Skip to main content
Download PDF

Antecedents of teenage pregnancy from a 14-year follow-up study using data linkage

BMC Public Health volume 10, Article number: 63 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Many western nations continue to have high rates of teenage pregnancies and births, which can result in adverse outcomes for both mother and child. This study identified possible antecedents of teenage pregnancy using linked data from administrative sources to create a 14-year follow-up from a cross-sectional survey.

Methods

Data were drawn from two sources - the 1993 Western Australian Child Health Survey (WACHS), a population-based representative sample of 2,736 children aged 4 to 16 years (1,374 girls); and administrative data relating to all their subsequent births and hospital admissions. We used weighted population estimates to examine differences between rates for teenage pregnancy, motherhood and abortion. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to model risk for teenage pregnancy.

Results

There were 155 girls aged less than 20 years at the time of their first recorded pregnancy. Teenage pregnancy was significantly associated with: family type; highest school year completed by primary carer; combined carer income; whether the primary carer was a smoker; and whether the girl herself displayed aggressive and delinquent behaviours. An age-interaction analysis on the association with aggressive and delinquent behaviours found that while girls with aggressive and delinquent behaviours who were older at the time of the survey were at highest risk of teenage pregnancy, there was elevated risk for future teenage pregnancy across all ages.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that interventions to reduce teenage pregnancy rates could be introduced during primary school years, including those that are focused on the prevention and management of aggressive and delinquent behaviour.

Peer Review reports

Background

Australia has a relatively high teenage pregnancy rate among western countries at 19.8 births per 1,000 women aged 15-19 years [1, 2]. Of 30 OECD countries, Australia ranks 11th highest in teenage birth rate [3]. There are three main reasons why reducing the incidence of teenage pregnancy should be given a high priority. Firstly, teenage pregnancies are associated with increased medical risks during pregnancy and poorer birth outcomes for their babies [4–8]. Secondly, teenage mothers have poorer life-course outcomes in adulthood such as a higher risk of: dependence on welfare; being a sole parent; being a smoker; and having a lower socio-economic status [9–11]. Finally, the children of teenage mothers are more likely to be socio-economically disadvantaged, and have the potential to repeat the cycle of teenage pregnancies [12–14].

There is ongoing debate as to whether the adverse medical, social, educational and economic outcomes associated with teenage pregnancy are due to intrinsic risks of pregnancy and childbirth in the teenage years, or are associated with the social, economic and environmental circumstances of teenagers and their offspring [5]. Nonetheless it is widely accepted that even for teenagers who live in poverty and disadvantage, teenage pregnancy compounds the handicaps associated with social disadvantage, and initiatives aimed at reducing teenage pregnancy rates have the potential to expand the options and choices available for young people to overcome disadvantaged backgrounds [15–18]. With greater understanding of the antecedents of teenage pregnancy it may be possible to develop more effective interventions with the aim of reducing teenage pregnancy rates.

A range of antecedents of teenage pregnancy have been identified in the literature. Among the strongest and most persistent associations are measures of social disadvantage, inequality and social exclusion [10, 12, 19]. A pattern of intergenerational transfer has also been observed with daughters of teenage mothers being at high risk to become teenage mothers themselves [14], which has been associated with the transfer of disadvantage between generations [20], and with an association with childhood aggressive behaviours [21]. Aggressive and antisocial behaviours have also been independently associated with teenage pregnancy [19]. Dysfunctional family relationships, family breakdown and sole parent family structures are associated with higher rates of teenage pregnancy [19, 20].

In this study we used a large, well-defined cross-sectional population sample of children which was subsequently linked to health system data spanning 14 years. The Western Australian Child Health Survey (WACHS) featured a framework of variables based on a social-ecology model allowing for extensive family-based demographic, psychosocial, health, educational and direct measures of both parents and survey children [22, 23]. We hypothesised that there are factors in early life that are predictors of teenage pregnancy. As the girls in the WACHS were aged 4 to 16 years at the time of the survey, the factors measured in the survey were collected across a range of life stages. Using administrative record linkage to ascertain occurrence of births or abortions, we set out to: a) quantify the association of known risk factors for teenage pregnancy within our WA sample; b) investigate if other factors within the social-ecology framework were independently associated with teenage pregnancy outcomes; and c) investigate whether the observed associations changed with the age of the girl at the time when the risk factors were assessed.

