Skip to main content

Table 1 Interaction of perceived threat and perceived efficacy to produce EPPMa control responses

From: Knowledge, risk perception and uptake of COVID-19 vaccination among internally displaced persons in complex humanitarian emergency setting, Northeast Nigeria

S/N

Perceived threat

Perceived efficacy

Type of control responses

Attitudinal dispositions and description

1

High

High

Danger control response

Responsive – Individuals are well motivated to undertake preventive and control measures to protect themselves against health risk. Usually manifests in positive changes in attitude, intention, and behavior.

2

High

Low

Fear control response

Avoidant – Affected individuals doubt their ability to perform the recommended responses and/or doubt the efficacy of such responses. Such individuals engage in defensive motivation using various psychological defense strategies, including defensive avoidance, denial, and reactance, to control their fears.

3

Low

High

Lesser danger control response

Proactive – Individuals taking some protective actions but are not really motivated to do much.

4

Low

Low

No control response

Indifferent – Individuals not considering the risk to be real or relevant to them; often not even aware of the risk. Affected individuals do not undertake any measure to protect themselves against health risk.

  1. aExtended Parallel Process Model