Skip to main content

Table 7 Truth table of multi-target interventions sub-analysis – interventions targeting both women and health providers or systems

From: Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis

Row

Group based delivery

Communication (IEC) materials

Partner or family member involvement

Interaction with health providers

Multi-target intervention

Outcome

Number of cases

inclS*

PRI**

Cases

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

5

1

1

Runmei (2012), Borem (2020), [46] Yu (2017), [45] Xia (2019), [44] Clarke (2020) [48]

2

1

1

1

0

0

1

2

1

1

Sharifirad (2013), [68] Feinberg (2015) [71]

3

1

1

1

1

0

1

2

1

1

Valiani (2014), [69] Rouhe (2013) [37]

4

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

Bastani (2005) [70]

5

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

Montgomery (2007) [43]

6

0

1

0

1

0

0

3

0

0

Fraser (1997), Fenwick (2015), [41] Saisto (2001) [42]

7

1

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

Masoumi (2016), [39] Navaee (2015) [40]

8

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

0

Zhang (2020) [49]

  1. *Inclusion score (InclS), also known as consistency, indicates the degree to which the evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that there is sufficient relation between the configuration and the outcome; **Proportional Reduction in Inconsistency (PRI) refers to the extent in which a configuration is sufficient in triggering successful outcome as well as the negation of the outcome