Skip to main content

Table 2 NOS scores of each item in the included studies

From: Dose–response relationship between active smoking and lung cancer mortality/prevalence in the Chinese population: a meta-analysis

General items

Case–control study (n = 10)

Cohort study (n = 2)

Detailed items

Score (%)

Detailed items

Score (%)

Selection

1) Is the Case Definition Adequate?

8 (80.00)

1) Representativeness of the Exposed Cohort

2 (100.00)

2) Representativeness of the Cases

3 (30.00)

2) Representativeness of the Non-Exposed Cohort

2 (100.00)

3) Selection of Controls

7 (70.00)

3) Ascertainment of Exposure

2 (100.00)

4) Definition of Controls

8 (80.00)

4) Demonstration That Outcome of Interest Was Not Present at Start of Study

2 (100.00)

Comparability

Comparability of Cases and Controls on the Basis of the Design or Analysis

19 (95.00)

Comparability of Cohorts on the Basis of the Design or Analysis

4 (100.00)

Exposure

1) Ascertainment of Exposure or Blinding

5 (50.00)

1) Assessment of Outcome

2 (100.00)

2) Same Method of Ascertainment for Cases and Controls

10 (100.00)

2) Was Follow-Up Long Enough for Outcomes to Occur

2 (100.00)

3) Non-Response Rate

0 (0.00)

3) Adequacy of Follow Up of Cohorts

2 (100.00)

Total score

 

60 (66.67)

 

18 (100.00)