must be regularly challenged .
In addition to policy and legislative change, further research is required to improve high-risk interventions capable of assisting those with established obesity. Such individuals are unlikely to be helped by population-wide programs [2, 34]. Improved high-risk interventions are important to assist the increasingly large proportion of the population in need of medical assistance to induce weight loss [2, 34, 60, 129]. The prevalence of obesity and severe obesity is high in a number of countries. In the US in 2007-08, the prevalence of obesity in adults was 34%. The prevalence of severe obesity - grades 2 and 3 - was 14% and 6%, respectively . Furthermore, Walls et al. (2010) have shown in Australia that if current incidence rates remain the same the prevalence of obesity will increase by 70% between 2000 and 2025. Recent data validates this prediction . Research to improve high-risk interventions is also important considering that even if policy and legislative chances were enacted to combat obesity, it is likely that their positive impact would be in preventing weight gain, and would be most beneficial for the younger generation [34, 132].
Community-based programmes, social marketing campaigns and associated media focussing on the undesirability of obesity are poorly supported by existing evidence, and have the potential for harm.
A more fruitful area for intervention is the enactment of high-level policy and legislative changes to provide incentives for healthy eating and increased physical activity. Such change must impact on the ability of the food and beverage industry to encourage unhealthy consumption. Adoption of healthier eating habits, complemented with increased levels of physical activity, provides the population-wide strategy most likely to reduce the incidence of obesity.
The development of evidence for regulatory reform addressing obesity should be a priority. Further research is also needed to improve management options for those with established obesity who are unlikely to benefit from population-wide approaches.
HLW was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council and National Heart Foundation scholarship, and a National Health and Medical Research Council grant (No. 465130). AP was supported by a VicHealth fellowship. We wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and the improvement that these have made to the manuscript.
- Backholer K, Walls H, Magliano D, Peeters A: Setting population targets for measuring successful obesity prevention. Am J Public Health. 2010, 100: 2033-7. 10.2105/AJPH.2010.200337.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang S, Brownell K: Public policy and obesity: the need to marry science with advocacy. Psychiatric Clin N Am. 2005, 28: 235-52. 10.1016/j.psc.2004.09.001.Google Scholar
- Egger G, Swinburn B: An "ecological" approach to the obesity pandemic. BMJ. 1997, 315: 477-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cohen D, Sturm R, Lara M, Gilbert M, Gee S: Discretionary calorie intake a priority for obesity prevention: results of rapid participatory approaches in low-income US communities. J Public Policy. 2010, 32: 379-86.Google Scholar
- Campbell K, Waters E, O'Meara S, Summerbell C: Interventions for preventing obesity in childhood. A systematic review. 2001, 2: 149-57.Google Scholar
- Postonll W, Foreyt J: Obesity is an enviornmental issue. Atherosclerosis. 1999, 146: 201-9. 10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00258-0.Google Scholar
- Christie C, Watkins S, Weerts S, Jackson H, Brady C: Community church-based intervention reduces obesity indicators in African American females. The Internet Journal of Nutrition and Wellness. 2010, 9-Google Scholar
- MacLean L, Edwards N, Gawad M, Sims-Jones N, Clinton K, Ashley L: Obesity, stigma and public health planning. Health Promotion. 2009, 24: 88-93. 10.1093/heapro/dan041.Google Scholar
- Bluford D, Sherry B, Scanlon K: Interventions to prevent or treat obesity in preschool children: A review of evaluated programs. Obesity. 2007, 15: 1356-72. 10.1038/oby.2007.163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thorndike A: Workplace interventions to redice obesity and cardiometabolic risk. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2010Google Scholar
- Datton S: Overweight and weight management: The health professional's guide to understanding and practice. 1997, Aspen Publishers, IncGoogle Scholar