Methods

The 1993 Western Australian Child Health Survey (WACHS)

The subjects for this data linkage study were the 1,374 girls sampled in the 1993 WA Child Health Survey, a population-based state-wide representative study of 2,736 children aged 4 to 16 years in Western Australia [24]. Dwellings were randomly selected and participation in the survey was voluntary. Overall 82% of contacted households participated in the survey. All survey data were gathered under appropriate institutional ethics clearance and supervision. Data collection took place from early July to the end of September 1993. For consenting families, data were gathered from personal interviews, forms completed by the family (by the primary carer and by children aged 12 to 16 years) and school administered forms (by the school Principal and by the school teacher with the best knowledge of the child). Aboriginal children living in country areas were excluded from the survey.

The personal interview comprised three main forms -- the Household Record Form (which recorded family member details and basic demographic information), the Family Background Questionnaire (which collected information about the primary and secondary carer of each survey child) and the Child Health Questionnaire (which recorded details of the child's physical and mental health).

Two forms were self-administered by the primary carer, the Family Health and Activity Questionnaire (collected details on parental health, relationships and neighbourhood environment) and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The CBCL is a 112-item instrument which was used to estimate mental health morbidity among children in the 1993 survey. The CBCL is one of the products from the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) [25]. The CBCL allows the calculation of an overall summary measure (Total Problem Behaviour) and eight individual syndrome scores: delinquent behaviour, aggressive behaviour, withdrawn, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, social problems, thought problems and attention problems. These scores are standardised as T-scores. The CBCL was administered to both the child's primary carer and their teacher. The respective T-scores were combined to create a categorical variable measuring overall mental health morbidity [26].

The Western Australian Data Linkage System (WADLS)

Subjects were followed up using linkage to administrative data obtained from the births and midwives collections, and the hospital morbidity data system, prepared by the Western Australian Data Linkage Unit (WADLU) using the Western Australian Data Linkage System (WADLS). This enables linkage of total population data for epidemiological and health services research. Survey data were linked with health service utilisation data collected between the time of the survey (i.e. 1993) and 31 December 2007. We also obtained birth records for the survey children. At the end of the follow-up (i.e. December 2007) the survey children were aged between 18 and 31 years.

At the time of the survey, carers and young people aged 12 years and over gave consent for access to medical and school records as part of the consent to participate in the study. As the WADLS did not exist in 1993 and no time period was specified in the consent arrangements in the survey, it was assumed that participants in the survey did not give specific consent to a record linkage study being undertaken 15 years later. This study was undertaken under the provisions for record linkage where consent is not obtained. Ethical approval for this record linkage study was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Curtin University of Technology and the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Western Australian Department of Health. To preserve the privacy and confidentiality of the information collected from participants in the WACHS, a strict protocol was established and followed to ensure that all research was conducted on de-identified files and that no researcher would be in a position to access identifying information for any study participant. The WACHS data custodians provided the list of names and addresses of survey participants to the WADLU, along with the mother's maiden name and the hospital where the child was born to increase the accuracy of the data linkage. Once the data were linked, these identifying variables were replaced with a unique encrypted record linkage key. This key was used to join the de-identified WACHS file with the birth and abortion outcomes. This de-identified, anonymised file was then sent to the analysts to complete the study. No-one associated with the study had access to both the named WACHS data and the de-identified linked file, which was maintained on a separate secure server at a separate site.

Outcome measurement

For the purposes of this analysis, a teenage pregnancy was identified by either a record of a live birth or abortion of a pregnancy that was reported from WA public and private hospitals between 1993 and 2007. Miscarriages were not included as they were not available on the linked data. Three outcomes were examined in our analyses: becoming pregnant as a teenager; becoming a teenage mother; and having a pregnancy aborted as a teenager. A girl was classified as a teenage mother if her first pregnancy resulting in a live birth occurred before she had reached 20 years of age. A girl was classified as having an abortion as a teenager if her first abortion occurred before she had reached 19 years and 6 months (due to the expected age of mother at time of delivery had the pregnancy continued, and that most abortions are carried out in the first trimester). We calculated the proportion of girls from the WACHS who had each of these outcomes overall, and then compared these proportions by variables from the WACHS. Individual, primary carer, family and community level characteristics were examined as potential correlates of these outcomes.

Individual characteristics of the teenager included her combined parent and teacher CBCL score, her birth weight, whether she was breastfed, the type of school she had attended (i.e. government, catholic and independent), how well the girl did at school (as reported by the primary carer and teacher) and whether she needed professional help for her emotional or behavioural problems (as reported by the primary carer). Characteristics of the primary carer (usually the girl's mother) included whether they had been a smoker, whether they themselves had been a teenage mother, their highest school year completed, the level of importance of religion to them, whether they were in receipt of government benefits, whether they had ever been treated for an emotional or mental health problem, their marital status, their level of satisfaction with their daughter's progress in her education and learning skills, and whether they had ever been arrested [27].

