Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparing physical activity prescription with verbal advice for general practice patients with cardiovascular risk factors: results from the PEPPER randomised controlled trial

Original Submission
4 Oct 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
6 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Weatherall
23 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Dec 2022 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Dec 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Dec 2022 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Dec 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Weatherall
13 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 5
4 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 6
9 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
23 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 7
23 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 8
25 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
24 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 9
24 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
27 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Matthieu Peurois
Resubmission - Version 10
27 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
12 Jul 2023 Editorially accepted
20 Jul 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12889-023-16302-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page