Skip to main content

Table 3 Poor engagement with technology defined as proportion of participants with counts of days with no digital confirmation over intensive and full course of TB treatment

From: Risk factors for poor engagement with a smart pillbox adherence intervention among persons on tuberculosis treatment in Ethiopia

 

POOR ENGAGEMENT (COUNTS OF DAYS WITH NO DIGITAL CONFIRMATION) OVER INTENSIVE PHASE

POOR ENGAGEMENT (COUNTS OF DAYS WITH NO DIGITAL CONFIRMATION) OVER FULL COURSE

 

Λ = 0.070

(4686/67315)

RRc

RRc 95%CI

RRa

RRa 95%CI

Λ = 0.091

(18,042/199133)

RRc

RRc 95%CI

RRa

RRa 95%CI

% -poor outcome

     < 4%

0.067

(1820/27307)

1

–

1

–

0.093

(7574/81424)

1

–

1

–

     > 4% to 7%

0.084

(1704/20370)

1.01

(0.88, 1.27)

1.02

(0.81, 1.28)

0.085

(5040/59171)

0.85

(0.71, 1.02)

0.86

(0.72, 1.02)

     > 7%a

0.059

(1162/19638)

1.10

(0.87, 1.38)

1.12

(0.89, 1.41)

0.093

(5428/58508)

0.94

(0.79, 1.12)

0.96

(0.81, 1.15)

Age, in years

    18 to 24

0.080

(1543/19256)

1

–

1

–

0.100

(5701/56987)

1

–

1

–

    25 to 34

0.058

(1249/21570)

0.89

(0.73, 1.09)

0.89

(0.73, 1.09)

0.088

(5683/64224)

0.86

(0.74, 1.00)

0.86

(0.74, 0.99)

    35 + 

0.072

(1894/26489)

0.87

(0.72, 1.05)

0.87

(0.72, 1.05)

0.085

(6658/77892)

0.81

(0.71, 0.93)

0.81

(0.70, 0.93)

Sex

    Female

0.071

(1952/27322)

1

–

1

–

0.084

(6699/80183)

1

–

1

–

    Male

0.068

(2734/39993)

0.96

(0.82, 1.12)

0.97

(0.82, 1.13)

0.095

(11,343/118920)

1.06

(0.94, 1.20)

1.08

(0.96, 1.21)

HIV status§

    Negative

0.067

(3955/58796)

1

–

1

–

0.090

(15,686/174676)

1

–

1

–

    Positive

0.086

(712/8278)

1.22

(0.97, 1.53)

1.29

(1.02, 1.63)

0.098

(2329/23738)

1.17

(0.99, 1.39)

1.28

(1.07, 1.53)

Previous TB

    No

0.070

(4420/63124)

1

–

1

–

0.092

(17,118/186625)

1

–

1

–

    Yes

0.064

(265/4168)

1.16

(0.85, 1.59)

1.18

(0.86, 1.62)

0.074

(923/12455)

1.06

(0.84, 1.34)

1.09

(0.86, 1.38)

Education

    None

0.060

(590/9765)

1

–

1

–

0.089

(2570/28867)

1

–

1

–

    Less than primary

0.075

(1832/24495)

1.12

(0.88, 1.42)

1.10

(0.85, 1.41)

0.098

(6975/71451)

1.19

(1.00, 1.43)

1.11

(0.92, 1.35)

    Primary completed

0.067

(789/11774)

1.03

(0.77, 1.36)

1.01

(0.75, 1.36)

0.081

(2833/35115)

1.06

(0.86, 1.30)

0.97

(0.77, 1.20)

    Secondary or more

0.069

(1475/21281)

1.09

(0.85, 1.40)

1.05

(0.81, 1.38)

0.089

(5664/63670)

1.10

(0.92, 1.33)

1.01

(0.83, 1.23)

Marital status

    Single

0.065

(1124/17321)

1

–

1

–

0.084

(4367/51838)

1

–

1

–

    Single/independent

0.069

(871/12552)

1.28

(1.01, 1.62)

1.31

(1.03, 1.67)

0.099

(3641/36595)

1.34

(1.13, 1.59)

1.38

(1.16, 1.64)

    Married/cohabiting

0.072

(2206/30546)

1.13

(0.92, 1.38)

1.22

(0.98, 1.50)

0.088

(7918/90404)

1.03

(0.89, 1.19)

1.13

(0.97, 1.32)

    Separated/widowed

0.070

(485/6896)

1.27

(0.96, 1.68)

1.40

(1.04, 1.90)

0.104

(2116/20266)

1.10

(0.89, 1.37)

1.26

(1.00, 1.58)

SEP

    Poorest

0.085

(1136/13328)

1

–

1

–

0.109

(4305/39618)

1

–

1

–

    Second

0.053

(695/13167)

0.86

(0.66, 1.11)

0.86

(0.66, 1.11)

0.088

(3421/38888)

0.91

(0.76, 1.10)

0.91

(0.75, 1.09)

    Middle

0.094

(1231/13076)

1.12

(0.88, 1.44)

1.12

(0.88, 1.43)

0.105

(4014/38276)

0.98

(0.82, 1.18)

0.97

(0.81, 1.17)

    Fourth

0.052

(693/13357)

0.90

(0.69, 1.16)

0.89

(0.69, 1.15)

0.081

(3246/40311)

0.88

(0.73, 1.05)

0.86

(0.72, 1.04)

    Wealthiest

0.061

(794/13091)

0.86

(0.66, 1.11)

0.87

(0.67, 1.12)

0.069

(2655/38259)

0.79

(0.65, 0.95)

0.79

(0.65, 0.96)

BC confirmed

    Yes

0.065

(2936/45052)

1

–

1

–

0.090

(12,081/133772)

1

–

1

–

    No

0.079

(1749/22240)

1.00

(0.84, 1.18)

1.00

(0.84, 1.18)

0.091

(5960/65308)

1.01

(0.89, 1.14)

1.01

(0.89, 1.14)

  1. Crude (RRc) and adjusted (RRa) rate ratio and 95%(CI) calculated using negative binomial regression with random effects. Adjusted models condition on age and sex only
  2. (Λ) rate calculated as counts of no digital confirmation over total treatment-days. aFacility level proportion of poor outcomes in the previous year (§) HIV status at baseline. TB Tuberculosis, BC bacteriological confirmation, SEP socio-economic position. There were 5 patients with unknown HIV status, 1 patient with unknown TB history, 26 with missing data on SEP and 1 patient with missing bacteriological confirmation