- Anderson L, Quinn T, Glanz K, Ramirez G, Kahwati L, Johson D, et al: The effectiveness of worksite nutrition and physical activity interventions for controlling employee overweight and obesity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 37: 340-57. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lang T, Rayner G: Overcoming policy cacophony on obesity: an ecological public health framework for policymakers. Obesity Reviews. 2007, 8: 165-81. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00338.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chopra M, Darnton-Hill I: Tobacco and obesity epidemic: not so different after all?. BMJ. 2004, 328: 1558-60. 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1558.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Atienza A, King A: Community-based health intervention trials: An overview of methodological issues. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2002, 24: 72-9. 10.1093/epirev/24.1.72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matan M: Weight-loss diets for the prevention and treatment of obesity. New Engl J Med. 2009, 360: 923-5. 10.1056/NEJMe0810291.Google Scholar
- Westley H: Thin living. BMJ. 2007, 335: 1236-10.1136/bmj.39409.451678.AD.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moynihan R: Small Australian town is model for community campaigns against obesity. BMJ. 2010, 337-Google Scholar
- Waters E, Brockhoff J, Swinburn B, Seidell J, Uauy R: Preventing childhood obesity: Evidence policy and practice: Wiley Online Library. 2010Google Scholar
- Keemer D, DGoodman K, Lowry A, Zaro S, Keffel Khan L: Recommended community strategies and measurements to prevent obesity in the Unoted States: Implementation and measurement guide. 2009, Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and PreventionGoogle Scholar
- Grier S, Bryant C: Social marketing in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005, 26: 319-39. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jefferey R: Public health strategies for obesity treatment and prevention. Am J Health Behav. 2001, 25: 252-9.Google Scholar
- Adler N, Stewart J: Reducing obesity: motivating action while not blaming the individual. Milbank Quarterly. 2009, 87: 49-70. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00547.x.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yancey A, Kumanyika S, Ponce N, McCarthy W, Fielding J, Leslie J, et al: Population-based interventions engaging communities of color in healthy eating and active living: A review. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004Google Scholar
- Lemmens V, Oenema A, Klepp K, Henriksen H, Brug J: A systematic review of the evidence regarding efficacy of obesity prevention interventions among adults. Obes Rev. 2008, b446-55. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00468.x.Google Scholar
- Gill T, Baur L, Bauman A, Steinbeck K, Storlein L, Fiatarone Singh M, et al: Childhood obesity in Australia remains a widespread health concern that warrants population-wide programs. MJA. 2009, 190: 146-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walls HL, Wolfe R, Haby MM, Magliano DJ, De Courten M, Reid CM, et al: Trends in Body Mass Index in Urban Australian Adults, 1980-2000. Public Health Nutrition. 2009, 22: 1-8.Google Scholar
- Sturm R: Stemming the global obesity epidemic: what can we learn from data about social and economic trends?. Public Health. 2008, 122: 739-46. 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.01.004.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sanigorski A, Bell A, Kremer P, Cutler R, Swinburn B: Reducing unhealthy weight gain in children through community capacity-building: results of a quasi-experimental intervention program, Be Actibe Eat Well. Int J Obes. 2008, 32: 1060-7. 10.1038/ijo.2008.79.Google Scholar
- Westley H: Thin living. BMJ. 2007, 335: 1236-7. 10.1136/bmj.39409.451678.AD.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Patel S, Hu F: Short sleep duration and weight gain: A systematic review. Obesity. 2008, 16: 643-53. 10.1038/oby.2007.118.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hubacek J: Eat less and exercise more - is it really enough to knock down the obesity pandemia?. Physiol Res. 2009, 58: 31-6.Google Scholar
- Dallman M, Pecoraro N, Akana S, la Fleur S, Gomez F, Houshyar H, et al: Chronic stress and obesity: a new view of "comfort food". Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 11696-701. 10.1073/pnas.1934666100.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Friedman J: Modern science versus the stigma of obesity. Nature Medicine. 2004, 10: 563-9. 10.1038/nm0604-563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crawford D: Population strategies to prevent obesity. BMJ. 2002, 325: 728-9. 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.728.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kremers S, Reubsaet A, Martens M, Gerards S, Jonkers R, Candel M, et al: Systematic prevention of overweight and obesity in adults: a qualitative and quantitative literature analysis. Obes Rev. 2010, 11: 371-9. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00598.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown T, Avenell A, Edmunds L, Moore H, Whittaker V, Avery L, et al: Systematic review of long-term lifestyle interventions to prevent weight gain and morbidity in adults. Obes Rev. 2009, 10: 627-38. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00641.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flodmark C, Marcus C, Britton M: Interventions to prevent obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic literature review. Int J Obes. 2006, 30: 579-89. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803290.Google Scholar
