Students’ attitudes, beliefs and perceptions surrounding 2SLGBTQIA + health education and inclusiveness in Canadian physiotherapy programs

Table 2 Results of the logistic regression models (n = 150)

Predictors	Odds Ratio (95%CIs)
Predictors	Felt their PT program did not provide sufficient knowledge about unique 2SLGBTQIA + healthcare needs	Believe their physiotherapy program is 2SLGBTQIA + -inclusive	Believe their clinical placements are 2SLGBTQIA + -inclusive
Age	1.08 (0.91 to 1.29)	0.89 (0.79 to 0.99)	0.85 (0.76 to 0.94)
Sex assigned at birth^a
Male	Ref	Ref	Ref
Female	3.15 (1.71 to 5.82)	0.34 (0.15 to 0.77)	0.52 (0.17 to 1.53)
10 or more hours of 2SLGBTQIA + training
< 10 h	Ref	Ref	Ref
10 + hours	0.28 (0.08 to 1.01)	3.18 (1.66 to 6.09)	1.69 (0.72 to 3.95)
Identifies as 2SLGBTQIA +
No	Ref	Ref	Ref
Yes	1.03 (0.48 to 2.21)	0.38 (0.15 to 0.94)	0.42 (0.23 to 0.76)

Bolded estimates represent statistically significant associations at the 5% level
The variance was adjusted for university attended using robust sandwich estimators
Abbreviations: 2SLGBTQIA + Two-spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, asexual/aromantic and all additional identities not considered heterosexual and cisgender, CI Confidence intervals, PT Physiotherapy, Ref. Reference variable
^aIntersex was also included as a survey response option, however no students reported intersex as their sex assigned at birth

ISSN: 1471-2458