- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Maternal characteristics during pregnancy and risk factors for positive HIV RNA at delivery: a single-cohort observational study (Brescia, Northern Italy)
© Izzo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 19 July 2010
- Accepted: 21 February 2011
- Published: 21 February 2011
Detectable HIV RNA in mothers at delivery is an important risk factor for HIV transmission to newborns. Our hypothesis was that, in migrant women, the risk of detectable HIV RNA at delivery is greater owing to late HIV diagnosis. Therefore, we examined pregnant women by regional provenance and measured variables that could be associated with detectable HIV RNA at delivery.
A observational retrospective study was conducted from January 1999 to May 2008. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses (generalized linear models) were used, with detectable HIV RNA at delivery as dependent variable.
The overall population comprised 154 women (46.8% migrants). Presentation was later in migrant women than Italians, as assessed by CD4-T-cell count at first contact (mean 417/mm3 versus 545/mm3, respectively; p = 0.003). Likewise, HIV diagnosis was made before pregnancy and HAART was already prescribed at the time of pregnancy in more Italians (91% and 75%, respectively) than migrants (61% and 42.8%, respectively). A subgroup of women with available HIV RNA close to term (i.e., ≤30 days before labour) was studied for risk factors of detectable HIV RNA (≥50 copies/ml) at delivery. Among 93 women, 25 (26.9%) had detectable HIV RNA. A trend toward an association between non-Italian nationality and detectable HIV RNA at delivery was demonstrated by univariate analysis (relative risk, RR = 1.86; p = 0.099). However, by multivariable regression analysis, the following factors appeared to be more important: lack of stable (i.e., ≥14 days) antiretroviral therapy at the time of HIV RNA testing (RR = 4.3; p < 0.0001), and higher CD4+ T-cell count at pregnancy (per 50/mm3, RR = 0.94; p = 0.038).
These results reinforce the importance of extensive screening for HIV infection, earlier initiation of antiretroviral therapy and stricter monitoring of pregnant women to reduce the risk of detectable HIV RNA at delivery. Public health interventions should be particularly targeted to migrant women who are frequently unaware of their HIV status at the time of pregnancy.
- Pregnant Woman
- Migrant Woman
- Italian Guideline
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Result
UNAIDS estimated that 31.3 million patients lived with HIV infection worldwide in 2008; among them, 15.7 million were women . Before the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), about 25% of infants born to HIV-infected women became HIV infected, but this risk was reduced by cART . As a consequence, many women desire to have children despite HIV infection, while others become pregnant unaware that they are infected with HIV. For instance, more than 6,000 women living with HIV become pregnant in the United States every year .
Detectable HIV RNA at delivery is the strongest predictor of mother-to-child HIV transmission . Katz et al.  examined the association between cART, demographic factors and detectable HIV-RNA at delivery. Alarmingly, 32% of the women displayed detectable HIV RNA at delivery, which was significantly associated with lower CD4+ counts and higher HIV RNA during pregnancy, but not type of cART . A recent study of the European Collaborative Cohort highlighted a group of pregnant women with detectable HIV RNA at delivery notwithstanding cART, suggesting the importance of strict monitoring and support for HIV-infected pregnant women .
In Italy, characteristics of HIV-infected pregnant women and possible determinants of positive HIV RNA at delivery have been poorly studied . In particular, maternal characteristics of migrants in comparison to autochthonous populations and the possible impact of migration on the risk of positive HIV RNA at delivery have not yet been investigated. We hypothesized that HIV infection is diagnosed in migrants later than in Italians, with consequences for the risk of detectable HIV RNA at delivery. First, we compared maternal characteristics of Italian and non-Italian women to determine whether there were any differences in terms of timing of presentation and cART initiation; second, we selected the women for whom HIV RNA close to term was available to explore possible risk factors for detectable HIV RNA at delivery, including patient nationality.
