Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of subgroup analyses based on country, study type, diagnostic criteria, test sample, and cutoff values

From: Effect of arsenic on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Subgroup

Number (N)

OR (95% CI)

Heterogeneity (I2%)

P

Country

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

China

7

1.23 (0.92, 1.65)

77

0.16

Canada

2

3.76 (1.78, 7.94)

0

0.0005

America

1

/

/

/

Bangladesh

1

/

/

/

Chile

1

/

/

/

French

1

/

/

/

Study Type

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Cohort study

5

1.59 (1.14, 2.22)

66

0.006

Cross-sectional study

4

1.43 (0.52, 3.92)

76

0.49

Retrospective case-control study nested in a cohort

2

2.04 (0.37, 11.32)

92

0.41

Case-control study

1

/

/

/

Semi-ecological study

1

/

/

/

Diagnostic Criteria

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ADA Criteria

5

1.17 (0.90, 1.52)

74

0.24

CDA-SOGC Criteria

2

3.76 (1.78, 7.94)

0

0.0005

MOH Criteria

2

0.78 (0.46, 1.33)

0

0.36

WHO Criteria

3

3.93 (1.27, 12.22)

62

0.02

CNGOF Criteria

1

/

/

/

Test Samples

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Blood

3

1.61 (0.97, 2.68)

78

0.07

Urine

7

1.39 (0.82, 2.34)

67

0.22

Hair

1

/

/

/

Tap water

1

/

/

/

Meconium

1

/

/

/

Cutoffs

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Tertile

6

1.16 (0.85, 1.56)

42

0.35

Quartile

4

2.13 (1.11, 4.10)

72

0.02

Not said

2

3.47 (0.64, 18.81)

84

0.15

Binary

1

/

/

/

Median year of publication

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Before 2018

7

2.61 (1.65, 4.13)

59

0.0001

After 2018

6

1.02 (0.85, 1.24)

39

0.82

Quality

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Moderate

7

2.51 (1.40, 4.50)

77

0.002

High

6

1.09 (0.81, 1.48)

71

0.56

  1. Abbreviations: WHO, World Health Organization; CDA-SOGC, Canadian Diabetes Association-Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada; CNGOF, French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; ADA, American Diabetes Association; MOH, Ministry of Health of China