Skip to main content

Table 3 Food bank usage by participant characteristics since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic as reported in round foura

From: Food-related worry and food bank use during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: results from a nationally representative multi-round study

 

Unadjusted models (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval)

Models adjusted for household income (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval)

Genderb

Cisgender man (n = 1479)

––

––

 Cisgender woman (n = 1501)

0.97 (0.66–1.42)

0.87 (0.59–1.29)

 Non-cisgender (n = 50)

1.77 (0.56–5.61)

1.13 (0.35–3.70)

Age (years)

 18–34 (n = 844)

5.48 (2.55–11.77)

5.58 (2.57–12.08)

 35–64 (n = 1461)

3.83 (1.80–8.14)

3.96 (1.85–8.49)

65 + (n = 725)

––

––

Province/region

Alberta (n = 340)

––

––

 British Columba/Territories (n = 391)

0.46 (0.21–1.00)

0.45 (0.20–0.99)

 Quebec (n = 714)

0.7 (0.39–1.28)

0.60 (0.33–1.12)

 Ontario (n = 1157)

0.64 (0.37–1.13)

0.66 (0.37–1.18)

 Manitoba/Saskatchewan (n = 221)

0.93 (0.44–1.98)

0.86 (0.39–1.87)

 Atlantic Provinces (n = 206)

0.28 (0.08–0.91)

0.24 (0.07–0.80)

Highest education completed

 High school or less (n = 473)

1.91 (1.20–3.07)

1.01 (0.61–1.67)

 Some college or university (n = 523)

1.80 (1.13–2.86)

1.40 (0.87–2.27)

College or university graduate (n = 2034)

––

––

Annual household income

 < $25 k (n = 217)

10.6 (6.09–18.46)

––

 25 k to < 50 k (n = 506)

3.81 (2.20–6.61)

––

 50 K to < 100 k (n = 956)

1.27 (0.70–2.31)

––

100 k + (n = 1216)

––

––

 Don't know/prefer not to say (n = 135)

0.41 (0.05–3.03)

––

Financial concerns in previous 2 weeks due to the pandemicc

 Yes (n = 920)

4.73 (3.18–7.02)

3.74 (2.49–5.63)

No/don't know/not applicable/prefer not to say (n = 2110)

––

––

Parent/guardian with child under 18

 Yes (n = 609)

2.29 (1.54–3.40)

3.64 (2.37–5.60)

No (n = 2421)

––

––

Race/ethnicityd

 Racialized (non-Indigenous) (n = 812)

1.75 (1.14–2.69)

1.63 (1.05–2.53)

 Indigenous (n = 115)

6.58 (3.68–11.75)

5.20 (2.82–9.60)

Non-racialized (n = 1971)

––

––

LGBT2Q + 

 Yes and unsure (n = 276)

2.42 (1.48–3.94)

2.02 (1.22–3.34)

No and prefer not to answer (n = 2754)

––

––

Identify as someone with a pre-existing mental health concern

 Yes (n = 575)

2.61 (1.76–3.97)

2.02 (1.34–3.03)

No and prefer not to answer (n = 2455)

––

––

Identify as someone with a disability

 Yes (n = 335)

3.49 (2.29–5.34)

2.04 (1.29–3.22)

No and prefer not to answer (n = 2695)

––

––

Tested for COVID-19 and had a positive result

 Yes (n = 88)

2.39 (1.09–5.23)

2.22 (0.98–5.01)

No, don’t know, and prefer not to answer (n = 2942)

––

––

Stressed or worried about having enough food to meet my household's basic needs as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in the past 2 weeks?

 Yes (n = 477)

6.85 (4.63–10.13)

4.75 (3.15–7.17)

No (n = 2408)

––

––

 Don't know/Not applicable/Prefer not to say (n = 145)

1.5 (0.56–4.03)

1.07 (0.39–2.94)

Worried that food would run out before you got money to buy more in the last 12 months?

 Often true (n = 122)

27.31 (15.47–48.21)

19.08 (10.51–34.64)

 Sometimes true (n = 471)

11.9 (7.40–19.13)

8.94 (5.48–14.60)

Never true (n = 2367)

––

––

 Don’t know/prefer not to answer (n = 71)

3.78 (1.10–13.03)

2.95 (0.84–10.36)

  1. aNovember-December 2021, N = 3030
  2. bRound 1 respondents were asked “Which gender do you most identify with?”. Those who responded “Man” were classified as Cisgender men; those who responded “Woman” were classified as Cisgender women; and those who responded “Transgender woman/trans woman”, “Transgender man/trans man”, “Non-binary”, and “Two-Spirit”, were classified as Non-cisgender. This measure was altered in rounds 2–4, with participants instead asked which gender they most identify with alongside “What sex were you assigned at birth?”. Non-binary and transgender identities of participants were then determined by comparing responses to the two items
  3. cE.g. going into debt, ability to pay bills, long-term economic impacts, etc.
  4. dParticipants were asked to report their ethnicity. Those who reported solely European origins were considered non-racialized, those who reported one or more non-European, non-Indigenous origins were considered racialized, and those who reported Indigenous origins were classified as Indigenous. Due to missing data this is not available for all participants
  5. eReference category in italics, odds ratios which are significant at p < 0.05 are bolded
  6. Note: Due to survey weights and rounding, numbers of cases may not always add up to N