Skip to main content

Table 3 Detailed Characteristics of studies included in the Review

From: Quality assessment of global health care system in the shadow of COVID-19: - a systematic review

S no.

Author Name

Title of the study

Year

Study design

Sampling technique

Study population

Age

Sample

size

health care institution

Country/state/city

Questionnaire consists of:

Type of scale used

Satisfaction (%)

1

Laura Wulandari [18]

Customer satisfaction during covid-19 pandemic period at private clinic X Surabaya

2021

Cross-sectional study

Non-probability technique: Incidental technique

Patients admitted in clinic X

Not mentioned

200

Private clinic X

Indonesia (Surabaya)

Reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, tangible

4-point Likert scale.

71.8

2

Thamer A. Bin Traiki et al. [10]

Impact of covid-19 pandemic on patient satisfaction and surgical outcome: A retrospective cross-sectional study

2020

Retrospective and cross-sectional study

Not mentioned

Patient admitted in King Khalid university hospital

Median age 53

223

university hospital

Saudi Arabia

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) questionnaire

Not mentioned

98.1

3

Thomas Key et al. [11]

The Patient Experience of Inpatient Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring Patient Perceptions, Communication, and Quality of Care at a University Teaching Hospital in the United Kingdom

2021

Cross-sectional study

Not mentioned

Hospital inpatients’

18–80+

704

Cardiff and Vale university Health Board

U.K.

Mixed method questionnaire

5-Point Likert scale

90

4

Berhanu Senbeta Deriba et al. [7]

Patient Satisfaction and Associated Factors During COVID-19 Pandemic in North Shoa Health Care Facilities

2020

Cross-sectional study

Systematic random sampling technique

Chronic disease patients: (HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory disease, and chronic musculoskeletal disease)

15->45

410

North shoa public health facility

Ethiopia (Oromia state)

Face to face interview by semi structured questionnaire

5-point Likert scale

44.6

5

Arvind Sharma et al. [12]

Satisfaction among COVID-19 Positive Patients: A Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India

2021

Retrospective cross-sectional study

simple random sampling

Covid-19 patients

18->60

150

Tertiary hospital

India (Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh)

interview

Not mentioned

90.6

6

Faten Methammem et al. [15]

Patients’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Care in the Tunisian Private Hospitals during the Second Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: Does Human Resource Planning Matter?

2022

Cross-sectional study

Not mentioned

Private hospital directors

(n = 85) and private hospital patients (n = 858)

Not mentioned

943

Private Hospitals

Tunisia

self-administered questionnaire consisting of close-ended questions

7-point Likert scale

59.1

7

Afiq Izzudin A. Rahim et al. [8]

Patient Satisfaction and Hospital Quality of Care Evaluation in Malaysia Using SERVQUAL and Facebook

2021

Cross-sectional study

Universal sampling

Face book data (n = 1825),

SERVQUAL data (n = 1200)

Not mentioned

3025

Government hospital

Malaysia

Utilized Facebook data and SERVQUAL data.

SERVQUAL data includes Tangible, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy

Not Mentioned

54.5

8

Magdalena Kludacz-Alessandri et al. [13]

The Quality of Medical Care in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Pandemic, with Particular Emphasis on the Access to Primary Healthcare and the Effectiveness of Treatment in Poland

2021

Cross-sectional study

Not mentioned

Patients of the Corten Medic primary healthcare facilities

< 25->65

98

Four primary health facility

Poland

Structured questionnaire

5-point Likert scale

71.1

9

Rezarta Kalaja et al. [14]

Patient satisfaction with quality of care in public hospitals in Albania

2022

Cross-sectional study

Simple random Sampling

Patients from ten selected hospitals

18 > 65

800

Public hospitals

Albania

SERVQUAL instrument

5-point Likert scale

67