Skip to main content

Compliance with herpes zoster vaccination in young and adult individuals in two regions of Italy



The purpose of this work was to explore the knowledge and acceptance of Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV)-Herpes Zoster (HZ) vaccination in the general Italian population, where the HZ vaccine has not yet been distributed, using a prevalence study of subjects from two regions in Italy.


A group of 3,173 individuals were interviewed using a questionnaire. The youngest age group (≤ 20 year) was composed of students interviewed at university. The middle age group (21-40 years) and the older age group (≥ 41 years) were interviewed by general practitioners in their office.


In both regions, the majority of subjects had been infected with varicella, and only 165 (5.2%) subjects reported receiving the VZV vaccination. Regarding HZ, 2,749 (86.6%) individuals stated that they knew of the virus and 2,233 (70%) were willing to be vaccinated against HZ. The majority of people willing to be vaccinated were in the middle and older age groups (36.6% and 44.7%, respectively).


Compliance versus vaccination results were satisfactory and probably, with the upcoming availability of the HZ vaccine in Italy, adults will be favourably disposed towards vaccination.

Peer Review reports


Worldwide, varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection (chickenpox) affects millions of individuals, causing significant suffering. During primary infection, the virus migrates to the dorsal root and cranial root ganglia, where it remains latent. Herpes zoster (HZ, shingles) is the result of reactivation of dormant VZV in the ganglia [1]. HZ causes acute and chronic morbidity and is characterized by a painful vesicular unilateral dermatomal rash. The most common HZ complication is post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), which consists of burning pain, paresthesias, dysesthesia, pruritus, or anesthesia in the affected area and most frequently develops in subjects over 60 years of age. The risk of developing HZ in people exposed to VZV ranges from 10% to 30%, with an increased incidence in older individuals and in immunocompromised hosts [26]. Cell-mediate immunity (CMI) is thought to be important in defense against VZV infection. Therefore, a defective CMI is a major factor in virus reactivation [1].

It has been predicted that a quarter of the general population will be affected by HZV reactivation during their lifetime [7]. In the United States (US), an estimated one million cases of HZ infection occur each year, with an incidence of 11.12 cases per 1,000 patient-years and there are higher incidence rates and number of hospitalizations among older adults (> 50 years) [812]. Studies examining the general population of European countries demonstrated that the incidence of HZ in all ages ranges was from 1.2 to 4.8 cases per 1000 person-years and, among people > 60 years of age, it was 7.2 to 11.8 cases per 1,000 person-years [13, 14]. Also, in a Spanish study, the majority of hospitalizations for HZ occurred in adults over 50 years of age [15]. In Italy, a regional survey conducted in 2007 reported a total incidence of 1.74 HZ cases/1000 population per year, over a period of 14 years and an incidence of hospital admissions of 0.12/1000 inhabitants, with an average cost of €4082.59 per hospitalization [16].

In 2006, an HZ vaccine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the prevention of shingles in individuals ≥ 60 years old. In the same year, European Medicines Agency (EMEA) gave its Marketing Authorization valid throughout the European Union to this product. EU approval states that the recommended age of vaccination starts from 50 yrs of age instead of 60 yrs of age as in the USA This new vaccine is made of the same live attenuated VZV strain used in the varicella vaccine, but it has a potency at least 14-times higher than that of single-antigen varicella vaccine, which is necessary to confer protection against zoster [17]. It boosts the CMI against HZ, thus reducing the incidence of the disease and severity [8, 1820]. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of a high titre VZV vaccine for the prevention of HZ infection and its sequelae were demonstrated in a multicentric study of over 38,000 older adults [9, 10].

Nowadays, the vaccine is only distributed in USA; vaccination has been recommended in Austria and Switzerland and it should be soon included in European geriatric guidelines [21].

In Italy, the HZ vaccine is not yet commercially available, though, it is about to be distributed. However, few population-based studies have been performed in Italy assessing the subjective perception of the relevance of VZV to health and the importance of vaccination. The aim of this study was to explore the knowledge of VZV infections in the general population of two Italian regions and analyze the VZV vaccine immunization status and the acceptance of HZ vaccination.


The sample group was composed by 3,173 subjects from two Italian Regions, Campania and Lazio. Subjects were consecutively enrolled: the youngest age group (≤ 20 year) was composed of university students interviewed by teachers; the middle age group (21-40 years) and the eldest age group (≥ 41 years) were interviewed by general practitioners in their office. Face-to-face interviews were done by administrating a brief questionnaire divided in two sections (Additional file 1).

The first section included general questions about sex, age, level of education, residence and nationality. In the second section, the subjects were asked about their knowledge of and personal experience with both chickenpox and shingles, and also, about their compliance versus HZ vaccination. Questionnaire was developed on the basis of previous experiences in collaboration with Sanofi Pasteur MSD and tested on a sample of university students. Statistical analysis was performed using the Epi Info software, version 3.32.


