Skip to main content

Table 3 Joint Effect of HIV Knowledge and HIV Risk Perception Among Male Tajik MWID

From: HIV knowledge, self-perception of HIV risk, and sexual risk behaviors among male Tajik labor migrants who inject drugs in Moscow

HIV Knowledge

HIV Risk Perception

N

% Reporting Outcome

Prevalence Ratio aPR (95% CI)a

Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction (95% CI)

Model 1: Multiple Sex Partners, N = 410

 Moderate/High

Moderate/High

26

16.4

ref

 Low

Moderate/High

14

22.6

0.94 (0.34, 1.45)

 Moderate/High

Low

52

44.1

1.82 (1.21, 2.76)*

 Low

Low

30

42.3

1.65 (1.01, 2.74)*

-0.11 (-0.70, 0.60)

Model 2: Sex with FSW, N = 410

 Moderate/High

Moderate/High

52

32.7

ref

 Low

Moderate/High

23

37.1

0.89 (0.55, 1.28)

 Moderate/High

Low

59

50.0

1.19 (0.87, 1.49)

 Low

Low

38

53.5

1.21 (0.89, 1.70)

0.13 (-0.27, 0.64)

Model 3: Condomless Sex, N = 250

 Moderate/High

Moderate/High

61

70.9

ref

 Low

Moderate/High

31

75.6

1.06 (0.88, 1.26)

 Moderate/High

Low

53

68.8

1.01 (0.90, 1.30)

 Low

Low

30

65.2

0.96 (0.72, 1.24)

-0.10 (-0.58, 0.15)

Model 4: Condomless Sex with FSW, N = 172

 Moderate/High

Moderate/High

14

26.9

ref

 Low

Moderate/High

7

30.4

1.14 (0.40, 2.29)

 Moderate/High

Low

24

40.7

1.68 (0.80, 3.61)

 Low

Low

15

39.5

1.63 (0.79, 2.93)

-0.19 (-2.22, 1.05)

  1. aAll estimates adjusted for study variables in modified Poisson regression
  2. * Denotes p < 0.05