Neighbourhood socio-economic disadvantage and loneliness: the contribution of green space quantity and quality

BMC Public Health

Table 6 Associations between the green space measures and loneliness

Built environment	Model¹
Built environment	β	95% CI
Percentage of green space 400 m buffer size
< 10%	Ref
10–20%	0.073	-0.01, 0.16
20–30%	-0.005	-0.10, 0.09
> 30%	0.078	-0.02, 0.18
Percentage of green space 800 m buffer size
< 10%	Ref
10–20%	-0.023	-0.12, 0.07
20–30%	0	-0.10, 0.10
> 30%	-0.009	-0.12, 0.10
Percentage of green space 1600 m buffer size
< 10%	Ref
10–20%	0.049	-0.10, 0.20
20–30%	0.026	-0.13, 0.18
> 30%	0.063	-0.10, 0.23
Quality of green space 800 m buffer size Lower Higher
Quality of green space 800 m buffer size Lower Higher	0.037	-0.03, 0.10
Quality of green space 800 m buffer size Lower Higher	Ref
Quality of green space 800 m buffer size Lower Higher	0.061	-0.01, 0.13
Quality of green space 1600 m buffer size Lower Higher	Ref
Quality of green space 1600 m buffer size Lower Higher	0.035	-0.04, 0.11

1.Model: adjusted for age and sex, education, occupation, household income, and distance from CBD

ISSN: 1471-2458