Characterisation of the overall population by geographical origin and management of pregnant women and newborns
A retrospective study was conducted on all pregnant women attending a large outpatient HIV clinic in Brescia (northern Italy) from January 1999 to July 2008. Pregnant women were initially referred to our clinic by general practitioners, obstetric services and services for sexually transmitted diseases at the time of HIV diagnosis, or were already on follow-up when they were found to be pregnant. On the basis of Italian guidelines for antiretroviral therapy available at the time of the study , the women were followed during pregnancy with examinations and clinical examinations every three months, using an integrated approach (HIV disease management and obstetric evaluation). Complete blood tests (including CD4+ T-cell count and HIV RNA) were performed, and the women were screened for latent tuberculosis infection, TORCH (T. gondii, others, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, HIV) and malaria, if clinically indicated. HIV RNA was determined by branched DNA quantification (Bayer bDNA test, Versant HIV-1 RNA 3.0 assay [bDNA], Bayer Health Care). Antiretroviral treatment was commenced as soon as possible if indicated by the mothers' conditions ; otherwise, cART was initiated as soon as the mothers entered the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. Italian guidelines edited in 2005 recommended beginning antiretroviral therapy at CD4+ T-cell count ≤350 cells/mm3; treatment at 350 < CD4+ < 500 cells/mm3 was only suggested if HIV RNA was >100,000 copies/ml . HIV-infected women were delivered by caesarean section, and zidovudine was infused as prophylaxis during delivery. Breastfeeding was discouraged.
The children were followed at the Paediatric Clinic of the local hospital (Spedali Civili di Brescia) with clinical evaluation and complete blood tests including HIV antibody test (ELISA) and HIV RNA on day 0, week 4, week 8, week 24, week 48 and week 96. Children were considered to be negative for HIV infection if HIV RNA and HIV antibody tests were negative at week 48.
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Spedali Civili di Brescia. The patients signed the informed consent for participation to this study.
Factors associated with detectable HIV RNA at delivery (subgroup of mothers with available HIV RNA close to term)
For this analysis, we considered only patients with available HIV RNA measured close to term (i.e., ≤30 days before delivery). Log-normal generalized linear regression models were used to assess factors associated with the outcome, defined as detectable HIV RNA (i.e., ≥50 copies/ml) close to term. Variables were selected on the basis of plausibility of their association with the outcome and epidemiological relevance, and to avoid possible biases. For example, CD4+ T-cell counts at delivery were not included, since antiretroviral therapy and time of initiation were likely to influence these values and HIV RNA at the same time. Therefore, the following variables were selected: geographical provenance (Italy versus other countries), age, calendar year at pregnancy, CD4+ T-cell count at pregnancy, and presence/type of cART at the time of HIV RNA testing (no therapy versus two antiretroviral drugs versus at least three drugs in combination, i.e., HAART regimens). Therapy was considered to be present if it was initiated at least 14 days before HIV RNA testing.
Since the 9 patients who were not prescribed cART at pregnancy were the same who were not on cART close to term, in the multivariable model we used a single dichotomy variable (no cART versus any cART close to term). Moreover, since all these 9 patients were non-Italians, there was an effect modification between country of origin and treatment exposure. For this reason, nationality was excluded from the main multivariable model. Lastly, in order to test whether nationality was correlated with detectable HIV RNA close to term, the 9 patients without treatment were excluded from a multivariable model that included nationality as variable.
Risk ratios (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used to describe the strength of the associations.
Additional definitions and statistical notes
The time of diagnosis of HIV infection was at the first positive HIV confirmatory test (western blotting), and the CD4+ T-cell count and HIV RNA at diagnosis were the first values obtained after HIV diagnosis. The time of pregnancy diagnosis was considered to be the last menstrual period, and CD4+ T-cell count and HIV RNA at pregnancy were the first values obtained after pregnancy diagnosis. Lastly, cART at delivery was the regimen at the last blood test before delivery.
The chi square test and score test for trend were used when appropriate. All statistical tests were two sided. P-values <0.05 were considered to be significant. Data were collected in an electronic chart used in our Centre (NetCare, version 1.05.11 sp 26) and double-checked for consistency and completeness with paper charts. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA software (Stata Statistical Software release 9.2, 2007; Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas).