- Doak C, Visscher T, Renders C, Seidell J: The prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: a review of interventions and programmes. Obes Rev. 2006, 7: 111-6. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00234.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stice E, Shaw H, Marti C: A meta-analytic review of obesity prevention programs for children and adolescents: the skinny on interventions that work. Psychol Bull. 2006, 132: 667-91. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.667.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Davis M, Gance-Cleveland B, Hassink S, Johnson R, Paradis G, Resnicow K: Recommendations for prevention of childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 2007, 120: 5229-53.Google Scholar
- Economos C, Irish-Hauser S: Community interventions: A brief overview and their application to the obesity epidemic. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 2007, 131-7. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00117.x.Google Scholar
- Gittelsohn J, Kumar M: Preventing childhood obesity and diabetes: is it time to move out of the school?. Pediatric Diabetes. 2007, 8: 55-69. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00333.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Young K, Northern J, Lister K, Drummond J, O'Brien W: A meta-analysis of family-behavioural weight-loss treatments for children. Clinical Psychology Review. 2007, 27: 240-9. 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.08.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veerman J, Barendregt J, van Beeck E, Seidell J, Mackenbach J: Stemming the obesity epidemic: a tantalizing prospect. Obesity. 2007, 15: 2365-70. 10.1038/oby.2007.280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puhl R, Heuer C: The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Epidemiology. 2009, 17: 941-64.Google Scholar
- Puhl R, Latner J: Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation's children. Psych Bull. 2007, 133: 557-80. 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.557.Google Scholar
- Rukavina P, Li W: School physical activity interventions: do not forget about obesity bias. Obes Rev. 2008, 9: 67-75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolfenden L, Wiggers J, Tursan D'Espaignet E, Bell A: How useful are systematic reviews of child obesity interventions". Obes Rev. 2010, 11: 159-65. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00637.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Myers P, Biocca F: The elastic body image: the effect of television advertising and programming on body image distortions in young women. J Communication. 1992, 42: 108-33. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00802.x.Google Scholar
- Malterud K, Tonstad S: Preventing obesity: Challenges and pitfalls for health promotion. Patient Education and Counselling. 2008, 76: 254-9. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.012.Google Scholar
- Thomas S, Hyde J, Karunaratne A, Herbert D, Komesaraff P: Being "fat" in today's world: a qualitative study of the lived experiences of people with obesity in Australia. Health Expenditure. 2008, 11: 321-30. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00490.x.Google Scholar
- Puhl R, Heuer C: Obesity stigma: Important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health. 2010, 100: 1019-28. 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159491.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz M, Brownell K: Actions necessary to prevent childhood obesity: creating the climate for change. J Law Med Ethics. 2007, 35: 78-89. 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00114.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puhl R, Brownell K: Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res. 2001, 9: 788-805. 10.1038/oby.2001.108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carr D, Friedman M: Is obesity stigmatizing? Body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. J Health Soc Behav. 2005, 46: 244-59. 10.1177/002214650504600303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puhl R, Heuer C: Public opinion about laws to prohibit weight discrimination in the United Sates. Obesity. 2011, 19: 74-82. 10.1038/oby.2010.126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collins M: Education for healthy body weight: helping adolescents balance the cultural pressure for thinness. J School Health. 1998, 58: 227-31. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1988.tb05870.x.Google Scholar