Family level characteristics included family type (original, step/blended or sole-parent), size of the family, combined carer income, whether the family lived in a metropolitan or non-metropolitan area, and the level of family functioning (as measured by the McMaster Family Assessment Device, FAD) [28]. Combined carer income, measured in 1993 Australian dollars, was defined as low (less than $600 per week), medium ($600 to $1100 per week) or high (over $1100 per week), which represented terciles of household income in 1993. One community level characteristic used as a potential predictor was the Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). Based on Census information, these indexes provide a measure of disadvantage and can be used to assess socio-economic conditions by geographical areas [29].

Weighting and estimation procedures

The WACHS was a stratified, clustered representative probability sample [24]. Western Australia was stratified into 6 geographic regions. Within each stratum, the sample was selected in two stages. The first stage entailed selection of census collection districts, and the second stage was selection of families. Within selected families all eligible children (aged 4-16 years) were included in the survey. Weights were employed to account for selection probabilities and correct for potential non-response biases, with post-stratification by age, sex, family size and geographic area. Because of the stratification, clustering and weighting, the statistical methods used needed to account for these aspects of the survey design. Proportions were estimated using the survey weights to produce unbiased population estimates. Variances and confidence intervals on these estimates were produced using the ultimate cluster variance estimation technique [30]. This accounted for the clustered nature of the original survey sample. Full details of the survey methodology, weighting and estimation procedures have been described elsewhere [24].

Proportional hazards regression analysis

The association between factors collected in the WACHS and teenage pregnancy was assessed using multivariate proportional hazards regression. To account for the clustered nature of the survey sample, the Lin and Wei robust sandwich estimate of the variance-covariance matrix was employed [31]. Proportional hazards regression was chosen because although all girls in the study had the same length of follow-up time, not all girls had passed through the teenage years by the end of follow-up. However, as the age of the children in the WACHS ranged from 4-16 years in 1993, the independent variables in the model were measured at different life stages for different children. To examine whether age at time of the WACHS affected the association with aggressive and delinquent behaviour and risk for teenage pregnancy, we fitted an age interaction model using age as a continuous variable. As proportional hazards regression models the log of the hazard ratio, it is generally not appropriate to assume that the association with a continuous variable will be linear (as this would imply an exponential relationship with age on the hazard ratio scale). As there were no theoretical grounds to hypothesise any particular shape for this relationship, we fitted a non-parametric spline curve using generalised additive models [32]. All statistical analyses except for the proportional hazards regression were undertaken using SAS (version 9; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The proportional hazards regression model was fitted using Hastie and Tibshirani's GAIM software [32] within Stata (version 10; StataCorp, College Station, TX).

We evaluated the power of the study based on the sample design and expected frequency of the outcome. For a predictor with prevalence of 10%, the study would have about 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 1.7, or 60% power to detect a hazard ratio of 1.5. Stronger power is associated with larger effect sizes or more prevalent risk factors. The study would only have modest power to detect associations with rarely occurring risk factors or risk factors associated with small effect sizes.

Results

There were 1,374 girls in the WACHS, of whom 381 had at least one recorded pregnancy on the linked dataset during the follow-up period. Of these, 155 were aged less than 20 years at the time of their first pregnancy. Of these teenagers, 72 had an abortion and 94 became mothers (11 teenagers had both). Table 1 shows the weighted proportions of girls from the 1993 WACHS by factors collected in the survey. Table 2 reports the weighted proportions of girls from the original survey who: i) went on to become pregnant as a teenager (10.5%); ii) became teenage mothers (6.9%); and iii) went on to have an abortion as a teenager (4.2%), cross-classified by variables collected in the 1993 WACHS. Each weighted proportion is presented with 95% confidence intervals.

Table 1 Characteristics of Western Australian girls aged 4-16 years in 1993
Full size table
Table 2 Estimated proportion of girls from the WACHS that became pregnant as a teenager, became teenage mothers or who had an abortion as a teenager
Full size table

Nearly 40% of girls who were identified as having both aggressive and delinquent behaviours became pregnant as a teenager, compared with fewer than 10% of girls who had neither of these behaviours. The combination of these behaviours had an increasing effect on both the proportion of girls that became teenage mothers, and the proportion of girls that had an abortion as a teenager.

The proportion of girls who became pregnant and gave birth before age 20 years decreased with increasing combined carer income, while the proportion of girls who had an abortion as a teenager did not vary by combined carer income. Some 12.3% of girls from low income families went on to become teenage mothers, while the proportion for girls from high income families was 2.7%.

