Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of included intervention studies

From: Educational interventions targeting pregnant women to optimise the use of caesarean section: What are the essential elements? A qualitative comparative analysis

Author

Sibling studies

Country & study years

Intervention

Comparison

Methods

Settings

Type of women

Study sample

Baseline CS rates

Relative effect

CS outcomes

Risk of Bias*

Interventions targeting women

          

Fraser 1997 [38]

None

Canada

1992—1994

Individualised prenatal education and support programme versus written information in pamphlet

Pamphlet

Randomized controlled trial

Hospital

Women with previous CS

1,301

Baseline CS rates were not stated but high preference in region of CS was cited

RR 0.88 (0.58–1.33)

Little or no difference

Some concerns

Fenwick 2015 [41]

4 studies: protocol [50], randomized controlled trial [51], cost-effectiveness [52], economic evaluation [53]

Australia

2012—2013

Midwife psychoeducation by telephone

Usual maternity care

Randomized controlled trial

Delivered by telephone

Women with fear of childbirth

339

Baseline CS rates were not stated but increasing CS in the country was cited

RR 0.81 (0.56–1.18)

Little or no difference

Some concerns

Masoumi 2016 [39]

None

Iran

2012—2013

Antenatal education programme for physiologic childbirth

Routine prenatal education

Randomized controlled trial

Hospital

Women with low-risk pregnancy

150

48% at country level

RR 1.03 (0.72–1.49)

Little or no difference

Some concerns

Montgomery 2007 [43]

7 studies: protocol [43], formative qualitative [54, 55], cost analysis [56], qualitative evaluation [57, 58], observational [59]

UK

2004—2006

Computer decision aids versus usual care

Usual care

Randomized controlled trial

Maternity units

Women with previous CS

742

22%-25% at facility level

Decision analysis group: RR 0.90 (0.79–1.02) & information group: RR 1.02 (0.90–1.14)

Little or no difference

Some concerns

Navaee 2015 [40]

None

Iran

Unclear

Role-play education versus standard education using lectures

Lecture education group

Blind clinical trial

Health centres

Women with fear of childbirth

67

47% at country level

RR 0.66 (0.39–1.12)

Little or no difference

Some concerns

Saisto 2001 [42] 

None

Finland

1996—1999

Intensive group therapy (cognitive behavioural therapy and childbirth psychotherapy)

Conventional therapy

Randomized controlled trial

Outpatient clinic

Women with fear of childbirth

176

Baseline CS rates were not stated but high preference for CS was cited among women with fear of birth (region not stated)

RR 0.90 (0.65–1.36)

Little or no difference

Some concerns

Bastani 2005 [70]

1 study: randomized controlled trial [60]

Iran

2002—2003

Nurse-led applied relaxation (breathing techniques & muscle relaxation) training programme

Routine prenatal care

Randomized controlled trial

Prenatal clinics

Women with fear of childbirth

110

Baseline CS rates were not stated but increasing CS worldwide was cited

RR 0.22 (0.11–0.43)

Decrease

Some concerns

Feinberg 2015 [71]

2 studies: randomized controlled trials [61, 62]

USA

2004—2006

Psychosocial couple-based prevention programme

Routine care (no educational classes)

Randomized controlled trial

Unclear

Women with low-risk pregnancy

169

Not stated

RR 0.53 (0.32–0.90)

Decrease

Some concerns

Rouhe 2013 [37]

2 studies: randomized controlled trials [63, 64]

Finland

2007—2009

Psychoeducation

Conventional care group

Randomized controlled trial

Hospital

Women with fear of childbirth

271

19.9% at country level

RR 0.70 (0.49–1.01)

Decrease

Some concerns

Sharifirad 2013 [68]

None

Iran

Unclear

Prenatal education for husbands

Unclear

Randomized controlled trial

Unclear

Women with low-risk pregnancy

88

41.6% at province level

CS rate in case and control groups was 29.5% and 50% (P < 0.05)

Decrease

Some concerns

Valiani 2014 [69]

None

Iran

Unclear

Childbirth training workshop

Mothers (alone), couples (mothers and partners), and control

Randomized controlled trial

Healthcare centres

Women with low-risk pregnancy

180

60% at province level

Mother group: RR 0.55 (0.33–0.89) & couple group: RR 0.59 (0.37–0.94)

Decrease

Some concerns

Interventions targeting women and health providers

         

Zhang 2020 [49]

None

China

2015—2017

Targeted health education to pregnant women, improved hospital CS policy, and training of midwives/doulas for 8 months

Usual practice

Randomized controlled trial

Tertiary and secondary hospitals

Women with low-risk pregnancy

10,752

42.50% at facility level

OR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.73, 1.15

Little or no difference

Some concerns

Borem 2020 [46] 

None

Brazil

2014—2016

A coalition of stakeholders, empowerment of pregnant women to choose mode of delivery, psychologic birth promotion, information system for providers

Baseline

Interrupted time series

Hospitals

Women with low-risk pregnancy

119,378

78.3% at facility level

Vaginal deliveries RR 1.62 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.07, p < 0.001)

Decrease

Not serious

Clarke 2020 [48]

3 studies: process evaluation [65], protocol [66], formative qualitative [67]

Italy, Ireland, Germany

2012—2016

Education of clinicians and women with one previous CS, appointment of opinion leaders, audit/peer review, and joint discussions by women and clinicians

Usual practice

Randomized controlled trial

Maternity units

Women with previous CS

2,002

VBAC rates < 35% at facility level

RR 0.9 (95%CI 0.85 to 0.98)

Decrease

Some concerns

Runmei 2012

None

China

2005—2011

Continuous quality improvement programme (education for staff and women, audits, public health education, monitoring CS rates, and neonatal outcomes)

Baseline

Controlled before-after

study

Regional referral centre

Women with low-risk pregnancy

25,280

53.5%-56.1% at facility level

OR 0.56 (0.52–0.59)

Decrease

Some concerns

Yu 2017 [45]

None

China

2006—2014

Face-to-face weekly educational meetings between patients and hospital staff, training for providers, new regulations adoption and projects on CS (i.e. encourage mothers to choose vaginal delivery, strictly control indications for CS and maternal request for CS)

Baseline

Pre-post intervention study

Tertiary public hospitals

Women with low-risk pregnancy

131,312

55–56% at facility level

Overall CS rate declined by 1.29% (p = 0.002)

Decrease

Not serious

Xia 2019 [44]

None

China

2010—2016

Programs for population health education, skills training for healthcare professionals, equipment and technical support for local healthcare facilities, and capacity building for the maternal near-miss care system

Baseline

Uncontrolled before-after study

Hospitals and community

Women with low-risk pregnancy

1,923,687

42% at facility level

Decreasing trend in the monthly CS rates (Z = 75.067, p < 0.001)

Decrease

Low risks of bias

  1. *See Additional file 2 for details of risk bias assessment