Skip to main content

Table 6 Overview of the results of the factor analyses on the RIBS in international studies

From: Psychometric validation of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS) in Hungary with a particular focus on ‘Don’t know’ responses and further scoring recommendations

Research group, year

Investigated population

Method of estimation

 

Results

Country

RMSEA

CFI (TLI)

GFI (AGFI)

Yamaguchi et al., 2014 [13]

undergraduate and postgraduate students

n = 224

not reported

0.072

0.955

0.956 (0.916)

Japan

Pingani et al., 2016 [12]

general public

n = 447

not reported

0.023

0.994

0.987 (0.975)

Italy

Garcia et al., 2017 [19]

nursing students

n = 268

not reported

0.092

0.985 (0.954)

-

France

Mansfield et al., 2020 [11]

Adolescents

11–15 years

n = 1032

not reported

0.06

1 (1)

-

United Kingdom

Ribeiro et al., 2021 [20]

Community sample (caregivers)

n = 1357

WLSMV

0.07

1 (1)

-

Brazil

Campo-Arias et al., 2021 [22]

Adolescents

10–17 years

n = 350

not reported

0.17

0.97 (0.92)

-

Columbia

Current study

Non-clinical population

n = 5141

WLSMV

0.031

0.999 (0.996)

-

Hungary

  1. AGFI Adjusted Goodness of Fit, CFI comparative fit index, GFI Goodness of Fit, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index, WLSMV diagonally weighted least squares