- Gortmaker S, Must A, Perrin J, Sobol A, Dietz W: Social and economic consequences of overweight in adolescence and young adulthood. NEJM. 1993, 329: 1008-12. 10.1056/NEJM199309303291406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilding J: Treatment strategies for obesity. Obes Rev. 2007, 8: 137-44. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00333.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Health & Medical Research Council: 2003, Overweight and obesity in adults: A guide for general practitioners: National Health & Medical Research CouncilGoogle Scholar
- Aronne L, Nelinson D, Lillo J: Obesity as a disease state: a new paradigm for diagnosis and treatment. Obesity as a disease state. 9-Google Scholar
- North American Association for the Study of Obesity and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute: The Practical Guide: Identifiation, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. 2000, Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of HealthGoogle Scholar
- Adan R, Vanderschuren L, La Fleur S: Anti-obesity drugs and neural circuits of feeding. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2008, 29: 208-17. 10.1016/j.tips.2008.01.008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Padwal R, Majumber S: Drug treatments for obesity: orlistat, sibutramine, and rimonanbant. Lancet. 2007Google Scholar
- Scheen A: The future of obesity: new drugs versus lifestyle interventions. 2008, 17: 263-7.Google Scholar
- Ruckner D, Padwal R, Li S, Curioni C, Lau D: Long term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight: updated meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007, 335-Google Scholar
- Tigue K, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Sutton S, Bunton A, et al: Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: Summary of the evidence: US Prevebtive Services Task Force.Google Scholar
- Astrup A: Drug management of obesity - Efficacy versus safety. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363: 288-90. 10.1056/NEJMe1004076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tadross J, le Roux C: The mechanisms of weight loss after bariatric surgery. Int J Obes. 2009, 33: S28-S32. 10.1038/ijo.2009.14.Google Scholar
- O'Brien P, Dixon J, Brown W: Obesity is a surgical disease: Overview of obesity and bariatric surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2004, 74: 200-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Brien P, Dixon J, Laurie C, Skinner S, Proietto J, McNeil J, et al: Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006, 144: 625-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, Sjostrom L, Sullivan M: Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for esevere obesity: The SOS Intervention Study. Int J Obes. 2007, 31: 1248-61. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803573.Google Scholar
- Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen M, Pories W, et al: Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009, 122: 3-10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041.Google Scholar
- Perry C, Hutter M, Smith D, Newhouse J, McNeil B: Survival and changes in comorbidities after bariatric surgery. Annals Surg. 2008, 247: 21-7. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318142cb4b.Google Scholar
- Robinson M: Surgical treatment of obesity - weighing the facts. NEJM. 2009, 361: 520-1. 10.1056/NEJMe0904837.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nugent C, Bai C, Elariny H, Gopalakrishnan P, Quigley C, Garone M, et al: Metabolic syndrome after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008, 18: 1278-86. 10.1007/s11695-008-9511-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Batsis J, Romero-Corral A, Collazo-Clavell M, Sarr M, Somers V, Lopez-Jimenez F: Effect of bariatric surgery on the metabolic syndrome: A population-based, long-term controlled study. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2008, 8 (897-906):Google Scholar
- Mauro M, Taylor V, Wharton S, Sharma A: Barriers to obesity treatment. Eur J Int Med. 2008, 19: 173-80. 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.09.011.Google Scholar
- Padwa R, Majumdar S: Drug treatments for obesity: orlistat, sibutramine, and rimonabant. The Lancet. 2007, 369: 71-7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60033-6.Google Scholar
- Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom D, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al: Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 741-52. 10.1056/NEJMoa066254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Irwin M, Yasui Y, Ulrich C, Bowen D, Rudolph R, Schwartz R, et al: Effect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003, 289: 323-30. 10.1001/jama.289.3.323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craig W: Health effects of vegan diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 1627S-33S. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736N.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraser G: Associations between diet and cancer, ischaemic heart disease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh-day Adventists. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999, 70: 532S-8S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dwyer J: Health aspects of vegetarian diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988, 48: 712-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Key T, Appleby P, Spencer E, Travis R, Roddam A, Allen N: Mortality in British vegetarians: results from the European Prospective Investigatoj into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford). Am J Clin Nutr. 89: 1613S-9S. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736L.Google Scholar
