Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariate logistic models, adjusted for school-clustering, to analyze neighborhood deprivation levels’ effect on participant’s overweight1

From: Neighborhood deprivation, built environment, and overweight in adolescents in the city of Oslo

  

OR (95% CI)

Model 1

Neighborhood deprivation level (Ref. Low)

 
 

Moderate

2.99 (1.51–5.88)

 

High

3.81 (1.96–7.43)

Model 2

Neighborhood deprivation level (Ref. Low)

 
 

Moderate

1.86 (0.95–3.64)

 

High

2.03 (1.08–3.82)

 

Ethnicity (Ref. Norwegian ethnicity)

 
 

Minority

2.25 (1.33–3.82)

 

Parental education (Ref. High)

 
 

Medium

0.89 (0.48–1.66)

 

Low

0.58 (0.32–1.05)

Model 3a

Neighborhood deprivation level (Ref. Low)

 
 

Moderate

1.71 (0.88–3.33)

 

High

1.86 (0.94–3.65)

- Availability of food outlets2:

• Restaurants

1.01 (0.97–1.05)

 

• Grocery stores

1.05 (0.95–1.15)

 

• Convenience stores

1.04 (0.97–1.12)

 

• Fast food restaurants

0.96 (0.84–1.09)

Model 4a

Neighborhood deprivation level (Ref. Low)

 
 

Moderate

1.80 (0.92–3.55)

 

High

1.84 (0.96–3.53)

- Availability of food outlets2:

• “Healthy” food outlets3

1.00 (0.97–1.02)

 

• “Unhealthy” food outlets4

1.03 (0.96–1.09)

Model 5a

Neighborhood deprivation level (Ref. Low)

 
 

Moderate

1.90 (0.96–3.75)

 

High

1.90 (1.00–3.60)

- Accessibility of food outlets5:

• Restaurants

0.97 (0.93–1.02)

 

• Grocery stores

1.01 (0.91–1.11)

 

• Convenience stores

0.99 (0.94–1.04)

 

• Fast food restaurants

1.00 (0.93–1.08)

Model 6a

Neighborhood deprivation level (Ref. Low)

 
 

Moderate

1.88 (0.96–3.71)

 

High

1.89 (0.99–3.58)

- Accessibility of food outlets5:

• “Healthy” food outlets3

0.99 (0.95–1.02)

 

• “Unhealthy” food outlets4

1.00 (0.96–1.03)

Model 7a

Neighborhood deprivation level (Ref. Low)

 
 

Moderate

1.88 (0.95–3.75)

 

High

2.00 (1.01–3.98)

- Availability of PA resources2:

• Green spaces

1.00 (0.97–1.04)

 

• Green spaces6

0.98 (0.94–1.03)

 

• Indoor facilities

1.09 (0.98–1.22)

 

• Small outdoor facilities

0.98 (0.94–1.03)

 

• Large outdoor facilities

1.01 (0.88–1.15)

 

• Public transportation stops7

1.01 (0.97–1.06)

Model 8a

Neighborhood deprivation level (Ref. Low)

 
 

Moderate

1.83 (0.93–3.63)

 

High

2.09 (1.09–3.99)

- Accessibility of PA resources5:

• Green spaces

1.02 (0.91–1.13)

 

• Indoor facilities

0.94 (0.88–1.01)

 

• Small outdoor facilities

0.99 (0.89–1.10)

 

• Large outdoor facilities

1.04 (0.98–1.10)

 

• Public transportation stop8

1.07 (0.96–1.19)

  1. 1IOTF body mass index cut-offs adjusted for child age and sex. 2Number of food outlets/physical activity resources of each type within an 800 m radius buffer around the residential neighborhood address of the participant. 3Merged restaurants + grocery stores. 4Merged convenience stores + fast food restaurants. 5Shortest distance in meters from the residential neighborhood address of the participant to the nearest food outlet/physical activity resource of each type (within an 800 m radius buffer). 6Total area of green spaces. 7Number of public transportation stops within an 800 m radius buffer around the residential neighborhood address of the participant, including bus, train, tram, and metro. 8Nearest public transportation stop, including bus, train, tram, and metro, within an 800 m radius buffer around the residential neighborhood address of the participant. aModel adjusted as well for the ethnicity of the participants and parental education. OR: odds ratio. CI: confidence interval. PA: physical activity