From: Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: does it work for Indigenous Australians?
Participation rate | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Males | Females | Total | Â | Â | Â | Females 1.2 times more likely to participate than males |
 | 36.2 *(2008) | 43.3* (2008) | 39.7 |  |  |  |  |
 | 36.0 (2009) | 42.6 (2009) | 39.3 |  |  |  |  |
Indigenous Status# | Non-Indigenous | Indigenous | Total | Â | Â | Â | Indigenous people are 2.3 times less likely to participate Than non-Indigenous people |
 | 38.6 (2008)* | 17*(2008) | 38.3 |  |  |  |  |
 | 37.0* | 17.0* |  |  |  |  |  |
 | 45.4 (Pilot) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
SES | Lowest SES | Highest SES | Â | Â | Â | Â | Participation significantly lower in the most disadvantaged quintile compared to any other quintile |
 | 37.5*(2008) | 41* (2008) |  |  |  |  |  |
Geographic Location | Very Remote | Remote | Outer Regional | Inner Regional | Cities | Total | Proportion of those who participate was significantly lower in remote and very remote compared to the national level. Participation was significantly higher in inner regional compared to other areas. |
 | 25.6*(2008) | 35.5 | 40.9 | 43.7 | 38.4 | 39.7* |  |
 | 25.0(2009) |  | 39.1 | 40.1 |  |  |  |
Spoken language | English as preferred language | Other language preferred | Â | Â | Â | Â | Those whose preferred correspondence language was English were 1.6 times (2008) and 2.9 times (2009) more likely to participate |
 | 42.2* (2008) | 27.0* (2008) |  |  |  |  |  |
 | 41.1* (2009) | 14.0* (2009) |  |  |  |  |  |
FOBT Positivity rate | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
Gender | Males | Females | Total | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 | 8.9* | 6.4* | 7.5 (2008) |  |  |  |  |
 | 7.7 | 5.7 | 6.6 (2009) |  |  |  |  |
Indigenous Status# | Non-Indigenous | Indigenous | Â | Â | Â | Â | Not statistically significant difference due to small numbers |
 | 7.5 (2008) | 8.6 (2008) |  |  |  |  |  |
 | 6.6 (2009) | 8.1 (2009) |  |  |  |  |  |
Geographic location | Very Remote | Remote | Outer Regional | Inner Regional | Cities | Total | Â |
 | 8.7*(2008) | 8.7*(2008) | 8.6* | 7.9* | 7.2* | 7.5 |  |
 | 8.4 (2009) | 7.8 (2009) | 7.3 (2009) |  | 6.4 (2009) |  |  |
SES | Low SES | Highest SES | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 | 7.8 (2009) | 5.5 (2009) |  |  |  |  |  |
Proportion of correctly completed tests | |||||||
Indigenous status# | Non-Indigenous | Indigenous | Â | Â | Â | Â | Significantly lower in Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous participants. Indigenous females aged over 65 have lowest correctly completed tests |
 | 96.3 * | 93.9 * |  |  |  |  |  |
Preferrred language | English | Other | Total | Â | Â | Â | Significantly lower number of correctly completed tests among those whose preferred language is not English |
 | 96.7* | 91.7 * | 96.2 |  |  |  |  |
Disability status/activity limitation# | Severe or profound | None | Total | Â | Â | Â | Significantly lower number of correctly completed tests in those with activity limitation |
 | 90.6* | 96.5* | 96.2 |  |  |  |  |
Geographic location | Very Remote | Remote | Outer regional | Inner regional | Major cities | Total | Â |
 | 96.0 | 97.4* | 96.8* | 96.9* | 95.8* | 96.2 |  |
Primary Practitioner visits after a positive test | |||||||
Indigenous status# | Indigenous | Non-Indigenous | Total | Â | Â | Â | No significant difference |
 | 46.4 | 43.7 | 43.2 |  |  |  |  |
Preferred language | English | Other language | Â | Â | Â | Â | Those with a preferred language other than English were significantly less likely to visit a GP after a positive test result. |
 | 43.6* | 40.0* |  |  |  |  |  |
SES | Lowest SES | Highest SES | Â | Â | Â | Â | Those in the most disadvantaged quintile were significantly more likely to see a GP following a positive test result |
 | 43.9* | 40.4* |  |  |  |  |  |