Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence of RV vaccination and seroconversion and their association with migrant status

From: The impact of migration-related characteristics on the risk of TORCH infections among women of childbearing age: a population-based study in southern China

 

No. of Positive/No. of Total

Prevalence (95% CI)

Adjusted OR a,b (95% CI)

Self-reported vaccine history

   

All migrants

21,501/443,725

4.85 (4.78–4.91)

0.78 (0.77–0.80)

Intra-provincial

11,373/229,001

4.97 (4.88–5.05)

0.80 (0.79–0.82)

Inter-provincial

10,128/214,724

4.72 (4.63–4.81)

0.76 (0.75–0.78)

Native spouse

15,633/286,590

5.45 (5.37–5.54)

0.89 (0.87–0.90)

Migrant spouse

5854/156,855

3.73 (3.64–3.83)

0.60 (0.58–0.61)

Natives

122,433/2,007,572

6.10 (6.07–6.13)

Reference

Anti-RV IgG + by natural infection c

   

All migrants

335,509/422,224

79.46 (79.35–79.57)

1.05 (1.04–1.06)

Intra-provincial

166,197/217,628

76.37 (76.19–76.55)

0.92 (0.91–0.93)

Inter-provincial

169,312/204,596

82.75 (82.59–82.92)

1.24 (1.22–1.25)

Native spouse

208,631/270,957

77.00 (76.86–77.14)

1.00 (0.99–1.01)

Migrant spouse

126,659/151,001

83.88 (83.69–84.06)

1.15 (1.13–1.17)

Natives

1,420,162/1,885,139

75.33 (75.28–75.39)

Reference

  1. Abbreviation: aOR Adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, RV Rubella virus, IgG Immunoglobulin G
  2. a Separate models of all migrant women compared to native women; inter-provincial migrant women and intra-provincial migrant women compared to native women; migrant women with migrant spouses and migrant women with native spouses compared to native women were constructed
  3. b Adjusted ORs were calculated by multivariate logistic regression after adjusting for age, ethnicity, educational attainment, occupation, residential address, and study year
  4. c Anti-RV IgG + by natural infection was conducted among women who reported not having RV vaccination