Skip to main content

Table 6 χ2/ANOVA results for mitigation behaviour analysis (Stages 8-10 to 11)

From: Using the precaution adoption process model and the health belief model to understand radon testing and mitigation: a pre-post quasi-experimental study

Construct

Question (levels compared, N)

Not mitigated (Stages 8-10) vs. mitigated (Stage 11) (χ2)

Demographic/ lifestyle variables

Age of youngest person in home (18 or under vs. 19 and over, N=370)

0.16

Smoking status (only never smokers in home vs. rest, N=370)

1.61

Hours spent on the lowest floor of home (4 levels, N=370)

3.68

Hours spent in basement (5 levels, N=383)

3.16

Perceived susceptibility

It is likely that someone in my household will get sick from radon. (agree/neutral vs. disagree, N=366)

8.28**

Perceived severity

If someone in my household got sick from radon, it would be very serious. (agree vs. disagree/neutral, N=362)

3.30†

Perceived benefits

If I reduced the levels of radon in my home, it would reduce the chances of someone getting sick from it. (agree vs. disagree/neutral, N=364)

20.14***

Perceived barriers/self-efficacy

The results of the radon tests are not reliable. (agree/neutral vs. disagree, N=363)

2.60

I don’t trust companies that deal with radon. (agree/neutral vs. disagree, N=354)

6.93**

I don’t know how to find an experience radon contractor to fix the high levels of radon in my home. (agree/neutral vs. disagree, N=362)

4.68*

I don’t have time to fix the high levels of radon in my home. (agree/neutral vs. disagree, N=364)

28.07***

It is too expensive to fix the high levels of radon in my home (agree/neutral vs. disagree, N=364)

18.66***

My home is worth a lot less because of the high levels of radon, even if I fix it. (agree/neutral vs. disagree, N=362)

1.19

Radon level

Log-transformed (ANOVA result, N=370)

***

  1. Statistical significance level in the results denoted by: ‘***’ for < 0.001, ‘**’ for < 0.01, ‘*’ for < 0.05 and † for <0.1