Significant differences by family type were noted for those girls who became pregnant as a teenager, and those that became teenage mothers. Girls living in either step/blended or sole-parent families were more likely to become pregnant as a teenager than those living in original families. Some 16.8% of girls who were in a step/blended family at the time of the WACHS went on to become pregnant as a teenager, compared with 7.5% of girls from original families.

Girls were more likely to become pregnant as teenagers if their primary carer was a smoker at the time of the survey (14.6%) compared with those carers that were non-smokers (9.0%). Of those girls whose primary carer completed Year 9 or lower at high school, 22.3% became pregnant as a teenager compared with 8.4% of girls whose carer completed Year 10 or higher at high school. About one-fifth (20.6%) of girls whose mother had been a teenage mother herself went on to become teenage mothers, compared with 6.2% of girls whose mother had not been a teenage mother.

Level of family functioning, whether the teenager was breastfed, importance of religion and birth weight were not significantly associated with the proportion of girls who became teenage mothers, or the proportion that had an abortion as a teenager.

Table 3 shows the results of proportional hazards modelling and reports on the variables associated with risk for teenage pregnancy. It shows that teenage pregnancy was significantly and independently associated with aggressive and delinquent behaviours as reported by primary carers at the time of the survey (HR: 3.52; CI 1.90-6.55); living in a step or blended family type (HR: 2.19; CI 1.41-3.40); living in a family with a low carer combined income (HR: 1.72; CI 1.01-2.92); primary carer completing Year 9 or lower at high school (HR: 1.71; CI 1.14-2.57); primary carer being a smoker (HR: 1.63; CI 1.14-2.31); and living in a non-metropolitan area at the time of the survey (HR: 1.52; CI 1.09-2.11).

Table 3 Proportional Hazards Model: Multivariate hazard ratios of associations between characteristics collected during childhood and later teenage pregnancy
Full size table

Teenage pregnancy was not independently and significantly associated with whether the girl's mother had been a teenage mother, level of family functioning, size of the family, whether the girl's primary carer had ever been treated for an emotional or mental health problem, SEIFA [29], type of school the girl had attended, how well the girl did at school (as reported by either the girl's primary carer or teacher), whether the girl needed professional help for emotional or behavioural problems (as reported by the primary carer), primary carer's marital status, primary carer's satisfaction level with the girl's progress in her education and learning skills, level of importance of religion to the girl's primary carer and whether the girl was breastfed.

To investigate whether age of the girl at the time of the survey affected the association between aggressive and delinquent behaviours and risk for teenage pregnancy, two age interaction models were fitted. Figure 1 shows the age interaction model which is unadjusted for other factors, while Figure 2 is adjusted for the other significant variables in the proportional hazards model (family type, combined carer income, highest school year completed by the girl's primary carer, whether the primary carer was a smoker and whether the girl lived in a metropolitan or non-metropolitan area at the time of the survey). Figure 1 shows that if a girl exhibited both aggressive and delinquent behaviours, she was between two to eight times as likely to become pregnant as a teenager compared with girls who showed neither of these problems. After adjusting for the other factors, Figure 2 showed that if a girl exhibited both aggressive and delinquent behaviours, she was between two to four times as likely to become pregnant as a teenager compared with girls who showed neither of these problems. The hazard curve was significantly elevated for girls who exhibited both aggressive and delinquent behaviours (χ2 = 12.4; p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between the hazard for girls who exhibited one of these problems compared with girls who showed neither (χ2 = 1.53; p < 0.448).

Figure 1
figure1

Unadjusted hazard ratios for teenage pregnancy, for children rated as having both aggressive and delinquent behaviours, one of these behaviours or neither of these behaviours, by age of child when factor was measured.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Adjusted hazard ratios for teenage pregnancy, for children rated as having both aggressive and delinquent behaviours, one of these behaviours or neither of these behaviours, by age of child when factor was measured.

