Skip to main content

Table 5 Support (or lack of) for hypotheses and explanations

From: The role of collectivism, liberty, COVID fatigue, and fatalism in public support for the zero-COVID policy and relaxing restrictions in China

Hypothesis Number

Hypothesis

Supported (or not) and explanation

H1a

Perceived positive health consequences of a COVID policy are associated with stronger support for the COVID policy

Supported

H1b

Perceived norms of supporting a COVID policy is associated with stronger support for the COVID policy

Supported

H1c

Hope induced by a COVID policy is associated with higher support for the COVID policy

Supported

H2a

Perceived positive health consequences of a COVID policy are associated with perceived norms of supporting that policy

Supported

H2b

Perceived positive health consequences of a COVID policy are associated with stronger hope

Supported

H3a

Collectivism is positively associated with support for zero-COVID

Supported

H3b-d

(b) liberty, (c) COVID fatigue, and (d) fatalism are negatively associated with support for zero-COVID.

H3b: not supported in June 2022 survey, supported in December 2022 survey

H3c: supported

H3d: not supported: opposite, but weak relationship

H4a

Collectivism is negatively associated with support for relaxing restrictions

Supported

H4b-d

(b) liberty, (c) COVID fatigue, and (d) fatalism are positively associated with support for relaxing restrictions.

H3b: supported in the June 2022 survey, not supported in the December 2022 survey

H3c: supported

H3d: not supported: opposite, but weak relationship