Skip to main content

Table 5 Quality assessment of case-control studies

From: Effect of arsenic on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First authors

Year

Country

Study type

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Total score

Quality

A

B

C

D

E

F

J

H

Peng

2015

China

Retrospective case-control

study nested in a cohort

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

6

Moderate

Marie

2018

French

Semi-ecological study

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

6

Moderate

Chen

2021

America

Case-control study

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

7

High

Jia

2021

China

Retrospective case-control

study nested in a cohort

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

7

High

  1. A: Is the case definition adequate? (0/1 point); B: Representativeness of the cases (0/1 point); C: Selection of Controls (0/1 point); D: Definition of Controls (0/1 point); E: Comparability of cases and controls based on the design or analysis (0/1/2 point); F: Ascertainment of exposure (0/1 point); G: Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls (0/1 point); H: Nonresponse rate (0/1 point)