Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Fine-grained mathematical modeling for cost-effectiveness evaluation of public health policies for cervical cancer, with application to a Colombian case study

Original Submission
5 Aug 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos A. Castañeda-Orjuela
17 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ivan Mura
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ivan Mura
Resubmission - Version 6
20 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
27 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ivan Mura
Resubmission - Version 7
27 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
5 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carlos A. Castañeda-Orjuela
12 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ivan Mura
Resubmission - Version 8
12 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
14 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ivan Mura
Resubmission - Version 9
14 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
31 May 2023 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12889-023-16022-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page