Characteristics of the population by geographical origin
Characteristics of the cohort (overall and sub-study population)
Pregnant women (all)
Pregnant women (HIV RNA available within 30 days before delivery)
Age (mean years, SD)
Risk factor for HIV infection (N, %)
Calendar year at HIV diagnosis (N, %)
Calendar year at pregnancy (N, %)
Previous pregnancies (mean, SD)
HIV diagnosis related to this pregnancy (N, %)
Pregnancy outcome (N, %)
CD4+/mm3 at first contact (mean, SD)
CD4+/mm3 at first contact (N, %)
CD4+/mm3 at pregnancy (mean, SD)
CD4+/mm3 at pregnancy (N, %)
Timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation (N, %)
Type of antiretroviral therapy at delivery; N (%)
2 NRTIs + NNRTI
2 NRTIs + PI
Type of antiretroviral therapy at delivery; N (%)
Factors associated with detectable HIV RNA at delivery
Among the 125 women who delivered, 93 had HIV RNA determination close to term (i.e., ≤ 30 days before delivery). Characteristics of these 93 women are illustrated in table 1. Moreover, CD4+ T-cell counts at delivery were slightly lower among non-Italians (mean: 464.7/mm3, SD 228.6/mm3) than Italians (mean: 582.1/mm3, SD 237.7/mm3) in the subset of patients with available HIV RNA determination close to term (p = 0.018). Significant differences were found between the 93 women with HIV RNA determination close to term and the remaining 61 women who lacked HIV RNA for CD4+ T-cell count at first contact (mean: 439.1 cell/mm3,SD 253.7/mm3 versus 535.7 cell/mm3, SD 298.2/mm3; p = 0.032) and initiation of cART before pregnancy (80.3% versus 54.8%, p = 0.014). No significant differences were found for the other variables between the two groups.
Univariate and multivariable regression analyses
Patient characteristics N = 93
Risk ratio for detectable HIV-RNA at delivery (95% confidence interval); p-value
Patients with undetectable HIV-RNA at delivery N = 68
Patients with detectable HIV-RNA at delivery N = 25
Multivariable regression analyses using generalized linear models
Nationality (N, %)
Excluded due to collinearity with cART
1.86 (0.86- 4.01); p = 0.099
Age (mean years, SD)
For each year 0.98 (0.93-1.04); p = 0.5
For each year 0.99 (0.94-1.05); p = 0.9
Calendar year at pregnancy (mean, SD)
For each year 0.93 (0.76-1.15); p = 0.7
For each year 0.96 (0.85-1.10); p = 0.6
cART at HIV RNA test (N, %)
4.4 (2.7-7.1); p < 0.0001
Dichotomy variable (no cART - versus- any cART)
Ref. 2 or ≥3 drugs (no differences among the 2)
4.4 (2.7-7.2) P < 0.0001
cART relative to pregnancy (N, %)
before 2nd trimester
Ref. any periods (no differences among the 3)
4.4 (2.7-7.1); P < 0.0001
CD4+/mm3 at pregnancy (mean, SD)
For each 50 CD4+/mm3 0.91 (0.84-0.99); P = 0.037
For each 50 CD4+/mm3 0.94 (0.89-0.99); P = 0.032
Among nine patients who were not on cART for ≥14 days at the time of HIV RNA testing, only one (11%) had undetectable HIV RNA. By contrast, among 78 patients who were on ≥3 antiretroviral drugs, 61 (78%) had undetectable HIV RNA and this percentage was not statistically different from the percentage of patients with undetectable HIV RNA among those who were prescribed two antiretroviral drugs (6/6 = 100%). Therefore, by univariate analysis, the RR of detectable HIV RNA was 4.4 (p < 0.0001) for lack of cART versus any cART at the time of HIV RNA testing. Similar results were obtained for presence/timing of initiation of cART, resulting in an identical RR of detectable HIV RNA for lack of cART versus any cART initiated before or during pregnancy.
Lastly, increasing CD4+ T-cell count at pregnancy appeared to reduce the risk of detectable HIV RNA at delivery by univariate analysis (RR = 0.91 per 50 cells/mm3; p = 0.037). All continuous variables included in the regression model were also studied as categorical variables to confirm the linear relationship; in particular, upper classes of CD4+ T-cell counts (200-349; 350-499; >500/mm3) were associated with a lower risk of detectable HIV RNA at delivery with respect to CD4+ <200/mm3 (data not shown).
Multivariable analysis confirmed that the risk of detectable HIV-RNA at delivery was increased by lack of cART, while higher CD4+ T-cell count at the beginning of pregnancy appeared to be protective; by contrast, age and calendar year did not appear to be associated with HIV-RNA at delivery (see Table 2). After excluding from the analysis the 9 patients who were not receiving any cART, we found that nationality was not independently associated with the risk of detectable HIV RNA close to term (RR = 0.91; p = 0.8). Also, in this model, results for the other variables did not change significantly. In particular, the protective role of CD4+ T-cell count at pregnancy was confirmed (risk ratio = 0.87 per 50 cells/mm3; p = 0.049).
