Skip to main content

Table 5 Path indicators and proportions of mediating effects between family communication, depression and anxiety

From: A cross-sectional study: family communication, anxiety, and depression in adolescents: the mediating role of family violence and problematic internet use

Paths

T. E

D. E

I. E

S. E

P. E

Bias 95%

Percentile 95%

LL

UL

LL

UL

FC-FV-DE

-.219

-.076a

-.143

.028

65.30%

-.198

-.080

-.194

-.078

FC-FV-AN

-.212

-.071a

-.141

.029

66.51%

-.198

-.074

-.187

-.064

FC-FV-PIU-DE

-.132

-.076a

-.056

.012

42.42%

-.081

-.030

-.078

-.028

FC-FV-PIU-AN

-.132

-.071a

-.061

.009

46.21%

-.080

-.043

-.076

-.040

  1. Only an indirect path with Empirical 95% confidence interval is presented, and it doesn’t overlap with zero; Bootstrap sample size = 2000; a represent statistically significant at 1‰ level. S. E. Standard errors, T. E. Total effects, D. E. Direct effects, I. E. Indirect effects, P. E. Proportional values of indirect-only mediated effects, FC Family Communication, FV Family Violence, PIU Problematic Internet Use, DE Depression, AN Anxiety, LL Lower Limit, UL Upper Limit