Skip to main content

Table 3 Portion of Indian tribal anaemia decline explained along with narrowing of tribal/general anaemia gap between 2005–2016 of National Family Health Surveys (NFHS)

From: To what extent classic socio-economic determinants explain trends of anaemia in tribal and non-tribal women of reproductive age in India? Findings from four National Family Heath Surveys (1998–2021)

Anaemia

Decline in log of odds of anaemia between NFHS rounds 3 & 4 in tribal NPWRA

(95% CI)

Portion of decline explained (%)

Unadjusted (N = 70,390)

-0.314 (-0.377, -0.251)

23%

Adjusteda (N = 70,335)

-0.242 (-0.308, -0.176)

Anaemia

Narrowing of tribal/general anaemia gap measured in log of odds of anaemia between NFHS rounds 3 & 4

(95% CI)

Portion of narrowing explained (%)

Unadjusted (N = 214,455)

-0.311 (-0.382, -0.241)

7%

Adjusteda (N = 214,263)

-0.288 (-0.358, -0.217)

  1. aModel was adjusted with age, place of residence, education, wealth, number of children born, body mass index