Increasing numbers of HIV-infected women are becoming pregnant or are planning a pregnancy owing to the widespread use of cART and a decrease in HIV-related mortality and morbidity in developed countries . In our HIV cohort we included 154 pregnant women from January 1999 to July 2008. More than half of them were migrants (especially from Africa), reflecting the burden of immigration in Italy in recent years [6, 9]. Importantly, more than one quarter of the migrants were diagnosed with HIV at the time of pregnancy, underlining the fact that HIV would have been diagnosed before pregnancy if the screening policy were more extensively implemented, thus allowing cART to be initiated earlier, in line with current recommendations . Indeed, current Italian guidelines suggest treatment irrespective of CD4+ count in case of pregnancy. At the same time, this finding indicates that pregnancy offers a unique opportunity for HIV screening, especially in high-risk populations of migrant women.
Likewise, CD4+ T-cell counts at the first contact with our clinic were significantly lower among non-Italian women than Italians, reflecting more advanced stages of HIV infection and a later HIV diagnosis in the former. Furthermore, CD4+ T-cell counts at delivery were lower in the subset of non-Italian patients with available HIV RNA at delivery. It has already been demonstrated that lower CD4+ T-cell count at delivery is a risk factor for mother-to-child transmission of HIV . Once again, these considerations reinforce the need for earlier diagnosis and treatment of HIV infection, particularly in migrant women.
It is important to note that, in about one quarter (31/125) of the women who delivered, HIV RNA was not measured in the 30 days before delivery, making it impossible to identify the risk of transmission to the newborn, suggesting appropriate interventions (e.g., treatment change or intensification, therapeutic drug monitoring to confirm low adherence and/or poor drug bioavailability, modification of drug dosage or counselling to improve adherence). The Italian guidelines for antiretroviral therapy edited in 2005  suggested similar schedules of follow-up for pregnant women and for the other patients (every 2-3 months). The lack of HIV RNA determination close to term was due to the fact that 26/61 (42.6%) women had abortions and 3/61 were lost to follow-up. Furthermore, the lack of HIV RNA determination in the remaining 32/61 (52.5%) women was due to compliance with the previous guidelines, which suggested an infrequent schedule of monitoring rather than lack of patient adherence to the scheduled follow-up. Although none of the mothers transmitted the infection, such infrequent follow-up constituted a potential risk just because HIV RNA was not determined, so the risk was not identified and appropriately addressed. In view these considerations, the most recent Italian guidelines for antiretroviral treatment  has suggested that the follow-up of pregnant women should be stricter, at least in those who have started or modified cART during pregnancy. Moreover, further HIV RNA determinations are now recommended between the 34th and the 36th weeks of gestation . Our findings support these recommendations.
In 25/93 (26.9%) women in whom HIV RNA was tested close to term, detectable HIV RNA values were found. Percentages of detectable HIV RNA at delivery were even greater in previous studies [4, 5], highlighting the importance of studies on risk factors for detectable HIV RNA at delivery to optimize the clinical management of HIV in pregnant women.
In the subgroup of 93 women with available HIV RNA, a statistically significant association was found between risk of detectable HIV RNA at delivery and lower CD4+ T-cell count at pregnancy onset. This finding is not new since it was previously demonstrated by Katz et al. , indicating that initiation of cART when the immune system is less compromised could help reduce HIV RNA to undetectable levels at delivery. Interestingly, type of cART (dual or triple therapy) did not appear to influence the risk of detectable HIV RNA at delivery, while any cART had a significant protective effect, even though it was initiated during later stages of pregnancy. This finding is reassuring because it suggests that cART has a protective effect even though it is initiated late in pregnancy, but only in cases where earlier treatment is not feasible owing to late diagnosis of HIV infection. Indeed, our results must be interpreted with caution and must not be used to conclude that cART can be initiated later and with suboptimal regimens. In fact, dual therapy is not recommended . Moreover, our sample size was extremely small for some categories (only six patients were treated with dual cART and only five started cART in the third trimester). Clearly, a larger number of patients might have altered the results.
