Skip to main content

Table 5 Multivariate logistic regression analysis for risk factors associated with all-cause death and TB specific death in Guizhou, 2006-2020

From: Changes in tuberculosis burden and its associated risk factors in Guizhou Province of China during 2006–2020: an observational study

Characteristic

All-cause death

TB specific death

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adj. OR (95% CI)

P value (LR-test)

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adj. OR (95% CI)

P value (LR-test)

Three periods

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

 Ref: 2006~2010

  2011~2015

1.32 (1.25~1.39)

1.22 (1.16~1.29)

 

0.35 (0.32~0.40)

0.39 (0.35~0.44)

 

  2016~2020

1.91 (1.82~2.01)

1.66 (1.58~1.75)

 

0.09 (0.08~0.10)

0.10 (0.08~0.11)

 

Residence ranked by average GDP per capita from 2006 to 2020

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

 Ref: Bijie (N.9, lowest)

  Guiyang (N.1, highest)

0.91 (0.85~0.97)

0.73 (0.68~0.79)

 

1.71 (1.42~2.06)

1.41 (1.15~1.73)

 

  Liupanshui (N.2)

0.80 (0.74~0.88)

0.84 (0.77~0.92)

 

3.27 (2.68~3.98)

3.27 (2.63~4.06)

 

  Zunyi (N.3)

0.83 (0.78~0.89)

0.62 (0.58~0.66)

 

1.17 (0.98~1.40)

1.32 (1.09~1.60)

 

  Qianxinan (N.4)

0.76 (0.70~0.82)

0.74 (0.68~0.80)

 

1.98 (1.60~2.43)

1.85 (1.47~2.33)

 

  Qiannan (N.5)

1.41 (1.32~1.50)

1.03 (0.97~1.10)

 

1.88 (1.59~2.21)

1.76 (1.47~2.11)

 

  Anshun (N.6)

0.68 (0.62~0.74)

0.60 (0.55~0.66)

 

0.79 (0.59~1.05)

0.79 ( 0.58~1.06)

 

  Tongren (N.7)

0.77 (0.71~0.83)

0.57 ( 0.53~0.62)

 

3.29 (2.74~3.95)

2.80 ( 2.28~3.44)

 

  Qiandongnan (N.8)

0.98 (0.91~1.05)

0.91 (0.85~0.98)

 

1.53 (1.28~1.84)

1.10 (0.90~1.34)

 

Gender

  

<0.001

   

 Ref: Female

   

——

——

 

  Male

1.31 (1.26~1.37)

1.33 (1.28~1.39)

 

——

——

 

Age

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

 Ref: ≤25

  26-59

3.70 (3.39~4.06)

3.20 (2.91~3.51)

 

0.58 (0.48~0.70)

0.63 (0.50~0.78)

 

  ≥60

13.34 (12.23~14.58)

11.41 (10.42~12.53)

 

0.39 (0.32~0.47)

0.53 (0.43~0.65)

 

Ethnic group

     

0.041

 Ref: Han

——

——

    

  Not Han

——

——

 

0.90 (0.82~1.00)

1.14 (1.01~1.29)

 

Occupation

  

<0.001

  

0.015

 Ref: Fixed job workers and others

  Migrant workers and unemployed

1.25 (1.11~1.41)

0.97 ( 0.86~1.10)

 

1.59 (1.20~2.13)

1.57 (1.14~2.17)

 

  Farmers

3.08 (2.81~3.38)

1.49 ( 1.35~1.64)

 

1.01 (0.80~1.27)

1.21 (0.94~1.58)

 

Classification of patients

  

<0.001

  

0.022

 Ref: New cases

  Previously treated cases

1.61 (1.52~1.71)

1.46 (1.38~1.55)

 

1.30 (1.13~1.48)

1.20 (1.03~1.39)

 

With severe symptoms

  

<0.001

  

0.128

 Ref: No

  Yes

1.63 (1.55~1.71)

1.47 (1.40~1.54)

 

0.88 (0.78~0.99)

0.90 (0.78~1.03)

 

Types of case finding

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

 Ref: PCF

  ACF

0.96 (0.91~1.02)

0.99 (0.94~1.05)

 

0.57 (0.50~0.66)

0.70 ( 0.59~0.81)

 

  Transfer in

1.38 (1.33~1.44)

1.21 (1.16~1.26)

 

0.69 (0.63~0.77)

0.93 (0.83~1.04)

 

Underwent DOT during whole treatment

  

<0.001

  

<0.001

 Ref: No

  Yes

1.16 (1.12~1.21)

1.08 (1.04~1.12)

 

1.20 (1.10~1.32)

1.23 (1.11~1.37)

 
  1. TB Tuberculosis, Adj. Adjusted, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence intervals, IR-test Likelihood ratio test, GDP Gross domestic product, PCF Passive case finding, ACF Active case finding, DOT Directly observed treatment