Full size image

Discussion

Of the eight mental health problems measured by the Child Behavior Checklist [25], two were strongly associated with teenage pregnancy - delinquent behaviour (including breaking rules and norms set by parents and communities) and aggressive behaviour (including bullying, teasing, temper tantrums, arguing, fighting and threatening behaviours). While many of the factors assessed in the survey would be expected to be reasonably constant over time, such as carer education, one factor that may well vary depending on the age of the child at the time of the survey is aggressive and delinquent behaviours. One might expect that the relationship with pregnancy outcomes would be strongest for girls who were older at the time of the survey. For example, knowing that a 16 year-old is aggressive and delinquent might be expected to be a stronger predictor of teenage pregnancy than observing the same behavioural problems in a 4 year-old. Some young children with behavioural problems will grow out of these problems by their teenage years, while for other children the onset of these problems would be at older ages. To address this issue, we fitted an age interaction with aggressive and delinquent behaviours. The adjusted association with aggressive and delinquent behaviours was strongest among girls aged 11 years and over, however the presence of the combination of these two mental health problems was significantly associated with teenage pregnancy regardless of the age at which it was identified. While other studies have identified that delinquent teenagers often proceed to risk behaviours such as drug taking and early sexual initiation [33, 34], our study extends other findings that found an association between conduct problems in girls aged 8 years and later teenage pregnancy [35].

Previous literature has shown that children of teenage mothers are more likely to exhibit aggressive and delinquent behaviours. One study found that adolescent children of younger mothers (aged 18-years or younger at the time of their first antenatal visit) were more likely to be delinquent and aggressive than the children of older mothers [36]. Another study suggested that the young children of teenagers were more likely to have higher levels of aggression than the young children of older mothers [13]. Together the studies suggest that the daughters of teenage mothers are more likely to show aggressive and delinquent behaviours, while we have found that these behaviours increase the probability that they too will become teenage mothers. Other studies suggest that teenagers who exhibit aggressive and delinquent behaviours are more likely to engage in sexual risk behaviours, including those that result in teenage pregnancy [33, 37]. It is important to prevent and manage aggressive and delinquent behaviours early before they become entrenched, but additionally, our results suggest that addressing these behaviours as early in developmental pathway as possible may reduce the likelihood of teenage pregnancy.

Whether the girl's mother was herself a teenage mother was strongly associated with teenage pregnancy outcomes, but was not a significant independent predictor in the final model. This suggests that other factors included in the final model, such as family type, income and education level, and carer smoking mediate the relationship in teenage motherhood from one generation to the next. The circumstances of a teenage mother are often low education, poverty and difficult family circumstances. Once we accounted for these factors, the association is not strong enough to remain independently significant.

Primary carers who were smokers were more likely to have daughters who became pregnant as teenagers. Smoking by primary carers remained a significant predictor of teenage pregnancy even after adjusting for a range of other variables including socio-economic status as measured by SEIFA [29], highest school year completed by primary carer, family type, primary carer in receipt of government benefits, combined carer income and whether the teenager lived in a metropolitan or non-metropolitan area as a child. Despite the presence of a wide range of other demographic and psycho-social variables, it is possible that smoking status was masking another variable that was not collected in our original survey and was not available via the data linkage. One variable that we could not account for adequately was mental health of the carer, and there is an established association between mental health problems and smoking [38, 39]. This issue deserves further investigation. When carer smoking status was assessed in 1993, smoking rates were higher than they are now. Nevertheless the health consequences of smoking had been well publicised for many years at that stage, and it is quite likely that carers, principally mothers, who were smokers were systematically different from non-smokers in ways other than just the demographic and psycho-social variables measures in the survey.

Girls from step/blended families were significantly more likely than girls from original families to become pregnant as teenagers. The difference between sole-parent families and original families was significant in the bivariate analysis but not significant in the adjusted proportional hazards regression model. Our data do not allow us to speculate as to whether the higher teenage pregnancy rate was impacted by the original family breaking up, or the arrival of the new parent in the step/blended family, or a combination of these two issues. We did not know the girl's age at the time of the family break up, or her age at the time of the arrival of the step parent. Others have also found an effect of family type on rates of young motherhood [10, 24, 40, 41]. Girls are more likely to delay first sexual intercourse and use contraception at first intercourse if they had lived with both natural parents to sixteen years of age [42]. Sole parent and step/blended family status are associated with higher risks for aggression and delinquency in young people [43]. Girls from step/blended families had an elevated risk for teenage pregnancy after adjusting for education and income factors.

Combined carer income and the highest year of school completed by the primary carer had strong effects on predicting risk for teenage pregnancy, even after controlling for a host of other child specific and family variables. The daughters of families with a low combined carer income, and those of carers who completed Year 9 or lower at high school, were more likely to become pregnant as teenagers, findings which were consistent with other research [34, 36, 42, 44]. Individual or household based socioeconomic measures such as these were stronger predictors of teenage pregnancy than community based measures such as SEIFA [29]. In addition, one study found that girls from socioeconomically disadvantaged households tended to know less about sex and contraception, and to have negative or indecisive attitudes regarding condom use, increasing their risk of becoming pregnant as teenagers [45].

