Skip to main content

Table 2 The results of the time-varying DID model of non-disabled people

From: Effect of long-term care insurance policy on depression in non-disabled people: evidence from China

Variables

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Depression

Depression

Depression

Depression

Depression

Treat*Post

−0.7378**

−0.7745***

−0.7766***

−0.7557**

−0.7600***

 

(0.2932)

(0.2896)

(0.2886)

(0.2893)

(0.2893)

Age

 

0.0052

0.0035

−0.0019

−0.0021

  

(0.0076)

(0.0075)

(0.0084)

(0.0092)

Gender

 

−1.4006***

−1.8924***

−1.9533***

−1.9509***

  

(0.1323)

(0.1704)

(0.1707)

(0.1703)

Education

 

−0.3258***

−0.2949***

−0.2050***

−0.2034***

  

(0.0387)

(0.0381)

(0.0383)

(0.0382)

Social participation

  

−0.5362***

−0.4336***

−0.4300***

   

(0.1278)

(0.1258)

(0.1255)

Smoking

  

0.6295***

0.5745***

0.5726***

   

(0.1897)

(0.1888)

(0.1883)

Physical activity

  

−0.2781

−0.2336

−0.2313

   

(0.1746)

(0.1762)

(0.1764)

Cohabitation arrangement

   

0.0083

0.0090

    

(0.0443)

(0.0443)

Number of children

   

−0.0320

−0.0329

    

(0.0610)

(0.0607)

Household income

   

−0.4160***

−0.4155***

    

(0.0466)

(0.0465)

Living environment

   

0.4334**

0.4386**

    

(0.1997)

(0.2003)

Financial support

   

−0.2102

−0.2076

    

(0.1300)

(0.1301)

Emotional support

   

−0.6768***

−0.6780***

    

(0.2295)

(0.2288)

Public pension

    

0.0080

     

(0.1540)

Public health insurance

    

−0.2694

     

(0.2624)

Fixed city

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Fixed year

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

_cons

7.6733***

9.1392***

9.5947***

14.1355***

14.3851***

 

(0.0372)

(0.4898)

(0.5187)

(0.7965)

(0.8519)

N

9279

9279

9279

9279

9279

R2

0.071

0.101

0.105

0.118

0.118

  1. Note *, **, and *** represent significant levels of 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively. The values in parentheses are city-level clustering robust standard errors