Table 5 Counts and likelihood of Tweets containing the three types of risk information studied (verbal cues, numeric information, and AQI risk labels) by institution type and regional scale
|  | Verbal cues (e.g., “large”) | Odds ratio (95% C.I.) | Numeric information (e.g., “[#]”) | Odds ratio (95% C.I.) | AQI risk labels (e.g., “unhealthy”) | Odds ratio (95% C.I.) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Institution type | Yes | None | Â | Yes | None | Â | Yes | None | Â |
Environmental | 210 | 627 | 1.13 (0.86, 1.48) | 43 | 839 | 1.07 (0.61, 1.80) | 155 | 727 | 0.78 (0.56, 1.08) |
Health (ref) | 106 | 299 | 21 | 384 | 58 | 347 | |||
Regional scale | Yes | None | Â | Yes | None | Â | Yes | None | Â |
State or national | 213 | 690 | 0.84 (0.64, 1.11) | 52 | 851 | 1.89 (1.03, 3.76) | 126 | 777 | 0.55 (0.41, 0.75) |
Local (ref) | 103 | 281 | 12 | 372 | 87 | 297 | |||