Skip to main content

Table 3 Multiple linear regression models for the association between dysmenorrhea and well-being (Model 1), and the association between dysmenorrhea and menstrual academic disruption (MAD) (Model 2). (N = 2657)

From: The hidden burden of dysmenorrhea among adolescent girls in Palestine refugee camps: a focus on well-being and academic performance

Well-being (WHO-5)

 

Coefficient

95%CI

p-value

Model 1a: Crude model/unadjusted model

2567

-2.10

[-2.45,-1.74]

< 0.001

Model 1b: Adjusted model a

2641

-1.45

[-1.82,-1.09]

< 0.001

Menstrual academic disruption (MAD)

N

Coefficient

95%CI

p-value

Model 2a: Crude model/ unadjusted model

2657

0.76

[0.73,0.80]

< 0.001

Model 2b: Adjusted model b

2641

0.74

[0.70,0.78]

< 0.001

Model 2c: Adjusted model with linear splines c

No to mild dysmenorrhea (score 0–4)

2641

0.07

[-0.05,0.19]

0.261

Moderate and severe dysmenorrhea (score 4–12)

0.95

[0.90,1.00]

< 0.001

Model 2d: Adjusted model with linear splines and correction for clustering by sisters

No to mild dysmenorrhea (score 0–4)

2641

0.08

[0.02,0.13]

0.006

Moderate and severe dysmenorrhea (score 4–12)

0.95

[0.90,1.00]

< 0.001

  1. a: adjusted for age, country, locality of camp community, standards of living, reported economic status, skipping breakfast, dietary diversity, physical activity, menstrual cycle length, intensity of bleeding age at menarche
  2. b: adjusted for age, country, locality of camp community, standards of living, reported economic status, skipping breakfast, dietary diversity, physical activity, menstrual cycle length, and intensity of bleeding
  3. c: adjusted model with linear splines with at knot at dysmenorrhea = 4