Edited by Nellie Bristol
Volume 20 Supplement 2
Lessons Learned from Global Polio Eradication - Part 1
Research
Publication of this supplement was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1178578 , Teaching Global Health Leaders about the Lessons Learned from Polio Eradication). The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editor declares that they have no competing interests.
-
Citation: BMC Public Health 2020 20(Suppl 2):1177
-
Synthesis and translation of research and innovations from polio eradication (STRIPE): initial findings from a global mixed methods study
Lessons from polio eradication efforts and the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) are useful for improving health service delivery and outcomes globally. The Synthesis and Translation of Research and I...
Citation: BMC Public Health 2020 20(Suppl 2):1176 -
Sampling method for surveying complex and multi-institutional partnerships: lessons from the Global Polio Eradication Initiative
Complex global initiatives, like the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), have prevented millions of paralyses and improved the health status of diverse populations. Despite the logistical challenges th...
Citation: BMC Public Health 2020 20(Suppl 2):1197 -
Evaluating the process of partnership and research in global health: reflections from the STRIPE project
Thoughtful and equitable engagement with international partners is key to successful research. STRIPE, a consortium of 8 academic and research institutions across the globe whose objective is to map, synthesiz...
Citation: BMC Public Health 2020 20(Suppl 2):1058
Annual Journal Metrics
-
2022 Citation Impact
4.5 - 2-year Impact Factor
4.7 - 5-year Impact Factor
1.661 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
1.307 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)2023 Speed
32 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
173 days submission to accept (Median)2023 Usage
24,332,405 downloads
24,308 Altmetric mentions
Peer-review Terminology
-
The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:
Identity transparency: Single anonymized
Reviewer interacts with: Editor
Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication