Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression Analysis (not adjusted and adjusted for covariates)

From: Behind the times? Associations of working-time autonomy with health-related and occupational outcomes in health care personnel– a latent profile analysis

 

Fatigue

(n = 1,093)

IRR, 95% CI

Psychosomatic health complaints

(n = 1,093)

IRR, 95% CI

Work ability

(n = 1,092)

OR, 95% CI

Job Satisfaction

(n = 1,093)

OR, 95% CI

Turnover intention1

(n = 883)

OR, 95% CI

Unadjusted

Cluster 1: High autonomy

Cluster 2: Medium autonomy

Cluster 3: Low autonomy

Ref.

1.085 (0.852; 1.398)

1.315** (1.105; 1.565)

Ref.

1.572**(1.119; 2.207)

1.764***(1.421; 2.191)

Ref.

0.668 (0.357; 1.247)

0.431***(0.280; 0.663)

Ref.

0.232***(0.131; 0.411)

0.173***(0.094; 0.320)

Ref.

1.025 (0.475; 2.212)

2.480*(1.214; 5.063)

Wald Test

x2(2) = 10.52, p = 0.005

x2(2) = 26.40, p < 0.001

x2(2) = 14.76, p < 0.001

x2(2) = 33.80, p < 0.001

x2(2) = 13.07, p = 0.001

Adjusted2

Cluster 1: High autonomy

Cluster 2: Medium autonomy

Cluster 3: Low autonomy

Ref.

1.064 (0.845; 1.340)

1.233 (0.992;1.533)

Ref.

1.255 (0.958; 1.645)

1.427** (1.098; 1.855)

Ref.

0.521*(0.307; 0.886)

0.339***(0.185; 0.621)

Ref.

0.313***(0.164; 0.597)

0.216***(0.103; 0.450)

Ref.

0.688 (0.288; 1.648)

2.432 (0.993; 5.956)

Wald Test

x2(2) = 3.97, p = 0.137

x2(2) = 7.11, p = 0.029

x2(2) = 14.39, p < 0.001

x2(2) = 17.82, p < 0.001

x2(2) = 15.22, p < 0.001

  1. Note *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.010; * p < = 0.050; 1= employed participants only; 2 = models adjusted for gender, age, education, income, children under 18 years living in the same household, working hours/week, occupational status (employed vs. self-employed), leadership position (yes/no), shift work (yes); IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval; OR = Odds Ratio