Skip to main content

Table 5 Multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for MUO across tertiles of alternate healthy eating index-2010 stratified by sex (n = 203)a

From: Association between alternative healthy eating index (AHEI) with metabolic health status in adolescents with overweight and obesity

 

Tertiles of energy-adjusted alternate healthy eating index-2010b

 

T1

(n = 68)

Score < 49

T2

(n = 67)

49–62

T3

(n = 68)

> 62

Ptrend

MUO Based on IDF criteria

 Girls (cases/participants)

27/37

13/33

2/32

 

  Crude

1.00

0.24 (0.09, 0.66)

0.03 (0.01, 0.12)

< 0.001

  Model 1

1.00

0.24 (0.08, 0.72)

0.02 (0.01, 0.09)

< 0.001

  Model 2

1.00

0.24 (0.08, 0.73)

0.02 (0.01, 0.12)

< 0.001

  Model 3

1.00

0.24 (0.08, 0.75)

0.02 (0.01, 0.11)

< 0.001

 Boys (cases/participants)

20/31

13/34

4/36

 

  Crude

1.00

0.34 (0.12, 0.94)

0.07 (0.02, 0.25)

< 0.001

  Model 1

1.00

0.37 (0.13, 1.02)

0.07 (0.02, 0.25)

< 0.001

  Model 2

1.00

0.47 (0.16, 1.38)

0.08 (0.02, 0.41)

0.01

  Model 3

1.00

0.41 (0.13, 1.25)

0.05 (0.01, 0.29)

0.01

MUO Based on IDF/HOMA-IR criteria

 Girls (cases/participants)

22/37

9/33

1/32

 

  Crude

1.00

0.26 (0.09, 0.70)

0.02 (0.01, 0.18)

< 0.001

  Model 1

1.00

0.22 (0.07, 0.69)

0.02 (0.01, 0.15)

< 0.001

  Model 2

1.00

0.22 (0.07, 0.70)

0.02 (0.01, 0.21)

< 0.001

  Model 3

1.00

0.22 (0.07, 0.70)

0.02 (0.01, 0.23)

< 0.001

 Boys (cases/participants)

19/31

12/34

4/36

 

  Crude

1.00

0.34 (0.13, 0.94)

0.08 (0.02, 0.28)

< 0.001

  Model 1

1.00

0.37 (0.13, 1.04)

0.08 (0.02, 0.30)

< 0.001

  Model 2

1.00

0.49 (0.16, 1.46)

0.10 (0.02, 0.47)

0.01

  Model 3

1.00

0.43 (0.14, 1.32)

0.05 (0.01, 0.34)

0.01

  1. aAll values are odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Model 1: Adjusted for age, energy intake. Model 2: More adjustments for physical activity levels, socioeconomic status. Model 3: Further adjustments for BMI
  2. bAlternate healthy eating index-2010 components were adjusted for energy intake based on residual method