A major strength of this study is the increased analytic power which comes from linking data from our 1993 cross sectional survey to administrative data collected in the fourteen years that followed. An additional strength is the wide range of variables, based on a social-ecology model, available from the WACHS. With respect to the data on abortions of teenage pregnancies, there is evidence to suggest that self-reported data on abortions may lead to under-reporting [46–48]. Our data linkage design avoids the bias associated with self reports and provides an opportunity to obtain accurate and less biased data on abortions. Another strength of our study is the high linkage rate of the 2,304 WACHS children that were born in WA, 2,282 were linked to their birth records. Of the 432 WACHS children that were born outside WA, 355 linked to the morbidity, mental health or electoral roll records. The overall level of inaccuracies in the WADLS (including false positives and false negatives) has been estimated at 0.11% [49].

This study has several limitations. Data on pregnancies includes only abortions and live births (i.e. miscarriages have been excluded). We did not have complete ascertainment of abortions, as data from some private clinics was not available via the data linkage. We used the actual abortion proportion for WA to confirm that the numbers we had observed in our population were close to what was expected. The abortion proportion is derived by taking the number of abortions divided by the number of abortions and live births combined. The average abortion proportion in WA over 2002-2005 for women aged less than 20 years was 51.9% [50]. For the teenagers in our study, we had 72 abortions and 94 live births, an abortion proportion of 43.4%.

It is inevitable that some girls sampled in the WACHS had moved out of WA since 1993, and therefore had reduced opportunity to have a record on the administrative datasets that were used in the data linkage. However, analysis of the number of survey children now on the electoral roll in WA showed that approximately 86% had enrolled to vote in WA, suggesting that the capture rate was still high.

With the available sample size, the study may not have had sufficient power to detect associations with risk factors that occurred rarely or were associated with small effect sizes. It is thus possible that some of the risk factors we considered but did not find significantly associated with teenage pregnancy have associations that were too small for the power of our study to detect.

Finally, it may have been useful to analyse the CBCL scores from the teacher and parent reports separately, in particular, those children who were rated as aggressive and delinquent. One study suggested that parent and teacher reports of child behaviours are not always linked, meaning that often only one source reports a problem while the other does not [51]. Although there was not sufficient statistical power to separate the parent and teacher reports of child behaviours, both showed similar patterns.

Conclusions

It is known that girls who become pregnant as a teenager will face increased medical risks, and if the pregnancy is taken to term, there are also increased medical risks for their babies. We also know that teenage mothers, and their children, can suffer from poorer life outcomes. In addition, the children of teenage mothers are more likely to become teenage mothers, perpetuating the intergenerational cycle of teenage pregnancies. With these consequences in mind, we should aim to further reduce the incidence of teenage pregnancy, in particular those pregnancies that are unwanted and unintended.

At the outset, we hypothesised that there are factors in early life that are potential predictors of teenage pregnancy. Our findings have confirmed this, and knowledge of these predictive factors should be used to inform future preventive policy interventions. Our findings suggest that interventions to reduce teenage pregnancy rates could address other issues in addition to the traditional focus on sex education programmes. In particular, early intervention to treat behavioural problems may also be useful in reducing the incidence of unwanted teenage pregnancy.

References

  1. 1.

    UNICEF (United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund): A league table of teenage births in rich nations. Innocenti Report Card No. 3. 2001, Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Singh S, Darroch JE: Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: levels and trends in developed countries. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000, 32: 14-23. 10.2307/2648144.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    OECD family database. [http://www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database]

  4. 4.

    Gupta N, Kiran U, Bhal K: Teenage pregnancies: obstetric characteristics and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008, 137: 165-171. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen XK, Wen SW, Fleming N, Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Walker M: Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007, 36: 368-373. 10.1093/ije/dyl284.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Adelson PL, Frommer MS, Pym MA, Rubin GL: Teenage pregnancy and fertility in New South Wales: an examination of fertility trends, abortion and birth outcomes. Aust J Public Health. 1992, 16: 238-244.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Straton JA, Stanley FJ: Medical risks of teenage pregnancy. Aust Fam Physician. 1983, 12: 474-

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fraser AM, Brockert JE, Ward RH: Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1995, 332: 1113-1117. 10.1056/NEJM199504273321701.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nanchahal K, Wellings K, Barrett G, Copas AJ, Mercer CH, Macmanus S, Macdowall W, Fenton KA, Erens B, Johnson AM: Changes in the circumstances of young mothers in Britain: 1990 to 2000. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005, 59: 828-833. 10.1136/jech.2004.026021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hobcraft J, Kiernan K: Childhood poverty, early motherhood and adult social exclusion. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion. CASE Paper (CASE/28). 1999, London: London School of Economics

