From: Determinants of spousal physical violence against women in Zambia: a multilevel analysis
Variables | Model 0 | Model I | Model II | Model III |
---|---|---|---|---|
aOR (95%CI) | aOR (95%CI) | aOR (95%CI) | ||
Individual level factors | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Age | Â | Â | Â | Â |
15–19 |  | 2.35** [1.33, 4.14] |  | 2.36** [1.34, 4.14] |
20–24 |  | 2.17*** [1.42, 3.30] |  | 2.11** [1.38, 3.22] |
25–29 |  | 1.81** [1.21, 2.70] |  | 1.78* [1.19, 2.66] |
30–34 |  | 1.79* [1.19, 2.70] |  | 1.74* [1.15, 2.63] |
35–39 |  | 1.34 [0.86, 2.09] |  | 1.32 [0.84, 2.01] |
40–44 |  | 1.43 [0.88, 2.31] |  | 1.43 [0.88, 2.32] |
45–49 |  | 1 |  | 1 |
Education level | Â | Â | Â | Â |
None | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Primary | Â | 1.15 [0.85, 1.56] | Â | 1.18 [0.88, 1.60] |
Secondary | Â | 1.21 [0.83, 1.76] | Â | 1.23 [0.84, 1.79] |
Higher | Â | 0.98 [0.48, 2.03] | Â | 1.08 [0.52, 2.23] |
Partner’s education |  |  |  |  |
None | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Primary | Â | 1.02 [0.73, 1.42] | Â | 1.02 [0.73, 1.42] |
Secondary | Â | 0.87 [0.62, 1.23] | Â | 0.86 [0.61, 1.22] |
Higher | Â | 0.62 [0.33, 1.15] | Â | 0.63 [0.34, 1.18] |
Household wealth status | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Poor | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Middle | Â | 1.09 [0.86, 1.37] | Â | 0.93 [0.72, 1.19] |
Rich | Â | 1.09 [0.82, 1.45] | Â | 0.82 [0.56, 1.20] |
Age at first marriage | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Less than 15 | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
15–19 |  | 1.18 [0.88, 1.58] |  | 1.20 [0.90, 1.61] |
20+ | Â | 1.18 [0.87, 1.60] | Â | 1.22 [0.90, 1.165] |
Employment status | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Not working | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Working | Â | 0.92 [0.74, 1.13] | Â | 0.93 [0.74, 1.17] |
Ownership of mobile phone | Â | Â | Â | Â |
No | Â | 1.34* [1.07, 1.67] | Â | 1.36* [1.10, 1.69] |
Yes | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Exposure to media | Â | Â | Â | Â |
No | Â | 0.98 [0.78, 1.23] | Â | 0.98 [0.78, 1.24] |
Yes | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Woman decision making autonomy | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Low | Â | 1.37** [1.13, 1.65] | Â | 1.24* [1.01, 1.54] |
High | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Partner drinks alcohol | Â | Â | Â | Â |
No | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Yes | Â | 2.83*** [2.31, 3.47] | Â | 2.82***[2.30, 3.45] |
Partner has more than one wife | Â | Â | Â | Â |
No | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Yes | Â | 1.48** [1.16, 1.88] | Â | 1.50** [1.18, 1.90] |
Partner jealous | Â | Â | Â | Â |
No | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Yes | Â | 2.40*** [1.89, 3.05] | Â | 2.38***[1.88, 3.02] |
Partner accuses wife of being unfaithful | Â | Â | Â | Â |
No | Â | 1 | Â | 1 |
Yes | Â | 2.65*** [2.18, 3.22] | Â | 2.65***[2.18, 3.22] |
Contextual variables | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Place of residence | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Urban | Â | Â | 1 | 1 |
Rural | Â | Â | 0.64** [0.48, 0.84] | 0.83 [0.59, 1.15] |
Community education | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Low | Â | Â | 0.93 [0.69, 1.26] | 0.83 [0.53, 1.20] |
Moderate | Â | Â | 1.16 [0.91, 1.48] | 1.13 [0.83, 1.50] |
High | Â | Â | 1 | 1 |
Community wealth status | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Low | Â | Â | 1 | 1 |
Moderate | Â | Â | 0.88 [0.68, 1.13] | 1.34 [0.99, 1.81] |
High | Â | Â | 0.67* [0.47, 0.95] | 1.20 [0.78, 1.87] |
Community employment | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Low | Â | Â | 1 | 1 |
Moderate | Â | Â | 0.96 [0.81, 1.15] | 1.12 [0.91, 1.38] |
High | Â | Â | 0.95 [0.78, 1.17] | 0.90 [0.70, 1.16] |
Community woman autonomy status | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Low | Â | Â | 1.96*** [1.58,2.41] | 1.66***[1.26, 2.19] |
Moderate | Â | Â | 1.70***[1.34, 2.15] | 1.61** [1.23, 2.10] |
High | Â | Â | 1 | 1 |
Community young age at first marriage | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Low | Â | Â | 1 | 1 |
Moderate | Â | Â | 1.14 [0.94, 1.38] | 1.06 [0.85, 1.31] |
High | Â | Â | 1.30* [1.06, 1.60] | 1.24 [0.96, 1.59] |
Random effects | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Variance (CI) | 0.27 [0.19–0.38] | 0.21 [0.12–0.36] | 0.19 [0.12–0.29] | 0.14 [0.07–0.28] |
ICC (%) | 7.6 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 4.1 |
PCV (%) | Ref | 22.2 | 29.6 | 48.1 |
Wald chi-square | Ref | 484.28*** | 66.31*** | 541.28*** |
Model fitness | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Log-likelihood | -3360.8 | -2187.3 | -3327.8 | -2167.4 |
AIC | 6725.6 | 4426.6 | 6681.6 | 4408.8 |
BIC | 6739.4 | 4599.8 | 6771.3 | 4655.3 |
N | 7,358 | 7,358 | 7,358 | 7,358 |