Our study was the first to investigate the potential effect of patient nationality on the risk of detectable HIV RNA at delivery. There was only a trend toward a statistically significant effect of non-Italian nationality by univariate analysis, and this disappeared on multivariable analysis. Once again, the small number of patients could have influenced the results, but it is possible that behavioural factors associated with nationality (i.e., late HIV diagnosis and late initiation of cART) or other factors not captured in this analysis (e.g., low patient adherence or unmeasured characteristics of the virus such as HIV drug resistance or viral subtype ) were more important than nationality "per se". Therefore our results suggest that early diagnosis and treatment, though prioritized in the migrants, should be extended to the overall population. A screening campaign in the general population and adherence to the recommendation to test pregnant women for HIV are mandatory.
This study has several limitations that need to be recognised. First, it was a retrospective analysis, so several items of information were not recorded. In particular, because they were not available for the earliest calendar years, HIV drug resistance testing, viral subtypes or therapeutic drug monitoring results were not considered. Second, as previously discussed, the sample size was small. Third, HIV RNA was available at delivery for only 93 women. Therefore, there should be further investigation of maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in migrant and autochthonous women using prospective cohorts with completed data and larger sample size.
Overall our results reinforce the recommendation to start HAART as soon as possible in pregnant women. Clearly, this is only achievable by testing for HIV as soon as possible. Migrant patients appeared to be a vulnerable population because they were more frequently unaware of their HIV status at the time of pregnancy than Italians. Since there is no nationwide legislation that imposes HIV-testing in pregnant women in Italy, our results have important public health implications. Moreover, they indicate the need for a strict virological and clinical follow-up of pregnant women to detect amendable causes of positive HIV RNA at delivery to minimize the risk of HIV transmission.
This paper has been presented in part as an oral communication at the 2nd Italian Conference on AIDS and Retroviruses (ICAR), Brescia June 20-22, 2010. The work was partially supported by a grant for the project "Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of viral infections in mothers and newborns" assigned by "I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico S. Matteo di Pavia Fundation" to Prof. Giuseppe Gerna.
- UNAIDS: AIDS Epidemic Update. 2009, last accessed on 30th September 2010, [http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/dataimport/pub/report/2009/jc1700_epi_update_2009_en.pdf]Google Scholar
- CDC: Progress toward elimination of perinatal HIV infection-Michigan 1993-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002, 51: 93-97.Google Scholar
- Moferson L, Lambert JS, Stiehm R, et al: Risk factors for perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in women treated with zidovudine. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341 (6): 385-93. 10.1056/NEJM199908053410601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katz IT, Shapiro R, Li D, et al: Risk factors for detectable HIV RNA at delivery among women receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy in the Women and Infants Transmission Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010, 54 (1): 27-34.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- European Collaborative Study: Factors associated with HIV RNA levels in pregnant women on non-suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy at conception. Antivir Ther. 2010, 15 (1): 41-9. 10.3851/IMP1489.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Baroncelli S, Tamburrini E, Ravizza M, for the Italian Group on Surveillance on Antiretroviral Treatment in Pregnancy, et al: Antiretroviral Treatment in pregnancy: a six-year perspective on recent trends in prescriptions patterns, viral load suppression, and pregnancy outcomes. AIDS Patients Care and STDs. 2009, 23 (7): 513-20. 10.1089/apc.2008.0263.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Italian Health Department: Update on Antiretroviral Therapy. 2005, last accessed on 15th October 2010, [http://www.salute.gov.it/aids/resources/aids/documenti/terapia.pdf]SecondGoogle Scholar
- Heard I, Sitta R, Lert F: Reproductive choice in men and women living with HIV: evidence from a large representative sample of outpatients attending French hospitals (ARS-EN12-VESPA Study). AIDS. 2007, 21 (S1): S77-82. 10.1097/01.aids.0000255089.44297.6f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Towsend CL, Cortina-Borja M, Pecham CS, Tookey PA: Trends in management and outcome of pregnancies in HIV-infected women in the UK and Ireland, 1990-2006. BJOG. 2008, 115: 1078-1986. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01706.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garcia-Tejedor A, Maiques V, Perales A, Lopez-Aldeguer J: Influence of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) on risk factors for vertical HIV transmission. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009, 88 (8): 882-7. 10.1080/00016340903062836.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Italian Guidelines on antiretroviral therapy and on diagnostic-therapeutic management of HIV infected patients. 2010, last accessed on 15th October 2010, [http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1301_allegato.pdf]
- Krivine A, Launay O, Firtion G, et al: Does HIV-1 subtype D have higher risk of vertical transmission then other HIV subtypes?. JID. 2009, 199: 1533-10.1086/598481.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/124/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.