Skip to main content

Table 3 Global quality scale (GQS) criteria

From: YouTube online videos as a source for patient education of cervical spondylosis—a reliability and quality analysis

Score

Description

1

Poor quality and flow, most information missing; technique misleading; unlikely to be useful for patient education

2

Generally sparse quality and flow, some information provided but many important topics missing; technique poor; of very limited use to patients

3

Moderate quality and suboptimal flow, some important information provided adequately but others poorly discussed; technique basically adequate; somewhat useful for patients

4

Good quality and generally good flow, majority of information provided but some topics not covered; technique almost adequate; useful for patients

5

Excellent quality and flow, full information provided; technique adequate; highly useful for patients