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Slowinski K: Unplanned teenage pregnancy and the support needs of young mothers, Part B: review of literature. 2001, Adelaide: Department of Human Services, South Australia

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Social Exclusion Unit: Teenage pregnancy. 1999, London: Stationery Office

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Coley RL, Chase-Landsdale PL: Adolescent pregnancy and parenthood: recent evidence and future directions. Am Psychol. 1998, 53: 152-166. 10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.152.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Meade CS, Kershaw TS, Ickovics JR: The intergenerational cycle of teenage motherhood: an ecological approach. Health Psychol. 2008, 27: 419-429. 10.1037/0278-6133.27.4.419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hoffman SD: Teenage childbearing is not so bad after all... or is it? A review of the new literature. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998, 30: 236-239. 10.2307/2991610. 243

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lawlor DA, Shaw M: Too much too young? Teenage pregnancy is not a public health problem. Int J Epidemiol. 2002, 31: 552-554. 10.1093/ije/31.3.552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Scally G: Too much too young? Teenage pregnancy is a public health, not a clinical, problem. Int J Epidemiol. 2002, 31: 554-555. 10.1093/ije/31.3.554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rich-Edwards J: Teen pregnancy is not a public health crisis in the United States. It is time we made it one. Int J Epidemiol. 2002, 31: 555-556. 10.1093/ije/31.3.555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Woodward L, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ: Risk factors and life processes associated with teenage pregnancy: Results of a prospective study from birth to 20 years. J Marriage Fam. 2001, 63: 1170-1184. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01170.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hardy JB, Astone NM, Brooks-Gunn J, Shapiro S, Miller TL: Like mother, like child: Intergenerational patterns of age at first birth and associations with childhood and adolescent characteristics and adult outcomes in the second generation. Dev Psychol. 1998, 34: 1220-1232. 10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1220.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Serbin LA, Cooperman JM, Peters PL, Lehoux PM, Stack DM, Schwartzman AE: Intergenerational transfer of psychosocial risk in women with childhood histories of aggression, withdrawal, or aggression and withdrawal. Dev Psychol. 1998, 34: 1246-1262. 10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1246.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jessor R: Successful adolescent development among youth in high-risk settings. Am Psychol. 1993, 48: 117-126. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.117.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bronfenbrenner U: The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. 1981, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zubrick SR, Silburn SR, Garton A, Burton P, Dalby R, Carlton J, Shepherd C, Lawrence D: Western Australian Child Health Survey: developing health and well-being in the nineties. 1995, Perth, Western Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Institute for Child Health Research

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Achenbach TM: Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. 1991, Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bird HR, Gould MS, Rubio-Stipec M, Staghezza BM, Canino G: Screening for childhood psychopathology in the community using the Child Behavior Checklist. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991, 30: 116-123. 10.1097/00004583-199101000-00018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Silburn SR, Zubrick SR, Garton A, Gurrin L, Burton P, Dalby R, Carlton J, Shepherd C, Lawrence D: Western Australian Child Health Survey: family and community health. 1996, Perth: Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Byles J, Byrne C, Boyle MH, Offord DR: Ontario Child Health Study: reliability and validity of the general functioning scale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Fam Process. 1988, 27: 97-104. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1988.00097.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Australian Bureau of Statistics: Information paper: 1991 Census Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas. 1994, Canberra: ABS Cat. 2912.0