Of the 3,173 subjects interviewed, 1,469 (46.3%) were men. The median age for both men and women was 36 years, ranging from 16 to 92 years. Overall, 2,017 subjects (63.5%) reported higher educational levels, i.e., secondary school and university. Moreover, the sample was homogeneously distributed within the two regions (Table 1). In the population interviewed, 2,256 (71.1%) individuals claimed that they had had chickenpox during their lifetime (22%, 41.4% and 36.7% from the three age groups, respectively). Only 165 individuals (5.2%) reported being vaccinated for VZV. With regard to the knowledge of HZ, 2,749 individuals (86.6%) reported that they knew of the disease and, notably, 352 (11.1%) had had the disease in the past (Table 2). Of the 2,082 individuals who reported that they knew the severity of the disease, 1,528 subjects were 1.5 times more probable to accept the vaccination (OR 1.5, CI.95 = 1.29-1.77, p-value = 1 × 10-6). Comparing financial statements, and using the educational level as a surrogate, people with higher educational levels (degree and secondary school) seem to be more likely to accept vaccination than those with a lower educational level (primary school) (OR 0.65, CI.95 = 0.48-0.89, p-value < .05 compared to OR 0.63, CI.95 = 0.90, p-value < .05, respectively). Moreover, individuals who have had VZV in the past are more likely to accept the vaccination than people with no previous history of VZV (OR 1.3, CI.95 = 1.10-1.54, p-value = .001).

Table 1 Characteristics of subjects interviewed
Table 2 Individuals who know or who were affected by VZV-associated diseases and their compliance with vaccinations

Among the 3,173 individuals interviewed about their knowledge of HZ, with respect to the acceptance of the vaccination, 1,960 (61.77%) individuals claimed to be amenable towards this type of prevention because they were familiar with the disease (OR 1.4, CI.95 = 1.17-1.82, p-value = 7 × 10-4). Furthermore, there were more people who were willing to be vaccinated in the middle and older adult age groups (36.6% and 44.7%, respectively) than in the youngest age class (OR 1.34, CI.95 = 1.07-1.66, p-value = 7 × 10-3).


VZV can cause two clinical conditions, the first results from the primary infection and the second is due to reactivation of the virus following the initial infection. Both of these diseases are often associated with severe complications. In 1995, a varicella vaccination program was implemented in the United States [22]. The immediate goal of the extensive vaccination against VZV was to significantly decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. With widespread vaccination, there has been a concomitant decline in the incidence of the disease, along with a decrease in hospitalizations and deaths due to VZV infection [23]. To improve protection, a two-dose schedule of immunization was recommended for routine use in children by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) in June 2006. At the same time, the licensure of the combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine was completed, which allowed harmonization of immunization against these four viruses with one injection given twice in childhood [23, 24].

The Shingles Prevention Study, a case-control study examining the widespread immunization against VZV, established that the zoster vaccine was safe, well-tolerated, and effective at reducing the burden of illness due to HZ and the incidence of PHN [9, 10, 2527].

In 2006, the US FDA licensed the HZ vaccine [8], which promises to reduce the morbidity and mortality of HZ. In fact, administration of the vaccine to younger people may offer a good cost-benefit balance [28].

The availability of a specific anti-zoster vaccine could offer an important tool for reducing health problems and improve the overall quality of life in the elderly, as demonstrated by several studies [2932]. A combined immunization against both varicella in childhood and HZ in adulthood in the developed world could improve the control of the virus [23]. The future challenge is represented by the prediction of how the decrease in VZV circulation will affect immunity among both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals: varicella will continue to occur even in a highly immunized population, because of the ability of VZV to reactivate as zoster. Studies have predicted that there will be an increase in HZ incidence until the adult population becomes predominantly composed of individuals with vaccine-induced immunity who do not harbour wild-type VZV [22]. Moreover, VZV vaccination in children, without optimal coverage, can shift the disease to adults, leading to severe illness and a higher incidence of herpes zoster. Vaccination strategies will likely need to be adjusted as the epidemiology of VZV and risk factors continues to evolve [33]. Some risk factors may help to redirect preventive vaccination strategies. Hicks et al. demonstrated that, in a cohort of non-immunocompromised subjects, there was a strong association between the development of HZ and a family history of HZ, suggesting that these individuals were at high risk for HZ infection. These individuals could be the primary target for vaccination, thus, decreasing both their possibility of VZV infection and health care expenditures due to HZ morbidity [34].

