Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariable-adjusted odds ratio for MUO across tertiles of alternate healthy eating index-2010 stratified by BMI categories (n = 203)a

From: Association between alternative healthy eating index (AHEI) with metabolic health status in adolescents with overweight and obesity

 

Tertiles of energy-adjusted alternate healthy eating index-2010b

 

T1

(n = 68)

Score < 49

T2

(n = 67)

49–62

T3

(n = 68)

> 62

Ptrend

MUO Based on IDF criteria

 Overweight (cases/participants)

17/25

10/30

1/49

 

  Crude

1.00

0.24 (0.08, 0.73)

0.02 (0.01, 0.08)

< 0.001

  Model 1

1.00

0.26 (0.08, 0.85)

0.02 (0.01, 0.09)

< 0.001

  Model 2

1.00

0.30 (0.09, 1.03)

0.02 (0.01, 0.12)

< 0.001

 Obesity (cases/participants)

30/43

16/37

5/19

 

  Crude

1.00

0.33 (0.13, 0.83)

0.16 (0.05, 0.52)

0.01

  Model 1

1.00

0.34 (0.13, 0.88)

0.13 (0.04, 0.50)

0.01

  Model 2

1.00

0.37 (0.14, 0.97)

0.15 (0.04, 0.63)

0.01

MUO Based on IDF/HOMA-IR criteria

 Overweight (cases/participants)

12/25

7/30

1/49

 

  Crude

1.00

0.33 (0.10, 1.05)

0.02 (0.01, 0.19)

< 0.001

  Model 1

1.00

0.33 (0.10, 1.14)

0.02 (0.01, 0.20)

< 0.001

  Model 2

1.00

0.39 (0.11, 1.41)

0.04 (0.01, 0.37)

0.01

 Obesity (cases/participants)

29/43

14/37

4/19

 

  Crude

1.00

0.29 (0.12, 0.74)

0.13 (0.04, 0.46)

0.01

  Model 1

1.00

0.31 (0.12, 0.79)

0.10 (0.03, 0.43)

0.01

  Model 2

1.00

0.32 (0.12, 0.84)

0.10 (0.02, 0.48)

0.01

  1. aAll values are odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, energy intake. Model 2: More adjustments for physical activity levels, socioeconomic status
  2. bAlternate healthy eating index-2010 components were adjusted for energy intake based on residual method