- Jakicic J, Marcus B, Lang W, Janney C: Effect of exercise on 24-month weight loss maintenace in overweight women. Arch Intern Med. 2008, 168: 1550-9. 10.1001/archinte.168.14.1550.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ding E, Hu F: Commentary: Relative importance of diet vs physical activity for health. Int J Epid. 2010, 39: 209-11. 10.1093/ije/dyp348.Google Scholar
- Hill J, Peters J, Wyatt H: The role of public policy in treating the epidemic of global obesity. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2007, 81: 772-5.Google Scholar
- Christakis N, Fowler J: The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 370-9. 10.1056/NEJMsa066082.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F: Dissecting obesogenic environments: The development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med. 1999, 29: 563-70. 10.1006/pmed.1999.0585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marmot M, Wilkinson R, editors: Social determinants of health. 2006, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Walls H, Peeters A, Loff B, Crammond B: Why education and choice won't solve the obesity problem. Am J Public Health. 2009, 99: 590-2. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156232.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Loff B, Crammond B: Wanted: politicians to champion health (not obesity). Med J Aust. 2010, 5: 397-9.Google Scholar
- McKinnon R, Orleans C, Kumanyika S, Haire-Joshu D, Krebs-Smith S, Finkelstein E, et al: Considerations for a policy research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 36: 351-7. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.017.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Swinburn B, Gill T, Kumanyika S: Obesity prevention: a proposed framework for translating evidence into action. Obes Rev. 2005, 6: 23-33. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00184.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friel S, Chopra M, Satcher D: Unequal weight: equity oriented policy responses to the global obesity epidemic. BMJ. 2007, 335: 1241-10.1136/bmj.39377.622882.47.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wickins-Drazilova D, Willimas G: Ethical and public policy aspects of childhood obesity: opinions of scientists working on an intervention study. Obesity Reviews. 2010, 11: 620-6. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00752.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds C: Public health law and regulation. 2004, NSW, Australoa: The Federation PressGoogle Scholar
- McKinnon R, Orleans T, Kumanyika S, Haire-Joshu D, Krebs-Smith S, Finkelstein E, et al: Considerations for an obesity policy research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 36: 351-7. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.017.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ferriman A: BMJ readers choose the 'sanitary revolution' as greatest medical advance since 1840. BMJ. 2007, 334: 111-10.1136/bmj.39097.611806.DB.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Grossman M, Chaloupka F: Cigarette taxes: the straw to break the camel's back. Public Health Rep. 1997, 112: 290-7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Walls H, Walls K, Loff B: The regulatory gap in chronic disease prevention: A historical perspective. Under review. 2011Google Scholar
- World Health Organization: Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Heath: WHO. 2004Google Scholar
- Frieden T, Dietz W, Collins J: Reducing childhood obesity through policy change: Acting now to prevent obesity. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010, 29: 357-63. 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0039.Google Scholar
- Hayne C, Moran P, Ford M: Regulating enviornments to reduce obesity. J Public Health Policy. 2004, 25: 391-407. 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3190038.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hodge J, Garcia A, Shah S: Legal themes concerning obesity regulation in the United States: Theory and practice. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy. 2008Google Scholar
- Sacks G, Swinburn B, Lawrence M: A systematic policy approach to changing the food system and physical activity environments to preevnt obesity. Aus NZ J Health Policy. 2008, 5: 13-10.1186/1743-8462-5-13.Google Scholar
- Muller M, Tagtow A, Roberts S, MacDougall E: Aligning food systems to advance public health. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition. 2009, 4: 225-40.Google Scholar
