Skip to main content

Table 2 Ranking the relative importance of each TDF domain according to the frequency of identification, thematic elaboration, and evidence of conflicting beliefs

From: Key influences on university students’ physical activity: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B model of human behaviour

Ranking

TDF Domain

COM-B Subcomponents

Frequency, no. of studies (%)

Elaboration, no. of themes

Evidence of mixed barriers/facilitators

1

Environmental context and resources

Physical opportunity

35(90)

12

Yes

2

Social influences

Social opportunity

28(72)

7

Yes

3

Goals

Reflective motivation

21(54)

3

Yes

4

Intentions

Reflective motivation

17(44)

3

Yes

5

Reinforcement

Automatic motivation

15(38)

8

Yes

6

Emotion

Automatic motivation

15(38)

2

Yes

7

Beliefs about consequences

Reflective motivation

12(31)

5

Yes

8

Knowledge

Psychological capability

11(28)

4

Yes

9

Physical skills

Physical capability

8(21)

3

Yes

10

Beliefs about capabilities

Reflective motivation

7(18)

2

Yes

11

Cognitive and interpersonal skills

Psychological capability

6(15)

1

Yes

12

Social/professional role and identity

Reflective motivation

3(8)

2

No

13

Behavioural regulation

Psychological capability

1(3)

2

No

14

Memory, attention and decision process

Psychological capability

0(0)

-

-

15

Optimism

Reflective motivation

0(0)

-

-