Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of eight studies addressing factors associated with vaccination decision making in anthroposophic communities

From: Understanding and explaining the link between anthroposophy and vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review

Mollema L, Wijers N, Hahné SJ, van der Klis FR, Boshuizen HC, de Melker HE. Participation in and attitude towards the national immunization program in the Netherlands: data from population-based questionnaires. BMC public health. 2012 Dec;12(1):1–3

The Netherlands

2013

The aim of this study was to measure vaccination coverage for MMR vaccines among children attending anthroposophical schools and gain more insight on attitudes towards childhood vaccination of parents with children attending anthroposophical schools

Quantitative (n = 458)

Parents of children attending anthroposophic schools

Byström E, Lindstrand A, Likhite N, Butler R, Emmelin M. Parental attitudes and decision-making regarding MMR vaccination in an anthroposophic community in Sweden–a qualitative study. Vaccine. 2014 Nov 28;32(50):6752–7

Sweden

2014

To explore facilitators and barriers to MMR vaccination among parents living in anthroposophic communities in Sweden

Qualitative: 19 semi-structured interviews

Parents in an anthroposophic community

Duffell E. Attitudes of parents towards measles and immunisation after a measles outbreak in an anthroposophical community. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2001 Sep 1;55(9):685–6

UK

2001

To explore attitudes of parents towards measles and immunisation after a measles outbreak in an anthroposophical community

Quantitative: Survey n = 126

Parents in an anthroposophical community in Gloucestershire

Harmsen IA, Ruiter RA, Paulussen TG, Mollema L, Kok G, de Melker HE. Factors that influence vaccination decision-making by parents who visit an anthroposophical child welfare center: a focus group study. Advances in preventive medicine. 2012 Jan 1;2012

The Netherlands

2012

To explore the beliefs underlying their childhood vaccination decision-making

Qualitative, 3 Focus Group Discussion (n = 16)

Parents who Visit an Anthroposophical Child Welfare Center

Mittring-Junghans N, Holmberg C, Witt CM, Teut M. Thoughts, beliefs and concepts concerning infectious childhood diseases of physicians practicing homeopathic, anthroposophic and conventional medicine–a qualitative study. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 2021 Dec;21(1):1–9

Germany

2021

To investigate the concepts and beliefs toward infectious childhood diseases among physicians practicing conventional, homeopathy and anthroposophic medicine

Qualitative, In-depth interviews (6 homeopathic, 6 anthroposophic and 6 conventional)

Health providers

Mollema L, Staal JM, van Steenbergen JE, Paulussen TG, de Melker HE. An exploratory qualitative assessment of factors influencing childhood vaccine providers' intention to recommend immunization in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec;12(1):1–0

Netherlands

2012

To examine factors related to providers’ intentions to recommend vaccinations to parents of young children

Qualitative, 4 Focus group discussions, only 1 dicussion with providers at an anthroposophic welfare centre

Health providers

Sobo, E.J., 2015. Social cultivation of vaccine refusal and delay among Waldorf (Steiner) school parents. Medical anthropology quarterly, 29(3), pp.381–399

USA

2015

To help explain this PBE rate and inform interventions

Qualitative, 2 focus groups and conducted six formative and 18 cognitive interviews, Survey of vaccine preferences (n = 36)

Parents at a Waldorf School

Deml MJ, Notter J, Kliem P, Buhl A, Huber BM, Pfeiffer C, Burton-Jeangros C, Tarr PE. “We treat humans, not herds!”: A qualitative study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers’ individualized approaches to vaccination in Switzerland. Social Science & Medicine. 2019 Nov 1;240:112,556

Switzerland

2019

Our study aims at understanding CAM providers' roles in VH and asks the following questions: (1) how do CAM providers describe their perspectives and roles regarding vaccination?; (2) in what ways, if any, do CAM providers’ views and practices diverge from biomedical and public health vaccination discourses?; and (3) how do CAM providers and parents discuss vaccination during consultations?

Qualitative, 17 interviews (7 anthroposophic providers) and observed during vaccination consultations (N = 18 observations with 5 providers) employed individualized approaches to vaccination

Alternative/Complementary Anthroposophic health providers