Skip to main content

Table 4 Study risk of bias

From: The effect of the Sport Education Model in physical education on student learning attitude: a systematic review

Author(s)/Date

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

L

M

S

C

NI

Ratinga

Research area

Wallhead & Ntoumanis (2004) [42]

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Serious

Moderate

4

2

2

0

0

Serious

Affective & cognitive

Spittle & Byrne (2009) [43]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Serious

Moderate

3

1

2

0

1

Serious

Affective & cognitive

Perlman (2010) [44]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Serious

Moderate

3

1

2

0

1

Serious

Affective

Menickelli & Hastie (2014) [45]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Serious

Moderate

3

1

2

0

0

Serious

Affective & cognitive

Wallhead et al. (2014) [23]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

Low

Serious

Moderate

4

1

2

0

0

Serious

Affective & cognitive

Cuevas et al. (2016) [46]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Moderate

Moderate

3

2

1

0

1

Serious

Affective

Fernández-Río et al. (2017) [47]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Serious

Moderate

3

1

2

0

1

Serious

Affective

Xu et al. (2019) [48]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Serious

Moderate

3

1

2

0

1

Serious

Affective & cognitive

Zhang & Su, (2020) [49]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Serious

Moderate

3

1

2

0

1

Serious

Affective

Viciana et al. (2020) [50]

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

4

3

0

0

0

Moderate

Affective & cognitive

Luna et al. (2020) [51]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

Low

Serious

Moderate

4

2

1

0

0

Serious

Affective

Chu et al. (2022) [52]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Serious

Moderate

3

1

2

0

1

Serious

Affective & cognitive

Iserbyt et al. (2023) [53]

Serious

Low

Low

Low

NI

Serious

Moderate

3

1

2

0

1

Serious

Cognitive

  1. ROBINS-I tools (Sterne et al., 2016) checklist items for non-randomized controlled studies related to bias in the following domains: I. Confounders; II. Participants selection; III. Classification of interventions; IV. Deviations from intervention; V. Missing data; VI. Outcomes measurement; VII. Results selection
  2. L Low risk, M Moderate risk, S Serious risk, C Critical risk, NI No information
  3. aRating: Declaring a study to be at a particular level of risk of bias for an individual domain will mean that the study as a whole has a risk of bias at least this severe