Age can also be considered as a risk factor: active HZV vaccination of individuals > 50 years of age, simultaneously or in sequence with anti-influenza vaccination, has been demonstrated to be an effective, well-tolerated strategy [35, 36]. Few studies have been conducted to investigate the social and epidemiological problems related to shingles disease or to the spread of immunization. In a recent global survey about awareness, knowledge, symptoms and treatment of HZ among 8,688 adults ≥ 50 years of age in 22 countries, there was wide variation in HZ awareness among the different areas and, almost, universally poor knowledge of the causes and symptoms of HZ were reported. Moreover, the majority of respondents were unaware of their risk of HZ. This survey suggests a population-wide effort to improve global awareness of HZ would be required for a successful vaccine initiative [37].

In the Netherlands, Opstelten et al. evaluated the determinants of non-compliance with HZ vaccination in community-dwelling elderly to whom a free HZ vaccination was offered simultaneously with the yearly influenza vaccination. In all, 690 patients (39%) were vaccinated against HZ, while 1,349 patients (76%) accepted influenza vaccination. Determinants of non-compliance with HZ vaccination included the perceived lack of recommendation by the GP, unwillingness to comply with the doctor's advice, perception of low risk for contracting HZ, perception of a short pain duration for HZ and the opinion that vaccinations weaken natural immunity [38].

In the present study we have compared attitude, knowledge and experience about VZV-associated diseases of individuals from different age groups in two different regions in Italy. In both regions, the majority of subjects had been affected by varicella infection, while a low percentage (5%) had been vaccinated against VZV. Regarding perception and availability of the HZ vaccination, in both regions, adults over the age of 21 seemed to be willing to accept this vaccination. This is probably due to greater knowledge of the infection/disease in this population and to a direct, or indirect, experience with HZ in the older age group.

Finally, limits and biases of this study should be mentioned. A cross-sectional study measures the prevalence of an outcome of interest in a certain population at a certain time point or over a short period. We have explored the acceptability of the HZ vaccination in people using face to face interviews, carried out by their pratictioners and in university staff. We randomly selected the interviewed population in two Italian regions, Lazio and Campania. Indeed, each of the associations identified in the current study must be interpreted with caution because our sample is not representative of the entire Italian population and study inclusion or exclusion could have been mediated by the interviewer during the face to face interview. A cross-sectional design may also make it difficult to establish the cause and the effect, i.e., for this study, the vaccine acceptability versus the knowledge of the disease and the vaccine acceptability versus the age group.

Moreover, it has to be remarked that our investigation didn't concern economical aspects of vaccination strategies. Therefore, the questionnaire do not comprise questions about willingness-to-pay of interviewed subjects.


In this study compliance versus vaccination results were satisfactory and it is possible to assume that, with the upcoming availability of a HZ vaccine in Italy, adults will be the population favourably disposed towards in vaccination. However, the reported compliance must be considered only as an estimate and should be verified by larger public health interventions and broaden cost-effectiveness analyses.


  1. Weinberg JM: Herpes zoster: epidemiology, natural history, and common complications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007, 57: S130-S135. 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hope-Simpson RE: The nature of herpes zoster: a long term study and a new hypothesis. Proc R Soc Med. 1965, 58: 9-20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ragozzino MW, Melton LJ, Kurland LT, Chu CP, Perry OH: Population-based study of herpes zoster and its sequelae. Medicine. 1982, 61 (5): 310-316. 10.1097/00005792-198209000-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brisson M, Edmunds WJ, Law B, et al: Epidemiology of varicella zoster virus infection in Canada and the United Kingdom. Epidemiol Infect. 2001, 127: 305-314. 10.1017/S0950268801005921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas SL, Hall AJ: What does epidemiology tell us about risk factors for herpes zoster?. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004, 4: 26-33. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00857-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Volpi A, Gross G, Hercogova J, Johnson RW: Current management of herpes zoster. The European view. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2995, 6 (5): 317-325. 10.2165/00128071-200506050-00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brisson M, Edmunds WJ: Epidemiology of Varicella-Zoster virus in England and Wales. J Med Virol. 2003, 14: 70-89.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weaver BA: The Burden of Herpes Zoster and Postherpetic Neuralgia in the United States. JAOA. 2007, 107 (1): 2-7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, Shingles Prevention Study Group, et al: A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 2271-84. 10.1056/NEJMoa051016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simberkoff MS, Arbeit RD, Johnson GR, et al: Safety of herpes zoster vaccine in the shingles prevention study: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010, 152 (9): 545-54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Insinga RP, Itzler RF, Pellissier JM, Saddier P, Nikas AA: The incidence of herpes zoster in a United States administrative database. J Gen Intern Med. 2005, 20: 748-753. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0150.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Coplan P, Black S, Rojas C, et al: Incidence and hospitalization rates of varicella and herpes zoster before varicella vaccine introduction: a baseline assessment of the shifting epidemiology of varicella disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001, 20: 641-645. 10.1097/00006454-200107000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dworkin RH, Schmader KE: Epidemiology and natural history of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. Edited by: Watson CPN, Gerhon AA. 2001, New York: Elsevier Press, 39-64.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schmader K, Gnann JW, Watson CP: The epidemiological, clinical, and pathological rationale for the herpes zoster vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197 (1): 207-15. 10.1086/522152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gil A Sanmartin M, Carrasco P, Gonzales A: Epidemiology of severe varicella-zoster virus infection in Spain. Vaccine. 2004, 22: 3947-51. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Legami V, Gianino MM, Atti MC, Massari M, Migliardi A, Tomba GS, Zotti C, Zoster Study Group: Epidemiology and costs of herpes zoster: background data to estimate the impact of vaccination. Vaccine. 2007, 25 (43): 7598-604. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Creed R, Satyaprakash A, Ravanfar P: Varicella zoster vaccines. Dermatol Ther. 2009, 22 (2): 143-9. 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2009.01226.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitka M: FDA approve Schingles Vaccine - Herpes Zoster Vaccine targets older adults. Medical News and Perspectives. 2006, 296: 157-

