Skip to main content

Table 2 Characterization of participants based on low, medium, or high BI score

From: Characterization of adults concerning the use of a hypothetical mHealth application addressing stress-overeating: an online survey

Characteristics

Low BI (n =  410)

Medium BI (n = 409)

High BI (n = 409)

Group differences

mean ± SD or n (%)

mean ± SD or n (%)

mean ± SD or n (%)

p-value

(p-valuec low BI vs. high BI)

Gendera

    

Male

101 (24.6)

75 (18.3)

62 (15.2)

0.002

Female

309 (75.4)

334 (81.7)

347 (84.8)

Age (years)b

31.26 ± 12.86

31.78 ± 12.92

31.38 ± 12.68

0.26

18–29

271 (66.1)

254 (62.1)

249 (60.9)

 

30–49

77 (18.8)

88 (21.5)

106 (25.9)

 

50–64

55 (13.4)

62 (15.2)

49 (12.0)

 

≥ 65

7 (1.7)

5 (1.2)

5 (1.2)

 

BMI (kg/m2)b

22.63 ± 3.76

23.50 ± 4.54

24.02 ± 4.47

< 0.001 (< 0.001)

< 18.5

38 (9.3)

16 (3.9)

11 (2.7)

 

18.5–24.9

283 (69.0)

290 (70.9)

262 (64.1)

 

25.0–29.9

71 (17.3)

67 (16.4)

95 (23.2)

 

≥ 30.0

18 (4.4)

36 (8.8)

41 (10.0)

 

Stress-eating behavior (SSES)b

2.90 ± 0.62

2.97 ± 0.70

3.17 ± 0.82

< 0.001 (< 0.001)

Stress-overeaters

135 (32.9)

161 (39.4)

217 (53.1)

< 0.001

Stress-undereaters

209 (51.0)

197 (48.2)

158 (38.6)

Non-stresseaters

66 (16.1)

51 (12.5)

34 (8.3)

Personality (BFI-10)b

    

Agreeableness

3.18 ± 0.76

3.24 ± 0.75

3.26 ± 0.79

0.56

Extraversion

3.20 ± 1.03

3.24 ± 0.75

3.26 ± 0.79

0.63

Conscientiousness

3.68 ± 0.81

3.58 ± 0.78

3.59 ± 0.83

0.46

Neuroticism

3.09 ± 0.93

3.26 ± 0.92

3.48 ± 0.90

< 0.001 (< 0.001)

Openness

3.65 ± 0.94

3.50 ± 0.94

3.60 ± 0.96

0.25

Eating reasons

(I eat what I eat because…)b

    

I like it.

6.26 ± 0.90

6.21 ± 0.93

6.24 ± 0.84

1

I usually eat it.

5.02 ± 1.33

5.00 ± 1.28

5.19 ± 1.25

0.30

I’m hungry.

5.55 ± 1.24

5.45 ± 1.13

5.48 ± 1.20

0.65

it is healthy.

5.22 ± 1.22

5.16 ± 1.22

5.23 ± 1.16

1

it is the most convenient.

4.13 ± 1.54

4.40 ± 1.44

4.56 ± 1.52

0.002 (0.001)

to indulge myself.

4.73 ± 1.45

4.93 ± 1.29

5.07 ± 1.27

0.052

out of traditions.

3.55 ± 1.71

3.79 ± 1.66

3.76 ± 1.76

0.65

it is natural.

4.33 ± 1.79

4.37 ± 1.77

4.27 ± 1.80

1

it is social.

4.11 ± 1.60

4.41 ± 1.60

4.25 ± 1.68

0.18

it is inexpensive.

3.26 ± 1.56

3.42 ± 1.51

3.45 ± 1.58

0.65

it spontaneously appeals to me.

3.27 ± 1.55

3.64 ± 1.55

3.86 ± 1.60

< 0.001 (< 0.001)

I watch my weight.

3.71 ± 1.82

3.97 ± 1.67

4.29 ± 1.68

< 0.001 (< 0.001)

I am frustrated.

2.78 ± 1.72

3.26 ± 1.78

3.86 ± 1.88

< 0.001 (< 0.001)

I am supposed to eat it.

1.91 ± 1.30

2.18 ± 1.37

2.28 ± 1.49

0.003 (0.002)

others like it.

1.71 ± 1.04

1.90 ± 1.22

2.01 ± 1.31

0.052

Personal innovativenessb

2.50 ± 0.92

2.82 ± 0.85

3.13 ± 0.95

< 0.001 (< 0.001)

  1. Note BFI = Big Five Inventory; BI = Behavioral Intention; BMI = body mass index; SD = standard deviation; SSES = Salzburg Stress Eating Scale
  2. aCategorical variable, Pearson’s Chi squared test used for comparison
  3. bNot normally distributed, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test used for comparison
  4. cWilcoxon rank sum test used for pairwise comparison