- Elinder L: Obesity, hunger and agriculture: the damaging role of subsidies. BMJ. 2005, 331: 1333-10.1136/bmj.331.7528.1333.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Elobeid A, Beghin J: Multilateral trade and agricultural policy reforms in sugar markets. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2006, 57: 23-48. 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00030.x.Google Scholar
- Alston J, Sumner D, Vosti S: Farm subsidies and obesity in the United States: National evidence and international comparisons. Food Policy. 2008, 33: 470-9. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.05.008.Google Scholar
- Tichenor PJ, Donohue GA, Olien CN: Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opin Q. 1970, 34: 159-70. 10.1086/267786.Google Scholar
- Ceci SJ, Papierno PB: The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: when the have-nots gain but the haves gain even more. The American Psychologist. 2005, 60 (2): 149-60. 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Viswanath K, Emmons KM: Message effects and social determinants of health: its application to cancer disparities. J Commun. 2006, S6 (Suppl 1): S238-S64. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00292.x.Google Scholar
- Meara E: Eduation, infant health, and cigarette smoking. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999, 96: 458-60. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08169.x.Google Scholar
- Niederdeppe J, Fiore MC, Baker TB, Smith SS: Smoking-cessation media campaigns and their effectiveness among socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged populations. Am J Public Health. 2008, 98 (5): 916-24. 10.2105/AJPH.2007.117499.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Liang H, Tussing L, Braunschweig C, Caballero B, Flay B: Obesity and related risk factors among low socio-economic status minotiry students in Chicago. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10: 927-38. 10.1017/S1368980007658005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanigorski A, Bell A, Kremer P, Cuttler R, Swinburn B: Reducing unhealthy weight gain in children through community capcity-building: results of a quasi-experimental intervention program, Be Active Eat Well. Int J Obes. 2008, 32: 1060-7. 10.1038/ijo.2008.79.Google Scholar
- Swinburn B, Egger G: Preventive strategies against weight gain and obesity. Obes Rev. 2002, 3: 289-301. 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2002.00082.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawkes C: Regulating food marketing to young people worldwide: trends and policy drivers. Am J Public Health. 2007, 97: 1962-73. 10.2105/AJPH.2006.101162.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mello M, Studdert D, Brennan T: Obesity - The new frontier of public health law. N Engl J Med. 2006, 354: 2601-10. 10.1056/NEJMhpr060227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swinburn B, Sacks G, Lobstein T, Rigby N, Baur L, Brownell K, et al: The 'Sydney principles' for reducing the commerical promotion of foods and beverages to children. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11: 881-6. 10.1017/S136898000800284X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koplan J, Brownell K: Response of the food and beverage industry to the obesity threat. JAMA. 2010, 304-Google Scholar
- Kelley B, Smith J: Legal approaches to the obesity epidemic: An introduction. J Public Health Policy. 2004, 25: 346-52. 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3190033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma L, Teret S, Brownell K: The food industry and self-regulation: Standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. Am J Public Health. 2010, 100: 240-6. 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160960.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Swinburn B: Obesity prevention: the role of policies, laws and regulations. Aus NZ J Health Policy. 2008, 5: 12-10.1186/1743-8462-5-12.Google Scholar
- Walls H, Peeters A, Loff B, Crammond B: Why education and choice won't solve the obesity problem. Am J Public Health. 2009, 99: 590-2. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156232.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brownell K: The humbling experience of treating obesity: should we persist or desist?. Behaviour Research & Therapy. 2010, 48: 717-9.Google Scholar
- Flegal K, Carroll M, Ogden C, Curtin L: Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010, 303: 235-41. 10.1001/jama.2009.2014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walls H, Magliano D, Stevenson C, Backholer K, Mannan H, Shaw J, et al: Projected progression of the prevalence of obesity in Australia. Obesity(Silver Spring). 2010, Jan 13 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Proietto J: Why staying lean is not a matter of ethics. Med J Aust. 1999, 171: 611-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/136/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.