Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality of included studies

From: Estimating the global prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Study purpose

Sampling technique

Sample Size

Assessement of lung function

COPD diagnostic criteria

Total score

Study quality

Bourbeau et al. 2022 [29]

Clearly defined (1)

Hazards sampling (1)

n = 1452 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Farooqi et al. 2022 [30]

Clearly defined (1)

Stratified random (1)

21 242 (1)

Objective (1)

LLN (1)

5

moderate quality

Grafino et al. 2022 [31]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

241 (0)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

4

moderate quality

Michiguchi et al. 2022 [32]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

n = 4364 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Pagano et al. 2022 [33]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

141 (0)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

4

moderate quality

Wang et al. 2022 [34]

Clearly defined (1)

Hazards sampling (1)

n = 33 664 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Xiao et al. 2022 [35]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n = 202 (0)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Kim et Kang 2021 [36]

Clearly defined (1)

Multi-stage complex randomness (1)

n = 12 919 (1)

Objective (1)

LLN (1)

5

moderate quality

Leung et al. 2021 [37]

Clearly defined (1)

Rondomized (1)

n = 4893 (1)

Objective

(1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

Li et 2021 [38]

Clearly defined (1)

Random in clusters (1)

n =2963 (1)

Objective

(1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Shanggaun et al. 2021 [39]

Clearly defined (1)

Multi-stage randomness (1)

n =2194 (1)

Objective

(1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Su et al. 2021 [40]

Clearly defined (1)

Multi-stage randomness (1)

n =3407 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Tamaki et al. 2021 [41]

Clearly defined (1)

Non-random (0)

n = 2518 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Zhang et al. 2021 [42]

Clearly defined (1)

Multi-stage randomness (1)

n = 2421 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Adhikari et al. 2020 [43]

Clearly defined (1)

Systemic randomness (1)

n =1438 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

Kim et al. 2020 [44]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n =6341 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Melbye et al. 2020 [45]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n =7247 (1)

Objective

(1)

LLN (1)

5

moderate quality

Sharifi et al. 2020 [46]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n =1007 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Sumit et al. 2020 [47]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

n = 373 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Timur et al. 2020 [48]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

n = 386 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Yan et al. 2020 [49]

Clearly defined (1)

Non-random (0)

n =4725 (1)

Objective

(1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Bikbov et al. 2019 [50]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n =5392 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

High quality

De Matteis et al. 2019 [51]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n =94,551 (1)

Objective (1)

LLN (1)

5

moderate quality

Sheng et al.

2019 [52]

Clearly defined (1)

Non-random (0)

n = 1371 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Zha et al. 2019 [53]

Clearly defined (1)

Random, complex in several degrees (1)

n =2770 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

Brostrôm et al. 2018 [54]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n = 1993 (1)

Objective (1)

LLN (1)

5

moderate quality

Ding et al. 2018 [55]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

n =5637 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Fang et al. 2018 [56]

Clearly defined (1)

Random, complex in several degrees (1)

n = 66,752 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Leem et al. 2018 [57]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized clustering in two stages (1)

n =6517(1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

Kotaki et al. 2017 [58]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

n = 293 (0)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

4

moderate quality

Nakaao et al. 2017 [59]

Clearly defined (1)

Non-random (0)

n = 746 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Sobrino et al. 2017 [60]

Clearly defined (1)

Random, stratified at four degrees (1)

n =4345 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

Torén et al. 2017 [61]

Clearly defined (1)

Rondomized (1)

n = 1050 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

Denguizli et al. 2016 [62]

Clearly defined (1)

Stratified random (1)

n = 661 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

El Rhazi et al. 2016 [63]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n =768 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

Fukuyama et al. 2016 [64]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

n = 2232 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Karrash et al. 2016 [65]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

n= 2256 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

5

moderate quality

Koul et al. 2016 [66]

Clearly defined (1)

Randomized (1)

n =757 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

Loh et al. 2016 [67]

Clearly defined (1)

Random simple stratified (1)

n = 663 (1)

Objective (1)

FR and LLN (2)

6

high quality

Obaseki et al. 2016 [68]

Clearly defined (1)

Random in three stages (1)

n = 875 (1)

Objective (1)

LLN (1)

5

moderate quality

Omori et al. 2016 [69]

Clearly defined (1)

Not mentioned (0)

n =22,293 (1)

Objectif (1)

FR (2)

5

moderate quality

Park et al. 2016 [70]

Clearly defined (1)

Random, complex in several degrees (1)

n = 3283 (1)

Objective (1)

FR (2)

6

high quality

  1. COPD : chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; FR : fixed ratio ; LLN : lower limit of normal