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pellissier JM, Brisson M, Levin MJ: Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness in the United States of a vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. Vaccine. 2007, 25 (49): 8326-37. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.09.066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harpaz R, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Steward JF: Prevention of Herpes Zoster. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR. 2008, 57: 1-30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marino MG, Bagnato B, Torella I, Franco E: Active immunoprophylaxis to reduce clinical impact of Herpes Zoster and its complications. Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2009, 65 (3): 299-311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds MA, Chaves SS, Harpaz R, Lopez AS, Seward JF: The impact of the varicella vaccination program on herpes zoster epidemiology in the United States: a review. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197 (1): 224-7. 10.1086/522162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gershon AA, Katz SL: Perspective on live varicella vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197 (2): 242-5. 10.1086/522151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hambleton S: Prevention of varicella and zoster by live attenuated VZV vaccine. Front Biosc. 2008, 13: 2696-704. 10.2741/2876.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Betts RF: Vaccination strategies for the prevention of Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007, 57 (6): 143-7. 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Levin MJ, Shmader K: Prevention strategies: herpes zoster, post-herpetic neuralgia and immunogenicity. Herpes. 2007, 14 (2): 45-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gnann JW: Vaccination to prevent herpes zoster in older adults. J Pain. 2008, 9 (1): 31-6. 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gelb LD: Preventing herpes zoster through vaccination. Ophtalmology. 2008, 115 (2): 35-8. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Franco E, Zaratti L, Ambrosini Spinella S: It is possible to prevent herpes zoster through vaccination?. Ig San Pubbl. 2007, 63 (2): 191-5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lieu TA, Ortega-Sanchez I, Ray GT, et al: Community and patient values for preventing herpes zoster. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008, 26 (3): 235-49. 10.2165/00019053-200826030-00006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Adams EN, Parnapy S, Bautista P: Herpes zoster and vaccination: a clinical review. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010, 67 (9): 724-7. 10.2146/ajhp090118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moore L, Remy V, Martin M, Beillat M, McGuire A: A health economic model for evaluating a vaccine for the prevention of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in the UK. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2010, 8 (1): 7-10.1186/1478-7547-8-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hambleton S, Gershon AA: The impact of varicella vaccination in the United States. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2005, 16: 38-43. 10.1053/j.spid.2004.09.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hicks LD, Cook-Norris RH, Mendoza N, Madkan V, Arora A, Tyring S: Family history as risk factor for herpes zoster. Arch Dermatol. 2008, 144 (5): 603-8. 10.1001/archderm.144.5.603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kerzner B, Murray AV, Cheng F, et al: Safety and immunogenicity profile of the concomitant administration of Zostavax and inactivated influenza vaccine in adults aged 50 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007, 55 (10): 1499-507. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01397.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cunningham AL, Breuer J, Dwyer DE, et al: The prevention and management of herpes zoster. Med J Aust. 2008, 188 (3): 171-6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Paek E, Johnson R: Public Awareness and Knowledge of Herpes Zoster: Results of a Global Survey. Gerontology. 2010, 56 (1): 20-31. 10.1159/000240046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Opstelten W, van Essen GA, Hak E: Determinants of non-compliance with herpes zoster vaccination in the community-dwelling elderly. Vaccine. 2009, 27 (2): 192-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references


The authors thank Sanofi Pasteur MSD S.p.A. for its cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Liguori.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AP, VRS, MC and GL conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. FF, EF and FG participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parlato, A., Spica, V.R., Ciccozzi, M. et al. Compliance with herpes zoster vaccination in young and adult individuals in two regions of Italy. BMC Public Health 10, 333 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: