Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression models explaining the three outcome variables

From: Perceptions of plain packaging and health warnings among university students in Turkey: a survey-based experiment

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Outcome Variable:

Negative affect

Avoidant responses

Intentions to quit

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 1

Model 2

Model 1

Model 2

Condition 1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Condition 2

0.21*

0.21*

0.17

0.17

0.049

0.039

Condition 3

0.54***

0.53***

0.56***

0.59***

0.047

0.047

Condition 4

0.74***

0.70***

0.68***

0.62***

0.079**

0.065**

Condition 5

0.79***

0.75***

0.75***

0.70***

0.089**

0.065*

Age

 

0.033*

 

-0.015

 

-0.0072

Gender: Male

 

0

 

0

 

0

 Female

 

0.32***

 

0.50***

 

-0.027

Income (in ‘000)

 

-0.042

 

0.032

 

-0.032

Age at initiation

 

0.041**

 

0.033**

 

-0.0012

Quit attempt

 

0.069

 

0.083

 

0.019

Nicotine dependence: 0: > 60 min

 

0

 

0

 

0

 1: in 31–60 min

 

-0.082

 

-0.17

 

-0.044

 2: in 6–30 min

 

-0.38***

 

-0.18

 

-0.068**

 3: within 5 min

 

-0.38**

 

-0.057

 

-0.080**

Past 30-day consumption: None

 

0

 

0

 

0

 10/day or less

 

-0.38***

 

-0.39***

 

-0.15***

 More than 10/day

 

-0.32**

 

-0.56***

 

-0.11***

Smoking is addictive

      

 Disagree/Definitely disagree

 

-0.081

 

-0.19

 

0.017

 Neither agree, nor disagree

 

0

 

0

 

0

 Agree/Definitely agree

 

0.11

 

-0.013

 

0.015

Cigarettes absolutely harmful

 

0.24**

 

0.068

 

0.057**

Smoking but not harming self:

      

 Disagree/Definitely disagree

 

-0.032

 

0.048

 

0.019

 Neither agree, nor disagree

 

0

 

0

 

0

 Agree/Definitely agree

 

-0.098

 

0.073

 

0.030

Constant

1.71***

0.33

1.79***

1.66***

0.043**

0.29**

N

623

623

623

623

623

623

  1. Columns in the table show estimates from different regressions. Coefficient estimates for reference categories are zero. Model 1 included only the dummy variables for conditions. Model 2 added other control variables. Ordinary least squares was used to estimate regressions in columns (1)-(4). Linear probability model was used to estimate regressions in columns (5)-(6). Condition 1: Brand logos + text, Condition 2: Brand logos + old text + old pictures, Condition 3: Brand logos + new text + new pictures, Condition 4: PP + old text + old pictures, Condition 5: PP + new text + new pictures. Negative affect was the average of scores in eight questions (1 to 5). Avoidant responses was the average of scores in five questions (1 to 5). Intentions to quit was a dummy variable that was 1 if the respondent intended to quit within six months or sooner, and 0 otherwise. The categories of ‘Past 30-day consumption’, ‘Smoking is addictive’, and ‘Smoking but not harming self’ were condensed to present the results more concisely. Since a large majority of the responses to harm perception question was ‘absolutely harmful’, a new variable ‘Cigarettes absolutely harmful’ was created as a dummy variable equal to 1 if ‘absolutely harmful’ was chosen, 0 if one of the other three responses was chosen. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.10