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wolter KM: Introduction to variance estimation. 1985, New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lin DY, Wei LJ: The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989, 84: 1074-1078. 10.2307/2290085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hastie T, Tibshirani R: Generalized additive models. Stat Sci. 1986, 1: 297-318. 10.1214/ss/1177013604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Durant RH, Knight J, Goodman E: Factors associated with aggressive and delinquent behaviors among patients attending an adolescent medicine clinic. J Adolesc Health. 1997, 21: 303-308. 10.1016/S1054-139X(97)00159-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hockaday C, Crase SJ, Shelley MC, Stockdale DF: A prospective study of adolescent pregnancy. J Adolesc. 2000, 23: 423-438. 10.1006/jado.2000.0329.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Woodward LJ, Fergusson DM: Early conduct problems and later risk of teenage pregnancy in girls. Dev Psychopathol. 1999, 11: 127-141. 10.1017/S0954579499001984.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Najman JM: Teenage children of teenage mothers: psychological, behavioural and health outcomes from an Australian prospective longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2005, 62: 2526-2539. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Siebenbruner J, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ, Egeland B: Sexual partners and contraceptive use: a 16-year prospective study predicting abstinence and risk behaviour. J Res Adolesc. 2007, 17: 179-206. 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00518.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lasser K, Boyd JW, Woolhandler S, Himmerstein DU, McCormick D, Bor DH: Smoking and mental illness: a population-based prevalence study. J Am Med Assoc. 2000, 284: 2606-2610. 10.1001/jama.284.20.2606.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lawrence D, Mitrou F, Zubrick SR: Smoking and mental illness: results from population surveys in Australia and the United States. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9: 285-10.1186/1471-2458-9-285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kenny DT: Adolescent pregnancy in Australia. Australia's adolescents: a health psychology perspective. Edited by: Kenny DT, Job RFS. 1995, Armidale: University of New England Press, 239-245.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ermisch J, Pevalin D: Who has a child as a teenager? Institute for Social and Economic Research. Working Paper No. 2003-30. 2003, Colchester: University of Essex

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wellings K, Nanchahal K, Macdowall W, McManus S, Erens B, Mercer CH, Johnson AM, Copas AJ, Korovessis C, Fenton KA, Field J: Sexual behaviour in Britain: early heterosexual experience. Lancet. 2001, 358: 1843-1850. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06885-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Griffin KW, Botvin GJ, Scheier LM, Diaz T, Miller NL: Parenting practices as predictors of substance use, delinquency, and aggression among urban minority youth: moderating effects of family structure and gender. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000, 14: 174-184. 10.1037/0893-164X.14.2.174.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Manlove J, Ikramullah E, Mincieli L, Holcombe E, Danish S: Trends in sexual experience, contraceptive use, and teenage childbearing: 1992-2002. J Adolesc Health. 2009, 44: 413-423. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.09.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bonell CP, Strange VJ, Stephenson JM, Oakley AR, Copas AJ, Forrest SP, Johnson AM, Black S: Effect of social exclusion on the risk of teenage pregnancy: development of hypotheses using baseline data from a randomised trial of sex education. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003, 57: 871-876. 10.1136/jech.57.11.871.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE: Induced abortion and risk for breast cancer: reporting (recall) bias in a Dutch case-control Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996, 88: 1759-1764. 10.1093/jnci/88.23.1759.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Udry JR, Gaughan M, Schwingl PJ, van den Berg BJ: A medical record linkage analysis of abortion underreporting. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996, 28: 228-231. 10.2307/2135842.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jagannathan R: Relying on surveys to understand abortion behavior: some cautionary evidence. Am J Public Health. 2001, 91: 1825-1831. 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1825.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Holman CDJ, John Bass, Rouse IL, Hobbs MST: Population-based linkage of health records in Western Australia: development of a health services research linked database. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999, 23: 453-459. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1999.tb01297.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Straton J, Godman K, Gee V, Hu Q: Induced abortion in Western Australia 1999-2005. Report of the WA Abortion Notification System. 2006, Perth, Western Australia: Department of Health

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ: Situational and generalised conduct problems and later life outcomes: evidence from a New Zealand birth cohort. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009, 50: 1084-1092. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02070.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/63/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

Healthway (formerly the Health Promotion Foundation of Western Australia) provided major funding for both the WACHS and this data linkage research study. We would like to thank the respondents who participated in the 1993 WACHS. The WA Data Linkage Unit undertook the data extraction from the WA Data Linkage System. We would also like to thank Dr Judy Straton for her valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, PO Box 855, West Perth, WA, 6872, Australia

    Jennifer Gaudie, Francis Mitrou, David Lawrence, Fiona J Stanley, Sven R Silburn & Stephen R Zubrick

  2. Centre for Developmental Health, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia

    David Lawrence, Sven R Silburn & Stephen R Zubrick

Authors
  1. Jennifer Gaudie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francis Mitrou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Lawrence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fiona J Stanley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sven R Silburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stephen R Zubrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lawrence.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SZ and SS undertook the 1993 WA Child Health Survey. SZ, SS and FJS conceived the original idea for this data linkage study. All authors contributed to the development of the study methodology. JG undertook the data analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with assistance from DL and FM. All authors edited the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaudie, J., Mitrou, F., Lawrence, D. et al. Antecedents of teenage pregnancy from a 14-year follow-up study using data linkage. BMC Public Health 10, 63 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-63

Download citation

Keywords

  • Delinquent Behaviour
  • Teenage Pregnancy
  • Family Type
  • Teenage Mother
  • Original Family

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us